Summary Background Vorinostat is a histone deacetylase inhibitor that changes gene expression and protein activity. On the basis of the clinical benefit reported in patients with malignant pleural ...mesothelioma treated in a phase 1 study of vorinostat, we designed this phase 3 trial to investigate whether vorinostat given as a second-line or third-line therapy improved patients' overall survival. Methods This double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial was done in 90 international centres. Patients with measurable advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma and disease progression after one or two previous systemic regimens were eligible. After stratification for Karnofsky performance status, histology, and number of previous chemotherapy regimens, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by use of an interactive voice response system with a block size of four to either treatment with vorinostat or placebo. Patients received oral vorinostat 300 mg (or matching placebo) twice daily on days 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 10, 15, 16, and 17 of a 21-day cycle. The primary endpoints were overall survival and safety and tolerability of vorinostat. The primary efficacy comparison was done in the intention-to-treat population, and safety and tolerability was assessed in the treated population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT00128102. Findings From July 12, 2005, to Feb 14, 2011, 661 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either vorinostat (n=329) or placebo (n=332) and included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Median overall survival for vorinostat was 30·7 weeks (95% CI 26·7–36·1) versus 27·1 weeks (23·1–31·9) for placebo (hazard ratio 0·98, 95% CI 0·83–1·17, p=0·86). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events for patients treated with vorinostat were fatigue or malaise (51 16% patients in the vorinostat group vs 25 8% in the placebo group) and dyspnoea (35 11% vs 45 14%). Interpretation In this randomised trial, vorinostat given as a second-line or third-line therapy did not improve overall survival and cannot be recommended as a therapy for patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma. Funding Merck & Co, Inc.
Perillyl alcohol is a plant-derived lipid with preclinical antitumor activity. Its proposed mechanism of action involves inhibition of post-translational isoprenylation of small G proteins, including ...the proto-oncogene p21- ras, thereby blocking signal transduction. This phase I trial was conducted to determine the optimal dose of perillyl alcohol.
The study group comprised 21 adults with advanced solid tumors who were treated with perillyl alcohol, delivered orally, four times daily, without interruption. Doses ranged from 4,800 to 11,200 mg/m(2) per day.
The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for this schedule was determined to be 8400 mg/m(2) per day. The dose-limiting toxicities in this trial were nausea and vomiting, encountered in all patients at the highest dose level. No antitumor activity was observed. Pharmacokinetic data suggest dose-dependent increases in C(max) of perillic acid, a metabolite of perillyl alcohol, but with high inter- and intrapatient variability.
The MTD of perillyl alcohol for this schedule was determined to be 8400 mg/m(2) per day. This is higher than the MTDs determined in other similar phase I trials. This may have been due to the fact that the gastrointestinal symptoms caused by perillyl alcohol are highly subjective, with high interpatient variability. Phase II trials of perillyl alcohol in hormone-refractory prostate, breast, ovarian and colorectal cancer using doses in the range 4800-6400 mg/m(2) per day are underway.
