Background
We recently reported that self‐evaluation of the incidence and severity of treatment‐related side effects (TSEs) using a National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for ...Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0‐based questionnaire was feasible and more informative than doctor reports in patients undergoing standard adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer. Here, we compare self‐ and doctor‐evaluated day of onset and duration of TSEs in the same population.
Patients and methods
Six hundred and four patients were enrolled at 11 sites in Italy. CTCAE v4.0 definitions of grade of severity of nausea, vomiting, constipation, anorexia, dysgeusia, diarrhea, fatigue, pain, paresthesia, and dyspnea were translated into Italian and rephrased. Questionnaires were administered after the first and third chemotherapy cycles. At each time‐point, information on TSEs was extracted from the medical charts and compared to patient questionnaires.
Results
A total of 594 and 573 paired patient and doctor questionnaires were collected after cycles one and three, respectively. TSE duration was significantly longer when reported by patients compared to doctors for six and seven of ten items after cycles one and three, respectively. Due to the combined effect of doctor underreporting of TSE incidence and duration, the mean percentages of cycle days with TSEs were significantly higher for all ten items when based on patient reports. Day of onset could not be evaluated because of insufficient numbers of complete records.
Conclusions
Self‐reporting TSE duration is feasible using a CTCAE‐derived questionnaire. As doctors tend to underestimate TSE incidence and duration, patient‐reported outcomes should be incorporated into clinical practice, perhaps using eHealth technologies, to harness their potential to better estimate total TSE burden.
We previously showed that self‐reporting the incidence and severity of common treatment‐related side effects (TSEs) was feasible using an NCI CTCAE‐derived questionnaire. We now show that patients can self‐report TSE day of onset and duration and, compared to doctor reports, patient may better describe the overall burden of adjuvant chemotherapy side effects.
The monoclonal antibody trastuzumab, the dual HER1 and HER2 inhibitor lapatinib, the monoclonal antibody pertuzumab, and the antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab emtansine have improved the life ...expectancy of women with HER2-overexpressing or HER2-amplified (HER2-positive) breast cancer.1,2 HER2 targeting has proven effective in other HER2-overexpressing cancers and, in gastric cancer, trastuzumab added to chemotherapy is now a standard first-line treatment.3 Nevertheless, despite these therapeutic successes, HER2-driven diseases still cause a great deal of morbidity and many deaths each year. Trastuzumab deruxtecan was reasonably well tolerated, with the only serious concern being interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis, which was the main cause of treatment discontinuation through adverse events (9 of 13 patients who discontinued treatment in the absence of disease progression in the breast cancer cohort). By contrast with HER2-positive breast cancer, no anti-HER2 strategy other than trastuzumab has shown efficacy in these patients, and no HER2-targeting compound is currently approved to treat trastuzumab-resistant disease. ...a proportion of patients who achieved objective response of 43·2% (95% CI 28·3–59·0), with apparently no differences according to previous exposure (and failure) to irinotecan (41·7%, 95% CI 22·1–63·4), is at the very least promising, as is the median duration of response of 7·0 months (95% CI 4·4–16·6).
BackgroundIt is possible to induce immunomodulation in HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) by modifying the route of administration of trastuzumab.MethodsIn this multicenter randomized phase II trial, ...all enrolled patients (pts) with T2–T4d HER2-positive BC received 3 cycles of neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) with fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide every 3 weeks (q21), followed by docetaxel/pertuzumab plus intravenous trastuzumab (arm A) or, docetaxel/pertuzumab plus subcutaneous (SC) trastuzumab (arm B) q21x4 cycles. After surgical operation, each pt was treated with trastuzumab q21x14 cycles using the same SC or intravenous formulation of NAT. Primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects with high stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in postneoadjuvant residual disease (RD).ResultsSixty-three pts (31 (arm A) and 32 (arm B)) were enrolled. Pathological complete response was obtained by 20/31 pts (64.5%; 95% CI 45.4% to 80.1%) in arm A and 19/32 pts (59.4%; 95% CI 40.1% to 76.3%) in arm B. High sTILs were observed in 27% and 46% of postneoadjuvant residual tumors in arms A and B, respectively. CD8+ T cells increased significantly in RDs of both arms (p=0.014 and 0.002 for arm A and B, respectively), whereas a significant decline in the level of CD4+ FoxP3+ regulatory T cells was observed only in arm B (p=0.016). A significant upregulation of PD-1 on sTILs was found in RD of pts enrolled in arm B (p=0.012), while programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) was significantly overexpressed in residual tumors of arm A (p=0.02). A strong negative correlation was reported in arm B between expression of PD-L1 on pretreatment sTILs and CD3 expression on sTILs in RD (τ: −0.73). Grade≥3 AE incidence rates were similar between the two arms.ConclusionsSC trastuzumab induced relevant sTILs enrichment, with favorable variations of immune parameters in HER2-positive BC pts with RD after NAT. Novel immunotherapy strategies should be tested to achieve SC-specific, antitumor immune response.Trial registration numberNCT03144947, and EudraCT number: 2016-000435-41.
Introduction: Endocrine therapy is the mainstay of treatment for a substantial proportion of hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC). Indeed, patients with metastatic disease not ...immediately life threatening may experience long disease control across several lines of endocrine therapy. The major limitation of this therapeutic approach is primary or acquired resistance. A better understanding of endocrine resistance has resulted in newer targeted agents to be added to endocrine therapy.
Areas covered: This review highlights new findings in the treatment of HR+/HER2- BC, with a particular focus on new drugs from phase 3 development onwards.
Expert opinion: Combining endocrine therapy with agents targeting putative mechanisms of endocrine resistance is a newer treatment paradigm in HR+ BC. Adding a biologically targeted agent to endocrine therapy results in improved response rate, and clinical benefit rate, and prolonged progression-free survival. A clear advantage in overall survival has not yet been reported. Combination therapy allows to delay chemotherapy but increases toxicities and costs, which are critical factors in decision making in the clinical practice. Moreover, identification and validation of biomarkers of response are needed. Ongoing and future trials should elucidate the role of these compounds in the treatment of HR+/HER2- BC.
The Hippo pathway and its two key effectors, Yes-associated protein (YAP) and transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ), are consistently altered in breast cancer. Pivotal regulators ...of cell metabolism such as the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), Stearoyl-CoA-desaturase 1 (SCD1), and HMG-CoA reductase (HMGCR) are relevant modulators of TAZ/YAP activity. In this prospective study, we measured the tumor expression of TAZ, YAP, AMPK, SCD1, and HMGCR by immunohistochemistry in 65 Her2+ breast cancer patients who underwent trastuzumab-based neoadjuvant treatment. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of the immunohistochemical expression of the Hippo pathway transducers and cell metabolism regulators on pathological complete response. Low expression of cytoplasmic TAZ, both alone and in the context of a composite signature identified by machine learning including also low nuclear levels of YAP and HMGCR and high cytoplasmic levels of SCD1, was a predictor of residual disease in the univariate logistic regression. This finding was not confirmed in the multivariate model including estrogen receptor > 70% and body mass index > 20. However, our findings were concordant with overall survival data from the TCGA cohort. Our results, possibly affected by the relatively small sample size of this study population, deserve further investigation in adequately sized, ad hoc prospective studies.
Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) allows analysis of both tumor volume and contrast enhancement pattern using a single tool. We sought to investigate whether DCE-MRI ...could be used to predict histological response in patients undergoing primary chemotherapy (PCT) for breast cancer.
Thirty patients with breast cancer, clinical diameter > 3 cm or stage III A/B, received anthracycline and taxane based PCT. DCE-MRI was performed at the baseline, after two cycles and after four cycles of PCT, before surgery. Histological response was assessed using a five-point scheme. Grade 4 (small cluster of dispersed residual cancer cells) and grade 5 (no residual viable cancer cell) were defined as a major histopathological response (MHR).
Univariate analysis showed that a > 65% reduction in the tumor volume and a reduction in the early enhancement ratio (ECU) after two cycles of PCT were associated with a MHR. Multivariate analysis revealed that tumor volume reduction after two cycles of PCT was independently associated with a MHR (odds ratio OR 39.968, 95% confidence interval CI 3.438-464.962, p < 0.01). ECU reduction was still associated with a MHR (OR 2.50, 95% CI 0.263-23.775), but it did not retain statistical significance (p = 0.42). Combining tumor volume and ECU reduction after two cycles of PCT yielded a 93% diagnostic accuracy in identifying tumors achieving a pathological complete response (pCR) (histopathological grade 5).
DCE-MRI allows prediction of the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Although in our study tumor volume reduction after two cycles had the strongest predictive value, DCE-MRI has the potential to provide functional parameters that could be integrated to optimize neoadjuvant chemotherapy strategies.
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) and beta-blockers (BB) are suggested to prevent and treat trastuzumab-related cardiac toxicity. We performed a prospective clinical trial in women ...experiencing mild cardiac toxicity (MCT) while on adjuvant treatment with trastuzumab.
MCT was defined as an asymptomatic absolute decrease in LVEF of ≥ 10 percentage units to >50%. Treatment consisted of enalapril 2.5 mg bid and carvedilol 3.75 mg bid, which were up-titrated to 10 mg bid for the enalapril and 6,25 mg bid of carvedilol. In patients receiving study drug, the primary study end-point was LVEF recovery, which was defined as a post-trastuzumab LVEF returning to no less than -5 percentage points of the baseline value.
103 patients were enrolled, 100 started trastuzumab, and 98 completed the planned treatment. Sixteen patients (16%) had MCT and received study drugs until trastuzumab completion. None of these patients achieved a post-trastuzumab LVEF recovery. Nevertheless, treated patients had significantly higher median LVEF recovery from nadir to post-trastuzumab LVEF in (8% points vs. 4% points, respectively, p = 0.004), resulting in no difference in post-treatment LVEF values compared to patients without MCT.
Treatment of MCT with ACEis and BB allows faster LVEF recovery from nadir values and should be further studied in this setting.
Background: Long-Interspersed Nuclear Element (L1) retrotransposons are silenced in healthy tissues but unrepressed in cancer. Even if L1 reactivation has been associated with reduced overall ...survival in breast cancer (BC) patients, a comprehensive correlation with clinicopathological features is still missing. Methods: Using quantitative, reverse-transcription PCR, we assessed L1 mRNA expression in 12 BC cells, 210 BC patients and in 47 normal mammary tissues. L1 expression was then correlated with molecular and clinicopathological data. Results: We identified a tumor-exclusive expression of L1s, absent in normal mammary cells and tissues. A positive correlation between L1 expression and tumor dedifferentiation, lymph-node involvement and increased immune infiltration was detected. Molecular subtyping highlighted an enrichment of L1s in basal-like cells and cancers. By exploring disease-free survival, we identified L1 overexpression as an independent biomarker for patients with a high risk of recurrence in hormone-receptor-negative BCs. Conclusions: Overall, L1 reactivation identified BCs with aggressive features and patients with a worse clinical fate.