Background The purpose of this study was to identify factors predicting risk of aortic arch recoarctation after the Norwood procedure. Methods Patient records were reviewed retrospectively for ...consecutive patients who underwent the Norwood procedure from 1996 to 2005. Preoperative and intraoperative parameters were identified for analysis. Aortic arch recoarctation was defined by the need for catheter or surgical reintervention. Data were analyzed using survival analysis, with freedom from intervention as the outcome. Factors predicting need for reintervention were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Results Thirty-five recoarctations were observed in 117 patients (30%). Freedom from aortic arch reintervention at six months, one, three, and five years were 72%, 63%, 56%, and 52%, respectively. The majority of arch reinterventions occurred in the first six months (63%), involving either surgical (43%) or catheter (57%) techniques. The use of bovine pericardium showed the greatest risk for potential recoarctation (hazard ratio = 1.81 0.90–3.64, p = 0.09). Age, gender, weight, ascending aortic diameter, ventricular morphology, primary anatomic diagnosis, and coarctation shelf resection were not found to be predictors of recoarctation. Conclusions Most interventions for aortic arch recoarctation after the Norwood procedure occur within the first six months of life. The type of patch material used for arch reconstruction appears to influence, most strongly, the long-term risk of aortic arch recoarctation.
Objectives We sought to determine the prevalence of noncardiac pathology in a large consecutive series of patients referred for clinical cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) studies. Background The ...imaging field for many CMR sequences extends outside of the heart border. As a result, noncardiac pathology may be identified. These noncardiac findings have clinical significance because they often lead to subsequent imaging/testing and intervention. The prevalence of noncardiac findings on clinical CMR studies has not been well described. Methods The reports of all 1,534 (62% male, age 50 ± 15 years) clinical CMR studies performed at an academic medical center during calendar years 2002 to 2006 were reviewed. All studies had been interpreted by both a staff cardiologist (level III trained in CMR) and a board-certified radiologist (with fellowship training in CMR). For each study, sex, age, indication for CMR study, and reported noncardiac pathology were extracted. Follow-up for each major noncardiac pathology was evaluated by reviewing the patient's medical center electronic medical record. These noncardiac pathologies were then categorized as significant if an intervention or change in the patient's management ensued. Results A total of 116 (7.6%) studies had at least one noncardiac finding. These findings included 55 major findings (e.g., lymphadenopathy, lung abnormalities, mediastinal masses) in 48 distinct reports (prevalence of 3.1%) and 74 minor findings (e.g., small pleural effusions, liver cysts, renal cysts) in 70 distinct reports (prevalence of 4.6%). The majority (62%) of major findings were previously known, with only 8 findings in 6 (0.4%) of 1,534 reports ultimately deemed to be new and clinically important/significant. The age of those with noncardiac pathology was greater (54 ± 16 years vs. 49 ± 16 years, p < 0.001). Conclusions In this large series of consecutive clinical CMR studies interpreted by both staff cardiologists and radiologists, noncardiac pathology is uncommonly reported. When reported, the majority of major findings are previously known. New major findings were detected in <0.5% of reports.
The prevalence and clinical correlates of left ventricular (LV) wall motion abnormalities (WMAs), associated with morbidity and mortality, have not been well-characterized in the population. ...Framingham Heart Study Offspring Cohort participants (n = 1,794, 844 men, age 65 ± 9 years) underwent cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for evaluation of LV function. A subset (n = 1,009, 460 men) underwent cardiac multidetector computed tomography for analysis of coronary artery calcium. The presence of coronary heart disease and heart failure (CHD-HF) were assessed in relation to the presence of WMAs. WMAs were present in 117 participants (6.5%) and were associated with male gender, elevated hemoglobin A1c, LV mass, LV end-diastolic volume, and lower LV ejection fraction. Of the 1,637 participants without CHD-HF, 68 (4.2%) had WMAs. In this group, WMAs were associated with obesity, hypertension, and Framingham coronary heart disease risk score in the age- and gender-adjusted analyses and were associated with male gender and hypertension on multivariate analysis. Most subjects with WMAs were in the greatest coronary artery calcium groups. The presence of coronary artery calcium greater than the seventy-fifth percentile and Agatston score >100 were associated with a greater than twofold risk of WMAs in the age- and gender-adjusted analysis but were no longer significant when additionally adjusted for CHD-HF. Previous Q-wave myocardial infarction was present in 29% of the 117 participants with WMAs. In conclusion, in the present longitudinally followed free-living population, 4.2% of the participants without CHD-HF had WMAs. WMAs were associated with the clinical parameters associated with cardiovascular disease risk. Aggressive risk factor modification may be prudent for subjects with WMAs, particularly those free of clinical CHD-HF.
This article highlights the technical challenges and general imaging strategies for coronary MRI. This is followed by a review of the clinical results for the assessment of anomalous CAD, coronary ...artery aneurysms, native vessel integrity, and coronary artery bypass graft disease using the more commonly applied MRI methods. It concludes with a brief discussion of the advantages/disadvantages and clinical results comparing coronary MRI with multidetector CT (MDCT) coronary angiography.
Current guidelines recommend an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) according to the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, they do not mandate volumetric LVEF assessment. We ...sought to determine whether volumetric LVEF measurement using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR-LVEF) is superior to conventional LVEF measurement using 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (Echo-LVEF) for risk stratifying patients referred for primary prevention ICD. Patients who underwent primary prevention ICD implantation at our institution and had undergone preimplantation CMR-LVEF from November 2001 to February 2011 were identified. Volumetric CMR-LVEF was determined from cine short-axis data sets. CMR-LVEF and Echo-LVEF were extracted from the clinical reports. The end point was appropriate ICD discharge (shock and/or antitachycardia pacing). Of 48 patients, appropriate ICD discharge occurred in 9 (19%) within 29 ± 25 months (range 1 to 99, median 20). All patients met the Echo-LVEF criteria for ICD implantation; however 25% (95% confidence interval 13% to 37%) did not meet the CMR-LVEF criteria. None (0%) of these latter patients had received an appropriate ICD discharge. Using CMR-LVEF ≤30% as a threshold for ICD eligibility, 19 patients (40%) with a qualifying Echo-LVEF would not have been referred for ICD, and none (0%) received an ICD discharge.For primary prevention ICD implantation, volumetric CMR-LVEF might be superior to clinical Echo-LVEF for risk stratification and can identify a large minority of subjects in whom ICD implantation can be safely avoided. In conclusion, if confirmed by larger prospective series, volumetric methods such as CMR should be considered a superior “gatekeeper” for the identification of patients likely to benefit from primary prevention ICD implantation.
PDF
