Background
Stillbirth is a global health problem. The World Health Organization (WHO) application of the International Classification of Diseases for perinatal mortality (ICD‐PM) aims to improve data ...on stillbirth to enable prevention.
Objectives
To identify globally reported causes of stillbirth, classification systems, and alignment with the ICD‐PM.
Search strategy
We searched CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline, Global Health, and Pubmed from 2009 to 2016.
Selection criteria
Reports of stillbirth causes in unselective cohorts.
Data collection and analysis
Pooled estimates of causes were derived for country representative reports. Systems and causes were assessed for alignment with the ICD‐PM. Data are presented by income setting (low, middle, and high income countries; LIC, MIC, HIC).
Main results
Eighty‐five reports from 50 countries (489 089 stillbirths) were included. The most frequent categories were Unexplained, Antepartum haemorrhage, and Other (all settings); Infection and Hypoxic peripartum (LIC), and Placental (MIC, HIC). Overall report quality was low. Only one classification system fully aligned with ICD‐PM. All stillbirth causes mapped to ICD‐PM. In a subset from HIC, mapping obscured major causes.
Conclusions
There is a paucity of quality information on causes of stillbirth globally. Improving investigation of stillbirths and standardisation of audit and classification is urgently needed and should be achievable in all well‐resourced settings. Implementation of the WHO Perinatal Mortality Audit and Review guide is needed, particularly across high burden settings.
Funding
HR, SH, SHL, and AW were supported by an NHMRC‐CRE grant (APP1116640). VF was funded by an NHMRC‐CDF (APP1123611).
Tweetable
Urgent need to improve data on causes of stillbirths across all settings to meet global targets.
Plain Language Summary
Background and methods
Nearly three million babies are stillborn every year. These deaths have deep and long‐lasting effects on parents, healthcare providers, and the society. One of the major challenges to preventing stillbirths is the lack of information about why they happen. In this study, we collected reports on the causes of stillbirth from high‐, middle‐, and low‐income countries to: (1) Understand the causes of stillbirth, and (2) Understand how to improve reporting of stillbirths.
Findings
We found 85 reports from 50 different countries. The information available from the reports was inconsistent and often of poor quality, so it was hard to get a clear picture about what are the causes of stillbirth across the world. Many different definitions of stillbirth were used. There was also wide variation in what investigations of the mother and baby were undertaken to identify the cause of stillbirth. Stillbirths in all income settings (low‐, middle‐, and high‐income countries) were most frequently reported as Unexplained, Other, and Haemorrhage (bleeding). Unexplained and Other are not helpful in understanding why a baby was stillborn. In low‐income countries, stillbirths were often attributed to Infection and Complications during labour and birth. In middle‐ and high‐income countries, stillbirths were often reported as Placental complications.
Limitations
We may have missed some reports as searches were carried out in English only. The available reports were of poor quality.
Implications
Many countries, particularly those where the majority of stillbirths occur, do not report any information about these deaths. Where there are reports, the quality is often poor. It is important to improve the investigation and reporting of stillbirth using a standardised system so that policy makers and healthcare workers can develop effective stillbirth prevention programs. All stillbirths should be investigated and reported in line with the World Health Organization standards.
Tweetable
Urgent need to improve data on causes of stillbirths across all settings to meet global targets.
Linked article This is a mini commentary on M Richards et al., pp. 722–730 in this issue. To view this article visit https://doi.org/10.1111/1471‐0528.16977
Linked article: This is a mini commentary on PE van Beek et al., pp. 529–538 in this issue. To view this article visit https://doi.org/10.1111/1471‐0528.17010
Objective
To describe the association of maternal anaemia with maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes.
Design
Prospective cohort study.
Setting
Rural India and Pakistan.
Population
Pregnant women ...residing in the study catchment area.
Methods
We performed an analysis of a prospective pregnancy registry in which haemoglobin is commonly obtained as well as maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes for 42 days post‐delivery. Women 40 years or older who delivered before 20 weeks or had a haemoglobin level of <3.0 g/dl were excluded. Our primary exposure was maternal anaemia, which was categorised in keeping with World Health Organization criteria based on a normal (≥11 g/dl), mild (>10–10.9 g/dl), moderate (7–9.9 g/dl) or severe (<7 g/dl). haemoglobin level. The primary maternal outcome was maternal death, the primary fetal outcome was stillbirth, and the primary neonatal outcome was neonatal mortality <28 days.
Results
A total of 92 247 deliveries and 93 107 infants were included, of which 87.8% were born to mothers who were anaemic (mild 37.9%, moderate 49.1%, and severe 0.7%). Maternal mortality (number per 100 000) was not associated with anaemia: normal 124, mild 106, moderate 135, and severe 325 (P = 0.64). Fetal and neonatal mortality was associated with severe anaemia: stillbirth rate (n/1000)—normal 27.7, mild 25.8, moderate 30.1, and severe 90.9; P < 0.0001; 28‐day neonatal mortality (n/1000)—normal 24.7, mild 22.9, moderate 28.1, and severe 72.6 (P < 0.0001). Severe maternal anaemia was also associated with low birthweight (<2500 and <1500 g), preterm birth, and postpartum haemorrhage.
Conclusion
Severe maternal anaemia is associated with higher risks of poor maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes but other degrees of anaemia are not. Interventions directed at preventing severe anaemia in pregnant women should be considered.
Tweetable
Severe maternal anaemia is associated with adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes in low/middle‐income countries.
Tweetable
Severe maternal anaemia is associated with adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes in low/middle‐income countries.
Importance of prenatal care in reducing stillbirth Goldenberg, RL; McClure, EM
BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology,
January 2018, 2018-01-00, 20180101, Letnik:
125, Številka:
2
Journal Article
Objective
Ultrasound is widely regarded as an important adjunct to antenatal care (ANC) to guide practice and reduce perinatal mortality. We assessed the impact of ANC ultrasound use at health ...centres in resource‐limited countries.
Design
Cluster randomised trial.
Setting
Clusters within five countries (Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, Kenya, Pakistan, and Zambia)
Methods
Clusters were randomised to standard ANC or standard care plus two ultrasounds and referral for complications. The study trained providers in intervention clusters to perform basic obstetric ultrasounds.
Main outcome measures
The primary outcome was a composite of maternal mortality, maternal near‐miss mortality, stillbirth, and neonatal mortality.
Results
During the 24‐month trial, 28 intervention and 28 control clusters had 24 263 and 23 160 births, respectively; 78% in the intervention clusters received at least one study ultrasound; 60% received two. The prevalence of conditions noted including twins, placenta previa, and abnormal lie was within expected ranges. 9% were referred for an ultrasound‐diagnosed condition, and 71% attended the referral. The ANC (RR 1.0 95% CI 1.00, 1.01) and hospital delivery rates for complicated pregnancies (RR 1.03 95% CI 0.89, 1.20) did not differ between intervention and control clusters nor did the composite outcome (RR 1.09 95% CI 0.97, 1.23) or its individual components.
Conclusions
Despite availability of ultrasound at ANC in the intervention clusters, neither ANC nor hospital delivery for complicated pregnancies increased. The composite outcome and the individual components were not reduced.
Tweetable
Antenatal care ultrasound did not improve a composite outcome that included maternal, fetal, and neonatal mortality.
Tweetable
Antenatal care ultrasound did not improve a composite outcome that included maternal, fetal, and neonatal mortality.
PDF
