Classification of the severity of hypertension and recommendations on the blood pressure values to be achieved during antihypertensive drug treatment have for decades been based on diastolic values. ...It is now clear, however, that systolic blood pressure is by no means less important. This paper will focus on the following sets of evidence: (1) that epidemiologically a selective elevation of systolic blood pressure has a major prevalence in the elderly population; (2) that isolated systolic hypertension carries a marked increase in the risk of cardiovascular disease and that even in systo-diastolic hypertension this risk may be more closely related to systolic than to diastolic blood pressure; (3) that treatment of systolic hypertension greatly reduces cardiovascular complications and that in all conditions this reduction is related to the treatment-induced reduction in systolic blood pressure to a degree similar to or superior to the relationship with the reduction in diastolic blood pressure; and (4) that in the hypertensive fraction of the population, control of systolic blood pressure is achieved much less often than control of diastolic blood pressure. That this last point is also the case in major intervention trials suggests that normalization of systolic blood pressure may be intrinsically more difficult than normalization of diastolic blood pressure, possibly because of the difficulty of reversing the pathophysiological abnormalities responsible for the elevation of systolic blood pressure. This emphasizes the importance of research into new drugs or treatment types with greater efficacy in systolic hypertension.
Background In ELSA, a randomized, double-blind trial in 2334 hypertensives, 4-year antihypertensive treatment with lacidipine slowed down progression of carotid atherosclerosis significantly more ...than atenolol treatment. To avoid bias, the primary outcome was measured blindly at study-end on a randomized sequence of scans, but measurements were limited to the four far walls of common carotids and bifurcations (CBMmax) and to one of each couple of duplicate scans recorded yearly.Objectives and methods Secondary outcomes included measurements made on all duplicate scans of both near and far walls, not only of common carotids and bifurcations, but also of internal carotids (12 walls). These measurements were made blindly during the 4-year study, shortly after recording. To avoid possible readers’ drift or bias, 250 duplicate baseline scans were re-read at yearly intervals (longitudinal on-line quality control) and a correction factor calculated.Results Measurements during the 4-year study showed a trend toward decreased values, with the lacidipine effect significantly greater than the atenolol one. A trend toward lower values was also observed in the longitudinal quality control of baseline scans. After applying a correction factor calculated from this longitudinal control, all measurements no longer decreased with time, but significantly increased, with progression being significantly smaller in lacidipine than in atenolol patients. Corrected values were quite similar to those calculated on measurements carried out at study-end.Conclusion The relative benefit of lacidipine over atenolol could be measured precisely by reading scans either during the study or at study-end. However, absolute treatment-related changes (progression versus regression) cannot safely be judged by readings made during a long-term study, unless a longitudinal quality control of readings is performed.
The increased cardiovascular mortality during an earthquake has been related, among other factors, to a sympathetically mediated increase in heart rate and blood pressure. However, this is supported ...only by indirect evidence collected after an earthquake, whereas for obvious technical difficulties, no data are available on the acute blood pressure and heart rate effects during an earthquake. In a patient undergoing 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (Spacelabs 90207), we had the opportunity to directly record the acute blood pressure and heart rate changes induced by an earthquake (magnitude 4.7 according to the Richter scale) that struck central Italy in March 1998. Systolic blood pressure rose to 150 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure rose to 122 mm Hg, and heart rate rose to 150 bpm at the time of the strongest tremor. Prequake blood pressure levels were restored only 1 hour later, but blood pressure remained characterized by a pronounced variability throughout the following 6 hours. Thus, a sympathetically mediated combined increase in blood pressure and heart rate may represent an important pathophysiological mechanism responsible for the increased frequency of cardiovascular events during an earthquake. The associated increase in blood pressure variability might further contribute to the increase in cardiovascular risk typical of this condition. Our case report further supports the usefulness of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to assess the blood pressure and heart rate effects of sudden daily life events, the actual cardiovascular impact of which can hardly be quantified through traditional measurements.
On the state of the Journal Zanchetti, Alberto; Mancia, Giuseppe
Journal of hypertension,
2006-January, 2006-01-00, Letnik:
24, Številka:
1
Journal Article
OBJECTIVETo assess spontaneous baroreceptor-heart rate reflex sensitivity during sleep in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, a condition associated with increased cardiovascular ...morbidity and mortality and characterized by marked sympathetic activation, which is believed to originate from hypoxic chemoreceptor stimulation, although little is known of other possible mechanisms such as baroreflex impairment.
DESIGN AND METHODSIn 11 patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (mean ± SD age 46.8 ± 8.1 years, apnea/hypopnea index 67.9 ± 19.1 h), who were normotensive or borderline hypertensive during wakefulness by clinic blood pressure measurements, finger blood pressure was monitored beat-by-beat non-invasively (Finapres) at night during polysomnography. Periods of wakefulness and sleep were identified based on electroencephalographic recordings. Baroreflex sensitivity was assessed by the sequence technique, as the slope of the regression line between spontaneous increases or reductions in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and the related lengthening or shortening in the RR interval, occurring over spontaneous sequences of four or more consecutive beats. The number of these sequences was also computed, as an additional index of baroreflex engagement by the spontaneous blood pressure fluctuations. The controls were age-related normotensive or borderline hypertensive subjects without sleep apnea who had been investigated in previous studies; in these subjects blood pressure was recorded intra-arterially over 24 h in ambulatory conditions and spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity was assessed by the sequence technique.
RESULTSIn our patients the lowest nocturnal arterial oxygen saturation was 78.6 ± 12.1% (mean ± SD). During sleep, the number of pooled +RR/+SBP and −RR/−SBP sequences per hour was 20.3 ± 2.7 per h in patients with sleep apnea and 27.1 ± 2.1/h in controls (means ± SEM). The average baroreflex sensitivity during sleep periods was 7.04 ± 0.8 ms/mmHg in sleep apnea patients and 10.05 ± 2.1 ms/mmHg in controls. Both the pooled number of sequences and baroreflex sensitivity values of the sleep apnea patients were significantly (P <0.01) less than the corresponding night values of control subjects. In the sleep apnea patients, at variance from controls, baroreflex sensitivity did not show any increase during sleep compared with its values during wakefulness (6.9 ± 1.0 ms/mmHg).
CONCLUSIONSOur data provide evidence that spontaneous baroceptor reflex sensitivity is depressed in severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. This suggests that in such patients baroreflex dysfunction and not only chemoreceptor stimulation by hypoxia may be involved in the sympathetic activation which occurs during sleep. Such dysfunction may contribute to the higher rate of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality reported in these patients.
PDF