Uvod, Individualne i građanske slobode, Individualna sloboda i pravo da se ne smije biti podvrgnut samovoljnom zatvaranju, Kontrola općih akata, I. Upravni sudac odavno štiti individualne slobode, ...I.1. U normalnim vremenima, Sloboda kretanja: putovnica, pravo stranaca, prisilno psihijatrijsko liječenje, Sloboda sklapanja braka, obiteljskog života i slobodnog vršenja zanimanja, Dom Porezne pretrage, I.2. U vremenima krize, Prvi svjetski rat i teorija o izvanrednim okolnostima, Dekolonizacija, Terorizam: Izvanredno stanje, Upravni pritvor i pretrage, II. Upravni sudac razvio je nove alate za suočavanje s novim izazovima, II.1. Novi izazovi, Dostojanstvo osobe, presude Morsang sur Orge, Milhaud i Lambert, Zdravlje i bioetika, presuda Perruche, Informatika i slobode, presuda Moon, II.2. Novi alati, Sve učestalija primjena sudske prakse Europskog suda za zaštitu ljudskih prava, Smanjenje područja interne mjere (jednostranog upravnog akta), Hitni postupak za donošenje mjera za zaštitu sloboda, Prioritetno pitanje ustavnosti, Izvanredno stanje, Zaključak, Komplementarnost, a ne konkurentnost između sudova opće nadležnosti i upravnih sudova
Vodna domena? U Francuskoj, kao i u večini europskih zemalja, vodna domena već dugo vremena ima dvije esencijalne karakterstike. Smatra se javna služba s industrijskim i komercijalnim karakterom, te ...s odgovornošću teritorijalnih kolektiviteta. Zbog toga postoji obveza reguliranja ugovornog postupanja u javnom-privatnom partnerstvu u vodnoj domeni.
The subject of this paper is a memoir of the last ten years of Croatian – French administrative days. Accordingly, without just limiting this exclusively to the hrestomaty of Administrative Days, ...published during the Ten Days, we will focus on the comments, suggestions and criticisms related to three elements: topics and presentation methods, presenters and moderators of round tables and the audience. Finally, we would like to remember all the organizers in the successful organisation of the commendable Croatian -French administrative days.
Pour ne pas me limiter à faire la promotion de cet ouvrage, et avant de remercier les personnes grâce auxquelles ce travail considérable a pu être accompli, je voudrais concentrer mes remarques, suggestions, voire critiques, sur trois points: les sujets abordés et la méthode de présentation, les orateurs et animateurs de tables rondes, le public, avant de remercier en conclusion tous les organisateurs, certains permanents, d’autres qui se sont succédés dans la continuité.
Predmet ovog rada je podsjetnik na protekle desetogodišnje Hrvatsko-francuske upravnopravne dane. U skadu s navedenim, bez ograničavanja isključivo na Hrestomatiju upravnih dana, objavljene povodom Desetih dana, usredotočit ćemo se na primjedbe, prijedloge i kritike u odnosu na tri elementa : teme i način prezentacije, referenti i moderatori okruglih stolova i publika. I na samom kraju želimo podsjetiti na sve organizatore koji su uspjeli u organizaciji hvalvrijednih Hrvatskofrancuskih upravnopravnih dana.
Pour ne pas me limiter à faire la promotion de cet ouvrage, et avant de remercier les personnes grâce auxquelles ce travail considérable a pu être accompli, je voudrais concentrer mes remarques, ...suggestions, voire critiques, sur trois points: les sujets abordés et la méthode de présentation, les orateurs et animateurs de tables rondes, le public, avant de remercier en conclusion tous les organisateurs, certains permanents, d’autres qui se sont succédés dans la continuité.
MASSOT Jean. L’immuable prépondérance de l’exécutif à travers une dyarchie hiérarchisée survivra-t-elle à une vingt-cinquième révision constitutionnelle ?. In: Revue internationale de droit comparé. ...Vol. 70 N°4,2018. pp. 759-763.
Administrative judge Massot, Jean
Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu,
02/2017, Letnik:
54, Številka:
1
Journal Article
Recenzirano
Uvod, Individualne i građanske slobode, Individualna sloboda i pravo da se ne smije biti podvrgnut samovoljnom zatvaranju, Kontrola općih akata, I. Upravni sudac odavno štiti individualne slobode, ...I.1. U normalnim vremenima, Sloboda kretanja: putovnica, pravo stranaca, prisilno psihijatrijsko liječenje, Sloboda sklapanja braka, obiteljskog života i slobodnog vršenja zanimanja, Dom Porezne pretrage, I.2. U vremenima krize, Prvi svjetski rat i teorija o izvanrednim okolnostima, Dekolonizacija, Terorizam: Izvanredno stanje, Upravni pritvor i pretrage, II. Upravni sudac razvio je nove alate za suočavanje s novim izazovima, II.1. Novi izazovi, Dostojanstvo osobe, presude Morsang sur Orge, Milhaud i Lambert, Zdravlje i bioetika, presuda Perruche, Informatika i slobode, presuda Moon, II.2. Novi alati, Sve učestalija primjena sudske prakse Europskog suda za zaštitu ljudskih prava, Smanjenje područja interne mjere (jednostranog upravnog akta), Hitni postupak za donošenje mjera za zaštitu sloboda, Prioritetno pitanje ustavnosti, Izvanredno stanje, Zaključak, Komplementarnost, a ne konkurentnost između sudova opće nadležnosti i upravnih sudova
Introduction; Individual and civil freedoms; Individual freedom and the right to not being succumbed to self-willed closure; control of general acts. I the administrative judge for a long time has protected individual freedoms; I.1 In normal times; Freedom of Movement: passports, rights of foreigners, coerced psychiatric treatment; Freedom to enter Marriage, family life and free carrying out of profession; House of Taxation Search I.2 In times of crisis; First World War and the theory of state of emergency; Decolonisation, Terrorism: State of Emergency, Administrative jail and searches; II The administrative judge has developed new tools for confronting new challenges; II.1 New challenges; Human Dignity, Morsang sur Orge, Milhaud and Lambert court decisions; Health and Bioethics, Perruche judgement; Computers and Freedoms, Moon judgement; II.2 New tools; More frequent application of the court practice of the European Court for the protection of human rights; Reducing the area of internal measures (unilateral administrative act) ; Urgent procedure for bringing in measures for the protection of freedom; Priority issue of constitutionality, state of emergency; Conclusion: complementariness, and not competiveness between the general supervisory court and administrative courts.
Introduction; Individual and civil freedoms; Individual freedom and the right to not being succumbed to self-willed closure; control of general acts. I the administrative judge for a long time has ...protected individual freedoms; I.1 In normal times; Freedom of Movement: passports, rights of foreigners, coerced psychiatric treatment; Freedom to enter Marriage, family life and free carrying out of profession; House of Taxation Search I.2 In times of crisis; First World War and the theory of state of emergency; Decolonisation, Terrorism: State of Emergency, Administrative jail and searches; II The administrative judge has developed new tools for confronting new challenges; II.1 New challenges; Human Dignity, Morsang sur Orge, Milhaud and Lambert court decisions; Health and Bioethics, Perruche judgement; Computers and Freedoms, Moon judgement; II.2 New tools; More frequent application of the court practice of the European Court for the protection of human rights; Reducing the area of internal measures (unilateral administrative act) ; Urgent procedure for bringing in measures for the protection of freedom; Priority issue of constitutionality, state of emergency; Conclusion: complementariness, and not competiveness between the general supervisory court and administrative courts.
Uvod, Individualne i građanske slobode, Individualna sloboda i pravo da se ne smije biti podvrgnut samovoljnom zatvaranju, Kontrola općih akata, I. Upravni sudac odavno štiti individualne slobode, I.1. U normalnim vremenima, Sloboda kretanja: putovnica, pravo stranaca, prisilno psihijatrijsko liječenje, Sloboda sklapanja braka, obiteljskog života i slobodnog vršenja zanimanja, Dom Porezne pretrage, I.2. U vremenima krize, Prvi svjetski rat i teorija o izvanrednim okolnostima, Dekolonizacija, Terorizam: Izvanredno stanje, Upravni pritvor i pretrage, II. Upravni sudac razvio je nove alate za suočavanje s novim izazovima, II.1. Novi izazovi, Dostojanstvo osobe, presude Morsang sur Orge, Milhaud i Lambert, Zdravlje i bioetika, presuda Perruche, Informatika i slobode, presuda Moon, II.2. Novi alati, Sve učestalija primjena sudske prakse Europskog suda za zaštitu ljudskih prava, Smanjenje područja interne mjere (jednostranog upravnog akta), Hitni postupak za donošenje mjera za zaštitu sloboda, Prioritetno pitanje ustavnosti, Izvanredno stanje, Zaključak, Komplementarnost, a ne konkurentnost između sudova opće nadležnosti i upravnih sudova
Zakonom od 30. lipnja 2000. zamijenjen je prethodni postupak odgode izvršenja s dvama hitnim postupcima, konkretno s odgodom po hitnom postupku i hitnom postupku zaštite osnovnih sloboda. Prikazat ...ćemo, dakle, zajednička i naročita pravila svakoga od ove dvije vrste postupaka, postupovna pravila i konkretne uvjete: hitnost, pravne uvjete, nezakonitost i, na koncu, ovlasti upravnog suca. Zatim će se analizirati kombinacija ovih pravila s primjenom europskoga prava i s novim postupkom prioritetnog pitanja ustavnosti. Pritom ćemo se osloniti na nedavne slučajeve koji su imali velikog odjeka, kao što je onaj koji se odnosi na zabranu jedne antisemitske predstave, ili na odluku o prestanku liječenja bolesnika koji je imao ireverzibilna moždana oštećenja.
The law of 30 June 2000 has replaced the previous procedure of postponing enforcement with two express procedures. This is the postponement by express proceedings and express procedures of protecting fundamental freedoms. We will show the common and special rules of each of the two types of procedure, procedural rules and concrete conditions: urgency, legal conditions, illegality and finally, powers of the administrative judge. Then, the combination of these rules with the application of European law and with the new procedure of the priority question of constitutionality will be referred to. Then, recent cases will be referred to which have echoed loudly such as the one related to forbidding an anti-Semite play or to the decision on cease curing a patient who had irreversible brain damage.
Une loi du 30 juin 2000 est venue substituer à l’ancienne procédure de sursis à exécution deux procédures d’urgence, le référé suspension et le référé liberté. On passera en revue les règles communes ou spécifiques à chaque type de référé, règles de procédure, condition de fait : urgence, condition de droit : illégalité et, enfin, office du juge. On examinera la combinaison de ces règles avec l’application du droit européen et avec la nouvelle procédure de question prioritaire de constitutionnalité. On s’appuiera sur des affaires récentes de grand retentissement, telles que celles concernant l’interdiction d’un spectacle antisémite ou l’arrêt des traitements à un malade souffrant de lésions cérébrales irréversibles.
The law of 30 June 2000 has replaced the previous procedure of postponing enforcement with two express procedures. This is the postponement by express proceedings and express procedures of protecting ...fundamental freedoms. We will show the common and special rules of each of the two types of procedure, procedural rules and concrete conditions: urgency, legal conditions, illegality and finally, powers of the administrative judge. Then, the combination of these rules with the application of European law and with the new procedure of the priority question of constitutionality will be referred to. Then, recent cases will be referred to which have echoed loudly such as the one related to forbidding an anti-Semite play or to the decision on cease curing a patient who had irreversible brain damage.
Francuski zakonodavac je 1978. osnovao prvo nezavisno upravno tijelo za kontrolu aktivnosti javnih vlasti, zatim postupno i za kontrolu privatnih subjekata, pri uporabi računala za obradu osobnih ...podataka građana. CNIL je upravno tijelo koje ne ovisi ni o vladi niti o parlamentu kao što to njegov sastav i način djelovanja potvrđuju. Ustavni, upravni i redovni sudac kontroliraju Nacionalno povjerenstvo za informatiku i slobode. Ono jamči poštivanje određenog broja načela koja su danas zajednička svim sličnim tijelima u Europskoj uniji. Zbog toga, to povjerenstvo prvenstveno obavlja prethodne kontrole odluka o provođenju obrade osobnih podataka, a koje su još strože u slučaju da predstavljaju opasnost za slobode. Međutim, povjerenstvo sve češće provodi naknadne kontrole na zahtjev građana ili samoinicijativno, a posljedica može biti izricanje kazni protiv odgovornih osoba za obradu podataka.
The French legislator in 1978 founded the first independent administrative body to control the activities of public authorities, then gradually to control private subjects with the use of the computer for analysing the personal data of citizens. CNIL is an administrative body which is independent of the government or parliament as its constitution and method of activity confirm. Constitutional, administrative and regular judges control the National Board for computer technology and freedoms. It guarantees respecting a certain number of principles which are common to all similar bodies in the European Union. Due to this, the Board mainly carries out previous controls of the decision on implementing analysis of personal data which are even stricter if it is a case of endangering freedom. However, the Board more and more often carries out additional controls upon citizen request or of its own accord. The consequence can be sentencing the persons responsible for data analysis.
Le législateur français a créé en 1978 la première autorité administrative indépendante pour contrôler l’activité des pouvoirs publics, puis progressivement des opérateurs privés, en matière de recours à l’informatique pour traiter les données personnelles des citoyens. La CNIL autorité administrative est bien indépendante du gouvernement et du parlement comme le montrent sa composition et son mode de fonctionnement. Elle reste contrôlée par le juge constitutionnel, administratif et judiciaire. Elle assure le respect d’un certain nombre de principes aujourd’hui communs à toutes les autorités similaires de l’U.E.
Pour cela, elle exerce en premier lieu des contrôles a priori sur les décisions de création des traitements de données personnelles d’autant plus poussés que ces traitements présentent des risques pour les libertés.
Mais de plus en plus, elle développe des contrôles a posteriori, soit à la demande des citoyens, soit de sa propre initiative, qui peuvent aller jusqu’au prononcé de sanctions contre les responsables de traitement
PDF
