Purpose
Real‐world data about pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are limited. We have aimed to highlight the role of PLD in daily practice focusing ...on older patients and patients with comorbidities with MBC.
Methods
We analyzed electronic records of all patients with advanced/metastatic breast cancer treated with single‐agent PLD at the University Hospital Basel between 2003 and 2021. Primary endpoint was time to next chemotherapy or death (TTNC). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS), and overall response rate (ORR). We performed univariate and multivariate analysis for clinical variables.
Results
112 patients with MBC having received single‐agent PLD in any treatment line were analyzed, including 34 patient who were older than 70 years and 61 patients with relevant comorbidities. Median TTNC, OS, and PFS for treatment with PLD were 4.6, 11.9, and 4.4 months, respectively. ORR was 13.6%. Age >70 years predicted shorter OS (median 11.2 months) in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.07–3.11, p = 0.026). Age and comorbidities did not significantly affect other endpoints. Unexpectedly, hypertension predicted longer TTNC (8.3 months, p = 0.04) in univariate analysis, maintained in multivariate analysis as a trend for both TTNC (HR 0.62, p = 0.07) and OS (HR 0.63, p = 0.1).
Conclusion
Age predicted shorter OS significantly but median OS was not relevantly shorter in older patients. PLD remains a treatment option in patients with comorbidities and older patients with MBC. However, our real‐world results of PLD appear underwhelming compared to relevant phase II trials through all age groups, pointing to an efficacy‐effectiveness gap, possibly due to sampling bias.
We have examined the efficacy of single‐agent pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in a real‐world population of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and in the subgroups of elderly patients and patients with comorbidities. We found no significant inferiority of PLD in these more vulnerable patient groups than in the overall population; however, substantially lower response rates in the overall population as compared to previous prospective evidence.
We sought to evaluate the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) in patients with stage I endometrioid epithelial ovarian cancer (EEOC) or ovarian clear cell cancer (OCCC) using a ...national database.
The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to identify patients diagnosed with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I EEOC or OCCC from 2000 to 2013. We sought to identify predictors of chemotherapy use and to assess the impact of chemotherapy on OS in these patients. OS was compared using the log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazards model.
In all, 3552 patients with FIGO stage I EEOC and 1995 patients with stage I OCCC were identified. Of the 1600 patients (45%) with EEOC who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy, the 5-year OS rate was 90%, compared with 89% for those who did not undergo adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.807). Of the 1374 (69%) patients with OCCC who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy, the 5-year OS rate was 85%, compared with 83% (P = 0.439) for those who did not undergo adjuvant chemotherapy. Chemotherapy use was associated with younger age, higher substage, and more recent year of diagnosis for both the EEOC and OCCC groups. Only in the subgroup of patients with FIGO substage IC, grade 3 EEOC (n = 282) was chemotherapy associated with an improved 5-year OS—81% compared with 62% (P = 0.003) in untreated patients (HR: 0.583; 95% CI: 0.359–0.949; P = 0.030). In patients with OCCC, there was no significant effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on OS in any substage.
Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved OS only in patients with substage IC, grade 3 EEOC. In stage I OCCC, adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with improved OS.
•The analysis demonstrated the utility of oncotype DX® RS in a population of older breast cancer patients.•After testing with oncotype DX®, older patients received less chemotherapy despite having a ...higher proportion of high-risk recurrence scores.•Oncotype DX® should be prescribed after consultation with older patients to assure benefits.
In early luminal breast cancer, the Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score (RS) prognostic and predictive value with regards to chemotherapy (CHT) application benefit has been broadly validated. In older patients its value has not been deeply addressed. This study aimed to evaluate the benefits of RS testing and to look at differences in treatment allocation for these patients when compared with younger ones.
We included data from consecutive patients with early luminal HER2-negative breast cancer, treated between 2010 and 2022 at the University Hospital Basel and Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Switzerland. The older cohort included 63 (19%) patients aged ≥70, and the younger cohort 263 (81%) patients aged <70.
Older breast cancer patients had more co-morbidities (N = 36, 57% vs. N = 92, 35%, p = 0.002) and a higher clinical risk status (N = 49, 78% vs. N = 155, 59%; p = 0.01) when compared to younger patients. Histopathologic characteristics were significantly different between the two cohorts. Although older patients had a higher clinical risk status (78% vs. 59%) (p = 0.01), most of them (74%) received no CHT. Specifically, adjuvant CHT was administered less frequently in older than in younger patients (13% vs. 22%; p = 0.01). Moreover, older patients were less likely to complete CHT (>4 cycles: 78% vs. 97%).
Breast cancer patients aged ≥70 have higher clinical risk status, more co-morbidities, higher clinical stage (driven by larger tumor size), and more often RS ≥26. However, they receive fewer adjuvant RT and CHT than those aged <70. RS maintains its independent prognostic value in older patients. However, assessing the predictive value of additional CHT benefit remains challenging due to significant differences in CHT administration. Although therapy decision-making in older patients with breast cancer still follows RS-based guidelines, clinical practice indicates an individualized treatment approach.
Display omitted
PDF
