Objectives
To evaluate utility of T2*-weighted (T2*W) MRI as a tool for intra-operative identification of ablation zone extent during focal laser ablation (FLA) of prostate cancer (PCa), as compared ...to the current standard of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1W) MRI.
Methods
Fourteen patients with biopsy-confirmed low- to intermediate-risk localized PCa received MRI-guided (1.5 T) FLA thermotherapy. Following FLA, axial multiple-TE T2*W images, diffusion-weighted images (DWI), and T2-weighted (T2W) images were acquired. Pre- and post-contrast T1W images were also acquired to assess ablation zone (
n
= 14) extent, as reference standard. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps and subtracted contrast-enhanced T1W (sceT1W) images were calculated. Ablation zone regions of interest (ROIs) were outlined manually on all ablated slices. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CBR) of the ablation site ROI relative to the untreated contralateral prostate tissue was calculated on T2*W images and ADC maps and compared to that in sceT1W images.
Results
CBRs in ablation ROIs on T2*W images (TE = 32, 63 ms) did not differ (
p
= 0.33, 0.25) from those in sceT1W images. Bland–Altman plots of ROI size and CBR in ablation sites showed good agreement between T2*W (TE = 32, 63 ms) and sceT1W images, with ROI sizes on T2*W (TE = 63 ms) strongly correlated (
r
= 0.64,
p
= 0.013) and within 15% of those in sceT1W images.
Conclusions
In detected ablation zone ROI size and CBR, non-contrast-enhanced T2*W MRI is comparable to contrast-enhanced T1W MRI, presenting as a potential method for intra-procedural monitoring of FLA for PCa.
Key Points
•
T2*-weighted MR images with long TE visualize post-procedure focal laser ablation zone comparably to the contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI.
•
T2*-weighted MRI could be used as a plausible method for repeated intra-operative monitoring of thermal ablation zone in prostate cancer, avoiding potential toxicity due to heating of contrast agent.
Sorafenib is an antiangiogenic agent with activity in renal cancer. We conducted a randomized trial to investigate dynamic contrast magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) as a pharmacodynamic ...biomarker.
Patients were randomly assigned to placebo or 200 or 400 mg twice per day of sorafenib. DCE-MRI was performed at baseline and 4 weeks. DCE-MRI parameters, area under the contrast concentration versus time curve 90 seconds after contrast injection (IAUC(90)), and volume transfer constant of contrast agent (K(trans)) were calculated for a metastatic site selected in a blinded manner. Primary end point was change in K(trans).
Of the 56 assessable patients, 48 underwent two MRIs; 44 MRIs were assessable for study end points. Mean K(trans) log ratios were 0.131 (standard deviation SD, 0.315), -0.148 (SD, 0.382), -0.271 (SD, 0.499) in placebo, 200- and 400-mg cohorts, respectively (P = .0077 for trend) corresponding to changes of +14%, -14%, and -24%. IAUC(90) log ratios were 0.041 (SD, 0.197), -0.040 (SD, 0.132), -0.356 (SD, 0.411), respectively (P = .0003 for trend), corresponding to changes of +4%, -4%, and -30%. Using a log-rank test, IAUC(90) and K(trans) changes were not associated with progression-free survival (PFS). Patients with high baseline K(trans) had a better PFS (P = .027).
IAUC(90) and K(trans) are pharmacodynamic biomarkers for sorafenib, but variability is high and magnitude of effect is less than previously reported. Changes in DCE-MRI parameters after 4 weeks of sorafenib are not predictive of PFS, suggesting that these biomarkers are not surrogate end points. The value of baseline K(trans) as a prognostic or predictive biomarker requires additional study.
The study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and advantages of a combined high temporal and high spatial resolution protocol for dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast.
...Twenty-three patients with enhancing lesions were imaged at 3T. The acquisition protocol consisted of a series of bilateral, fat-suppressed "ultrafast" acquisitions, with 6.9- to 9.9-second temporal resolution for the first minute following contrast injection, followed by four high spatial resolution acquisitions with 60- to 79.5-second temporal resolution. All images were acquired with standard uniform Fourier sampling. A filtering method was developed to reduce noise and detect significant enhancement in the high temporal resolution images. Time of arrival (TOA) was defined as the time at which each voxel first satisfied all the filter conditions, relative to the time of initial arterial enhancement.
Ultrafast images improved visualization of the vasculature feeding and draining lesions. A small percentage of the entire field of view (<6%) enhanced significantly in the 30 seconds following contrast injection. Lesion conspicuity was highest in early ultrafast images, especially in cases with marked parenchymal enhancement. Although the sample size was relatively small, the average TOA for malignant lesions was significantly shorter than the TOA for benign lesions. Significant differences were also measured in other parameters descriptive of early contrast media uptake kinetics (P < 0.05).
Ultrafast imaging in the first minute of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast has the potential to add valuable information on early contrast dynamics. Ultrafast imaging could allow radiologists to confidently identify lesions in the presence of marked background parenchymal enhancement.
High Spectral and Spatial resolution (HiSS) MRI shows high diagnostic performance in the breast. Acceleration methods based on k-space undersampling could allow stronger T2*-based image contrast ...and/or higher spectral resolution, potentially increasing diagnostic performance. An agar/oil phantom was prepared with water-fat boundaries perpendicular to the readout and phase encoding directions in a breast coil. HiSS MRI was acquired at 3T, at sensitivity encoding (SENSE) acceleration factors R of up to 10, and the R = 1 dataset was used to simulate corresponding compressed sensing (CS) accelerations. Image quality was evaluated by quantifying noise and artifact levels. Effective spatial resolution was determined via modulation transfer function analysis. Dispersion vs. absorption (DISPA) analysis and full width at half maximum (FWHM) quantified spectral lineshape changes. Noise levels remained constant with R for CS but amplified with SENSE. SENSE preserved the spatial resolution of HiSS MRI, while CS reduced it in the phase encoding direction. SENSE showed no effect on FWHM or DISPA markers, while CS increased FWHM. Thus, CS might perform better in noise-limited or geometrically constrained applications, but in geometric configurations specific to breast MRI, spectral analysis might be compromised, decreasing the diagnostic performance of HiSS MRI.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has detected changes in pancreas volume and other characteristics in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. However, differences in MRI technology and approaches across ...locations currently limit the incorporation of pancreas imaging into multisite trials. The purpose of this study was to develop a standardized MRI protocol for pancreas imaging and to define the reproducibility of these measurements. Calibrated phantoms with known MRI properties were imaged at five sites with differing MRI hardware and software to develop a harmonized MRI imaging protocol. Subsequently, five healthy volunteers underwent MRI at four sites using the harmonized protocol to assess pancreas size, shape, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), longitudinal relaxation time (T1), magnetization transfer ratio (MTR), and pancreas and hepatic fat fraction. Following harmonization, pancreas size, surface area to volume ratio, diffusion, and longitudinal relaxation time were reproducible, with coefficients of variation less than 10%. In contrast, non-standardized image processing led to greater variation in MRI measurements. By using a standardized MRI image acquisition and processing protocol, quantitative MRI of the pancreas performed at multiple locations can be incorporated into clinical trials comparing pancreas imaging measures and metabolic state in individuals with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.
Celotno besedilo
Dostopno za:
DOBA, IZUM, KILJ, NUK, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, SIK, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
We investigated why some prostate cancers (PCas) are not identified on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) by using ground truth reference from whole-mount prostatectomy specimens. A total of 61 patients ...with biopsy-confirmed PCa underwent 3T mpMRI followed by prostatectomy. Lesions visible on MRI prospectively or retrospectively identified after correlating with histology were considered "identified cancers" (ICs). Lesions that could not be identified on mpMRI were considered "unidentified cancers" (UCs). Pathologists marked the Gleason score, stage, size, and density of the cancer glands and performed quantitative histology to calculate the tissue composition. Out of 115 cancers, 19 were unidentified on MRI. The UCs were significantly smaller and had lower Gleason scores and clinical stage lesions compared with the ICs. The UCs had significantly (
< 0.05) higher ADC (1.34 ± 0.38 vs. 1.02 ± 0.30 μm
/ms) and T2 (117.0 ± 31.1 vs. 97.1 ± 25.1 ms) compared with the ICs. The density of the cancer glands was significantly (
= 0.04) lower in the UCs. The percentage of the Gleason 4 component in Gleason 3 + 4 lesions was nominally (
= 0.15) higher in the ICs (20 ± 12%) compared with the UCs (15 ± 8%). The UCs had a significantly lower epithelium (32.9 ± 21.5 vs. 47.6 ± 13.1%,
= 0.034) and higher lumen volume (20.4 ± 10.0 vs. 13.3 ± 4.1%,
= 0.021) compared with the ICs. Independent from size and Gleason score, the tissue composition differences, specifically, the higher lumen and lower epithelium in UCs, can explain why some of the prostate cancers cannot be identified on mpMRI.
Abstract
Background
Thresholding apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps obtained from Diffusion-Weighted-Imaging (DWI) has been proposed for identifying benign lesions that can safely avoid ...biopsy. The presence of malignancies with high ADC values leads to high thresholds, limiting numbers of avoidable biopsies.
Purpose
We evaluate two previously reported methods for identifying avoidable biopsies: using case-set dependent ADC thresholds that assure 100% sensitivity and using negative likelihood ratio (LR-) with a fixed ADC threshold of 1.50 × 10
–3
mm
2
/s. We evaluated improvements in efficacy obtained by excluding non-mass lesions and lesions with anisotropic intra-lesion morphologic characteristics.
Study type
Prospective.
Population
55 adult females with dense breasts with 69 BI-RADS 4 or 5 lesions (38 malignant, 31 benign) identified on ultrasound and mammography and imaged with MRI prior to biopsy.
Field strength/sequence
1.5 T and 3.0 T. DWI.
Assessment
Analysis of DWI, including directional images was done on an ROI basis. ROIs were drawn on DWI images acquired prior to biopsy, referencing all available images including DCE, and mean ADC was measured. Anisotropy was quantified via variation in ADC values in the lesion core across directional DWI images.
Statistical tests
Improvement in specificity at 100% sensitivity was evaluated with exact McNemar test with 1-sided
p
-value < 0.05 indicating statistical significance.
Results
Using ADC thresholding that assures 100% sensitivity, non-mass and directional variance filtering improved the percent of avoidable biopsies to 42% from baseline of 10% achieved with ADC thresholding alone. Using LR-, filtering improved outcome to 0.06 from baseline 0.25 with ADC thresholding alone. ADC thresholding showed a lower percentage of avoidable biopsies in our cohort than reported in prior studies. When ADC thresholding was supplemented with filtering, the percentage of avoidable biopsies exceeded those of prior studies.
Data conclusion
Supplementing ADC thresholding with filters excluding non-mass lesions and lesions with anisotropic characteristics on DWI can result in an increased number of avoidable biopsies.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of increasing the spatial resolution of the prostate DWI protocol on image quality and lesion conspicuity.
Twenty-nine patients with biopsy-proven ...prostate cancer undergoing MRI examinations were imaged with two diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) protocols: current standard clinical protocol (6.7 mm(3) voxels) and a new high-resolution protocol (3.1 mm(3) voxels). Diffusion-weighted images were independently and subjectively scored on lesion conspicuity, internal architecture definition, and overall image quality by two radiologists. Average apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were measured in normal tissue and cancerous lesions on both sequences. Reader scores and ADC and contrast values were compared between the two protocols. Cancer ADC values were correlated with Gleason scores.
The signal-to-noise ratio of the new high-resolution DWI protocol was 40% lower than that of the standard protocol. The reader scores were higher by 0.73 (range, 0.29-1.16) grades, or 19% (range, 7-32%), on average, for the new protocol, indicating better image quality. The average ADC values were 8% higher with the new protocol, with ADC contrast values between cancer and normal prostate unchanged. There was marginally significant correlation of cancer ADC values with Gleason scores (p = 0.05, r ≈ -0.36).
We showed that for DWI of the prostate at 3-7 mm(3) voxel sizes the benefits of higher spatial resolution outweigh the effects of reduced signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios, potentially improving the sensitivity to small or sparse prostate cancers. Radiologists can consider using higher-spatial-resolution DWI sequences in their practices.
State-of-the-art resource details effective breast MRI techniques for improved screening and diagnosis Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast has evolved into an important breast cancer ...screening tool and major advance in women's health. Breast MRI is currently the most sensitive detection technique for both non-invasive and invasive cancers and follow-up in women with a new breast cancer diagnosis. It is increasingly becoming the go-to imaging method for screening women at high and intermediate risk of breast cancer and those with dense breast tissue on mammography. Yet despite its reliability and growing use, many radiologists lack the expertise to accurately perform breast MR image interpretation. Breast MRI Interpretation: Text and Case Analysis for Screening and Diagnosis by Gillian M. Newstead reflects insights and expertise from one of the leading authorities on breast imaging. The book is a highly practical reference on evaluation and interpretation of breast MR imaging, with discussion of the modality as a screening and diagnostic tool. Topics include image acquisition and interpretation, clinical implementation, managing findings, and overcoming problems. Key Highlights About 3,000 illustrations from the University of Chicago including single selected images, side-by-side images at different time points and acquisition parameters, and 3-D images enhance understanding of breast imaging Discussion of advanced acquisition techniques and future potential applications including non-contrast imaging, quantitative dynamic imaging, and artificial intelligence using advanced computer analytic methods This remarkable resource streamlines the breast MRI process, enabling radiologists to incorporate this imaging modality into practice, conduct screening and diagnostic exams more efficaciously, and interpret findings accurately.