Salivary cortisol, α-amylase (sAA), secretory IgA (sIgA), testosterone, and soluble fraction of receptor II of TNFα (sTNFαRII) could serve as objective pain measures, but the normal variability of ...these potential biomarkers is unknown.
Saliva was collected with the passive secretion method from 34, pain-free subjects in two single samples at least 24 hours apart. Biomarker variation and intersession reliability were assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Also, we calculated the within-subject standard deviation (Sw) and the reproducibility (2.77 × Sw) of intersession measures.
Salivary cortisol, sAA, sIgA, testosterone, and sTNFαRII yielded the following ICCs: 0.53, 0.003, 0.88, 0.42 and 0.83, respectively. We found no statistically significant systematic differences between sessions in any biomarker except for testosterone, which showed a decrease on the second day (p<0.001). The reproducibility for salivary cortisol, sAA, sIgA, testosterone, and sTNFαRII were 0.46 ng/ml, 12.88 U/ml, 11.7 μg/ml, 14.54 pg/ml and 18.29 pg/ml, respectively. Cortisol, testosterone and TNFαRII measurement variability showed a positive correlation with the magnitude (p<0.002), but no relationship was found for sAA and sIgA.
Salivary sIgA and sTNFαRII show a remarkable good reproducibility and, therefore, could be useful as pain biomarkers. When using the passive secretion method, intersession variations in salivary sIgA of more than 11.7 μg/ml may reflect true biomarker change. In the case of sTNFαRII this will depend of the magnitude. The estimates herein provided should help investigators and clinicians differentiate actual biomarker modification from measurement variability.
Celotno besedilo
Dostopno za:
DOBA, IZUM, KILJ, NUK, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, SIK, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
•EVO+ (STAAR Surgical, Monrovia, California, USA) implantable collamer lens implantation improves mesopic visual performance, quality of vision, and quality of life.•Activities under mesopic ...conditions with glare can be affected during the first postoperative week.•Ring-shaped dysphotopsia decreases progressively to very low levels by 6 months.
To assess the effect of EVO+ (V5) Visian implantable collamer lens implantation on mesopic visual performance, quality of vision (QoV), and quality of life (QoL).
Prospective interventional case series.
Thirty-six eyes of 36 participants who underwent EVO+ implantation for myopia were evaluated preoperatively and at postoperative visits at 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months. Visual acuity (VA) and mesopic contrast sensitivity (CS) with and without halogen- and xenon-type glare sources were evaluated at each visit. Subjective QoV was assessed with the QoV questionnaire and QoL assessed with the Quality of Life Impact of Refractive Correction (QIRC) questionnaire at each visit. Ring-shaped dysphotopsia was also assessed at each postoperative visit. Linear, cumulative link and logit mixed models were fitted to analyze the effect of the EVO+.
Following EVO+ implantation, VA significantly (P ≤ .012) improved at the 4 postoperative visits. Mesopic CS progressively improved at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively (P ≤ .012). Halogen glare CS decreased at 1 week and halogen and xenon glare CS improved at 6 months (P ≤ .016). Photostress recovery time after halogen glare improved at 3 and 6 months (P ≤ .004). QoV scores improved at 1 week and 3 and 6 months (P ≤ .001). QIRC scores improved postoperatively (P < .001). Ring-shaped dysphotopsia decreased at 3 and 6 months (P ≤ .007).
EVO+ implantation provides good mesopic visual performance, QoV, and QoL during up to 6 months follow-up. Some activities performed under mesopic conditions with glare sources may be affected during the first postoperative week. Ring-shaped dysphotopsia is negligibly bothersome 6 months after surgery.
To analyze the effect of the central hole location in the V4c implantable collamer lens (ICL) on the quality of vision, including progressive headlight glare simulation and quality of life.
IOBA-Eye ...Institute, Valladolid, Spain.
Case series.
The central hole location was determined by slitlamp and dual Scheimpflug imaging for 6 months or more postoperatively. The visual acuity, mesopic contrast sensitivity, halogen glare contrast sensitivity, xenon glare contrast sensitivity, photostress recovery time after glare, de Boer scale, and Quality of Life Impact of Refractive Correction (QIRC) questionnaire results were evaluated. Multiple regression models were used to analyze the effect of the central hole location on parameters using the pupil center and visual axis as references based on Cartesian and polar coordinates.
The safety index was 1.13 and the efficacy index, 1.12. Under all testing circumstances, central hole decentration did not affect the visual acuity or contrast sensitivity. With the visual axis as a reference, worse QIRC values were associated with greater upward central hole displacement (P = .03) and a lower polar angle value (P = .008); also, halogen glare discomfort was greater with a higher radius (P = .04). Using the pupil center as a reference, greater nasal central hole decentration was associated with longer xenon glare photostress recovery time (P = .002).
Implantation of the ICL with a central hole yielded excellent visual outcomes, even under increasing glare sources, regardless of the hole's location. However, hole decentration might affect patient-perceived quality of life, bothersome halogen glare, and longer xenon glare photostress recovery time. Such complaints after the early postoperative period might be managed with discrete ICL centration if the central hole is decentered upward or nasally.
Purpose
To assess the relationship between anterior chamber depth (ACD) and lens thickness (LT), as well as its three main components (anterior and posterior cortex and nucleus thickness), in ...cataractous and non-cataractous eyes, depending on the axial length (AxL).
Methods
Anterior and posterior cortex and nucleus thickness of the crystalline lens, ACD, and AxL were measured using optical low-coherence reflectometry in cataractous and non-cataractous eyes. They were also classified into hyperopia, emmetropia, myopia, and high myopia, depending on AxL; thus, eight subgroups were created. A minimum sample size of 44 eyes (of 44 patients) for each group was recruited. Linear models were fitted for the whole sample and each AxL subgroup to assess if there were differences in the relationships between the crystalline lens variables and ACD, including age as a covariate.
Results
Three hundred seventy cataract patients (237 females, 133 males) and 250 non-cataract controls (180 females, 70 males), aged 70.5 ± 9.4 and 41.9 ± 15.5 years, respectively, were recruited. The mean AxL, ACD, and LT for the cataractous and non-cataractous eyes were 23.90 ± 2.05, 24.11 ± 2.11, 2.64 ± 0.45, and 2.91 ± 0.49, 4.51 ± 0.38, 3.93 ± 0.44 mm, respectively. The inverse relationship of LT, anterior and posterior cortex, and nucleus thickness with ACD was not significantly (
p
≥ 0.26) different between cataractous and non-cataractous eyes. Further subclassification of the sample depending on AxL showed that the inverse relationship between the posterior cortex and ACD was no longer significant (
p
> 0.05) for any non-cataractous AxL group. LT, anterior and posterior cortex, and nucleus thickness was not significantly (
p
≥ 0.43) different between cataractous and non-cataractous eyes for the whole sample, and all AxL groups after adjusting for age.
Conclusions
The presence of cataracts does not modify the inverse relationship of the LT, anterior and posterior cortex, and nucleus with ACD. And this relationship does not seem to depend importantly on AxL. Besides, the possible differences in LT, anterior and posterior cortex, and nucleus between cataractous and non-cataractous eyes may not be caused by lens opacification, but possibly by the progressive lens growth due to aging.
Human corneal epithelial cells are needed to study corneal pathophysiology in vitro. Due to the limitations of cell lines, the use of primary cells is highly desirable, but the scarcity of human ...tissues, along with ethical issues, make it difficult to accomplish all required experiments. In advanced surface ablation (ASA), the central corneal epithelium is removed and discarded. We hypothesized that ASA samples could be used to perform in vitro assays. In this study, 29 samples from patients undergoing ASA were recovered in supplemented DMEM/F12 culture medium, RIPA buffer, or RLT lysis buffer. The first aim was to determine whether cells could be maintained in culture. Although with the explant technique, tissue pieces did not attach to the culture surface, after disaggregation, cells showed high viability (90.0 ± 6.0%), attached to plates, and remained viable for up to 14 days. The second aim was to elucidate if ASA samples could be used to study protein or gene expression. Cytokeratin-3, ZO-1, Ki67, and E-cadherin protein expression were confirmed by immunofluorescence. Total protein (485.8 ± 115.8 μg) was isolated from cells in RIPA buffer, and GAPDH was detected by Western blotting, indicating that samples are adequate for protein studies. RNA (9.0 ± 3.6 μg) was isolated from samples in RLT lysis buffer, and GAPDH gene expression was studied by PCR, confirming that samples were also suitable for gene expression studies. These results suggest that samples obtained from corneal surface ablation procedures may constitute a valuable source of human cells to accomplish in vitro studies.
•Cells removed in corneal surface ablation surgery are useful for in vitro research.•A whole epithelial cell sheet that maintains tight junctions is obtained from ASA.•Total protein and RNA can be easily obtained from ASA surgery samples.•Human corneal epithelial cells can be maintained in culture for several days.
To determine the longitudinal variation in the KS-aquaPORT central hole location of the phakic EVO+I Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) (STAAR Surgical) and analyze its influence on visual performance, ...quality of vision (QoV), and quality of life (QoL).
A prospective study was performed including 36 patients who had EVO+ ICL implantation. The KS-aquaPORT central hole location (Cartesian and polar coordinates) was determined with respect to the pupil center and visual axis. The effect of time (6-month follow-up) on central hole location was analyzed using linear mixed models. The effect of the KS-aquaPORT location on visual performance, QoV, and QoL parameters was assessed with multivariate regression models.
With respect to the visual axis, no significant changes in KS-aquaPORT location were found during follow-up. With respect to the pupil center, the X-coordinate and radius of KS-aquaPORT location showed modest, but significant (
≤ .05) differences between 1-week and 3-month postoperative visits, and between 1-week and 6-month visits. X-coordinate variation was significant (
= .022) between 1-and 6-month visits. With respect to the visual axis, greater KS-aquaPORT decentration was associated with worse visual acuity (X-coordinate:
= .004; radius:
= .006), and inferior decentration with longer xenon-type glare photostress recovery time (
= .021). With respect to the pupil center, a lower radius was associated with better QoV scores (
≤ .01) and temporal decentration produced higher ring-shaped dysphotopsia (
= .007).
EVO+ ICL KS-aquaPORT location appears to be clinically stable up to 6 months postoperatively. A central location of the EVO+ ICL KS-aquaPORT hole is preferred because it allows reduced perception of dysphotopic phenomena that can result in better QoV.
.
To assess the repeatability and agreement of Cartesian coordinates and the length of apparent chord mu and pupil diameter measurements during static (Galilei G4) and dynamic (Topolyzer Vario) ...evaluations.
IOBA-Eye Institute, Valladolid, Spain.
Case series.
3 consecutive measurements per scenario (Galilei G4 and Topolyzer Vario under low mesopic and photopic conditions) were performed by the same clinician. The intrasession repeatability was assessed using the within-subject SD (Sw), the precision, the coefficient of variation, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The agreement was analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance and the Bland-Altman method.
Thirty-seven healthy participants were recruited. The Sw values for chord mu parameters and pupil diameter ranged from 0.01 to 0.03 and 0.08 to 0.21, respectively. The ICC was ≥0.89 for all parameters. Galilei G4 and Topolyzer Vario under low mesopic and photopic conditions provided significantly different measures of apparent chord mu length (0.23 ± 0.11 mm, 0.30 ± 0.10 mm, and 0.25 ± 0.11 mm, respectively, P ≤ .02), X-coordinate (-0.18 ± 0.12 mm, -0.27 ± 0.11 mm, and -0.21 ± 0.12 mm, respectively, P < .001), and pupil diameter (3.38 ± 0.50 mm, 6.29 ± 0.60 mm, and 3.04 ± 0.41 mm, respectively, P < .001). Y-coordinate values obtained by Galilei G4 and Topolyzer Vario under low mesopic conditions were significantly different (0.06 ± 0.13 mm vs 0.03 ± 0.11 mm, respectively, P = .02), in contrast to Galilei G4 and Topolyzer Vario under photopic conditions (0.05 ± 0.13 mm, P = .82) and both illumination conditions of Topolyzer Vario (P ≥ .23).
Galilei G4 and Topolyzer Vario provide consistent measurements of apparent chord mu Cartesian coordinates and length, as well as pupil diameter; however, the measurements are not interchangeable. Ophthalmic surgeons should consider these findings when planning customized intraocular lens implantation and refractive surgery procedures.
Intraocular lens implantation in phakic eyes for the correction of refractive error is currently a widespread procedure. The EVO and EVO+ Visian Implantable Collamer Lenses (ICL) are two of the most ...prevalent lenses implanted. They incorporate a central orifice to avoid the need for iridotomy. The main difference between both ICL is the higher optical diameter zone provided by the EVO+, allowing a better quality of vision at night. This review aims to provide an overview of the current ICL models available for correcting myopia and myopic astigmatism.
During the last decade, more than 100 scientific papers analyzing the performance of EVO and EVO+ lenses have been published. This review describes the objective visual performance achieved with the implantation of central hole ICL lenses and the subjective perception of the patients implanted with these lenses. In addition, the safety and the potential complications associated with undergoing an EVO and EVO+ ICL implantation have been addressed.
Refractive surgeons and candidates to undergo ICL implantation should be aware of the excellent safety and visual outcomes provided by the implantation of central hole ICL lenses. However, future research could address minor issues currently not resolved.
Purpose:
The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence, natural course, and distribution pattern of superficial punctate keratopathy and describe the changes in signs and symptoms of dry eye ...after cataract surgery.
Setting:
The setting of this study is University Hospital Rio Hortega and Instituto Universitario de Oftalmobiología Aplicada, Valladolid, Spain.
Design:
This is a prospective interventional study.
Materials and Methods:
In total, 55 eyes of 55 different patients with no history of dry eye underwent standard phacoemulsification through a 2.75-mm-wide corneal incision. We measured tear break-up time, Schirmer test I, and tear meniscus height, and recorded the Ocular Surface Disease Index score, fluorescein staining patterns, and photo documentation of the ocular surface before and 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month postoperatively. Patients were divided into two groups (with and without superficial punctate keratopathy development, 1 day postoperatively).
Results:
Patients (mean age: 75.75 ± 7.27 years) showed an incidence of 76.3% of superficial punctate keratopathy at 24 h. Location predominated in the center of the cornea until a week (32.7%) and then began to prevail in the inferior quadrant (21.8%) at 1 month. All dry eye tests were significantly worse after surgery. Ocular Surface Disease Index increased from 10.98 ± 5.05 to 15.87 ± 6.57 at 24 h (p < .001), to 12.80 ± 5.77 at 7 days (p < .001), and to 11.09 ± 4.63 at 1 month (p = .90). Fluorescein staining patterns got worse 24 h postoperatively with a score of 2.12 using the National Eye Institute/Industry–recommended guidelines staining grid. Average break-up time values were significantly lower at 1 day (6.61 ± 2.68),1 week (6.98 ± 2.79), and 1 month (7.05 ± 2.86) postoperatively than preoperatively (8.78 ± 2.97) (p < .001). The mean postoperative first month Schirmer test I value (8.32 ± 3.58) was significantly lower than preoperative value (9.05 ± 3.63) (p < .001).
Conclusion:
Phacoemulsification tends to induce short-term transitory ocular surface impairment manifesting as both signs and symptoms. Superficial punctate keratopathy distribution has a characteristic pattern evolution according to the postoperative time. Those patients with altered preoperative values are more likely to develop ocular surface disease and for longer time.
Purpose
To assess whether the postoperative outcomes of the implantation of an EVO + implantable collamer lens (ICL) in one eye can be used as a predictor of the vault of the fellow eye, and to ...evaluate the vault changes of the implantation in both eyes during the postoperative period.
Methods
A prospective study including 40 eyes of 20 patients with a bilateral EVO + ICL implantation was performed. Subjects were evaluated before the surgery and 1 day, 1 week and 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Central vault was assessed using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. The inter-eye and follow-up analyses were performed using lineal models and the Bland–Altman method.
Results
The vault of the first implanted eye at the 1-day visit highly predicts the vault of the second eye (
R
2
= .87;
P
< .001); the mean inter-eye difference was − 0.95 μm, and the superior and inferior limits of agreement were −50.27 μm and 148.37 μm, respectively. This relationship was maintained during the medium-term follow-up, not finding differences in the slopes among visits (
P
≥ .09). A progressive decrease of vault was found during the follow-up (
P
< .001). Larger vault change 6 months after the surgery was associated with higher vault 1 day after the ICL implantation (
R
2
= .19;
P
= .005).
Conclusion
One-day postoperative vault in the first eye can help to predict the optimal ICL sizing in the second eye. Vault tends to decrease during the first 6 months after EVO + ICL implantation. Eyes with higher initial vaults will also show larger reductions during the medium-term follow-up.
PDF
