•Multicenter international registry with T2DM patients and AMI undergoing PCI.•SGLT2-I users exhibited significantly lower creatinine values at 72 h after PCI.•The rate of CI-AKI was significantly ...lower in SGLT2-I compared to non-SGLT2-I users.•SGLT2-I were identified as an independent predictor of reduced rate of CI-AKI.
To analyze the association between chronic SGLT2-I treatment and development of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing PCI.
Multicenter international registry of consecutive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and AMI undergoing PCI between 2018 and 2021. The study population was stratified by the presence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and anti-diabetic therapy at admission (SGLT2-I versus non-SGLT2-I users).
The study population consisted of 646 patients: 111 SGLT2-I users 28 (25.2%) with CKD and 535 non-SGLT2-I users 221 (41.3%) with CKD. The median age was 70 61–79 years. SGLT2-I users exhibited significantly lower creatinine values at 72 h after PCI, both in the non-CKD and CKD stratum. The overall rate of CI-AKI was 76 (11.8%), significantly lower in SGLT2-I users compared to non-SGLT2-I patients (5.4% vs 13.1%, p = 0.022). This finding was also confirmed in patients without CKD (p = 0.040). In the CKD cohort, SGLT2-I users maintained significantly lower creatinine values at discharge. The use of SGLT2-I was an independent predictor of reduced rate of CI-AKI (OR 0.356; 95%CI 0.134–0.943, p = 0.038).
In T2DM patients with AMI, the use of SGLT2-I was associated with a lower risk of CI-AKI, mostly in patients without CKD.
Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2-i) have shown significant cardiovascular benefits in patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). They have also gained interest for ...their potential anti-arrhythmic role and their ability to reduce the occurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in T2DM and heart failure patients.
To investigate in-hospital new-onset cardiac arrhythmias in a cohort of T2DM patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated with SGLT2-i vs. other oral anti-diabetic agents (non-SGLT2-i users).
Patients from the SGLT2-I AMI PROTECT registry (NCT05261867) were stratified according to the use of SGLT2-i before admission for AMI, divided into SGLT2-i users vs. non-SGLT2-i users. In-hospital outcomes included the occurrence of in-hospital new-onset cardiac arrhythmias (NOCAs), defined as a composite of new-onset AF and sustained new-onset ventricular tachycardia (VT) and/or ventricular fibrillation (VF) during hospitalization.
The study population comprised 646 AMI patients categorized into SGLT2-i users (111 patients) and non-SGLT2-i users (535 patients). SGLT2-i users had a lower rate of NOCAs compared with non-SGLT2-i users (6.3 vs. 15.7%,
= 0.010). Moreover, SGLT2-i was associated with a lower rate of AF and VT/VF considered individually (
= 0.032). In the multivariate logistic regression model, after adjusting for all confounding factors, the use of SGLT2-i was identified as an independent predictor of the lower occurrence of NOCAs (OR = 0.35; 95%CI 0.14-0.86;
= 0.022). At multinomial logistic regression, after adjusting for potential confounders, SGLT2-i therapy remained an independent predictor of VT/VF occurrence (OR = 0.20; 95%CI 0.04-0.97;
= 0.046) but not of AF occurrence.
In T2DM patients, the use of SGLT2-i was associated with a lower risk of new-onset arrhythmic events during hospitalization for AMI. In particular, the primary effect was expressed in the reduction of VAs. These findings emphasize the cardioprotective effects of SGLT2-i in the setting of AMI beyond glycemic control.
Data are part of the observational international registry: SGLT2-I AMI PROTECT. ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT05261867.
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is still associated with high mortality and severe complications, despite major treatment advances in this field. Ischemic heart disease is a common cause of ...OHCA, and current guidelines clearly recommend performing immediate coronary angiography (CAG) in patients whose post-resuscitation electrocardiogram shows ST-segment elevation (STE). Contrarily, the optimal approach and the advantage of early revascularization in cases of no STE is less clear, and decisions are often based on the individual experience of the center. Numerous studies have been conducted on this topic and have provided contradictory evidence; however, more recently, results from several randomized clinical trials have suggested that performing early CAG has no impact on overall survival in patients without STE.
Cardiogenic shock remains a deadly complication of acute on chronic decompensated heart failure (ADHF-CS). Despite its increasing prevalence, it is incompletely understood and therefore often ...misdiagnosed in the early phase. Precise diagnosis of the underlying cause of CS is fundamental for undertaking the correct therapeutic strategy. Temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) is the mainstay of management: identifying and selecting optimal patients through understanding of the hemodynamics and a prompt profiling and timing, is key for success. A recent statement from the American Heart Association provided pragmatic suggestions on tMCS device selection, escalation, and weaning strategies. However, several areas of uncertainty still remain in clinical practice. Accordingly, we present an overview of the main pitfalls that can occur during patients’ management with tMCS through a clinical case. This case illustrates the strict interdependency between left ventricular unloading and right ventricular dysfunction in the case of low filling pressures. Moreover, it further illustrates the pivotal role of stepwise escalation of therapy in a patient with an ADHF-CS and its peculiarities as compared to other forms of acute heart failure.
Debulking lesions with severe coronary artery calcification (CAC) is highly recommended to obtain good procedural and long-term success. Utilization and performance of coronary intravascular ...lithotripsy (IVL) after rotational atherectomy (RA) has not been thoroughly studied. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IVL with the Shockwave Coronary Rx Lithotripsy System in lesions with severe CAC as elective or bail-out strategy after RA. This observational, prospective, single-arm, multicenter, international, open-label Rota-Shock registry included patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease and lesions with severe CAC treated by percutaneous coronary intervention, including lesion preparation with RA and IVL, at 23 high-volume centers. Primary efficacy end point was procedural success, defined as final diameter stenosis <30% by quantitative coronary angiography. Primary safety end point was freedom from serious angiographic complications, which included >National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute type B dissection, perforation, abrupt closure, slow or no flow, final thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow <3, and acute thrombosis. A total of 160 patients were enrolled between June 2020 and June 2022. The primary efficacy end point was observed in 155 patients (96.9%). The primary safety end point occurred in 145 cases (90.6%). Dissections >National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute type B occurred in 3 patients (1.9%), whereas slow or no flow occurred in 8 (5.0%), final thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow <3 in 3 (1.9%), and perforation in 4 patients (2.5%). Free from inhospital major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, including cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, cerebrovascular accident, definite/probable stent thrombosis, and major bleeding, occurred in 158 patients (98.7%). In conclusion, IVL after RA in lesions with severe CAC was effective and safe, with a very low incidence of complications as either elective or bail-out strategy.
To investigate in-hospital and long-term prognosis in T2DM patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated with SGLT2-I versus other oral anti-diabetic agents (non-SGLT2-I users).
...In this multicenter international registry all consecutive diabetic AMI patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention between 2018 and 2021 were enrolled and, based on the admission anti-diabetic therapy, divided into SGLT-I users versus non-SGLT2-I users. The primary endpoint was defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, recurrent AMI, and hospitalization for HF (MACE). Secondary outcomes included i) in-hospital cardiovascular death, recurrent AMI, occurrence of arrhythmias, and contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI); ii) long-term cardiovascular mortality, recurrent AMI, heart failure (HF) hospitalization.
The study population consisted of 646 AMI patients (with or without ST-segment elevation): 111 SGLT2-I users and 535 non-SGLT-I users. The use of SGLT2-I was associated with a significantly lower in-hospital cardiovascular death, arrhythmic burden, and occurrence of CI-AKI (all p < 0.05). During a median follow-up of 24 ± 13 months, the primary composite endpoint, as well as cardiovascular mortality and HF hospitalization were lower for SGLT2-I users compared to non-SGLT2-I patients (p < 0.04 for all). After adjusting for confounding factors, the use of SGLT2-I was identified as independent predictor of reduced MACE occurrence (HR=0.57; 95%CI:0.33–0.99; p = 0.039) and HF hospitalization (HR=0.46; 95%CI:0.21–0.98; p = 0.041).
In T2DM AMI patients, the use of SGLT2-I was associated with a lower risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes during index hospitalization and long-term follow-up. Our findings provide new insights into the cardioprotective effects of SGLT2-I in the setting of AMI.
Data are part of the observational international registry: SGLT2-I AMI PROTECT. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05261867.
Display omitted
•Multicenter international registry of diabetic AMI patients undergoing PCI divided into SGLT-I users versus non-SGLT2-I users.•A mitigated negative LV remodeling was detected in patients treated with SGLT2-I.•SGLT2-I were associated with a lower in-hospital cardiovascular death and arrhythmic burden.•In SGLT2-I users cardiovascular mortality, HF hospitalization and MACE were significantly lower compared to no-SGLT2-I patients.
Abstract
Objectives
The aim of this study was to assess the natural history and clinical burden of moderate aortic stenosis and to investigate the interaction of left ventricular ejection fraction ...and of age with prognosis.
Background
The mortality risk of patients with moderate aortic stenosis is not well known but recent studies suggested that it might negatively affect prognosis.
Methods
A systematic research was conducted on PubMed. The inclusion criteria were: 1) inclusion of patients with moderate aortic stenosis; 2) report of the survival at 1-year follow-up (minimum). Incidence ratios related to all-cause mortality in patients and controls of each study were estimated and then pooled using a fixed effects model. Meta-regression analysis was performed to assess the impact of left ventricular ejection fraction and age on the prognosis of patients with moderate aortic stenosis.
Results
Fifteen studies and 11,596 patients with moderate aortic stenosis were included. All-cause mortality was significantly higher among patients with moderate aortic stenosis than among controls: 10.7% (95% CI: 0.1010-0.1136) vs 4.5% (95% CI: 0.0438-0.0454) at 1-year, 17.7% (95% CI: 0.1692-0.1854) vs 7.6% (95% CI: 0.0754-0.0775) at 2-year, 23.0% (95% CI: 0.2204-0.2387) vs 9.9% (95% CI: 0.0973-0.0997) at 3-year, 27.9% (95% CI: 0.2685-0.2899) vs 11.9% (95% CI: 0.1177-0.1203) at 4-year, and 32.4% (95% CI: 0.3125-0.3360) vs 14.2% (95% CI: 0.1402-0.1430) at 5-year follow-up. Left ventricular ejection fraction did not significantly impact on the prognosis of patients with moderate aortic stenosis (estimate = -0.0020; 95% CI: -0.0078-0.0038; p = 0.4584), unlike of age (estimate = 0.0067; 95% CI: 0.0007-0.0127; p = 0.0323).
Conclusions
Moderate aortic stenosis is not a benign disease. Further studies are necessary to confirm the prognostic impact of this valvulopathy and the possible benefit of the aortic valve replacement.
All-cause mortality of patients (red) vs controls (black) at 1-, 2-, 3-, 4- and 5-year follow-up.
The mortality risk of patients with moderate aortic stenosis is not well known, but recent studies suggested that it might negatively affect prognosis. We aimed to assess the natural history and ...clinical burden of moderate aortic stenosis and to investigate the interaction of patients' baseline characteristics with prognosis.
Systematic research was conducted on PubMed. The inclusion criteria were inclusion of patients with moderate aortic stenosis; and report of the survival at 1-year follow-up (minimum). Incidence ratios related to all-cause mortality in patients and controls of each study were estimated and then pooled using a fixed effects model. All patients with mild aortic stenosis or without aortic stenosis were considered controls. Meta-regression analysis was performed to assess the impact of left ventricular ejection fraction and age on the prognosis of patients with moderate aortic stenosis.
Fifteen studies and 11 596 patients with moderate aortic stenosis were included. All-cause mortality was significantly higher among patients with moderate aortic stenosis than in controls in all timeframes analysed (all P < 0.0001). Left ventricular ejection fraction and sex did not significantly impact on the prognosis of patients with moderate aortic stenosis ( P = 0.4584 and P = 0.5792), while increasing age showed a significant interaction with mortality (estimate = 0.0067; 95% confidence interval: 0.0007-0.0127; P = 0.0323).
Moderate aortic stenosis is associated with reduced survival. Further studies are necessary to confirm the prognostic impact of this valvulopathy and the possible benefit of aortic valve replacement.
PDF
