Among patients coinfected with HIV-1 and HCV genotype 1 or 4 who were receiving effective antiretroviral therapy, treatment with 12 weeks of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir was associated with a sustained ...HCV virologic response in 96% of patients.
Globally, an estimated 4 million to 5 million persons are chronically infected with both human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and hepatitis C virus (HCV).
1
Patients who are coinfected with HIV-1 and HCV have higher rates of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and hepatic decompensation than do patients monoinfected with HCV; they also have a higher rate of death from any cause.
2
–
8
In observational cohort studies, treatment-induced clearance of HCV infection has been associated with decreased morbidity and mortality associated with liver disease.
9
,
10
However, treatment of HCV with interferon and ribavirin in patients who are coinfected with HIV-1 and HCV . . .
IMPORTANCE: Treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in patients also infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) has been limited due to drug interactions with antiretroviral therapies ...(ARTs) and the need to use interferon. OBJECTIVE: To determine the rates of HCV eradication (sustained virologic response SVR) and adverse events in patients with HCV-HIV coinfection receiving sofosbuvir and ribavirin treatment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Open-label, nonrandomized, uncontrolled phase 3 trial conducted at 34 treatment centers in the United States and Puerto Rico (August 2012-November 2013) evaluating treatment with sofosbuvir and ribavirin among patients with HCV genotypes 1, 2, or 3 and concurrent HIV. Patients were required to be receiving ART with HIV RNA values of 50 copies/mL or less and a CD4 T-cell count of more than 200 cells/μL or to have untreated HIV infection with a CD4 T-cell count of more than 500 cells/μL. Of the treatment-naive patients, 114 had HCV genotype 1 and 68 had HCV genotype 2 or 3, and 41 treatment experienced participants who had been treated with peginterferon-ribavirin had HCV genotype 2 or 3, for a total of 223 participants. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment-naive patients with HCV genotype 2 or 3 received 400 mg of sofosbuvir and weight-based ribavirin for 12 weeks and treatment-naive patients with HCV genotype 1 and treatment-experienced patients with HCV genotype 2 or 3 received the same treatment for 24 weeks. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary study outcome was the proportion of patients with SVR (serum HCV <25 copies/mL) 12 weeks (SVR12) after cessation of HCV therapy. RESULTS: Among treatment-naive participants, 87 patients (76%) of 114 (95% CI, 67%-84%) with genotype 1, 23 patients (88%) of 26 with genotype 2 (95% CI, 70%-985), and 28 patients (67%) of 42 with genotype 3 (95% CI, 51%-80%) achieved SVR12. Among treatment-experienced participants, 22 patients (92%) of 24 with genotype 2 (95% CI, 73%-99%) and 16 patients (94%) of 17 (95% CI, 71%-100%) achieved SVR12. The most common adverse events were fatigue, insomnia, headache, and nausea. Seven patients (3%) discontinued HCV treatment due to adverse events. No adverse effect on HIV disease or its treatment was observed. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this open-label, nonrandomized, uncontrolled study, patients with HIV who were coinfected with HCV genotype 1, 2, or 3 who received the oral, interferon-free combination of sofosbuvir and ribavirin for 12 or 24 weeks had high rates of SVR12. Further studies of this oral regimen in diverse populations of coinfected patients are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01667731.
Summary Background Although interferon-free regimens are approved for patients co-infected with HIV and genotype-2 or genotype-3 hepatitis C virus (HCV), interferon-based regimens are still an option ...for those co-infected with HIV and HCV genotypes 1 or 4. These regimens are limited by clinically significant toxic effects and drug interactions with antiretroviral therapy. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of an interferon-free, all-oral regimen of sofosbuvir plus ribavirin in patients with HIV and HCV co-infection. Methods We did this open-label, non-randomised, uncontrolled, phase 3 study at 45 sites in seven European countries and Australia. We enrolled patients (aged ≥18 years) co-infected with stable HIV and chronic HCV genotypes 1–4, including those with compensated cirrhosis. Once-daily sofosbuvir (400 mg) plus twice-daily ribavirin (1000 mg in patients with bodyweights <75 kg and 1200 mg in those with weights ≥75 kg) was given for 24 weeks to all patients except treatment-naive patients with genotype-2 HCV, who received a 12-week regimen. The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virological response 12 weeks after treatment. We did analysis by modified intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01783678. Findings Between Feb 7, 2013, and July 29, 2013, we enrolled 275 eligible patients, of whom 262 (95%) completed treatment; 274 patients were included in the final analysis. Overall rates of sustained virological response 12 weeks after treatment were 85% (95% CI 77–91) in patients with genotype-1 HCV, 88% (69–98) in patients with genotype-2 HCV, 89% (81–94) in patients with genotype-3 HCV, and 84% (66–95) in patients with genotype-4 HCV. Response rates in treatment-naive patients with HCV genotypes 2 or 3 (89% 95% CI 67–99 and 91% 81–97, respectively) were similar to those in treatment-experienced patients infected with those genotypes (83% 36–100 and 86% 73–94, respectively). There was no emergence of sofosbuvir-resistance mutations in patients with HCV viral relapse. Six (2%) patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events. The most common adverse events were fatigue, insomnia, asthenia, and headache. Four (1%) patients had serious adverse events regarded as related to study treatment. Additionally, four (1%) patients receiving antiretroviral treatment had a transient HIV viral breakthrough; however, none required changes in antiretroviral regimen. Interpretation Sofosbuvir and ribavirin provided high rates of sustained virological response after 12 weeks of treatment in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients co-infected with HIV and HCV genotypes 1–4. The characteristics of this interferon-free combination regimen make sofosbuvir plus ribavirin a useful treatment option for this patient population. Funding Gilead Sciences.
The vanilloid receptor TRPV1 has been identified as a molecular target for the treatment of pain associated with inflammatory diseases and cancer. Hence, TRPV1 antagonists have been considered for ...therapeutic evaluation in such diseases. During Phase I clinical trials with AMG 517, a highly selective TRPV1 antagonist, we found that TRPV1 blockade elicited marked, but reversible, and generally plasma concentration-dependent hyperthermia. Similar to what was observed in rats, dogs, and monkeys, hyperthermia was attenuated after repeated dosing of AMG 517 (at the highest dose tested) in humans during a second Phase I trial. However, AMG 517 administered after molar extraction (a surgical cause of acute pain) elicited long-lasting hyperthermia with maximal body temperature surpassing 40
°C, suggesting that TRPV1 blockade elicits undesirable hyperthermia in susceptible individuals. Mechanisms of AMG 517-induced hyperthermia were then studied in rats. AMG 517 caused hyperthermia by inducing tail skin vasoconstriction and increasing thermogenesis, which suggests that TRPV1 regulates vasomotor tone and metabolic heat production. In conclusion, these results demonstrate that: (a) TRPV1-selective antagonists like AMG 517 cannot be developed for systemic use as stand alone agents for treatment of pain and other diseases, (b) individual susceptibility influences magnitude of hyperthermia observed after TRPV1 blockade, and (c) TRPV1 plays a pivotal role as a molecular regulator for body temperature in humans.
Success of blinding is a fundamental issue in many clinical trials. The validity of a trial may be questioned if this important assumption is violated. Although thousands of ostensibly double-blind ...trials are conducted annually and investigators acknowledge the importance of blinding, attempts to measure the effectiveness of blinding are rarely discussed. Several published papers proposed ways to evaluate the success of blinding, but none of the methods are commonly used or regarded as standard. This paper investigates a new approach to assess the success of blinding in clinical trials. The blinding index proposed is scaled to an interval of −1 to 1, 1 being complete lack of blinding, 0 being consistent with perfect blinding and −1 indicating opposite guessing which may be related to unblinding. It has the ability to detect a relatively low degree of blinding, response bias and different behaviors in two arms. The proposed method is applied to a clinical trial of cholesterol-lowering medication in a group of elderly people.
Anaemia is a major and persistent manifestation of chronic kidney disease (CKD) caused by the deficient production of erythropoietin in the kidneys, the prevalence of which is proportional to the ...deterioration in kidney function. Darbepoetin alfa, an erythropoiesis-stimulating protein, exhibits a lower clearance and longer terminal half-life in serum than recombinant human erythropoietin, thereby allowing for a reduced dosing frequency. A recent study in patients with CKD, using a 4-week sampling period, suggested that the terminal half-life of darbepoetin alfa in serum is longer than that reported in previous studies, which were based on a 1-week sampling period. This study was conducted to characterise the pharmacokinetic profile of a single subcutaneous dose of darbepoetin alfa 1 microg/kg in patients with CKD, using a sampling duration of 4 weeks, which was hypothesised to allow better characterisation of the terminal half-life in serum.
Twenty patients with CKD not on dialysis, with a calculated glomerular filtration rate of 20-60 mL/min and who had not been treated with erythropoietic agents in the previous 12 weeks, were enrolled into this single-dose, open-label study. Patients received a single subcutaneous dose of darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp) 1 microg/kg on day 1, and blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analyses predose, 6 and 12 hours postdose and up to 28 days postdose. Seroreactivity sampling and further safety laboratory tests (clinical chemistry and urinalysis) were also performed. Patients were assessed for adverse events at each study visit. The primary endpoint was characterisation of the terminal half-life following a single subcutaneous dose of darbepoetin alfa 1 microg/kg.
The mean terminal half-life in serum of darbepoetin alfa was determined to be 69.6 hours. Peak serum concentrations were reached in a median time of 36 hours postdose, and a mean apparent clearance of 3.51 mL/h/kg was comparable to that observed previously in this patient population.
Based on an extended sampling schedule of 4 weeks, the terminal half-life of darbepoetin alfa was approximately 70 hours. This is longer than the 48.8 hours reported previously in patients with CKD on dialysis. These data suggest that the pharmacokinetic properties of darbepoetin alfa make this erythropoietic agent well suited to an extended dosing regimen.
Aims
Filgotinib is a potent, oral, JAK1‐preferential inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This report describes exposure‐response (ER) analyses of filgotinib for dose ...confirmation based on three phase 3 and two phase 2 studies in moderate to severe RA patients.
Methods
The pharmacokinetic exposures used in ER analyses were derived from population pharmacokinetic analysis. The exposure‐efficacy relationships were assessed for efficacy endpoints (ACR20/50/70 and DAS28) over effective area under curve (AUCeff), the combined exposures of filgotinib and GS‐829845 (major, active metabolite), with nonlinear logistic regression models developed. Also, a t‐test was performed to compare the exposure between subjects who achieved response and those who did not. For the ER analyses of safety, exposures were examined between subjects who experienced and who did not experience the evaluated safety events, which was conducted separately for filgotinib and GS‐829845.
Results
The nonlinear logistic regression showed increasing response with increasing exposure, with exposures at 200 mg dose primarily residing on the curve plateau. Also, AUCeff was significantly higher in the subjects who achieved responses compared to those who did not (10 900 vs 9900 h*ng/mL for ACR20, P value < .0001). For exposure‐safety analyses, filgotinib and GS‐829845 exposures were similar irrespective of the presence/absence of the evaluated safety endpoints, indicating no exposure‐safety relationship for common treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs)/laboratory abnormalities and serious TEAEs/infections.
Conclusions
ER analyses confirmed that filgotinib produced more robust therapeutic effects across the exposure range observed at 200 mg once daily compared to lower doses, and collectively with the lack of exposure‐safety relationship, the 200 mg once daily dose was supported for commercialization.
PDF
