The echinocandins are being used increasingly as therapy for invasive candidiasis. Prospective sentinel surveillance for the emergence of in vitro resistance to the echinocandins among invasive ...Candida sp. isolates is indicated. We determined the in vitro activities of anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin against 5,346 invasive (bloodstream or sterile-site) isolates of Candida spp. collected from over 90 medical centers worldwide from 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2006. We performed susceptibility testing according to the CLSI M27-A2 method and used RPMI 1640 broth, 24-h incubation, and a prominent inhibition endpoint for determination of the MICs. Of 5,346 invasive Candida sp. isolates, species distribution was 54% C. albicans, 14% C. parapsilosis, 14% C. glabrata, 12% C. tropicalis, 3% C. krusei, 1% C. guilliermondii, and 2% other Candida spp. Overall, all three echinocandins were very active against CANDIDA: anidulafungin (MIC₅₀, 0.06 μg/ml; MIC₉₀, 2 μg/ml), caspofungin (MIC₅₀, 0.03 μg/ml; MIC₉₀, 0.25 μg/ml), micafungin (MIC₅₀, 0.015 μg/ml; MIC₉₀, 1 μg/ml). More than 99% of isolates were inhibited by <=2 μg/ml of all three agents. Results by species (expressed as the percentages of isolates inhibited by <=2 μg/ml of anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin, respectively) were as follows: for C. albicans, 99.6%, 100%, and 100%; for C. parapsilosis, 92.5%, 99.9%, and 100%; for C. glabrata, 99.9%, 99.9%, and 100%; for C. tropicalis, 100%, 99.8%, and 100%; for C. krusei, 100%, 100%, and 100%; and for C. guilliermondii, 90.2%, 95.1%, and 100%. There was no significant change in the activities of the three echinocandins over the 6-year study period and no difference in activity by geographic region. All three echinocandins have excellent in vitro activities against invasive strains of Candida isolated from centers worldwide. Our prospective sentinel surveillance reveals no evidence of emerging echinocandin resistance among invasive clinical isolates of Candida spp.
•Antifungal resistance has been slowly increasing among certain yeast species.•Emergence of yeast species with intrinsic resistance to antifungals has been observed.•Non-susceptibility to ...echinocandins ranged from 0.0–2.3% and was highest in Candida glabrata.•Elevated fluconazole MICs were noted for less common Candida and other yeast species.•Azole resistance in C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis was mostly due to Erg11 Y132F alterations.
This study evaluated the activity of echinocandins, azoles and amphotericin B against Candida spp. isolates and other yeasts and characterised azole resistance mechanisms in Candida parapsilosis and Candida tropicalis. Invasive Candida spp. isolates (n = 2936) collected in 60 hospitals worldwide during 2016–2017 underwent antifungal susceptibility testing by broth microdilution. Azole-resistant C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis were submitted to qPCR for ERG11, CDR1 and MDR1, and the whole genome sequence was analysed. Results of non-susceptibility to echinocandins ranged from 0.0–2.3%, being highest in Candida glabrata. More than 99.0% of the Candida albicans isolates were susceptible to both fluconazole and voriconazole. Fluconazole resistance in C. glabrata was 6.5% overall, being highest in the USA (13.0%). Resistance to voriconazole in Candida krusei was only noted in the USA (5.0%). Azoles inhibited 89.1–91.6% of C. parapsilosis isolates, with most resistant isolates noted in Europe (15.1%), including 36 isolates from Italy (three hospitals), of which 34 harboured Erg11 Y132F mutations and overexpressed MDR1. Azole non-wild-type C. tropicalis (7/227) were found in five countries: 3 isolates from Thailand had the same Erg11 Y132F alteration. Fluconazole non-wild-type isolates were noted among 3/77 (3.9%) Candida dubliniensis, 4/17 (23.5%) Candida guilliermondii, 4/47 (8.5%) Candida lusitaniae and other less common yeast species. Echinocandin use has been recommended over fluconazole for invasive Candida infections. However, azoles are still active against the most common Candida spp. and resistance appears to be restricted to certain geographic regions and associated with Erg11 Y132 alterations in C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis.
SCY-078 (formerly MK-3118) is a novel orally active inhibitor of fungal β-(1,3)-glucan synthase (GS). SCY-078 is a derivative of enfumafungin and is structurally distinct from the echinocandin class ...of antifungal agents. We evaluated the
activity of this compound against wild-type (WT) and echinocandin-resistant isolates containing mutations in the
genes of
spp. Against 36
spp.
mutants tested, 30 (83.3%) were non-WT to 1 or more echinocandins, and only 9 (25.0%) were non-WT (MIC, >WT-upper limit) to SCY-078. Among
isolates carrying
alterations, 84.0% were non-WT to the echinocandins versus only 24.0% for SCY-078. In contrast to the echinocandin comparators, the activity of SCY-078 was minimally affected by the presence of
mutations, suggesting that this agent is useful in the treatment of
infections due to echinocandin-resistant strains.
We tested a global collection of Candida sp. strains against anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin, using CLSI M27-A3 broth microdilution (BMD) methods, in order to define wild-type (WT) ...populations and epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs). From 2003 to 2007, 8,271 isolates of Candida spp. (4,283 C. albicans, 1,236 C. glabrata, 1,238 C. parapsilosis, 996 C. tropicalis, 270 C. krusei, 99 C. lusitaniae, 88 C. guilliermondii, and 61 C. kefyr isolates) were obtained from over 100 centers worldwide. The modal MICs (in μg/ml) for anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin, respectively, for each species were as follows: C. albicans, 0.03, 0.03, 0.015; C. glabrata, 0.06, 0.03, 0.015; C. tropicalis, 0.03, 0.03, 0.015; C. kefyr, 0.06, 0.015, 0.06; C. krusei, 0.03, 0.06, 0.06; C. lusitaniae, 0.05, 0.25, 0.12; C. parapsilosis, 2, 0.25, 1; and C. guilliermondii, 2, 0.5. 05. The ECVs, expressed in μg/ml (percentage of isolates that had MICs that were less than or equal to the ECV is shown in parentheses) for anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin, respectively, were as follows: 0.12 (99.7%), 0.12 (99.8%), and 0.03 (97.7%) for C. albicans; 0.25 (99.4%), 0.12 (98.5%), and 0.03 (98.2%) for C. glabrata; 0.12 (98.9%), 0.12 (99.4%), and 0.12 (99.1%) for C. tropicalis; 0.25(100%), 0.03 (100%), and 0.12 (100%) for C. kefyr; 0.12 (99.3%), 0.25 (96.3%), and 0.12 (97.8%) for C. krusei; 2 (100%), 0.5 (98.0%), and 0.5 (99.0%) for C. lusitaniae; 4 (100%), 1 (98.6%), and 4 (100%) for C. parapsilosis; 16 (100%), 4 (95.5%), and 4 (98.9%) for C. guilliermondii. These WT MIC distributions and ECVs will be useful in surveillance for emerging reduced echinocandin susceptibility among Candida spp. and for determining the importance of various FKS1 or other mutations.
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) data from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program generated by reference methods were analysed to compare the antifungal resistance profiles and species ...distribution of Candida bloodstream infection (BSI) isolates obtained from patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and those from non-ICU locations. Results from 79 medical centres between 2008 and 2009 were tabulated. MIC values were obtained for anidulafungin, caspofungin, micafungin, fluconazole, posaconazole and voriconazole. Recently revised Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints for resistance were employed. A total of 1752 isolates of Candida spp. were obtained from ICU (779; 44.5%) and non-ICU (973; 55.5%) settings. The frequency of ICU-associated Candida BSI was higher in Latin America (56.5%) compared with Europe (44.4%) and North America (39.6%). The frequency of candidaemia in the ICU decreased both in Latin America and North America over the 2-year study period. Approximately 96% of isolates both in ICU and non-ICU settings were caused by only five species (Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis, Candida tropicalis and Candida krusei). Resistance both to azoles and echinocandins was uncommon in ICU and non-ICU settings. Overall, fluconazole resistance was detected in 5.0% of ICU isolates and 4.4% of non-ICU isolates. Candida glabrata was the only species in which resistance to azoles and echinocandins was noted, and this multidrug-resistant phenotype was found in both settings. In conclusion, the findings from this global survey indicate that invasive candidiasis can no longer be considered to be just an ICU-related infection, and efforts to design preventive and diagnostic strategies must be expanded to include other at-risk populations and hospital environments. Concern regarding C. glabrata must now include resistance to echinocandins as well as azole antifungal agents.
Antifungal testing results from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2008 to 2009) were analyzed for regional variations of invasive Candida species infections. Among 2,085 cases from the ...Asian-Pacific (APAC) (51 cases), Latin American (LAM) (348 cases), European (EU) (750 cases), and North American (NAM) (936 cases) regions, Candida albicans predominated (48.4%), followed by C. glabrata (18.0%), C. parapsilosis (17.2%), C. tropicalis (10.5%), and C. krusei (1.9%). Resistance to echinocandins (anidulafungin 2.4% and micafungin 1.9%) and azoles (3.5 to 5.6%) was most prevalent among C. glabrata isolates, as determined using recently established CLSI breakpoint criteria. C. glabrata isolates were more common in NAM (23.5%), and C. albicans isolates were more common in APAC (56.9%), with C. parapsilosis (25.6%) and C. tropicalis (17.0%) being more prominent in LAM. Emerging resistance patterns among C. glabrata cases in NAM require focused surveillance.
We report on the in vitro activity of the Hos2 fungal histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor MGCD290 (MethylGene, Inc.) in combination with azoles against azole-resistant yeasts and molds. ...Susceptibility testing was performed by the CLSI M27-A3 and M38-A2 broth microdilution methods. Testing of the combinations (MGCD290 in combination with fluconazole, posaconazole, or voriconazole) was performed by the checkerboard method. The fractional inhibitory concentrations were determined and were defined as <0.5 for synergy, greater-than-or-equal0.5 but <4 for indifference, and greater-than-or-equal4 for antagonism. Ninety-one isolates were tested, as follows: 30 Candida isolates, 10 Aspergillus isolates, 15 isolates of the Zygomycetes order, 10 Cryptococcus neoformans isolates, 8 Rhodotorula isolates, 8 Fusarium isolates, 5 Trichosporon isolates, and 5 Scedosporium isolates. MGCD290 showed modest activity when it was used alone (MICs, 1 to 8 μg/ml) and was mostly active against azole-resistant yeasts, but the MICs against molds were high (16 to >32 μg/ml). MGCD290 was synergistic with fluconazole against 55 (60%) of the 91 isolates, with posaconazole against 46 (51%) of the 91 isolates, and with voriconazole against 48 (53%) of the 91 isolates. Synergy between fluconazole and MGCD290 was observed against 26/30 (87%) Candida isolates. All 23 of the 91 Candida isolates that were not fluconazole susceptible demonstrated a reduced fluconazole MIC that crossed an interpretive breakpoint (e.g., resistant MIC, greater-than-or-equal64 μg/ml to susceptible MIC, less-than or equal to8 μg/ml) when fluconazole was combined with MGCD290 at 0.12 to 4 μg/ml. The activity of fluconazole plus MGCD290 was also synergistic against 6/10 Aspergillus isolates. Posaconazole plus MGCD290 demonstrated synergy against 14/15 Zygomycetes (9 Rhizopus isolates and 5 Mucor isolates). Voriconazole plus MGCD290 demonstrated synergy against six of eight Fusarium isolates. Thus, MGCD290 demonstrated in vitro synergy with azoles against the majority of clinical isolates tested, including many azole-resistant isolates and genera inherently resistant to azoles (e.g., Mucor and Fusarium). Further evaluation of fungal HDAC inhibitor-azole combinations is indicated.
PDF
