Purpose
Base de Datos para la Investigación Farmacoepidemiológica en Atención Primaria (BIFAP) is a population based database administered by the AEMPS (Spanish Agency for Medicines) of longitudinal ...electronic medical records (EMR) of patients attended in primary care. Its main purpose is to serve as source of information for independent studies on drug safety and support of medicines regulation activities. This article aim is to describe the characteristics of BIFAP, how to access the database and a summary of its potential for research.
Methods
Health problems are registered by primary care physicians as episodes of care and include socio‐demographic data, results of diagnostic procedures, lifestyle data, general data, and interventions. A proportion of data on hospitalizations and specialist care are currently available through linkage with other data sources. EMRs of the Spanish healthcare system are provided by the regional administrations. Specific data extraction and standardization processes are performed.
Results
BIFAP includes data from 12 million patients starting in 2001 and updated annually. Validation of drug and diagnosis definitions has been ascertained. Participation in international collaborative projects and a number of articles in peer reviewed journals reflect its contribution to the knowledge of the risks associated with medicines and drug utilization patterns.
Conclusions
BIFAP is a useful tool for generating scientific evidence on medicines related issues, helping regulatory decision making in Europe. The main strengths of BIFAP are related to large sample size, population‐based, longitudinal nature and annual update of data. BIFAP shares common challenges with similar data sources including accurate and efficient identification of health outcomes and of treatment exposure.
•In 100 K immunocompromised people with 3 COVID-19 vaccine doses, up to 4 hospitalisations or 2 deaths with COVID-19 were avoided.•In 100 K boosted > 80 aged individuals, up to 6 hospitalisations or ...7 deaths with COVID-19 were avoided.•In 5.5 M adults, booster doses were moderate-high effective against severe COVID-19.•Real-world evidence is crucial for regulatory decisions in low-represented vulnerable people.
Using 4 data-sources (Spain, Italy, United Kingdom) data and a 1:1 matched cohort study, we aimed to estimate vaccine effectiveness (VE) in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infections with hospitalisations (±30 days) and death (±56 days) in general population and clinical subgroups with homologous/heterologous booster schedules (Comirnaty-BNT and Spikevax-MOD original COVID-19 vaccines) by comparison with unboosted individuals, during Delta and beginning of Omicron variants. Hazard Ratio (HR, by Cox models) and VE (1-HR*100) were calculated by inverse probability weights. Between December 2020-February 2022, in adults without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, we matched 5.5 million people (>1 million with immunodeficiency, 343,727 with cancer) with a booster (3rd) dose by considering doses 1 and 2 vaccine brands and calendar time, age, sex, region, and comorbidities (immunodeficiency, cancer, severe renal disease, transplant recipient, Down Syndrome). We studied booster doses of BNT and MOD administered after doses 1 and 2 with BNT, MOD, or Oxford-AstraZeneca during a median follow-up between 9 and 16 weeks. BNT or MOD showed VE ranging from 70 to 86% across data sources as heterologous 3rd doses, whereas it was 42–88% as homologous 3rd doses. Depending on the severity and available follow-up, 3rd-dose effectiveness lasted between 1 and 5 months. In people with immunodeficiency and cancer, protection across data sources was detected with both heterologous (VE = 54–83%) and homologous (VE = 49–80%) 3rd doses. Overall, both heterologous and homologous 3rd doses with BTN or MOD showed additional protection against the severe effects of SARS-CoV-2 infections for the general population and for patients at potentially high risk of severe COVID-19 (elderly, people with immunodeficiency and cancer) in comparison with two doses schemes during Delta or early Omicron periods. The early VE after vaccination may be due to unknown confounders, deserving cautious interpretation. The VE wane over time needs further in-depth research to properly envisage when or whether a booster of those vaccines should be administered.
Purpose
In Spain, a human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine was firstly marketed in 2006 and mainly administered in primary care (PC) practices for girls/women or schools. As for all vaccines, a valid ...data source is required for research on observational effectiveness or safety. The objective of this study is to identify and validate HPV vaccinations recorded among women in The Primary Care Database For Pharmacoepidemiological Research (BIFAP) from 2007.
Methods
BIFAP includes a Vaccination File filled by PC practitionners and pediatricians. Information on women with HPV vaccinations recorded at any age was identified and validated according to whether (1) doses adhered to the following standard intervals: 27 to 269 days between first and second doses, >55 days between second and third doses, and <366 between first and third doses, and (2) additional information recorded in clinical records confirmed (through recording the brand, batch, expiring date, administration site, or vaccination comment) or refuted the vaccination and date. The latter was retrieved through manual review of anonymous records randomly selected.
Results
One hundred seventeen thousand seventy‐three women with HPV vaccination records were identified (mean age 14.7 years); 82.5% had three jabs, 87.3% in recommended intervals. A sample of 978 patients' records, including 2245 jabs, was reviewed. Of the 363 jabs with additional information, 91% confirmed the vaccination. Confirmatory data was more frequent when doses strictly adhered to recommendations (96.8%‐100%) than not (60.0%‐85.7%).
Conclusions
In BIFAP, a cohort of women vaccinated against HPV, mostly with three doses in recommended intervals, was identified. Although additional information about the vaccination was scarce, when present, it highly confirmed it, making BIFAP a potential data source for HPV vaccine research.
We aimed to estimate the absolute (incidence) and relative (hazard ratio; HR) risk of agranulocytosis associated with metamizole in comparison with non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs ...(NSAIDs).PURPOSEWe aimed to estimate the absolute (incidence) and relative (hazard ratio; HR) risk of agranulocytosis associated with metamizole in comparison with non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).A cohort study of new users of metamizole versus NSAIDs was performed with BIFAP (Pharmacoepidemiologic Research Database in Public Health Systems; Spain). Patients aged ≥ 2 years in 2005-2022 were followed up from the day after their first metamizole or NSAID dispensation till the end of the treatment period to identify patients hospitalized due to idiosyncratic agranulocytosis. Incidence rate (IR) and adjusted HR of agranulocytosis with metamizole versus NSAID were estimated assuming the onset date of agranulocytosis was the date of hospitalization sensitivity analysis or 7 days before (main analysis). In secondary analyses, we used (1) opioids-paracetamol as negative control and (2) any hospitalized neutropenia as outcome (assuming the onset was 7 days before).METHODSA cohort study of new users of metamizole versus NSAIDs was performed with BIFAP (Pharmacoepidemiologic Research Database in Public Health Systems; Spain). Patients aged ≥ 2 years in 2005-2022 were followed up from the day after their first metamizole or NSAID dispensation till the end of the treatment period to identify patients hospitalized due to idiosyncratic agranulocytosis. Incidence rate (IR) and adjusted HR of agranulocytosis with metamizole versus NSAID were estimated assuming the onset date of agranulocytosis was the date of hospitalization sensitivity analysis or 7 days before (main analysis). In secondary analyses, we used (1) opioids-paracetamol as negative control and (2) any hospitalized neutropenia as outcome (assuming the onset was 7 days before).The cohorts included 444,972 new users of metamizole, 3,814,367 NSAID, and 3,129,221 opioids-paracetamol on continuous treatment during a median of 37-40 days. Overall, 26 hospitalized agranulocytosis occurred, 5 in the first week (and so removed in main analysis) and 21 thereafter. IR of agranulocytosis was 14.20 (N = 5 cases) and 8.52 (N = 3), 1.95 (N = 6) and 1.62 (N = 5), and 4.29 (N = 15) and 3.72 (N = 13)/107 person-weeks of continuous treatment using the date of hospitalization or 7 days before, respectively. Two, 0 and 2 of cases identified in both analyses had neoplasia in every cohort, respectively. HR of agranulocytosis associated with metamizole was 7.20 95% CI: 1.92-26.99 and 4.40 0.90-21.57 versus NSAID, and 3.31 1.17-9.34 and 2.45 0.68-8.83 versus opioid-paracetamol, respectively. HR of neutropenia with metamizole was 2.98 1.57-5.65 versus NSAID.RESULTSThe cohorts included 444,972 new users of metamizole, 3,814,367 NSAID, and 3,129,221 opioids-paracetamol on continuous treatment during a median of 37-40 days. Overall, 26 hospitalized agranulocytosis occurred, 5 in the first week (and so removed in main analysis) and 21 thereafter. IR of agranulocytosis was 14.20 (N = 5 cases) and 8.52 (N = 3), 1.95 (N = 6) and 1.62 (N = 5), and 4.29 (N = 15) and 3.72 (N = 13)/107 person-weeks of continuous treatment using the date of hospitalization or 7 days before, respectively. Two, 0 and 2 of cases identified in both analyses had neoplasia in every cohort, respectively. HR of agranulocytosis associated with metamizole was 7.20 95% CI: 1.92-26.99 and 4.40 0.90-21.57 versus NSAID, and 3.31 1.17-9.34 and 2.45 0.68-8.83 versus opioid-paracetamol, respectively. HR of neutropenia with metamizole was 2.98 1.57-5.65 versus NSAID.Agranulocytosis was very rare but more common (above 4 times more) with metamizole than other analgesics. The impact of the drug-induced agranulocytosis was less precise with metamizole than the comparators due to its lower use, which precluded to find statistical differences in main analysis. The increased risk of hospitalized neutropenias with metamizole supports the link with its severity although triggers unavailable during the follow-up (ex. cytotoxic medication) can not be discarded.CONCLUSIONSAgranulocytosis was very rare but more common (above 4 times more) with metamizole than other analgesics. The impact of the drug-induced agranulocytosis was less precise with metamizole than the comparators due to its lower use, which precluded to find statistical differences in main analysis. The increased risk of hospitalized neutropenias with metamizole supports the link with its severity although triggers unavailable during the follow-up (ex. cytotoxic medication) can not be discarded.
Purpose
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) recording validation among girls in the Spanish Primary Care Database For Pharmacoepidemiological Research (BIFAP).
Methods
In this observational study, girls ...aged 9 to 18 years registered in BIFAP between 2002 and 2016, were followed up until there was a recorded IBD diagnosis or a referral to specialist indicating IBD. Anonymized profiles were reviewed to retrieve diagnosis confirmation (a positive colonoscopy or biopsy, specialist, or physician's comments mentioning the IBD diagnosis) or discarding (negative procedure results, alternative diagnosis, or family history). “possible” IBD were profiles missing that evidence, or had suspected IBD. The prescriptions of intestinal anti‐inflammatory agents, azatioprine, and mercaptopurine were collected. The prevalence of IBD was estimated after review.
Results
Out of 480 634 girls, 323 had a first ever recorded IBD, of which, 37.8% (N = 122) were “confirmed” incident IBD diagnosis, 19.8% (N = 64) discarded and 38.7% (N = 125) “possible” IBD. Additionally, 12 IBD records (3.7%) referred to prevalent IBD. Prescriptions were recorded in 94.3% (confirmed), 63.2% (possible), 83.3% (prevalent), and 3.1% (discarded) IBD cases. Prevalence was 52.83 “confirmed” or 93.58/105 girls when “possible” IBD were added.
Conclusions
For a third of the girls, the first recorded IBD included evidence confirming the diagnosis while most of those with missing evidence had treatment indicated for IBD. For research focused in sensitivity, an algorithm including “possible” plus “confirmed” episodes is recommended, whereas only “confirmed” to guarantee higher predictive value. Prevalence suggests that IBD is not a rare disease among girls.
Residents in long-term care facilities (LTCF) experienced a large morbidity and mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain and were prioritised for early COVID-19 vaccination. We used the ...screening method and population-based data sources to obtain estimates of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness for elderly LTCF residents. The estimates were 71% (95% CI: 56-82%), 88% (95% CI: 75-95%), and 97% (95% CI: 92-99%), against SARS-CoV-2 infections (symptomatic and asymptomatic), and COVID-19 hospitalisations and deaths, respectively.
Introduction
The public–private ADVANCE collaboration developed and tested a system to generate evidence on vaccine benefits and risks using European electronic healthcare databases. In the safety of ...vaccines, background incidence rates are key to allow proper monitoring and assessment. The goals of this study were to compute age-, sex-, and calendar-year stratified incidence rates of nine autoimmune diseases in seven European healthcare databases from four countries and to assess validity by comparing with published data.
Methods
Event rates were calculated for the following outcomes: acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, Bell’s palsy, Guillain–Barré syndrome, immune thrombocytopenia purpura, Kawasaki disease, optic neuritis, narcolepsy, systemic lupus erythematosus, and transverse myelitis. Cases were identified by diagnosis codes. Participating organizations/databases originated from Denmark, Italy, Spain, and the UK. The source population comprised all persons registered, with at least 1 year of data prior to the study start, or follow-up from birth. Stratified incidence rates were computed per database over the period 2003 to 2014.
Results
Between 2003 and 2014, 148,947 incident cases of nine autoimmune diseases were identified. Crude incidence rates were highest for Bell’s palsy 23.8/100,000 person-years (PYs), 95% confidence interval (CI) 23.6–24.1 and lowest for Kawasaki disease (0.7/100,000 PYs, 95% CI 0.6–0.7). Specific patterns were observed by sex, age, calendar time, and data sources. Rates were comparable with published estimates.
Conclusion
A range of autoimmune events could be identified in the ADVANCE system. Estimation of rates indicated consistency across selected European healthcare databases, as well as consistency with US published data.
•The incidence of Guillain-Barré was 5.4–6.5/106 girl-years in Spain in 2002–2016.•Incidence peaked during the last period of the study (2007–2016) with 11 GBS cases.•Out of 11 GBS cases, 4 (36%) ...reported infections as the potential triggers.•3 cases were vaccinated against papillomavirus ever before (7.87/106 girl-years)•The adjusted risk of GBS after HPV vaccination was not different from non-exposed.
Studies of the association of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) with papillomavirus vaccination (HPVv; scheduled from 2007) have provided contradicting results, probably due to the low frequency of this disease. We aimed at estimating that risk relative to non-vaccination among girls, by using the Spanish Primary Care Database for Pharmacoepidemiological Research (BIFAP).
A cohort study of girls aged 9–18 years during 2007–2016 free of GBS or HPVv was selected and followed up to GBS diagnosis. Follow-up time was divided by time-varying HPVv exposure and confounders. Crude Incidence rates (IR per 1,000,000 person-years (py)) and adjusted Hazard Ratios (HR) of GBS were estimated anytime after vaccination compared to non-exposed periods. HRs were also estimated for the first 90 days after HPVv (risk-window) and thereafter.
Out of 388,849 girls, of which 154,255 were vaccinated, 6 'confirmed' GBS cases occurred during non-exposure periods (IR of 5.83 per million person-years; 95% CI: 2.62–12.97) and 3 ‘confirmed’ cases anytime after vaccination (IR of 7.87; 95% CI: 2.54–24.39). The resulting adjusted HR anytime after vaccination was 1.24 (95% CI: 0.19–8.00). All three cases occurred after the risk window of 90 days with an HR of 1.77 (95% CI: 0.25–12.54) for post-exposure periods as compared with non-exposure. Since zero cases occurred during the risk window, no HR could be estimated for exposed periods.
Incidences of GBS were in line with the range previously reported for young people, supporting the potential of BIFAP for performing studies on GBS. However, a lack of power may be present for quantifying the relative risk of such a rare disease after the vaccination among the study cohort, where we can only exclude an increased risk of 8-times relative to no vaccination.
We aimed at estimating the incidence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and maculopathy (DMP) among newly diagnosed type 1 (t1DM) and type 2 diabetic patients (t2DM) in the United Kingdom primary care ...system. The incidence of DMP among patients with DR was also estimated.
We conducted a cohort study using The Health Improvement Network database. The cohort included 64,983 incident diabetic patients (97.3% were t2DM) aged 1-84 years diagnosed between 2000 and 2007. This cohort was followed from the date of diabetes diagnosis until recording of DR or DMP in two separate follow-ups. Follow-up was censored at 85 years of age, death, or end of 2008. An additional follow-up was conducted from DR to DMP diagnosis using similar censoring reasons. DR and DMP cumulative incidences were calculated as well as incidence rates (IR; cases per 1,000 person-years) per calendar period (2000-2001 and 2006-2007).
Follow-up for DR: 9 years after diabetes diagnosis, 28% of t2DM and 24% of t1DM patients had developed DR (7,899 incident DR cases). During the first 2 years with diabetes, the IR was almost 2 times higher in patients diagnosed with diabetes in 2006-2007 (47.7) than among those diagnosed in 2000-2001 (24.5). Follow-up for DMP: 9 years after diabetes diagnosis, 3.6% of t2DM and 4.4% of t2DM patients had developed DMP (912 incident DMP cases). During the first 2 years with diabetes, the IR was three times higher in patients diagnosed with diabetes in 2006-2007 (5.8) than among those diagnosed in 2000-2001 (1.8). Macular oedema occurred in 0.8% of patients.
In a cohort of incident diabetes, 28% of patients developed retinopathy and 4% maculopathy within the first 9 years. The 2-year IRs of DR and DMP were higher in patients diagnosed with diabetes during the period 2006-2007 than in those diagnosed during the 2000-2001 period.
Celotno besedilo
Dostopno za:
DOBA, IZUM, KILJ, NUK, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, SIK, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
Objective
To establish the risk of major bleeding in direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) users (overall and by class) versus vitamin K antagonist (VKA) users, using health care databases from four ...European countries and six provinces in Canada.
Methods
A retrospective cohort study was performed according to a similar protocol. First‐users of VKAs or DOACs with a diagnosis of non‐valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) were included. The main outcome of interest was major bleeding and secondary outcomes included gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and intracranial haemorrhage (ICH). Incidence rates of events per 1000 person years were calculated. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using a Cox proportional hazard regression model. Exposure and confounders were measured and analysed in a time‐dependant way. Risk estimates were pooled using a random effect model.
Results
421 523 patients were included. The risk of major bleeding for the group of DOACs compared to VKAs showed a pooled HR of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.87–1.02). Rivaroxaban showed a modestly increased risk (HR 1.11, 95% CI: 1.06–1.16). Apixaban and dabigatran showed a decreased risk of respectively HR 0.76 (95% CI: 0.69–0.84) and HR 0.85 (95% CI: 0.75–0.96).
Conclusions
This study confirms that the risk of major bleeding of DOACs compared to VKAs is not increased when combining all DOACs. However, we observed a modest higher risk of major bleeding for rivaroxaban, whereas for apixaban and dabigatran lower risks of major bleeding were observed compared to VKAs.
PDF
