The American Academy of Ophthalmology recommendations on screening for chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) retinopathy are revised in light of new information about the prevalence of ...toxicity, risk factors, fundus distribution, and effectiveness of screening tools.
Although the locus of toxic damage is parafoveal in many eyes, Asian patients often show an extramacular pattern of damage. DOSE: We recommend a maximum daily HCQ use of ≤5.0 mg/kg real weight, which correlates better with risk than ideal weight. There are no similar demographic data for CQ, but dose comparisons in older literature suggest using ≤2.3 mg/kg real weight.
The risk of toxicity is dependent on daily dose and duration of use. At recommended doses, the risk of toxicity up to 5 years is under 1% and up to 10 years is under 2%, but it rises to almost 20% after 20 years. However, even after 20 years, a patient without toxicity has only a 4% risk of converting in the subsequent year.
High dose and long duration of use are the most significant risks. Other major factors are concomitant renal disease, or use of tamoxifen.
A baseline fundus examination should be performed to rule out preexisting maculopathy. Begin annual screening after 5 years for patients on acceptable doses and without major risk factors.
The primary screening tests are automated visual fields plus spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD OCT). These should look beyond the central macula in Asian patients. The multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) can provide objective corroboration for visual fields, and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) can show damage topographically. Modern screening should detect retinopathy before it is visible in the fundus.
Retinopathy is not reversible, and there is no present therapy. Recognition at an early stage (before any RPE loss) is important to prevent central visual loss. However, questionable test results should be repeated or validated with additional procedures to avoid unnecessary cessation of valuable medication.
Patients (and prescribing physicians) should be informed about risk of toxicity, proper dose levels, and the importance of regular annual screening.
Recent advances in pharmacological agents have led to successful treatment of a variety of retinal diseases such as neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic macular oedema (DMO), ...and retinal vascular occlusions (RVO). These treatments often require repeated drug injections for an extended period of time. To reduce these repeated treatment burdens, minimally invasive drug delivery systems are needed. An ideal therapy should maintain effective levels of drug for the intended duration of treatment following a single application, recognising that a significant number of months of therapy may be required. There are numerous approaches under investigation to improve treatment options. This review will highlight the advantages and limitations of selected drug delivery systems of novel biomaterial implants and depots. The main emphasis will be placed on less invasive, longer acting, sustained release formulations for the treatment of retinal disorders.
The American Academy of Ophthalmology recommendations for screening of chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) retinopathy were published in 2002, but improved screening tools and new knowledge ...about the prevalence of toxicity have appeared in the ensuing years. No treatment exists as yet for this disorder, so it is imperative that patients and their physicians be aware of the best practices for minimizing toxic damage.
New data have shown that the risk of toxicity increases sharply toward 1% after 5 to 7 years of use, or a cumulative dose of 1000 g, of HCQ. The risk increases further with continued use of the drug.
The prior recommendation emphasized dosing by weight. However, most patients are routinely given 400 mg of HCQ daily (or 250 mg CQ). This dose is now considered acceptable, except for individuals of short stature, for whom the dose should be determined on the basis of ideal body weight to avoid overdosage.
A baseline examination is advised for patients starting these drugs to serve as a reference point and to rule out maculopathy, which might be a contraindication to their use. Annual screening should begin after 5 years (or sooner if there are unusual risk factors).
Newer objective tests, such as multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG), spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), and fundus autofluorescence (FAF), can be more sensitive than visual fields. It is now recommended that along with 10-2 automated fields, at least one of these procedures be used for routine screening where available. When fields are performed independently, even the most subtle 10-2 field changes should be taken seriously and are an indication for evaluation by objective testing. Because mfERG testing is an objective test that evaluates function, it may be used in place of visual fields. Amsler grid testing is no longer recommended. Fundus examinations are advised for documentation, but visible bull's-eye maculopathy is a late change, and the goal of screening is to recognize toxicity at an earlier stage.
Patients should be aware of the risk of toxicity and the rationale for screening (to detect early changes and minimize visual loss, not necessarily to prevent it). The drugs should be stopped if possible when toxicity is recognized or strongly suspected, but this is a decision to be made in conjunction with patients and their medical physicians.
Introduction: Recent advances in pharmacological therapies to treat ocular diseases such as glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema and retinal vascular occlusions have ...greatly improved the prognosis for these diseases. Due to these advances in pharmacological therapy, there is a great deal of interest in minimally invasive delivery methods, which has generated rapid developments in the field of ocular drug delivery.Areas covered: This review will summarize currently available and recent developments for ocular drug delivery to both the anterior and posterior segments. Modes of delivery, including topical, systemic, transcleral/periocular and intravitreal, will be discussed and corresponding examples will be given. This review will highlight the advantages and disadvantages of each mode of delivery and discuss strategies to address these issues.Expert opinion: An ideal therapy should maintain effective levels of drug for the intended duration of treatment following a single application, yet a significant number of months of therapy may be required. There are numerous approaches under investigation to improve treatment options. From the use of novel biomaterial implants and depots for sustained release, to prodrug formations, to iontophoresis to improve drug delivery, the main emphasis will continue to be placed on less invasive, longer acting, sustained release formulations in the treatment of numerous ocular disorders.
Purpose: Current standard of care for neovascular eye diseases require repeated intravitreal bolus injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGFs). The purpose of this study was ...to validate a degradable microsphere-thermoresponsive hydrogel drug delivery system (DDS) capable of releasing bioactive aflibercept in a controlled and extended manner for 6 months.
Materials and Methods: The DDS was fabricated by suspending aflibercept-loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres within a biodegradable poly(ethylene glycol)-co-(l-lactic acid) diacrylate/N-isopropylacrylamide (PEG-PLLA-DA/NIPAAm) thermoresponsive hydrogel. Encapsulation efficiency of DDSs and in vitro release profiles were characterized by iodine-125 radiolabeled aflibercept. The degradation of hydrogel was determined by dry weight changes. The cytotoxicity from degraded DDS byproducts was investigated by quantifying cell viability using LIVE/DEAD® assay. In addition, dot blot and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were used to determine the bioactivity of released drug. Finally, morphology of microspheres and hydrogel were investigated by cryo-scanning electron microscopy before and after thermal transformation.
Results: The microsphere-hydrogel DDS was capable of releasing bioactive aflibercept in a controlled and extended manner for 6 months. The amount and rate of aflibercept release can be controlled by both the cross-linker concentration and microspheres load amount. The initial burst (release within 24 h) was from 37.35 ± 4.92 to 74.56 ± 6.16 µg (2 and 3 mM hydrogel, each loaded with 10 and 20 mg/ml of microspheres, respectively), followed by controlled drug release of 0.07-0.15 µg/day. Higher PEG-PLLA-DA concentration (3 mM) degraded faster than the lower concentration (2 mM). No significant cytotoxicity from degraded DDS byproducts was found for all investigated time points. Bioactivity of released drug was maintained at therapeutic level over entire release period.
Conclusions: The microsphere-hydrogel DDS is safe and can deliver bioactive aflibercept in a controlled manner. This may provide a significant advantage over current bolus injection therapies in the treatment of ocular neovascularization.
Celotno besedilo
Dostopno za:
DOBA, IJS, IZUM, KILJ, NUK, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
Purpose: Demonstrate in vivo that controlled and extended release of a low dose of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) from a microsphere-hydrogel drug delivery system (DDS) has a ...therapeutic effect in a laser-induced rat model of choroidal neovascularization (CNV).
Methods: Anti-VEGF (ranibizumab or aflibercept) was loaded into poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres that were then suspended within an injectable poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-based thermo-responsive hydrogel DDS.The DDS was shown previously to release bioactive anti-VEGF for ~200 days. CNV was induced using an Ar-green laser. The four experimental groups were as follows: (i) non-treated, (ii) drug-free DDS, (iii) anti-VEGF-loaded DDS, and (iv) bolus injection of anti-VEGF. CNV lesion areas were measured based on fluorescein angiograms and quantified using a multi-Otsu thresholding technique. Intraocular pressure (IOP) and dark-adapted electroretinogram (ERG) were also obtained pre- and post-treatment (1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks).
Results: The anti-VEGF-loaded DDS group had significantly smaller (60%) CNV lesion areas than non-treated animals throughout the study. A small transient increase in IOP was seen immediately after injection; however, all IOP measurements at all time points were within the normal range. There were no significant changes in ERG maximal response compared to pre-treatment measurements for the drug-loaded DDS, which suggests no adverse effects on retinal cellular function.
Conclusions: The current study demonstrates that the DDS can effectively decrease laser-induced CNV lesions in a murine model. Controlled and extended release from our DDS achieved greater treatment efficacy using an order of magnitude less drug than what is required with bolus administration. This suggests that our DDS may provide a significant advantage in the treatment of posterior segment eye diseases.
Celotno besedilo
Dostopno za:
DOBA, IJS, IZUM, KILJ, NUK, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
Introduction: The development of new therapies for treating various eye conditions has led to a demand for extended release delivery systems, which would lessen the need for frequent application ...while still achieving therapeutic drug levels in the target tissues.
Areas covered: Following an overview of the different ocular drug delivery modalities, this article surveys the biomaterials used to develop sustained release drug delivery systems. Microspheres, nanospheres, liposomes, hydrogels, and composite systems are discussed in terms of their primary materials. The advantages and disadvantages of each drug delivery system are discussed for various applications. Recommendations for modifications and strategies for improvements to these basic systems are also discussed.
Expert opinion: An ideal sustained release drug delivery system should be able to encapsulate and deliver the necessary drug to the target tissues at a therapeutic level without any detriment to the drug. Drug encapsulation should be as high as possible to minimize loss and unless it is specifically desired, the initial burst of drug release should be kept to a minimum. By modifying various biomaterials, it is possible to achieve sustained drug delivery to both the anterior and posterior segments of the eye.
Age-Related Macular Degeneration Jager, Rama D; Mieler, William F; Miller, Joan W
The New England journal of medicine,
06/2008, Letnik:
358, Številka:
24
Journal Article
Recenzirano
Age-related macular degeneration is the leading cause of irreversible blindness in people 50 years of age or older in the developed world. This article reviews the clinical and histopathological ...features of age-related macular degeneration and its genetics and epidemiology and discusses current management options and research advances.
This article reviews the clinical and histopathological features of age-related macular degeneration and its genetics and epidemiology and discusses current management options and research advances.
Age-related macular degeneration is the leading cause of irreversible blindness in people 50 years of age or older in the developed world.
1
,
2
More than 8 million Americans have age-related macular degeneration, and the overall prevalence of advanced age-related macular degeneration is projected to increase by more than 50% by the year 2020.
3
Recent advances in clinical research have led not only to a better understanding of the genetics and pathophysiology of age-related macular degeneration but also to new therapies designed to prevent and help treat it. This article reviews the clinical and histopathological features of age-related macular degeneration, as . . .
Intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGF) are the current standard of care for patients with choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular ...degeneration (AMD). There is a growing subset of patients that does not respond to anti-VEGF monotherapy treatment. Some patients, however, do respond to combination therapy of corticosteroids and anti-VEGF. This treatment requires monthly/bimonthly injections of anti-VEGF and semi-annual injections of corticosteroid. A drug delivery system (DDS) that simultaneously releases multiple drugs could benefit these patients by reducing the number of injections. The purpose of this study was to characterize the simultaneous release of aflibercept and dexamethasone from a biodegradable microparticle- and nanoparticle-hydrogel DDS.
Dexamethasone-loaded nanoparticles and aflibercept-loaded microparticles were created using modified single- and double-emulsion techniques, respectively. Then, microparticles and nanoparticles were embedded into a thermoresponsive, biodegradable poly(ethylene glycol)-co-(L-lactic acid) diacrylate (PEG-PLLA-DA)-N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAAm) hydrogel DDS. Drug release studies and characterization of DDS were conducted with varying doses of microparticles and nanoparticles.
The combination aflibercept-loaded microparticle- and dexamethasone-loaded nanoparticle- hydrogel (Combo-DDS) achieved a total release time of 224 days. Small decreases were seen in swelling ratio and equilibrium water content for Combo-DDS compared to monotherapy aflibercept-loaded microparticle-hydrogel DDS (AFL-DDS) and monotherapy dexamethasone-loaded nanoparticle-hydrogel DDS (DEX-DDS). Bioactivity of aflibercept was maintained in Combo-DDS compared to AFL-DDS.
The Combo-DDS was able to extend and control the release of both aflibercept and dexamethasone simultaneously from a single DDS. This may eliminate the need for separate dosing regiments of anti-VEGF and corticosteroids for wet AMD patients.
Celotno besedilo
Dostopno za:
DOBA, IJS, IZUM, KILJ, NUK, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
The purpose of this study was to examine antibiotic drug transport from a hydrogel drug delivery system (DDS) using a computational model and a 3D model of the eye. Hydrogel DDSs loaded with ...vancomycin (VAN) were synthesized and release behavior was characterized in vitro. Four different compartmental and four COMSOL models of the eye were developed to describe transport into the vitreous originating from a DDS placed topically, in the subconjunctiva, subretinally, and intravitreally. The concentration of the simulated DDS was assumed to be the initial concentration of the hydrogel DDS. The simulation was executed over 1500 and 100 h for the compartmental and COMSOL models, respectively. Based on the MATLAB model, topical, subconjunctival, subretinal and vitreous administration took most (~500 h to least (0 h) amount of time to reach peak concentrations in the vitreous, respectively. All routes successfully achieved therapeutic levels of drug (0.007 mg/mL) in the vitreous. These models predict the relative build-up of drug in the vitreous following DDS administration in four different points of origin in the eye. Our model may eventually be used to explore the minimum loading dose of drug required in our DDS leading to reduced drug use and waste.
PDF
