Despite the increasing number of studies evaluating patient reported outcome measures (PROs), there is no clearness regarding which restorative treatment offers major benefits based on the pediatric ...patient perspective.
To compare different restorative techniques in pediatric dentistry regarding patient-reported outcomes.
Literature searching was carried out on prospective studies indexed in PubMed, Scopus and OpenGrey. A Mixed Treatment Comparisons (MTC) meta-analysis was undertaken considering the results from reviewed studies. Anxiety, pain and quality of life were extracted as mean with standard deviation, percentage of pain, and mean difference of scores with standard deviation, respectively. For direct comparisons, data were combined using a random-effect model. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 statistic. For indirect comparisons, fixed and random effects were chosen through comparison of competing models based on the Deviance Information Criteria (DIC). The expected efficacy ranking based on the posterior probabilities of all treatment rankings was also calculated.
An initial search resulted in 4,322 articles, of which 17 were finally selected. Due to unavailability of data, only pain, anxiety and oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL) were statistically analyzed. The difference in means (95% CI) of anxiety between treatments using only hand instruments with or without chemomechanical agents were -5.35 (-6.42 to -4.20) and -5.79 (-7.77 to -3.79) respectively when compared to conventional treatment using rotary instruments and/or local anesthesia. Regarding pain, there was a trend for treatments without rotary instruments and local anesthesia to be less frequently reported as painful. No statistical difference was found intragroup nor among treatments for OHRQoL.
Anxiety and pain are directly related with more invasive restorative treatments. On the other hand, quality of life is not improved regardless of the restorative technique used. Further well-designed prospective studies regarding PROs in children are still necessary.
Celotno besedilo
Dostopno za:
DOBA, IZUM, KILJ, NUK, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, SIK, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
IntroductionDespite the widespread acceptance of conventional treatment using composite resin in primary teeth, there is limited evidence that this approach is the best option in paediatric clinics. ...Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) using high-viscosity glass ionomer cement has gradually become more popular because it performs well in clinical studies, is easy to handle and is patient friendly. Therefore, the aim of this randomised clinical trial study is to compare the restoration longevity of conventional treatment using composite resin with that of ART in posterior primary teeth. As secondary outcomes, cost-efficacy and patient self-reported discomfort will also be tested.Methods and analysisChildren aged 3–6 years presenting with at least one occlusal and/or occlusal-proximal cavity will be randomly assigned to one of two groups according to the dental treatment: ART (experimental group) or composite resin restoration (control group). The dental treatment will be performed at a dental care trailer located in an educational complex in Barueri/SP, Brazil. The unit of randomisation will be the child. A sample size of 240 teeth with occlusal cavities and 188 teeth with occlusal-proximal cavities has been calculated. The primary outcome will be restoration longevity, which will be clinically assessed after 6, 12, 18 and 24 months by two examiners. The duration of the dental treatment and the cost of all materials used will be considered when estimating the cost-efficacy of each treatment. Individual discomfort will be measured after each dental procedure using the Facial Scale of Wong-Baker.Ethics and disseminationThis clinical trial was approved by the local ethics committee from the Faculty of Dentistry of the University of São Paulo (registration no. 1.556.018). Participants will be included after their legal guardians have signed an informed consent form containing detailed information about the research.Trial registration number www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02562456; Pre-results.
•The aim of this trial was to evaluate the 2-year survival rate and the cost-effectiveness different glass ionomer materials for restoring occlusal dentin caries lesions in primary ...molars.•Restorations performed with Vitro Molar and Maxxion R were more likely to fail after 24 months when compared to Fuji IX.•Fuji IX presented a higher initial cost when compared to Vitro Molar and Maxxion R, but this difference was no longer perceived after 24 months evaluation, due to the expected higher repair needs in the other groups.•Fuji IX is the most cost-effective option for treating occlusal restorations in primary molars using ART technique when compared to Vitro Molar and Maxxion R after 24 months.
To evaluate the 2-year survival rate and the cost-effectiveness of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) using three different glass ionomer cements (GICs) for restoring occlusal dentin caries lesions in primary molars.
One hundred and fifty (150) 4-8-year-old children were selected, randomly allocated and treated in school tables according to the restorative material: Fuji IX Gold Label (GC Corp), Vitro Molar (nova DFL) and Maxxion R (FGM), the latter two being low-cost brands. Materials and professionals’ costs were considered to analyse baseline total cost, and from this the cumulative cost of each treatment was calculated. Restoration assessments were performed after 2, 6, 12 and 24 months by an independent calibrated examiner. Restoration survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression was used to test association with clinical factors. Bootstrap regression (1,000 replications) compared material´s cost over time and Monte-Carlo simulation was used to build cost-effectiveness scatter plots.
The overall survival rate of occlusal ART restorations after 2 years was 53% (Fuji IX = 72.7%; Vitro Molar = 46.5%; Maxxion R = 39.6%). Restorations performed with Vitro Molar and Maxxion R were more likely to fail when compared to Fuji IX. At baseline, Fuji IX was the more expensive option (p < 0.001), however, considering the simulation of accumulated cost caused by failures until 2-year evaluation, no difference was found between the groups.
After 2 years’ follow up, restorations performed with Fuji IX proved to be superior in terms of survival, with a similar overall cost, when compared to low-cost glass ionomers cements (Vitro Molar and Maxxion R).
To identify the best available approach to avoid initial caries lesions progression in primary teeth.
Search was performed in MEDLINE/Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase and CENTRAL databases until March ...2021. Studies compared treatment options to avoid the initial caries lesion progression with at least 12 months of follow-up were included. Network meta-analyses were conducted considering the non-progression of caries lesions as an outcome.
Potentially eligible studies were screened (n = 2820) and eleven were included. Six studies evaluated the use of fluoride varnish, resin infiltration, sealing, and toothbrushing/flossing on proximal initial caries lesions. When considering occlusal surfaces, only two studies evaluating the ozone gas, fluoride varnish, resin infiltration, and sealants were included. For buccal/lingual surfaces, three studies evaluating toothbrushing, CPP-ACP paste, fluoride varnish, and resin infiltration were included. For all types of surfaces, the resin infiltration showed the best probability to avoid the progression of initial caries lesions.
The limited number of included studies, most with a high risk of bias and lack of hard outcomes, such as frank cavitation, makes it not feasible to recommend a specific management approach for initial caries lesion control in primary teeth with a high certainty of evidence. PROSPERO: #CRD42016037781
Introduction: Dental caries is the most prevalent non-communicative disease worldwide. Although the etiological factors are well known for years, reducing the number of decayed and missing teeth in ...children still remains as a barrier. Preventive and curative options are numerous but little is known about their economical advantages. Selecting the intervention that offers the best balance of effectiveness and financial resources becomes crucial in the current situation of budget restrictions worldwide.
Areas covered: This expert review summarizes available evidence on cost-effectiveness analyses of preventive and curative measures to manage dental caries in children.
Expert commentary: Preventive measures have been more extensively studied than dental caries treatment. Only water fluoridation and tooth brushing are well-established as cost-effective preventive approaches. Despite the increasing number of cost analysis treatment studies in the literature, most of them focus on the cost description, with no correlation to the intervention effectiveness. There is a current need of well-designed and well-reported cost-effectiveness regarding dental caries management.
Abstract Introduction The high costs of the worldwide recommended GICs might be a barrier for the implementation of ART. To overcome this problem, low cost GIC are used even though there is a lack of ...evidence for the survival rate of restorations. Objectives To evaluate the performance of low-cost GICs used on occlusal ART restorations after one year. Methods A total of 150 primary molars in 150 children with occlusal caries lesions were selected in 4–8 year-old children. The patients were randomly allocated in three groups: G1–GC Gold Label 9 (GC Corp); G2–Vitro Molar (DFL) and G3–Maxxion R (FGM). All treatments were performed following the ART premises in school setting. Restorations were evaluated after 2, 6 and 12 months. Restoration survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Log-rank test and Cox regression was used for testing association with clinical factors (α = 5%). Results GC Gold Label 9 had better performance compared to the low-cost GICs (HR = 1.47, CI = 1.04–2.08, p = 0.027). The overall SR of restorations was 65.33% and the SR per group was G1 = 77.55%; G2 = 61.11% and G3 = 42.55%. Conclusions The low-cost GICs have a poorer performance than GC Gold Label 9 in occlusal ART restoration in primary molars.
O objetivo desta tese foi identificar, analisar e sintetizar evidências científicas quanto à eficácia do Tratamento Convencional (TC) e do Tratamento Restaurador Atraumático (ART) em molares decíduos ...considerando os parâmetros de longevidade, custo, aceitabilidade e desfechos reportados pelo paciente. Este volume apresenta um compilado de uma revisão sistemática e dois ensaios clínicos randomizados orientados pelas recomendações PRISMA, CONSORT-PRO e CHEERS. Realizamos uma revisão sistemática, cuja pesquisa bibliográfica buscou por desfechos reportados pelo paciente (PROs) em relação a tratamentos restauradores na dentição decídua em estudos prospectivos indexados no PubMed, Scopus e OpenGrey até fevereiro de 2018. Meta-análise de Comparação de Tratamento Misto foi realizada considerando os resultados dos estudos revisados. Devido à incompatibilidade de dados, apenas dor, ansiedade e a qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde bucal (QVRSB) foram analisados estatisticamente. Adicionalmente, delineamos um ensaio clínico de não inferioridade randomizado por cluster cujo desfecho primário foi a longevidade do TC e do ART em cavidadades oclusais e oclusoproximais de molares decíduos após 24 meses de acompanhamento. Como desfechos secundários, foram avaliados a aceitabilidade, representada pelo desconforto auto relatado e cooperação dos participantes, e a custo-eficácia. Crianças entre 3 e 6 anos apresentando pelo menos uma cavidade oclusal ou oclusoproximal em molares decíduos foram randomizadas entre os grupos convencional (TC) com resina composta sob isolamento absoluto após anestesia local ou o ART. Em ambos os grupos foi realizada remoção parcial de tecido cariado. O estudo foi desenvolvido em um trailer odontológico localizado no interior de uma escola municipal de Barueri/SP. Imediatamente após cada sessão restauradora, foi mensurado o desconforto auto relatado pelo participante e o comportamento pelo operador através da Escala Facial de Wong-Baker e escala de 5 pontos, respectivamente. As restaurações oclusais e oclusoproximais foram avaliadas após 6, 12, 18 e 24 meses segundo o critério de Frencken et al. 1998 e de Roeleveld et al. 2006. Os custos profissional e do procedimento, subdividido em custos variável e do material de consumo, foram considerados para estimar o custo incremental dos tratamentos. Regressão de Poisson em análise de multinível, Regressão de Cox com fragilidade compartilhada e regressão de Bootstrap foram utilizadas para testar o desconforto e cooperação, a sobrevida e o custo entre os tratamentos e outras variáveis independentes. O nível de significância foi ajustado em 5%. Tratamentos restauradores que utilizam agentes quimicomecânicos ou apenas instrumentos manuais para remoção de tecido cariado, como o ART, resultaram em menores índices de ansiedade e menor tendência em provocar dor em crianças do que tratamentos que utilizam instrumentos rotatórios e/ou anestesia. A QVRSB não foi influenciada pelos tratamentos restauradores nem diferiu entre os grupos. Por outro lado, o TC e o ART apresentaram baixa taxa de desconforto e alto índice de cooperação sem diferença estatisticamente significante entre eles. Ambos os tratamentos apresentaram sobrevida semelhante nas cavidades oclusais após 24 meses de acompanhamento, porém o custo do ART foi menor, demonstrando ser a opção mais custo-eficaz. Em relação às restaurações oclusoproximais, apesar do desempenho do TC ser superior ao ART, ele apresentou maior custo. Pode-se concluir que ansiedade e dor estão diretamente relacionados com tratamentos restauradores mais invasivos. Por outro lado, o TC e o ART apresentaram desconforto, cooperação e custo-eficácia semelhantes no tratamento de molares decíduos. Palavras-chave: Restauração dentária permanente. Dente decíduo. Longevidade. Custos e análises de custo. Medidas de resultados relatados pelo paciente. Ensaio clínico. Revisão. Odontopediatria.
The aim of this thesis was to identify, analyze and synthesize scientific evidences regarding the efficacy of conventional treatment (CT) and Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) in primary molars considering the parameters of longevity, cost, acceptability and patient reported outcomes. This volume presents a compilation of a systematic review and two randomized clinical trials guided by the PRISMA, CONSORT-PRO and CHEERS recommendations. We performed a systematic review whose literature search included outcomes reported by the pediatric patient (PROs) related to restorative treatments in the primary dentition in prospective studies indexed in PubMed, Scopus and OpenGrey until February 2018. Mixed Treatment Comparison analysis was performed considering the results of the reviewed studies. Due to data incompatibility, only pain, anxiety and oral health related to quality of life (OHRQoL) were analyzed statistically. Additionally, we designed a cluster randomized non-inferiority clinical trial whose primary outcome was the longevity of occlusal and occlusoproximal ART and TC restorations in primary molars after 24 months of follow-up. As secondary outcomes, acceptability, represented by self-reported discomfort and participant cooperation, and cost-efficacy were assessed. Children between 3 and 6 years old presenting at least one occlusal or occlusoproximal cavity in primary molars were randomized between the conventional group (TC) with composite resin under rubber dam isolation after local anesthesia or ART. Partial removal of carious tissue was performed in both groups. The study was carried out in a dental trailer located inside a municipal school in Barueri/SP. Immediately after each restorative session, self-reported discomfort and participant cooperation were measure through the Wong-Baker Facial Scale and a 5-point scale, respectively. The occlusal and occlusoproximal restorations were evaluated after 6, 12, 18 and 24 months according to the criteria of Frencken et al. 1998 and Roeleveld et al. 2006. The professional and procedural costs, subdivided into variable and material of consumption\' costs, were considered to estimate treatments\' incremental cost. Poisson regression in multilevel analysis, Cox regression with shared fragility and Bootstrap regression were used to test discomfort and cooperation, survival and cost between treatments and among others independent variables. The level of significance was set at 5%. Restorative treatments using chemomechanical agents or only manual instruments, such as ART, were related to lower anxiety rates and less tendency to provoke pain in children compared to treatments using rotary instruments and/or anesthesia. OHRQoL was not influenced by restorative treatments nor differed between groups. On the other hand, CT and ART presented low rate of discomfort and a high cooperation with no statistically significant difference between them. Both treatments presented similar survival rates in occlusal restorations after 24 months of follow-up, but the ART cost was lower, proving to be the most cost-effective option. Regarding occlusoproximal restorations, although CT performance was superior to ART, it presented a higher cost. It can be concluded that anxiety and pain are directly related to more invasive restorative treatments. Differently, CT and ART have similar discomfort, cooperation and cost-efficacy in the treatment of primary molars.
PDF
