La vía de suplementación óptima (intravenosa vs. oral) de hierro en pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica (ERC) no en diálisis es controvertida. Recientemente se ha desarrollado una preparación oral ...(hierro liposomal, FeSu) con elevada biodisponibilidad y baja incidencia de efectos secundarios. El objetivo fue evaluar la eficacia del FeSu en pacientes con ERC estadio 3 y limitación digestiva a la ferroterapia oral convencional.
Estudio observacional prospectivo con pacientes con ERC estadio 3 estable e intolerancia digestiva a la ferroterapia oral convencional. Se administró una dosis de FeSu de 30mg/día oral durante 12 meses. El objetivo primario fue el aumento de la hemoglobina a los 6 y 12 meses. También se evaluó la adherencia terapéutica y efectos adversos.
Se incluyeron 37 pacientes de 72,6±14,7 años y un filtrado glomerular estimado de 42±10mL/min/1,73m2. Treinta y dos pacientes habían recibido tratamiento previo con formulaciones orales convencionales, manifestando el 73% intolerancia digestiva con una adherencia del 9,4%. Tras 6 meses con FeSu se objetivó un incremento de las cifras de hemoglobina respecto a la basal, manteniéndose a los 12 meses (0,49±0,19 y 0,36±0,19g/dL, respectivamente, p<0,05), y pese a un descenso significativo del filtrado glomerular estimado de 3,16±1,16 y 4,20±1,28mL/min/1,72 m2 a los 6 y 12 meses, respectivamente. Ningún paciente presentó reacciones adversas que obligaran a suspender el tratamiento. La adherencia fue del 100% en ambos momentos analizados.
El FeSu es eficaz en una cohorte de pacientes con ERC estadio 3 de características extrapolables a la población general de pacientes con ERC moderada, con una baja tasa de reacciones adversas y excelente tolerabilidad.
The optimal iron supplementation route of administration (intravenous vs oral) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) not on dialysis is a hot topic of debate. An oral preparation (liposomal iron, FeSu) has recently been developed with high bioavailability and low incidence of side effects. The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of FeSu in patients with stage 3 CKD and gastrointestinal intolerance to conventional oral iron therapy.
Prospective observational study of patients with stable stage 3 CKD and gastrointestinal intolerance to conventional oral iron therapy. An oral 30mg/day dose of FeSu was administered for 12 months. The primary outcome measure was haemoglobin increase at 6 and 12 months. Treatment adherence and adverse effects were also evaluated.
37 patients aged 72.6±14.7 years and with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 42±10ml/min/1.73m2 were included. 32 patients had received previous treatment with conventional oral formulations, 73% of which exhibited gastrointestinal intolerance with treatment adherence of 9.4%. After 6 months with FeSu, an increase in haemoglobin was observed versus baseline, which was sustained at 12 months (0.49±0.19 and 0.36±0.19g/dl, respectively, P<.05), despite a significant eGFR decrease of 3.16±1.16 and 4.20±1.28ml/min/1.73 m2 at 6 and 12 months, respectively. None of the patients experienced adverse reactions that required the treatment to be suspended. Adherence was 100% at both 6 and 12 months.
FeSu is effective in a cohort of patients with stage 3 CKD with similar characteristics to the general population of moderate CKD patients, with a low rate of adverse reactions and excellent tolerability.
Monoclonal serum free light chains (sFLC) are a well-known cause of renal impairment (RI) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). As an indicator of monoclonality, sFLC ratio has acquired a key role ...in the diagnosis and monitorization of the disease. However, its interpretation is altered in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study aims to evaluate the modification of the sFLC ratio reference range in patients with CKD, and propose an optimal range for patients with CKD.
Serum FLC κ/λ ratio and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were retrospectively analyzed in 113 control patients (without hematologic disease), 63 patients with MM in complete remission and 347 patients with active MM. The three groups included patients with CKD (eGFR < 90).
In the group of patients without active MM (n = 176), the sFLC ratio increased at different stages of CKD without pathological significance, with an increase in the number of false positives specially when eGFR is ≤55 ml/min. An optimal range was established for patients with eGFR ≤55 ml/min/1.73 m2: 0.82-3,6 with maximum sensitivity + specificity for that group with an improvement in the Area under the curve (AUC), 0.91 (0.84-0.97) compared with the current ranges proposed by Katzmann and Hutchinson.
This study confirms the influence of eGFR on the interpretation of the sFLC ratio, showing a decreasing specificity in progressive CKD stages when using the reference sFLC range (Katzmann), especially in patients with eFGR ≤55. According to our results, we suggest a modified optimal range (0.82-3,6) for eGFR ≤55 ml/min/1.73 m2. It is necessary to validate this modified range in larger and prospective studies.
Recipients of simultaneous liver‐kidney transplantations (SLKTs) have a lower risk of rejection compared with recipients of kidney transplants alone. However, there is disagreement about the impact ...of pretransplant anti–human leukocyte antigen sensitization on patient and kidney graft survival in the long term. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of the recipient immunological risk and comorbidities in renal graft outcomes on SLKT. We reviewed the SLKTs performed in our center from May 1993 until September 2017. Patient and graft survival were analyzed according to the immunological risk, comorbidities, liver and kidney rejection episodes, immunosuppression, and infections. A total of 20 recipients of SLKT were considered in the high immunological risk (HIR) group, and 68 recipients were included in the low immunological risk (LIR) control group. The prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection, second renal transplant, and time on dialysis prior to transplantation were significantly higher in the HIR group. The incidence of acute kidney rejection was higher in the HIR group (P<0.01). However, death‐censored kidney graft survival as well as the estimated glomerular filtration rate at follow‐up were not different between the 2 groups. Comorbidities, but not the immunological risk, impact negatively on patient survival. Despite the higher incidence of rejection in the HIR SLKT group, longterm renal function and graft survival were similar to the LIR group.
ObjectiveImprovement in insulin alternatives is leading to a delayed presentation of microvascular and macrovascular complications of diabetes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the ...long-term outcomes of older (≥50 years) diabetic patients who receive a pancreas transplantation (PT).Research design and methodsWe retrospectively evaluated all 338 PTs performed at our center between 2000 and 2016 (mean follow-up 9.4±4.9 years). Recipient and graft survivals were estimated for up to 10 years after PT. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) before and after PT were included in the analysis.ResultsThirty-nine patients (12%) were ≥50 years old (52.7±2.3 years) at the day of PT, of which 29 received a simultaneous pancreas–kidney transplantation (SPK) and 10 a pancreas after kidney transplantation (PAK). SPK recipients were first transplants, whereas in the PAK up to 50% were pancreas re-transplantations. Recipient and pancreas graft survivals at 10 years were similar between the group <50 years old and the older group for both SPK and PAK (log-rank p>0.05). The prevalence of MACE prior to PT was similar between both groups (31% vs 29%). Following PT, older recipients presented inferior post-transplant MACE-free survival. In a multivariate regression model, diabetes vintage (HR 1.054, p=0.03) and pre-transplantation MACE (HR 1.98, p=0.011), but not recipient age (HR 1.45, p=0.339), were associated with post-transplant MACE.ConclusionsLong-term survival of older pancreas transplant recipients are similar to younger counterparts. Diabetes vintage, but not age, increased the risk of post-transplantation MACE. These results suggest pancreas transplantation is a valuable treatment alternative to older diabetic patients.
Obesity increases the risk of developing chronic kidney disease (CKD), which has a major negative impact on global health. Bariatric surgery (BS) has demonstrated a substantial improvement of ...obesity-related comorbidities and thus, it has emerged as a potential therapeutic tool in order to prevent end-stage renal disease. A limited number of publications to date have examined the beneficial effects and risks of BS in patients with non-advanced stages of CKD. We aimed to investigate the safety of BS in patients with CKD stages 3–4 (directly related or not to obesity) and both the metabolic/renal outcomes post-BS. A total of 57 individuals were included (n = 19 for CKD-group; n = 38 for patients with obesity, but normal eGFR control-group). Weight loss and obesity comorbidities resolution after BS were similar in both groups. Renal function (eGFR CKD-EPI) improved significantly at the 1-year follow-up: Δ10.2 (5.2–14.9) (p < 0.001) for CKD-group and Δ4.0 (−3.9–9.0) mL/min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.043) for controls. Although this improvement tended to decrease in the 5-year follow-up, eGFR remained above its basal value for the CKD-group. Noteworthy, eGFR also improved in those patients who presented CKD not directly attributed to obesity. For patients with CKD, BS appears to be safe and effective regarding weight loss and obesity comorbidities resolution, irrespective of the main cause of CKD (related or not to obesity).
Obesity and kidney transplantation (KTx) are closely related. Obesity increases the risk of chronic kidney disease and can be a relative contraindication for KTx. Besides, KTx recipients are ...predisposed to obesity and its comorbidities. Consequently, bariatric surgery (BS) emerges as a powerful therapeutic tool either before or after KTx. Since evidence regarding the best approach is still scarce, we aimed to describe renal and metabolic outcomes in a single centre with more than 15-year experience in both surgeries. Methods: A retrospective study including patients who had received a KTx either before or after BS. Usual metabolic and renal outcomes, but also new variables (as renal graft dysfunction) were collected for a minimum follow-up of 1-year post-BS. Results: A total of 11 patients were included: n = 6 (BS-post-KTx) and n = 5 (BS-pre-KTx). One patient was assessed in both groups. No differences in the main outcomes were identified, but BS-post-KTx group tended to gain more weight during the follow-up. The incidence of renal graft dysfunction was comparable (4/6 for BS-post-KTx, 3/5 for BS-pre-KTx) between groups. Conclusions: BS in patients with KTx appears to be safe and effective attending to metabolic and renal outcomes. These results seem irrespective of the time course, except for weight regain, which appears to be a common pattern in the BS-post-KTx group.
Tacrolimus is pivotal in pancreas transplants but poses challenges in maintaining optimal levels due to recipient differences. This study aimed to explore the utility of time spent below the ...therapeutic range and intrapatient variability in predicting rejection and
donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) development in pancreas graft recipients. This retrospective unicentric study included adult pancreas transplant recipients between January 2006 and July 2020. Recorded variables included demographics, immunosuppression details, HLA matching, biopsy results, dnDSA development, and clinical parameters. Statistical analysis included ROC curves, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. A total of 131 patients were included. Those with biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR, 12.2%) had more time (39.9% ± 24% vs. 25.72% ± 21.57%,
= 0.016) and tests (41.95% ± 13.57% vs. 29.96% ± 17.33%,
= 0.009) below therapeutic range. Specific cutoffs of 31.5% for time and 34% for tests below the therapeutic range showed a high negative predictive value for BPAR (93.98% and 93.1%, respectively). Similarly, patients with more than 34% of tests below the therapeutic range were associated with dnDSA appearance (38.9% vs. 9.4%,
= 0.012; OR 6.135, 1.346-27.78). In pancreas transplantation, maintaining optimal tacrolimus levels is crucial. Suboptimal test percentages below the therapeutic range prove valuable in identifying acute graft rejection risk.
The transplant community is focused on prolonging the
preservation time of kidney grafts to allow for long-distance kidney graft transportation, assess the viability of marginal grafts, and optimize ...a platform for the translation of innovative therapeutics to clinical practice, especially those focused on cell and vector delivery to organ conditioning and reprogramming. We describe the first case of feasible preservation of a kidney from a donor after uncontrolled circulatory death over a 73-h period using normothermic perfusion and analyze hemodynamic, biochemical, histological, and transcriptomic parameters for inflammation and kidney injury. The mean pressure and flow values were 71.24 ± 9.62 mmHg and 99.65 ± 18.54 mL/min, respectively. The temperature range was 36.7°C-37.2°C. The renal resistance index was 0.75 ± 0.15 mmHg/mL/min. The mean pH was 7.29 ± 0.15. The lactate concentration peak increased until 213 mg/dL at 6 h, reaching normal values after 34 h of perfusion (8.92 mg/dL). The total urine output at the end of perfusion was 1.185 mL. Histological analysis revealed no significant increase in acute tubular necrosis (ATN) severity as perfusion progressed. The expression of KIM-1, VEGF, and TGFβ decreased after 6-18 h of perfusion until 60 h in which the expression of these genes increased again together with the expression of
-catenin, Ki67, and TIMP1. We show that normothermic perfusion can maintain a kidney graft viable
for 3 days, thus allowing a rapid translation of pre-clinical therapeutics to clinical practice.
PDF
