Summary
Background
All organ transplant populations are predisposed to increased rates of keratinocyte carcinoma (KC). Since this increased risk was first appreciated, immunosuppressive regimens have ...changed and organ transplant recipients (OTRs) have been aggressively screened for KC. There is a perception that these measures have impacted on KC incidence but there is a paucity of population‐based studies on post‐transplant rates of basal cell carcinoma (BCC).
Objectives
To identify trends in incidence rates for KC following solid organ transplantation over the past two decades.
Methods
This nationwide, population‐based study included all solid OTRs transplanted between 1994 and 2014. Patient data were matched to national cancer registry data to determine the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of KC in solid OTRs compared with the general population.
Results
In total 3580 solid OTRs were included. The total follow‐up time was 28 407 person‐years (median follow‐up 7·11 years). The overall SIRs for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and BCC were 19·7 and 7·0, respectively. Our study documents a progressive fall in the SIRs for SCC and BCC from peak SIRs (95% confidence intervals) in 1994–1996 of 26·4 (21·5–32·4) and 9·1 (7·4–11·3) to 6·3 (2·3–16·7) and 3·2 (1·4–7·1) in 2012–2014, respectively. The ratio of SCC to BCC has remained at 3 to 1 over the last two decades.
Conclusions
Our study is the first to demonstrate a significant reduction over the past two decades in the incidences of both SCC and BCC following solid organ transplantation. The SCC‐to‐BCC ratio was maintained, demonstrating that both are reducing equally. This trend coincided with temporal changes in immunosuppressive protocols and the introduction of skin cancer prevention programmes.
What's already known about this topic?
Prior studies have shown that the risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) has declined over recent decades following solid organ transplantation.
It is not known whether the risk of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) has reduced in line with this.
What does this study add?
Our study documents a progressive fall in the risk of SCC and BCC following solid organ transplantation over the last two decades.
The SCC‐to‐BCC ratio was maintained, demonstrating that both are reducing equally.
The trends observed in our study coincided with temporal changes in immunosuppressive protocols and the introduction of cancer prevention programmes, suggesting that these factors have positively impacted on the risk of keratinocyte carcinoma in this cohort.
Linked Editorial: Gjersvik. Br J Dermatol 2019; 181:879–880
Plain language summary available online
Respond to this article
Keratinocyte carcinoma in organ transplant recipients Menzies, S.; O'Leary, E.; Callaghan, G. ...
British journal of dermatology (1951),
November 2019, 2019-11-00, 20191101, Letnik:
181, Številka:
5
Journal Article
Recenzirano
Odprti dostop
Summary
Skin cancer commonly affects people who have received a solid organ transplant (heart, lung, liver and kidney). Transplant patients can get multiple skin cancers, some of which can grow very ...quickly. The commonest types of skin cancer are basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Immunosuppressant medication is used to prevent rejection of the transplanted organ. This alters the body's immune system, which in turn means that transplant patients are more prone to skin cancers that can grow rapidly. Over the last 20 years, newer immunosuppressants have been introduced which are thought to lessen the risk of skin cancer. Previous studies have shown a lower risk of SCC with the newer medication, but no study to date has looked at BCC rates. This study, from Ireland, aimed to find out if the rate of skin cancer in transplant patients has reduced over the last 20 years, spanning the introduction of newer immunosuppressive medications. The National Cancer Registry of Ireland registers all skin cancers for the Republic of Ireland. The authors looked at the rate of skin cancer in people who received a solid organ transplant and compared this to the rate of skin cancer in the general population. They found that the rate of SCC and BCC in patients who received an organ transplant has significantly reduced over the last two decades. This change in risk of skin cancer coincided with changes in immunosuppressant medication, along with focused education and regular skin cancer screening for transplant recipients.
Linked Article: Menzies et al. Br J Dermatol 2019; 181:983–991
Highlights • Spinal dysraphisms are among the most common neurodevelopmental anomalies. • Bony and neural structures may be anatomically abnormal. • Neuraxial blocks are possible in selected ...patients. • The incidence of complications and failure is relatively high. • Magnetic resonance imaging can clarify anatomical abnormalities and assist decision making regarding neuraxial techniques.
Summary
Propranolol is an effective, safe treatment for complicated infantile haemangiomas (IH). We evaluated all patients (n = 44) with IH treated with propranolol in our department. Of the 44 ...patients who were begun on propranolol therapy, 26 patients have completed the treatment to date and all had a good response. The mean duration of treatment was 45.7 weeks. Four patients developed rebound growth of their IH, which responded to the reintroduction of propranolol. Two patients with PHACES (posterior fossa malformations, haemangiomas, arterial anomalies, coarctation of the aorta/cardiac abnormalities, eye anomalies and sternal defects/supraumbilical raphe) syndrome were treated with lower than standard doses, because of concern about possible cerebrovascular compromise. Adverse effects were minor in most patients. Three patients discontinued propranolol because of vomiting, wheeze, and hypoglycaemia, respectively. Our duration of treatment was longer than that of other series, and may be due to our group having higher rates of hypotension, recorded in 27.3% of patients, precluding an increase in propranolol dose. Our experience supports that propranolol is an effective first‐line agent for complicated IH.
Summary
We describe two patients with newly diagnosed dermatoses localizing to the radiotherapy field following treatment for breast cancer. Patient 1 was a 53‐year‐old woman who developed bullous ...morphoea on her left breast two years after radiotherapy. Patient 2 was a 43‐year‐old woman who developed urticaria pigmentosa on her right breast eight months after radiotherapy and similar lesions gradually developed beyond the radiotherapy field. Both patients experienced a significant delay in diagnosis due to diagnostic confusion and concern over breast cancer recurrence. Irradiated skin demonstrates gradual and sustained alterations in fibrosis due to the production of long‐lived cytokines and chemokines. These changes can induce a koebnerizing response in conditions such as morphoea and urticaria pigmentosa. We explore the mechanisms behind radiotherapy‐induced skin changes, and highlight the potential for radiotherapy to exacerbate or unmask underlying dermatoses and systemic disease in the months and years following treatment.
Oral pigmentation Lenane, P; Powell, Fc
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology,
November 2000, Letnik:
14, Številka:
6
Journal Article
Recenzirano
Oral pigmentation may be physiological or pathological in nature. It may represent a localized anomaly of limited significance or the presentation of potentially life‐threatening multisystem disease. ...Evaluation of a patient with oral pigmentation requires a systematic approach with resource to appropriate investigations in certain circumstances. A full history of evolution of the pigmentary changes, as well as inquiring into family history, drug ingestion and systemic symptoms of concurrent disease are clearly important in the assessment. The duration, pattern, hue and distribution of colour changes can provide useful diagnostic clues. Special attention is given to newly appearing lesions, or those that have changed significantly in appearance, and biopsy may be needed to validate the clinical impression.
This review should enable the reader to increase their familiarity with the assessment of oral pigmentation, the common causes of oral pigmentary change and the rarer disorders of pigmentation seen in this area. The systemic diseases that may give rise to oral pigmentation are detailed and the early signs of oral melanoma are highlighted, as well as the drugs which may cause pigmentary changes in this area and the different pattern of pigmentation they may induce.