PORTEC-2 was a randomised trial for women with high-intermediate risk (HIR) endometrial cancer, comparing pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with vaginal brachytherapy (VBT). We evaluated ...long-term outcomes combined with the results of pathology review and molecular analysis.
427 women with HIR endometrial cancer were randomised between 2002-2006 to VBT or EBRT. Primary endpoint was vaginal recurrence (VR). Pathology review was done in 97.4%, combined with molecular analysis.
Median follow-up was 116 months; 10-year VR was 3.4% versus 2.4% for VBT vs. EBRT (p = 0.55). Ten-year pelvic recurrence (PR) was more frequent in the VBT group (6.3% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.004), mostly combined with distant metastases (DM). Ten-year isolated PR was 2.5% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.10, and DM 10.4 vs. 8.9% (p = 0.45). Overall survival for VBT vs. EBRT was 69.5% vs. 67.6% at 10 years (p = 0.72). L1CAM and p53-mutant expression and substantial lymph-vascular space invasion were risk factors for PR and DM. EBRT reduced PR in cases with these risk factors.
Long-term results of the PORTEC-2 trial confirm VBT as standard adjuvant treatment for HIR endometrial cancer. Molecular risk assessment has the potential to guide adjuvant therapy. EBRT provided better pelvic control in patients with unfavourable risk factors.
The Post-Operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma (PORTEC)-4a trial is a randomized trial for women with high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer (EC), comparing individualized adjuvant ...treatment based on a molecular-integrated risk profile to standard adjuvant treatment; vaginal brachytherapy. To evaluate patient acceptability and pathology logistics of determining the risk profile, a pilot phase was included in the study.
PORTEC-4a is ongoing and the first 50 patients enrolled were included in the pilot phase. Primary endpoints of the pilot phase were patient acceptance, evaluated by analyzing the screening logs of the participating centers, and logistical feasibility of determination of the risk profile within 2 weeks, evaluated by analyzing the pathology database.
In the first year, 145 eligible women were informed about the trial at 13 centers, of whom 50 (35%) provided informed consent. Patient accrual ranged from 0 to 57% per center. Most common reasons for not participating were: not willing to participate in any trial (43.2%) and not willing to risk receiving no adjuvant treatment (32.6%). Analysis of the pathology database showed an average time between randomization and determination of the molecular-integrated risk profile of 10.2 days (1–23 days). In 5 of the 32 patients (15.6%), pathology review took >2 weeks.
The PORTEC-4a trial design was proven feasible with a satisfactory patient acceptance rate and an optimized workflow of the determination of the molecular-integrated risk profile. PORTEC-4a is the first randomized trial to investigate use of a molecular-integrated risk profile to determine adjuvant treatment in EC.
•Molecular-integrated risk profiling holds promise to improve individualization of treatment in endometrial cancer (EC).•PORTEC-4a is the first randomized clinical trial investigating molecular profile-based adjuvant treatment in EC.•The trial design was proven feasible with a good patient acceptance rate and logistical feasibility; accrual is ongoing.
Summary Background After surgery for intermediate-risk endometrial carcinoma, the vagina is the most frequent site of recurrence. This study established whether vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) is as ...effective as pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in prevention of vaginal recurrence, with fewer adverse effects and improved quality of life. Methods In this open-label, non-inferiority, randomised trial undertaken in 19 Dutch radiation oncology centres, 427 patients with stage I or IIA endometrial carcinoma with features of high-intermediate risk were randomly assigned by a computer-generated, biased coin minimisation procedure to pelvic EBRT (46 Gy in 23 fractions; n=214) or VBT (21 Gy high-dose rate in three fractions, or 30 Gy low-dose rate; n=213). All investigators were masked to the assignment of treatment group. The primary endpoint was vaginal recurrence. The predefined non-inferiority margin was an absolute difference of 6% in vaginal recurrence. Analysis was by intention to treat, with competing risk methods. The study is registered, number ISRCTN16228756. Findings At median follow-up of 45 months (range 18–78), three vaginal recurrences had been diagnosed after VBT and four after EBRT. Estimated 5-year rates of vaginal recurrence were 1·8% (95% CI 0·6–5·9) for VBT and 1·6% (0·5–4·9) for EBRT (hazard ratio HR 0·78, 95% CI 0·17–3·49; p=0·74). 5-year rates of locoregional relapse (vaginal or pelvic recurrence, or both) were 5·1% (2·8–9·6) for VBT and 2·1% (0·8–5·8) for EBRT (HR 2·08, 0·71–6·09; p=0·17). 1·5% (0·5–4·5) versus 0·5% (0·1–3·4) of patients presented with isolated pelvic recurrence (HR 3·10, 0·32–29·9; p=0·30), and rates of distant metastases were similar (8·3% 5·1–13·4 vs 5·7% 3·3–9·9; HR 1·32, 0·63–2·74; p=0·46). We recorded no differences in overall (84·8% 95% CI 79·3–90·3 vs 79·6% 71·2–88·0; HR 1·17, 0·69–1·98; p=0·57) or disease-free survival (82·7% 76·9–88·6 vs 78·1% 69·7–86·5; HR 1·09, 0·66–1·78; p=0·74). Rates of acute grade 1–2 gastrointestinal toxicity were significantly lower in the VBT group than in the EBRT group at completion of radiotherapy (12·6% 27/215 vs 53·8% 112/208). Interpretation VBT is effective in ensuring vaginal control, with fewer gastrointestinal toxic effects than with EBRT. VBT should be the adjuvant treatment of choice for patients with endometrial carcinoma of high-intermediate risk. Funding Dutch Cancer Society.
Microcystic, elongated fragmented (MELF) pattern of myometrial invasion is a distinct histologic feature occasionally seen in low-grade endometrial carcinomas (EC). The prognostic relevance of MELF ...invasion was uncertain due to conflicting data, and it had not yet appropriately been studied in the context of the molecular EC classification. We aimed to determine the relation of MELF invasion with clinicopathological and molecular characteristics, and define its prognostic relevance in early-stage low/intermediate risk EC.
Single whole tumor slides of 979 (85.8%) out of 1141 (high)intermediate-risk EC of women who participated in the PORTEC-1/−2 trials were available for review. Clinicopathological and molecular features were compared between MELF invasion positive and negative cases. Time-to-event analyses were done by Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank tests and Cox’ proportional hazards models.
MELF invasion was found in 128 (13.1%) cases, and associated with grade 1–2 histology, deep myometrial invasion and substantial lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI). 85.6% of MELF invasion positive tumors were no-specific-molecular-profile (NSMP) EC. NSMP EC with MELF invasion were CTNNB1 wild type in 92.2% and KRAS mutated in 24.4% of cases. Risk of recurrence was lower for MELF invasion positive as compared to MELF invasion negative cases (4.9% vs. 12.7%, p = 0.026). However, MELF invasion had no independent impact on risk of recurrence (HR 0.65, p = 0.30) after correction for clinicopathological and molecular factors.
MELF invasion has no independent impact on risk of recurrence in early-stage EC, and is frequently observed in low-grade NSMP tumors. Routine assessment of MELF invasion has no clinical implications and is not recommended.
•MELF pattern of invasion is identified in 13.1% of early-stage endometrial cancer.•MELF invasion is associated with low-grade endometrial cancer.•MELF invasion is predominantly seen in CTNNB1 wild type no-specific-molecular-profile endometrial cancer.•MELF invasion has no independent prognostic impact.
Vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) in high-intermediate-risk endometrial cancer (EC) provides a significant reduction in the risk of local cancer recurrence, but without survival benefit and with increased ...mucosal atrophy. Five-year local control is estimated to be similar for VBT and a watchful waiting policy (WWP), in which patients receive VBT combined with external radiation in case of a recurrence. Our aim was to assess treatment preferences of EC patients and clinicians regarding VBT and WWP, and to evaluate their preferred and perceived involvement in treatment decision making.
Interviews were held with 95 treated EC patients. The treatment trade-off method was used to assess the minimally desired benefit from VBT in local control. Patients' preferred and perceived involvement in decision making were assessed using a questionnaire. Seventy-seven clinicians completed a questionnaire assessing their minimally desired benefit and preferred involvement in decision making.
Minimally desired benefit of VBT was significantly lower for patients than for clinicians (median=0 vs 8%, P<0.001), for irradiated than for non-irradiated patients (median=0 vs 6.5%, P<0.001), and for radiation oncologists than for gynaecologists (median=4 vs 13%, P<0.001). Substantial variation existed within the groups of patients and clinicians. Participants preferred the patient and clinician to share in the decision about VBT. However, irradiated patients indicated low perceived involvement in actual treatment decision making.
We found variations between and within patients and clinicians in minimally desired benefit from VBT. However, the recurrence risk at which patients preferred VBT was low. Our results showed that patients consider active participation in decision making essential.
•Quality assurance is essential for uniform treatment in multi-institutional radiotherapy trials.•At dummy run, 71.4% of the brachytherapy plans needed revisions to fulfil trial protocol ...requirements.•At annual QA, 18.5% of the reviewed brachytherapy plans showed major protocol deviations.•Annual QA contributes to protocol compliance, ensuring high-quality VBT.
The PORTEC-4a trial investigates molecular-integrated risk profile guided adjuvant treatment for endometrial cancer. The quality assurance programme included a dummy run for vaginal brachytherapy prior to site activation, and annual quality assurance to verify protocol adherence. Aims of this study were to evaluate vaginal brachytherapy quality and protocol adherence.
For the dummy run, institutes were invited to create a brachytherapy plan on a provided CT-scan with the applicator in situ. For annual quality assurance, institutes provided data of one randomly selected brachytherapy case. A brachytherapy panel reviewed and scored the brachytherapy plans according to a checklist.
At the dummy run, 15 out of 21 (71.4%) institutes needed adjustments of delineation or planning. After adjustments, the mean dose at the vaginal apex (protocol: 100%; 7 Gy) decreased from 100.7% to 99.9% and range and standard deviation (SD) narrowed from 83.6–135.1 to 96.4–101.4 and 8.8 to 1.1, respectively. At annual quality assurance, 22 out of 27 (81.5%) cases had no or minor and 5 out of 27 (18.5%) major deviations. Most deviations were related to delineation, mean dose at the vaginal apex (98.0%, 74.7–114.2, SD 7.6) or reference volume length.
Most feedback during the brachytherapy quality assurance procedure of the PORTEC-4a trial was related to delineation, dose at the vaginal apex and the reference volume length. Annual quality assurance is essential to promote protocol compliance, ensuring high quality vaginal brachytherapy in all participating institutes.
Addition of deep hyperthermia to radiotherapy results in improved local control (LC) and overall survival compared to radiotherapy alone in cervical carcinoma patients. Based on preclinical data, the ...time interval between radiotherapy, and hyperthermia is expected to influence treatment outcome. Clinical studies addressing the effect of time interval are sparse. The repercussions for clinical applications are substantial, as the time between radiotherapy and hyperthermia should be kept as short as possible. In this study, we therefore investigated the effect of the time interval between radiotherapy and hyperthermia on treatment outcome.
We analyzed all primary cervical carcinoma patients treated between 1996 and 2016 with thermoradiotherapy at our institute. Data on patients, tumors and treatments were collected, including the thermal dose parameters TRISE and CEM43T90. Follow-up data on tumor status and survival as well as late toxicity were collected. Data was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards analysis and Kaplan Meier analysis.
400 patients were included. Kaplan Meier and univariate Cox analysis showed no effect of the time interval (range 30-230 min) on any clinical outcome measure. Besides known prognostic factors, thermal dose parameters TRISE and CEM43T90 had a significant effect on LC. In multivariate analysis, the thermal dose parameter TRISE (HR 0.649; 95% CI 0.501-0.840) and the use of image guided brachytherapy (HR 0.432; 95% CI 0.214-0.972), but not the time interval, were significant predictors of LC and disease specific survival.
The time interval between radiotherapy and hyperthermia, up to 4 h, has no effect on clinical outcome. These results are re-ensuring for our current practice of delivering hyperthermia within maximal 4 h after radiotherapy.
Postoperative radiotherapy for International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage-1 endometrial carcinoma is a subject of controversy due to the low relapse rate and the lack of data ...from randomised trials. We did a multicentre prospective randomised trial to find whether postoperative pelvic radiotherapy improves locoregional control and survival for patients with stage-1 endometrial carcinoma
Patients with stage-1 endometrial carcinoma (grade 1 with deep ≥50% myometrial invasion, grade 2 with any invasion, or grade 3 with superficial <50% invasion) were enrolled. After total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, without lymphadenectomy, 715 patients from 19 radiation oncology centres were randomised to pelvic radiotherapy (46 Gy) or no further treatment. The primary study endpoints were locoregional recurrence and death, with treatment-related morbidity and survival after relapse as secondary endpoints.
Analysis was done according to the intention-to-treat principle. Of the 715 patients, 714 could be evaluated. The median duration of follow-up was 52 months. 5-year actuarial locoregional recurrence rates were 4% in the radiotherapy group and 14% in the control group (p<0·001). Actuarial 5-year overall survival rates were similar in the two groups: 81% (radiotherapy) and 85% (controls), p=0·31. Endometrial-cancer-related death rates were 9% in the radiotherapy group and 6% in the control group (p=0·37). Treatment-related complications occurred in 25% of radiotherapy patients, and in 6% of the controls (p<0·0001). Two-thirds of the complications were grade 1. Grade 3–4 complications were seen in eight patients, of which seven were in the radiotherapy group (2%). 2-year survival after vaginal recurrence was 79%, in contrast to 21% after pelvic recurrence or distant metastases. Survival after relapse was significantly (p=0·02) better for patients in the control group. Multivariate analysis showed that for locoregional recurrence, radiotherapy and age below 60 years were significant favourable prognostic factors.
Postoperative radiotherapy in stage-1 endometrial carcinoma reduces locoregional recurrence but has no impact on overall survival. Radiotherapy increases treatment-related morbidity. Postoperative radiotherapy is not indicated in patients with stage-1 endometrial carcinoma below 60 years and patients with grade-2 tumours with superficial invasion.
We noted a significant decline in the serum concentrations of citrulline of 32 haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients following intensive myeloablative therapy during the first 3 weeks after ...transplantation when patients have oral mucositis, a markedly disturbed gut integrity (L/R ratio) and are most at risk of infection and other severe complications. Closer inspection of the citrulline concentrations of 12 patients confirmed that the decline did indeed correspond to the onset of oral mucositis and altered gut integrity. Since serum citrulline is a reliable biochemical marker of small bowel enterocyte mass in humans with villous-atrophy-associated diseases, it may prove a useful marker for intestinal mucosal damage induced by chemotherapy, allowing the relationship between gut mucosal damage and post-transplant complications including infections to be explored more readily.
Background
In the pragmatic open-label randomised controlled non-inferiority LADI trial we showed that increasing adalimumab (ADA) dose intervals was non-inferior to conventional dosing for ...persistent flares in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) in clinical and biochemical remission.
Aims
To develop a prediction model to identify patients who can successfully increase their ADA dose interval based on secondary analysis of trial data.
Methods
Patients in the intervention group of the LADI trial increased ADA intervals to 3 and then to 4 weeks. The dose interval increase was defined as successful when patients had no persistent flare (> 8 weeks), no intervention-related severe adverse events, no rescue medication use during the study, and were on an increased dose interval while in clinical and biochemical remission at week 48. Prediction models were based on logistic regression with relaxed LASSO. Models were internally validated using bootstrap optimism correction.
Results
We included 109 patients, of which 60.6% successfully increased their dose interval. Patients that were active smokers (odds ratio OR 0.90), had previous CD-related intra-abdominal surgeries (OR 0.85), proximal small bowel disease (OR 0.92), an increased Harvey-Bradshaw Index (OR 0.99) or increased faecal calprotectin (OR 0.997) were less likely to successfully increase their dose interval. The model had fair discriminative ability (AUC = 0.63) and net benefit analysis showed that the model could be used to select patients who could increase their dose interval.
Conclusion
The final prediction model seems promising to select patients who could successfully increase their ADA dose interval. The model should be validated externally before it may be applied in clinical practice.
Clinical Trial Registration Number
ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03172377.
PDF
