BRCA1 (BReast‐CAncer susceptibility gene 1) and BRCA2 are tumor suppressor genes, the mutant phenotypes of which predispose to breast and ovarian cancers. Intensive research has shown that BRCA ...proteins are involved in a multitude of pivotal cellular processes. In particular, both genes contribute to DNA repair and transcriptional regulation in response to DNA damage. Recent studies suggest that BRCA proteins are required for maintenance of chromosomal stability, thereby protecting the genome from damage. New data also show that BRCAs transcriptionally regulate some genes involved in DNA repair, the cell cycle, and apo ptosis. Many of these functions are mediated by a large number of cellular proteins that interact with BRCAs. The functions of BRCA proteins are also linked to distinct and specific phosphory‐lation events; however, the extent to which phosphorylation‐acti‐vated molecular pathways contribute to tumor suppressor activity remains unclear. Finally, the reasons why mutations in BRCA genes lead to the development of breast and ovarian cancers are not clearly understood. Elucidation of the precise molecular functions of BRCAs is expected to improve our understanding of hereditary as well as sporadic mammary carcinogenesis.
The cellular response to genotoxic stress that damages DNA includes cell cycle arrest, activation of DNA repair, and in the event of irreparable damage, induction of apoptosis. However, the signals ...that determine cell fate, that is, survival or apoptosis, are largely unclear. The tumor suppressor p53 has been implicated in many important cellular processes, including regulation of apoptotic cell death. When cells encounter genotoxic stress, certain sensors for DNA lesions eventually stabilize and activate p53. Subsequently, p53 exerts its tumor suppressor function by transactivating numerous target genes. Active p53 is subjected to a complex and diverse array of covalent post‐translational modifications, which selectively influence the expression of p53 target genes. In this regard, the molecular basis for how p53 induces apoptosis has been extensively studied; however, the relative contribution of each downstream effecter is still to be explored. Moreover, little is known about precise mechanisms by which modified p53 is capable of apoptosis induction. A thorough understanding for the whole picture of p53 modification in apoptosis will be extremely valuable in the development of highly effective and specific therapies for caner patients. This review is focused on the current views regarding the regulation of cell fate by p53 in the apoptotic response to DNA damage.
(Cancer Sci 2010; 101: 831–835)
Immunotherapies that target programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand PD-L1 as well as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4) have shown impressive clinical outcomes for ...multiple tumours. However, only a subset of patients achieves durable responses, suggesting that the mechanisms of the immune checkpoint pathways are not completely understood. Here, we report that PD-L1 translocates from the plasma membrane into the nucleus through interactions with components of the endocytosis and nucleocytoplasmic transport pathways, regulated by p300-mediated acetylation and HDAC2-dependent deacetylation of PD-L1. Moreover, PD-L1 deficiency leads to compromised expression of multiple immune-response-related genes. Genetically or pharmacologically modulating PD-L1 acetylation blocks its nuclear translocation, reprograms the expression of immune-response-related genes and, as a consequence, enhances the anti-tumour response to PD-1 blockade. Thus, our results reveal an acetylation-dependent regulation of PD-L1 nuclear localization that governs immune-response gene expression, and thereby advocate targeting PD-L1 translocation to enhance the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade.
BRCA1 gene: function and deficiency Takaoka, Miho; Miki, Yoshio
International journal of clinical oncology,
02/2018, Letnik:
23, Številka:
1
Journal Article
Recenzirano
The BRCA1 protein, a hereditary breast and ovarian cancer-causing gene product, is known as a multifunctional protein that performs various functions in cells. It is well known, along with BRCA 2, to ...cause hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, but here we will specifically focus on BRCA1. We introduce the mechanism and the latest report on homologous recombination repair, replication, involvement in checkpoint regulation, transcription, chromatin remodeling, and cytoplasmic function (centrosome regulation, apoptosis, selective autophagy), and consider the possibility of carcinogenesis from inhibition of the intracellular functions in each. We also consider the possibility of drug development based on each function. Finally, we will explain, from data obtained through basic research, that an appropriate regimen is important for raising the response rate for poly (ADP)-ribose polymerase inhibitors, in the case of low susceptibility, iatrogenic toxicity, tolerance, etc.
CDK1 plays key roles in cell cycle progression through the G2/M phase transition and activation of homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair pathway. Accordingly, various CDK1 inhibitors have been ...developed for cancer therapy that induce prolonged G2 arrest and/or sensitize cells to DNA damaging agents in tumor cells, resulting in cell death. However, CDK1 inhibition can induce resistance to DNA damage in certain conditions. The mechanism of different DNA damage sensitivity is not completely understood. We performed immunofluorescence and flow cytometry analysis to investigate DNA damage responses in human tumor cells during low and high dose treatments with RO-3306, a selective CDK1 inhibitor. This comparative investigation demonstrated that RO-3306-induced G2 arrest prevented cells with DNA double-strand breaks from transitioning into the M-phase and that the cells maintained their DNA repair capacity in G2-phase, even under RO-3306 dose-dependent DNA repair inhibition. These findings reveal that CDK1 inhibitor-induced DNA repair inhibition and cell cycle control, which regulate each other during the G2/M phase transition determine the cellular sensitivity to DNA damage, providing insight useful for developing clinical strategies targeting CDK1 inhibition in tumor cells.
•Higher dose of CDK1 inhibitor reverses DNA damage sensitivity.•Higher dose of CDK1 inhibitor promotes DSB repair compared to lower dose.•CDK1 inhibitor prevents DNA damage from being carried over into M-phase.
High estrogen concentration leads to an inflammatory reaction in the mammary gland tissue in vivo; however, the detailed mechanism underlying its specific effects on the breast duct has not been ...fully clarified. We used 3D-cultured MCF-10A acini as a breast duct model and demonstrated various deleterious effects of 17-β estradiol (E2), including the destruction of the basement membrane surrounding the acini, abnormal adhesion between cells, and cell death via apoptosis and pyroptosis. Moreover, we clarified the mechanism underlying these phenomena: E2 binds to GPER in MCF-10A cells and stimulates matrix metalloproteinase 3 (MMP-3) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) secretion via JNK and p38 MAPK signaling pathways. IL-1β activates the IL-1R1 signaling pathway and induces continuous MMP-3 and IL-1β secretion. Collectively, our novel findings reveal an important molecular mechanism underlying the effects of E2 on the integrity of duct-like structures in vitro. Thus, E2 may act as a trigger for ductal carcinoma transition in situ.
The overwhelming majority of participants in current genetic studies are of European ancestry. To elucidate disease biology in the East Asian population, we conducted a genome-wide association study ...(GWAS) with 212,453 Japanese individuals across 42 diseases. We detected 320 independent signals in 276 loci for 27 diseases, with 25 novel loci (P < 9.58 × 10
). East Asian-specific missense variants were identified as candidate causal variants for three novel loci, and we successfully replicated two of them by analyzing independent Japanese cohorts; p.R220W of ATG16L2 (associated with coronary artery disease) and p.V326A of POT1 (associated with lung cancer). We further investigated enrichment of heritability within 2,868 annotations of genome-wide transcription factor occupancy, and identified 378 significant enrichments across nine diseases (false discovery rate < 0.05) (for example, NKX3-1 for prostate cancer). This large-scale GWAS in a Japanese population provides insights into the etiology of complex diseases and highlights the importance of performing GWAS in non-European populations.
Germline mutations in breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 or 2 (BRCA1 or BRCA2) significantly increase cancer risk in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC). Both genes function in the ...homologous recombination (HR) pathway of the DNA double‐strand break (DSB) repair process. Therefore, the DNA‐repair defect characteristic of cancer cells brings about a therapeutic advantage for poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor‐induced synthetic lethality. PARP inhibitor‐based therapeutics initially cause cancer lethality but acquired resistance mechanisms have been found and need to be elucidated. In particular, it is essential to understand in detail the mechanism of DNA damage and repair to PARP inhibitor treatment. Further investigations have shown the roles of BRCA1/2 and its associations to other molecules in the DSB repair system. Notably, the repair pathway chosen in BRCA1‐deficient cells could be entirely different from that in BRCA2‐deficient cells after PARP inhibitor treatment. The present review describes synthetic lethality and acquired resistance mechanisms to PARP inhibitor through the DSB repair pathway and subsequent repair process. In addition, recent knowledge of resistance mechanisms is discussed. Our model should contribute to the development of novel therapeutic strategies.
Poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor induces single‐ended double‐strand break (seDSB) during DNA replication in S‐phase. seDSB is repaired by two major pathways: homologous recombination (HR) or non‐homologous end joining (NHEJ) as a result of DSB repair pathway choice mechanism in S/G2 phase. We explain PARP inhibitor‐induced synthetic lethality and acquired resistance mechanism in BRCA1/2‐mutated cancer cells through the repair choice model.
Breast cancer susceptibility gene 2 (BRCA2) mediates genome maintenance during the S phase of the cell cycle, with important roles in replication stress, centrosome replication, and cytokinesis. In ...this study, we showed that a small heat shock protein, HSP27, interacted with and participated in the degradation of BRCA2 in estrogen-treated MCF-7 cells. BRCA2 degradation reportedly requires ubiquitination of the C-terminal region; thus, fragments of amino acid (aa) residues 2241–2940 were produced and assayed for their degradation following cycloheximide (CHX) treatment. The results showed that aa 2491–2580 affected the degradation of BRCA2, especially lysine (Lys) 2497. Furthermore, the K2497 A/R mutation increased ATP production and the proliferation of DLD-1 (BRCA2 knockout) cells compared to the cells expressing wild-type BRCA2-FLAG. Notably, a single residue, Lys2497, affected BRCA2 degradation, and K2497R is reportedly a missense mutation in hereditary breast cancer.
•Endogenous BRCA2 interacted with small heat shock protein (HSP) 27 in M phase.•HSP27 mediated BRCA2 degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway.•The BRCA2 K2497R missense mutation inhibited proteasome degradation.•BRCA2(K2497R)-FLAG enhanced ATP production and cell proliferation.
PDF
