To compare the 2-year efficacy of phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implant (phaco/IOL) with laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) in the early management of acute primary angle closure (APAC) and ...coexisting cataract.
Randomized, controlled trial.
We included 37 subjects presenting with APAC who had responded to medical treatment such that intraocular pressure (IOP) was ≤30 mmHg within 24 hours, and had cataract with visual acuity of ≤6/15.
The primary outcome measure was failure of IOP control defined as IOP between 22 to 24 mmHg on 2 occasions (readings taken within 1 month of each other) or IOP ≥25 mmHg on 1 occasion, either occurring after week 3. Secondary outcome measures were complications, degree of angle opening, amount of peripheral anterior synechiae, visual acuity, and corneal endothelial cell count (CECC).
Subjects were randomized to receive either LPI or phaco/IOL in the affected eye within 1 week of presentation and were examined at fixed intervals over 24 months. Patients underwent a standardized examination that included Goldmann applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, and CECC measurements. Logistic regression was used to estimate the effect of treatment on failure of IOP control. Time to failure was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier technique and Cox regression was used to estimate the relative risk of failure.
There were 18 patients randomized to LPI and 19 to phaco/IOL. The average age of subjects was 66.0±9.0 years and mean IOP after medical treatment was 14.5±6.9 mmHg. The 2-year cumulative survival was 61.1% and 89.5% for the LPI and phaco/IOL groups, respectively (P = 0.034). There was no change in CECC for either group from baseline to month 6. There was 1 postoperative complication in the phaco/IOL group compared with 4 in the LPI group (P = 0.180).
Performed within 1 week in patients with APAC and coexisting cataract, phaco/IOL resulted in lower rate of IOP failure at 2 years compared with LPI.
To report 3-year results of a randomized, controlled trial comparing the use of a single application of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with placebo in trabeculectomy surgery.
Prospective, randomized, ...double-blinded treatment trial.
Two hundred forty-three Asian patients with primary open-angle or primary angle-closure glaucoma undergoing primary trabeculectomy.
One eye of each patient was randomized to receive either intraoperative 5-FU or normal saline (placebo) during trabeculectomy.
Primary outcome measure was the level of intraocular pressure (IOP). Secondary outcomes were progression of visual field loss, rates of adverse events, and interventions after surgery.
Of the 288 eligible patients, 243 were enrolled and 228 completed 3 years follow-up; 120 patients received 5-FU and 123 received placebo. Trial failure, according to predefined IOP criteria, was lower in the 5-FU group compared with the placebo group, although the difference was only significant with a failure criterion of IOP >17 mmHg (P = 0.0154). There was no significant difference in progression of optic disc and/or visual field loss over 36 months between 5-FU and placebo (relative risk RR, 0.67; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.34-1.31; P = 0.239). Uveitis occurred more often in the 5-FU-treated group (14/115 12% vs 5/120 4%; P = 0.032).
This is the first masked, prospective, randomized trial reporting the effect of adjunctive 5-FU in trabeculectomy surgery in an East Asian population. The trial shows that an increased success rate can be achieved for several years after a single intraoperative treatment with 5-FU. We conclude that 5-FU is relatively safe and can be routinely used in low-risk East Asian patients.
The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
To compare the performance of the scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyzer (SPAC) and the modified van Herick grading system in the assessment of angle closure, using gonioscopy as the ...reference standard.
Prospective comparative study.
One hundred twenty phakic subjects (53 with primary angle closure and 67 with open angles) with no history of laser or intraocular surgery.
The modified van Herick grading system was used to grade the peripheral anterior chamber depth (ACD) clinically. The SPAC was used to assess ACD, and this was graded categorically as S (suspect angle closure), P (potential angle closure), or N (normal) and numerically from 1 to 12. One randomly selected eye of each subject underwent examination with the modified van Herick grading, SPAC, Goldmann applanation tonometry, optic disc examination, and gonioscopy. The SPAC measurements, modified van Herick grades (0%, 5%, 15%, 25%, 40%, 75%, and > or =100% of corneal thickness), and gonioscopy (graded as narrow or open) were correlated using the Spearman correlation coefficient. The receiver operating characteristics of the 2 methods to detect angle closure also were compared.
Grading of ACD by the SPAC, the modified van Herick system, and gonioscopic grading of the angle.
The SPAC results correlated well with the modified van Herick grading system (categorical grade, r = 0.527; numerical grade, r = 0.542; P<0.0001). For eyes graded as having narrow angles by gonioscopy, the area under the curve (AUC) for SPAC categorical grade S or P was 0.790; sensitivity and specificity were 84.9% and 73.1%, respectively. For the modified van Herick grading system, using a cutoff of peripheral ACD < or = 25% corneal thickness, the AUC was 0.872 and sensitivity and specificity were 84.9% and 89.6%. Compared with gonioscopy that found 53 of 120 cases of narrow angles, the SPAC graded more eyes as having narrow angles (63/120) than the modified van Herick system (52/120).
The SPAC correlated well with the modified van Herick system in grading peripheral ACD. However, the SPAC appeared to overestimate the proportion of eyes with narrow angles relative to gonioscopy and the modified van Herick grading system.
Use of Surodex in Phacotrabeculectomy Surgery Seah, Steve K.L.; Husain, Rahat; Gazzard, Gus ...
American journal of ophthalmology,
05/2005, Letnik:
139, Številka:
5
Journal Article
Recenzirano
To evaluate the use of Surodex (Oculex Pharmaceuticals, Sunnyvale, California) a drug delivery system incorporating 60 micrograms of dexamethasone in a pellet, in phacotrabeculectomy surgery.
...Nonrandomized, prospective, interventional case series.
Phacotrabeculectomy was performed on 37 Asian subjects with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) using a standardized technique. All subjects received a Surodex pellet underneath the scleral flap. Results were compared with those of 31 POAG subjects who had undergone phacotrabeculectomy augmented with 50 mg/ml of intraoperative 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) during the same period.
Mean follow-up in months was 19.7 ± 7.9 and 22.1 ± 6.2 for the Surodex and 5-FU groups, respectively (P = .29). There was a 20.1% decrease in intraocular pressure in the Surodex group compared with 28.5% decrease in the 5-FU group (P = .6). Postoperative complications occurred in three cases (8.1%) and six cases (19.3%), respectively (P = .04).
Combined phacotrabeculectomy surgery augmented by intra-scleral placement of Surodex results in good control of IOP and a low incidence of complications.
OBJECTIVE To determine whether the timing of cataract surgery after trabeculectomy has an effect on trabeculectomy function in terms of intraocular pressure control. METHODS This was a cohort study ...nested within a randomized clinical trial. There were 235 participants with glaucoma who had a single previous trabeculectomy augmented with either intraoperative 5-fluorouracil or placebo. Cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation was performed on participants judged to have significant lens opacity. Cox regression was performed to evaluate the effect of time between trabeculectomy and cataract surgery on the time to trabeculectomy failure, after adjusting for other relevant risk factors. The main outcome measure was time to failure of trabeculectomy, defined as an intraocular pressure of greater than 21 mm Hg. RESULTS Of the 235 participants, 124 (52.7%) underwent subsequent cataract surgery. The median time from trabeculectomy to cataract surgery for these patients was 21.7 months (range, 4.6-81.9 months). The median follow-up period was 60 months (range, 28-84 months) for the cataract surgery group and 48 months (range, 12-84 months) for the non–cataract surgery group. Cox regression showed that the time from trabeculectomy to cataract surgery was significantly associated with time to trabeculectomy failure (hazard ratio, 1.73 95% CI, 1.05-2.85; P = .03). The adjusted declining hazard ratios for risk of subsequent trabeculectomy failure when cataract surgery was performed 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after trabeculectomy were 3.00 (95% CI, 1.11-8.14), 1.73 (95% CI, 1.05-2.85), and 1.32 (95% CI, 1.02-1.69), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Cataract surgery after trabeculectomy increases the risk of trabeculectomy failure, and this risk is increased if the time between trabeculectomy and cataract surgery is shorter.
BACKGROUND Data on prevalence of glaucoma in East Asia are scarce. OBJECTIVE To determine the prevalence and clinical characteristics of glaucoma in adult Chinese Singaporeans. METHODS A group of ...2000 Chinese people, aged 40 to 79 years, were selected from the electoral register of Tanjong Pagar district in Singapore using a disproportionate, stratified, clustered, random-sampling procedure. Glaucoma was diagnosed in people with an excavated optic neuropathy and a reproducible visual field defect or on the basis of severe structural disc abnormality alone, if reliable field results could not be obtained. The diagnosis was also made in blind subjects with raised intraocular pressure or previous glaucoma surgery. RESULTS Of 1717 eligible subjects, 1232 were examined, with a response rate of 71.8%. There were 45 cases of glaucoma: 27 were men and 18 were women. The main diagnoses were primary open-angle glaucoma (n = 22 49%), primary angle-closure glaucoma (n = 14 31%), and secondary glaucoma (n = 7 16%). It was not possible to determine the mechanism in 2 (4%). CONCLUSIONS The age-standardized prevalence of glaucoma was 3.2% (95% confidence interval, 2.3-4.1) in the population 40 years and older. Glaucoma was the leading cause of blindness. Primary angle-closure glaucoma and secondary glaucoma were the most visually destructive forms of the disease. Our findings suggest current projections of glaucoma prevalence among ethnic Chinese are a substantial underestimate.Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:1105-1111-->
PURPOSEApproximately 10% of Chinese people older than 50 years in Singapore have asymptomatic narrow angles also termed primary angle closure suspects (PACS). The aim of this study was to determine ...the attitudes and practices of ophthalmologists in Singapore regarding the management of these patients.
METHODSA nation wide questionnaire-based survey was conducted on all registered, practicing ophthalmologists in Singapore by electronic mail and post. An ophthalmologist was defined as a doctor who had completed at least 3 years of specialist training in ophthalmology and had passed the Masterʼs Degree in Ophthalmology or equivalent examinations. The survey asked the ophthalmologists about the methods and criteria used for the diagnosis of angle closure. It also inquired about the management of PACS and opinions on the effectiveness of prophylactic laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) in preventing both acute and chronic angle closure.
RESULTSA total of 126 out of 158 ophthalmologists responded (79.7% response rate). Of the respondents, 84.9% would advise prophylactic LPI for asymptomatic PACS; 84.9% believed that prophylactic LPI would prevent acute angle closure but only 44% thought that it could prevent the development of glaucomatous optic nerve damage. The preferred method of prophylactic LPI was sequential argon-YAG LPI. In assessing patients for angle closure, 85.4% used gonioscopy, 92.9% assessed anterior chamber depth, and 17.5% performed provocative tests.
CONCLUSIONSOphthalmologists in Singapore vary in the method of assessment of patients with angle closure. Most believe that prophylactic LPI should be performed for asymptomatic PACS.
Background: Ischaemic changes in the iris occur frequently after an episode of acute primary angle closure (APAC). The aim of this study was to investigate the significance of such changes with ...regards to visual outcome.
Methods: Acute primary angle closure cases were treated with medical therapy followed by laser peripheral iridotomy after resolution of the acute episode. Subjects were examined at 1, 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks post laser peripheral iridotomy. Eyes were examined for signs of iris ischaemic changes (IIC), defined as the presence of iris whorling or stromal atrophy. Iris photographs were also taken at weeks 1, 8 and 16. Subjects requiring glaucoma medication or filtering surgery during the follow‐up period were excluded. The visual acuity and visual field (using automated white‐on‐white threshold perimetry) at week 16 were used in the assessment of visual outcome.
Results: Sixty‐one subjects with APAC completed the study. The majority of subjects were female (82%) and Chinese (92%), and the mean age was 59 ± 8.8 years. More than half the subjects (52.5%) were found to have developed IIC during the study, 65% of whom already had signs of IIC by the first week. Only 13 subjects (41%) with IIC and 6 subjects (21%) without IIC had an abnormal visual field defect at week 16 (P = 0.09). There was also no difference in visual acuity at week 16, the majority of subjects in both groups having visual acuity of 6/12 or better.
Conclusions: The development of iris ischaemic changes after a single episode of APAC may not be associated with an adverse visual outcome.
Aims: To assess the additive effect of unoprostone and latanoprost in patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT) Methods: 32 patients with POAG or OHT were ...randomised to receive either latanoprost once daily or unoprostone twice daily for 4 weeks. After 4 weeks, all patients received both latanoprost and unoprostone for another 4 weeks. The IOP was measured at 9 am and 5 pm on the baseline, day 28, and day 56 visits, and at 9 am on day 14 and day 42 visits. The medications were given to the patients in an open label fashion. The observer was masked to the treatment given. The mean of the measurements was calculated. Safety parameters were also recorded. The additive effect of the medications was assessed by the reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP) when both medications were used, compared with when one medication was used. Results: 28 patients completed both treatment periods and had IOP data available for evaluation. After 1 month of treatment, latanoprost significantly reduced IOP (mean by 6.1 (SEM 0.8) mm Hg (p<0.001) and unoprostone by 4.9 (1.0) mm Hg (p<0.001) from the baseline of 24.4 (0.6) mm Hg and 24.4 (1.1) mm Hg respectively (p = 0.18). When latanoprost once daily was given to patients treated with unoprostone, there was additional IOP lowering of 1.9 (0.6) mm Hg (p = 0.012). However, adding unoprostone to those being treated with latanoprost produced an IOP change of +0.4 (0.5) mm Hg (p = 0.42). Ocular symptoms and findings were mild and equally distributed between treatment groups, and after combined therapy. Hyperaemia and ocular irritation were the most frequently reported events. Over a third of patients experienced ocular irritation with the combination of medications. Conclusions: Latanoprost once daily causes additional IOP lowering in eyes which were being treated with unoprostone twice a day. However, there was no additional IOP lowering when unoprostone was added to eyes which were being treated with latanoprost. Both drugs were well tolerated together with few ocular adverse events.
PDF
