This comprehensive review explores the intricate aspects of left ventricular thrombus (LVT), a potential complication in both ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathies. It provides a thorough ...understanding of left ventricular thrombus, revealing its uncommon incidence in the general population (7 cases per 10,000 patients), predominantly linked to ischemic heart diseases (ICMs) at an 80% prevalence rate. Diagnostic tools, notably transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), demonstrate varying sensitivity but remain indispensable in specific clinical contexts related to LVT as non-invasive diagnostic modalities. A detailed comparison between ICM patients and those with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) who have left ventricular thrombus reveals subtle distinctions with significant clinical implications. This analysis underscores the importance of these imaging techniques in distinguishing between the two conditions. Additionally, we explored the occurrence of LVT in specific non-ischemic cardiomyopathies, including Takotsubo syndrome, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, eosinophilic myocarditis, Chagas disease, cardiac amyloidosis, and several other conditions. The article further delves into anticoagulation strategies, thoroughly examining their impact on LVT regression and patient outcomes. Pharmacological interventions, with a focus on direct oral anticoagulants, emerge as promising alternatives; however, there is insufficient information on their efficiency and safety, especially in NICM population. In conclusion, this review highlights the complex nature of LVT, incorporating a range of etiopathogenic factors, diagnostic complexities, and evolving therapeutic approaches. It emphasizes the pressing need for ongoing research in this field.
Purpose
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of ejection fraction (EF), left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) and global constructive work (GCW) as prognostic ...variables in patients with cardiac amyloidosis (CA).
Methods
CA patients were retrospectively identified between 2015 and 2021 at a tertiary care hospital. Comprehensive clinical, biochemical, and imaging evaluation including two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography with myocardial work (MW) analysis was performed. A clinical combined endpoint was defined as all-cause mortality and heart failure readmission.
Results
70 patients were followed for 16 (7–37) months and 37 (52.9%) reached the combined endpoint. Patient with versus without clinical events had a significantly lower LVEF (40.71% vs. 48.01%, p = 0.039), LVGLS (-9.26 vs. -11.32, p = 0.034) and GCW (1034.47mmHg% vs. 1424.86mmHg%, p = 0.011). Multivariable analysis showed that LVEF ( odds ratio (OR): 0.904; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.839–0.973, p = 0.007), LVGLS ( OR: 0.620; 95% CI: 0.415–0.926, p = 0.020) and GCW ( OR: 0.995; 95% CI: 0.990–0.999, p = 0.016) were significant predictors of outcome, but the model including GCW had the best discriminative ability to predict the combined endpoint (C-index = 0.888). A GCW less than 1443mmHg% was able to predict the clinical endpoint with a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 64% (Area under the curve (AUC): 0.771 (95% CI: 0.581–0.961; p = 0.005)).
Conclusion
In CA patients, GCW may be of additional prognostic value to LVEF and GLS in predicting heart failure hospitalization and all-cause mortality.
Background:
The association of known cardiovascular risk factors with poor prognosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been recently emphasized. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score is ...considered a risk modifier in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. We hypothesized that the absence of CAC might have an additional predictive value for an improved cardiovascular outcome of hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
Materials and methods:
We prospectively included 310 consecutive hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Thirty patients with history of coronary artery disease were excluded. Chest computed tomography (CT) was performed in all patients. Demographics, medical history, clinical characteristics, laboratory findings, imaging data, in-hospital treatment, and outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. A composite endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was defined.
Results:
Two hundred eighty patients (63.2 ± 16.7 years old, 57.5% male) were included in the analysis. 46.7% patients had a CAC score of 0. MACE rate was 21.8% (61 patients). The absence of CAC was inversely associated with MACE (OR 0.209, 95% CI 0.052–0.833,
p
= 0.027), with a negative predictive value of 84.5%.
Conclusion:
The absence of CAC had a high negative predictive value for MACE in patients hospitalized with COVID-19, even in the presence of cardiac risk factors. A semi-qualitative assessment of CAC is a simple, reproducible, and non-invasive measure that may be useful to identify COVID-19 patients at a low risk for developing cardiovascular complications.
Lung transplantation (LT) constitutes the last therapeutic option for selected patients with end-stage respiratory disease. Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a form of severe lung injury, occurring ...in the first 72 h following LT and constitutes the most common cause of early death after LT. The presence of pulmonary hypertension (PH) has been reported to favor PGD development, with a negative impact on patients’ outcomes while complicating medical management. Although several studies have suggested a potential association between pre-LT left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) and PGD occurrence, the underlying mechanisms of such an association remain elusive. Importantly, the heterogeneity of the study protocols and the various inclusion criteria used to define the diastolic dysfunction in those patients prevents solid conclusions from being drawn. In this review, we aim at summarizing PGD mechanisms, risk factors, and diagnostic criteria, with a further focus on the interplay between LVDD and PGD development. Finally, we explore the predictive value of several diastolic dysfunction diagnostic parameters to predict PGD occurrence and severity.
Left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC) with preserved ejection fraction (EF) is still a controverted entity. We aimed to characterize structural and functional changes in LVNC with heart failure with ...preserved EF (HFpEF).
We enrolled 21 patients with LVNC and HFpEF and 21 HFpEF controls. For all patients, we performed CMR, speckle tracking echocardiography (STE), and biomarker assessment for HFpEF (NT-proBNP), for myocardial fibrosis (Galectin-3), and for endothelial dysfunction ADAMTS13, von Willebrand factor, and their ratio. By CMR, we assessed native T1 and extracellular volume (ECV) for each LV level (basal, mid, and apical). By STE, we assessed longitudinal strain (LS), globally and at each LV level, base-to-apex gradient, LS layer by layer, from epicardium to endocardium, and transmural deformation gradient.
In the LVNC group, mean NC/C ratio was 2.9 ± 0.4 and the percentage of NC myocardium mass was 24.4 ± 8.7%. LVNC patients, by comparison with controls, had higher apical native T1 (1061 ± 72 vs. 1008 ± 40 ms), diffusely increased ECV (27.2 ± 2.9 vs. 24.4 ± 2.5%), with higher values at the apical level (29.6 ± 3.8 vs. 25.2 ± 2.8%) (all
< 0.01); they had a lower LS only at the apical level (-21.4 ± 4.4 vs. -24.3 ± 3.2%), with decreased base-to-apex gradient (3.8 ± 4.7 vs. 6.9 ± 3.4%) and transmural deformation gradient (3.9 ± 0.8 vs. 4.8 ± 1.0%). LVNC patients had higher NT-proBNP 237 (156-489) vs. 156 (139-257) pg/mL and Galectin-3 7.3 (6.0-11.5) vs. 5.6 (4.8-8.3) ng/mL, and lower ADAMTS13 (767.3 ± 335.5 vs. 962.3 ± 253.7 ng/mL) and ADAMTS13/vWF ratio (all
< 0.05).
LVNC patients with HFpEF have diffuse fibrosis, which is more extensive at the apical level, explaining the decrease in apical deformation and overexpression of Galectin-3. Lower transmural and base-to-apex deformation gradients underpin the sequence of myocardial maturation failure. Endothelial dysfunction, expressed by the lower ADAMTS13 and ADAMTS13/vWF ratio, may play an important role in the mechanism of HFpEF in patients with LVNC.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emerged as a worldwide health crisis, overwhelming healthcare systems. Elevated cardiac troponin T (cTn T) at admission was associated with increased in-hospital ...mortality. However, data addressing the role of cTn T in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in COVID-19 are scarce. Therefore, we assessed the role of baseline cTn T and cTn T kinetics for MACE and in-hospital mortality prediction in COVID-19.
Three hundred and ten patients were included prospectively. One hundred and eight patients were excluded due to incomplete records. Patients were divided into three groups according to cTn T kinetics: ascending, descending, and constant. The cTn T slope was defined as the ratio of the cTn T change over time. The primary and secondary endpoints were MACE and in-hospital mortality.
Two hundred and two patients were included in the analysis (mean age 64.4 ± 16.7 years, 119 58.9% males). Mean duration of hospitalization was 14.0 ± 12.3 days. Sixty (29.7%) patients had MACE, and 40 (19.8%) patients died. Baseline cTn T predicted both endpoints (p = 0.047, hazard ratio HR 1.805, 95% confidence interval CI 1.009-3.231; p = 0.009, HR 2.322, 95% CI 1.234-4.369). Increased cTn T slope predicted mortality (p = 0.041, HR 1.006, 95% CI 1.000-1.011). Constant cTn T was associated with lower MACE and mortality (p = 0.000, HR 3.080, 95% CI 1.914-4.954, p = 0.000, HR 2.851, 95% CI 1.828-4.447).
The present study emphasizes the additional role of cTn T testing in COVID-19 patients for risk stratification and improved diagnostic pathway and management.
Three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) is advised for right ventricular (RV) assessment. Data regarding the optimal acquisition settings and optimization are still scarce. We aimed to evaluate the ...feasibility, reproducibility and validation of 3DE for RV volume and function assessment, using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) as gold standard. Thirty healthy volunteers and 36 consecutive patients were prospectively included. CMR was performed in the latter. Standard apical four-chamber view (A4CV), focused A4CV and modified A4CV were used for 3DE RV acquisition. Feasibility (and the effect of changes in settings) was evaluated. Intra and interobserver analyses were performed by three observers (expert vs. novice). RV parameters by echocardiography were compared to CMR. Feasibility of acquisition was 16.7% for A4CV, 80.0% for focused A4CV and 16.7% for modified A4CV. Changes in settings had no significant influence on feasibility and further analysis. Intraobserver variability was good in both expert and novice, interobserver variability was good between experienced observers. Compared to CMR, 3DE volumes were significantly lower with fair to moderate correlation (EDV: 91.1 ± 24.4 mL vs. 144.3 ± 43.0 mL (
< 0.001), r = 0.653 and ESV: 48.1 ± 16.4 mL vs. 60.4 ± 21.2 mL (
< 0.001), r = 0.530, by multi-beat 3DE and CMR respectively). These findings suggest that standardization is needed in order to implement this technique in clinical practice, thus further studies are required.
Left atrium (LA) volume is a biomarker of cardiovascular outcomes. Three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) provides an accurate LA evaluation, but data regarding the optimal 3DE method is scarce. We ...assessed the feasibility and reproducibility of LA measurements using different 3DE methods. One hundred and ninety-four patients were prospectively analyzed. Conventional 3DE and two semi-automatic 3DE algorithms (Tomtec™ and Dynamic Heart Model (DHM)) were used in 110 patients. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility and intervendor comparison were performed in additional patients' subsets. Forty patients underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Feasibility was 100% for Tomtec, 98.2% for DHM, and 72.8% for conventional 3DE. Tomtec volumes were higher than 3DE and DHM (
< 0.001). Reproducibility was better for DHM (intraobserver LA maximum volume (LAmax) ICC 0.99 (95% CI 1.0-0.99), LA minimum volume (LAmin) 0.98 (95% CI 0.95-0.99), LApreA 0.96 (95% CI 0.91-0.98); interobserver LAmax ICC 0.98 (95% CI 0.96-0.99), LAmin 0.99 (95% CI 0.99-1.00), and LApreA 0.97 (95% CI 0.94-0.99)). Intervendor comparison showed differences between left ventricle (LV) software adapted for LA (
< 0.001). Tomtec underestimated the least LA volumes compared to CMR. These findings emphasize that dedicated software should be used for LA assessment, for consistent clinical longitudinal follow-up and research.
PDF
