Summary Background Our objective was to assess therapeutic non-inferiority of dual treatment with lopinavir–ritonavir and lamivudine to triple treatment with lopinavir–ritonavir plus two ...nucleos(t)ides for maintenance of HIV-1 viral suppression. Methods In this randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial, we recruited patients from 32 HIV units in hospitals in Spain and France. Eligible patients were HIV-infected adults (aged ≥18 years) with HIV-1 RNA of less than 50 copies per mL, for at least 6 months on triple treatment with lopinavir–ritonavir (twice daily) plus lamivudine or emtricitabine and a second nucleos(t)ide, with no resistance or virological failure to these drugs, and no positive hepatitis B serum surface antigen. Investigators at each centre randomly assigned patients (1:1; block size of four; stratified by time to suppression <1 year or >1 year and nadir CD4 cell count <100 cells per μL or >100 cells per μL; computer-generated random sequence) to continue triple treatment or switch to dual treatment (oral lopinavir 400 mg and oral ritonavir 100 mg twice daily plus oral lamivudine 300 mg once daily). The primary endpoint was response to treatment in the intention-to-treat population (all randomised patients) at 48 weeks. The non-inferiority margin was 12%. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01471821. Findings Between Oct 1, 2011, and April 1, 2013, we randomly assigned 250 participants to continue triple treatment (127 51% patients) or switch to dual treatment (123 49% patients). In the intention-to-treat population, 110 (86·6%) of 127 patients in the triple-treatment group responded to treatment versus 108 (87·8%) of 123 in the dual-treatment group (difference −1·2% 95% CI −9·6 to 7·3; p=0·92), meeting the criteria for non-inferiority. Serious adverse events occurred in eight (7%) patients in the triple-treatment group and five (4%) in the dual-treatment group (p=0·515), and study drug discontinuations due to adverse events occurred in four (3%) in the triple-treatment group and one (1%) in the dual-treatment group (p=0·223). Interpretation Dual treatment with lopinavir–ritonavir plus lamivudine has non-inferior therapeutic efficacy and is similarly tolerated to triple treatment. Funding AbbVie and Red Temática Cooperativa de Investigación en Sida.
Summary Primary neuroendocrine (NE) tumors of the kidney (PNRTs) are rare and frequently mistaken for other renal and urothelial cancers. We evaluated morphological and molecular findings of 11 PNRTs ...classified according to the World Health Organization classification of lung NE tumors. Patients included 5 men and 6 women with a median age of 50 years. These tumors occurred in the left (5/11), right (3/11), and horseshoe (1/11) kidney. The histologic patterns were predominantly solid, trabecular, and pseudoglandular. Lymphovascular invasion and calcification were found in 3 and 1 cases, respectively. There were 2 atypical and 9 typical carcinoids. At the time of surgery, 2 patients with atypical carcinoids had hepatic metastasis, and 1 of the typical carcinoid patients had lymph node metastasis. All cases showed <1% proliferative rate, except 2 cases with hepatic metastasis, which showed 3% to 5% with MIB1/Ki-67 immunostaining. Immunostainings were frequently positive for synaptophysin, chromogranin, CD56, CD99, and neuron-specific enolase. Follow-up data (average 4 years) were available for 6 patients. Two patients with distant metastasis were alive with disease, and four patients with no metastasis were alive without disease. We evaluated the association of PNRT and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) on chromosome 3p21 and found LOH in 2 of 3 cases. However, the comparative genomic hybridization study (2/2) did not demonstrate significant chromosomal imbalances. We conclude that PNRTs are positive for NE markers and may have LOH on chromosome 3p21. PNRTs should be classified as NE tumors in other sites, and proliferative rate can be an indicator of aggressive behavior/metastasis.
Background Approximately 8% of nonmedullary thyroid cancers are familial. The optimal age for screening in familial nonmedullary thyroid cancer (FNMTC) is unknown. Methods Kindreds with FNMTC (2 or ...more first-degree relatives affected) were screened prospectively with thyroid ultrasonography. Results Fifteen kindreds showed an overall prevalence of thyroid nodule(s) ≥5 mm of 44% at screening; 19% in the second generation, and 90% in the generation anterior to the index case. The youngest age of detection was 10 years for thyroid nodules and 18 years for thyroid cancer. Microcalcification of thyroid nodules at screening was associated with a greater risk of cancer ( P < .05). Family members diagnosed with thyroid cancer by ultrasonographic screening were diagnosed at a younger age and had a lower rate of extra thyroidal invasion ( P < .05). Conclusion In FNMTC, first-degree relatives 10 years or older, including the generation anterior to the index case, should have thyroid screening by ultrasonography, which may result in earlier diagnosis.
Our objective was to assess the therapeutic noninferiority of dual therapy with darunavir/ritonavir and lamivudine compared to triple therapy with darunavir/ritonavir plus 2 nucleos(t)ides for ...maintenance of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) suppression.
This was a multicenter, open-label, noninferiority trial (margin 12%). Patients with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL for 6 months or longer on triple therapy with darunavir/ritonavir and 2 nucleos(t)ides (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine or abacavir and lamivudine) and with no resistance were randomized to continue therapy (n = 128) or switch to darunavir/ritonavir and lamivudine (n = 129). The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL after 48 weeks of follow-up according to the snapshot algorithm.
A total of 249 participants received study drugs (intention-to-treat exposed). The proportion of participants with HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL in the dual- and triple-therapy arms was 88.9% (112/126) and 92.7% (114/123; difference, -3.8%; 95% confidence interval, -11.0 to 3.4), respectively. Four participants in the dual-therapy arm and 2 in the triple-therapy arm developed protocol-defined virological failure. Switching to dual therapy was associated with a significant increase in total, low-density lipoprotein, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, but not in the total-to-HDL cholesterol ratio. Serious adverse events and study drug discontinuations due to adverse events occurred in 4.8% vs 4.9%P = .97) and in 0.8% (1/126) vs 1.6% P = .55) in dual therapy vs triple therapy, respectively.
Dual therapy with darunavir/ritonavir and lamivudine demonstrated noninferior therapeutic efficacy and similar tolerability compared to triple therapy.
NCT02159599.
Abstract Purpose Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and fusion biopsy (FBx) detect more high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) and less low-risk PCa than systematic biopsy (SBx). However, there remains a small ...subset of patients where SBx captures higher grade disease than FBx. We aim to identify potential mechanisms for failure of FBx biopsy in detection of clinically significant (CS) PCa. Methods We reviewed a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing mpMRI followed by FBx and SBx from 2007-2014. In patients disease upgraded to CS disease (Gleason ≥ 7) by SBx over FBx, independent re-review of MR imaging, archived biopsy imaging, and whole mount pathology, as well as needle coordinate mapping were conducted. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine predictors for upgrading by SBx. Results Disease upgrading based on SBx over FBx occurred in 135/1003 (13.5%) patients, of which only 62 (6.2%) were to intermediate (Gleason=7) N=51, 5.1% or high risk PCa (Gleason≥8) N=11, 1.1%. On multivariate analysis, lower PSA (p <0.001), higher MRI prostate volume (p <0.001), and lower number of target cores (p=0.001) were predictors of upgrading by SBx. Main mechanisms for under-grading by FBx included mpMRI reader oversight, presence of MR invisible cancer, FBx technique error, and intra-lesion Gleason heterogeneity. Conclusions MRI and FBx rarely misses CS PCa, as only 62/1003 (6.2%) cases were upgraded to CS disease by SBx. Imaging and biopsy techniques are continually refined and further studies will help to clarify mechanisms of FBx failure and patient populations which benefit from SBx in addition to FBx.
To describe the preliminary safety and accuracy of a magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-guided high-intensity-focused ultrasound (HIFU) system employing new technical developments, including ablation ...control via volumetric thermal feedback, for the treatment of uterine leiomyomata with histopathologic correlation.
In this phase I clinical trial, 11 women underwent MR-guided HIFU ablation (Sonalleve 1.5T; Philips Medical Systems, Vantaa, Finland), followed by hysterectomy within 30 days. Adverse events, imaging findings, and pathologic confirmation of ablation were assessed. The relationship between MR imaging findings, thermal dose estimates, and pathology and HIFU spatial accuracy were assessed using Bland-Altman analyses and intraclass correlations.
There were 12 leiomyomata treated. No serious adverse events were observed. Two subjects decided against having hysterectomy and withdrew from the study before surgery. Of 11 women, 9 underwent hysterectomy; all leiomyomata demonstrated treatment in the expected location. A mean ablation volume of 6.92 cm(3) ± 10.7 was observed at histopathologic examination. No significant differences between MR imaging nonperfused volumes, thermal dose estimates, and histopathology ablation volumes were observed (P > .05). Mean misregistration values perpendicular to the ultrasound beam axis were 0.8 mm ± 1.2 in feet-head direction and 0.1 mm ± 1.0 in and left-right direction and -0.7 mm ± 3.1 along the axis.
Safe, accurate ablation of uterine leiomyomata was achieved with an MR-guided HIFU system with novel treatment monitoring capabilities, including ablation control via volumetric thermal feedback.
The INhibitor of Growth (ING) family of tumor suppressors regulates the transcriptional state of chromatin by recruiting remodeling complexes to sites with histone H3 trimethylated at lysine 4 ...(H3K4me3). This modification is recognized by the plant homeodomain (PHD) present at the C-terminus of the five ING proteins. ING5 facilitates histone H3 acetylation by the HBO1 complex, and also H4 acetylation by the MOZ/MORF complex. We show that ING5 forms homodimers through its N-terminal domain, which folds independently into an elongated coiled-coil structure. The central region of ING5, which contains the nuclear localization sequence, is flexible and disordered, but it binds dsDNA with micromolar affinity. NMR analysis of the full-length protein reveals that the two PHD fingers of the dimer are chemically equivalent and independent of the rest of the molecule, and they bind H3K4me3 in the same way as the isolated PHD. We have observed that ING5 can form heterodimers with the highly homologous ING4, and that two of three primary tumor-associated mutants in the N-terminal domain strongly destabilize the coiled-coil structure. They also affect cell proliferation and cell cycle phase distribution, suggesting a driver role in cancer progression.
Display omitted
•ING5 is a dimeric, bivalent reader of histone H3K4me3.•The coiled-coil N-terminal domain of ING5 is the dimerization site.•ING5 can form heterodimers with ING4.•Mutants that destabilize the N-terminal domain structure disrupt cell cycling and proliferation.
Summary Background The combination of cobimetinib with vemurafenib improves progression-free survival compared with placebo and vemurafenib in previously untreated patients with BRAFV600 -mutant ...advanced melanoma, as previously reported in the coBRIM study. In this Article, we report updated efficacy results, including overall survival and safety after longer follow-up, and selected biomarker correlative studies. Methods In this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre study, adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with histologically confirmed BRAFV600 mutation-positive unresectable stage IIIC or stage IV melanoma were randomly assigned (1:1) using an interactive response system to receive cobimetinib (60 mg once daily for 21 days followed by a 7-day rest period in each 28-day cycle) or placebo, in combination with oral vemurafenib (960 mg twice daily). Progression-free and overall survival were primary and secondary endpoints, respectively; all analyses were done on the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01689519 , and is ongoing but no longer recruiting participants. Findings Between Jan 8, 2013, and Jan 31, 2014, 495 eligible adult patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the cobimetinib plus vemurafenib group (n=247) or placebo plus vemurafenib group (n=248). At a median follow-up of 14·2 months (IQR 8·5–17·3), the updated investigator-assessed median progression-free survival was 12·3 months (95% CI 9·5–13·4) for cobimetinib and vemurafenib versus 7·2 months (5·6–7·5) for placebo and vemurafenib (HR 0·58 95% CI 0·46–0·72, p<0·0001). The final analysis for overall survival occurred when 255 (52%) patients had died (Aug 28, 2015). Median overall survival was 22·3 months (95% CI 20·3–not estimable) for cobimetinib and vemurafenib versus 17·4 months (95% CI 15·0–19·8) for placebo and vemurafenib (HR 0·70, 95% CI 0·55–0·90; p=0·005). The safety profile for cobimetinib and vemurafenib was tolerable and manageable, and no new safety signals were observed with longer follow-up. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events occurring at a higher frequency in patients in the cobimetinib and vemurafenib group compared with the vemurafenib group were γ-glutamyl transferase increase (36 15% in the cobimetinib and vemurafenib group vs 25 10% in the placebo and vemurafenib group), blood creatine phosphokinase increase (30 12% vs one <1%), and alanine transaminase increase (28 11% vs 15 6%). Serious adverse events occurred in 92 patients (37%) in the cobimetinib and vemurafenib group and 69 patients (28%) in the vemurafenib group. Pyrexia (six patients 2%) and dehydration (five patients 2%) were the most common serious adverse events reported in the cobimetinib and vemurafenib group. A total of 259 patients have died: 117 (47%) in the cobimetinib and vemurafenib group and 142 (58%) in the vemurafenib group. The primary cause of death was disease progression in most patients: 109 (93%) of 117 in the cobimetinib and vemurafenib group and 133 (94%) of 142 in the vemurafenib group. Interpretation These data confirm the clinical benefit of cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib and support the use of the combination as a standard first-line approach to improve survival in patients with advanced BRAFV600 -mutant melanoma. Funding F Hoffmann-La Roche–Genentech.
Abstract Objectives To determine whether supplemental biopsy of hypoechoic ultrasound lesions (HUL) incidentally found during MRI-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion-targeted prostate biopsy results ...in improved prostate cancer (PCa) detection. Methods Patients underwent MRI-TRUS targeted biopsy as part of an ongoing prospective trial from August 2007 to February 2015. For men with HUL, the biopsy pathology of HUL and MRI lesions was classified according to the updated 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system. The detection of PCa by MRI-targeted biopsy with and without HUL biopsy was compared. Results Of 1260 men in the trial, 106 underwent biopsy of 119 HUL. PCa was diagnosed in 52/106 men (49%) by biopsy of either MRI lesions or HUL. Biopsy of HUL in addition to MRI lesions resulted in 4 additional diagnoses of high-grade (ISUP Grade 3-5) PCa vs biopsy of MRI lesions alone (20 vs 16 men, p=0.046). Three of these cases were upgraded from lower grade (ISUP Grade 1-2) PCa on MRI-guided biopsy alone, and only 1 case (1% of cohort) was diagnosed that would have been missed by MRI-guided biopsy alone. Supplemental biopsy of HUL did not change the PCa risk category in 96% (102/106) of men with HUL. Conclusions Supplemental biopsy of HUL yields a small increase in the detection of higher grade PCa as compared to biopsy of MRI lesions alone. As upgrading is rare, routinely screening for HUL during MRI-targeted biopsy remains controversial.
PDF
