Our aim was to assess the efficacy of adjuvant programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors and compare the other adjuvant treatments in patients with surgically resected stage III or IV acral ...melanoma. This study is a multicenter, retrospective analysis. We included 114 patients with stage III or IV acral malignant melanoma who underwent surgery within the past 10 years. We analyzed the effect of adjuvant programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitors on disease-free survival (DFS). The mean follow-up was 40 months, during which 69 (59.5%) patients experienced recurrence. Among the participants, 64 (56.1%) received systemic adjuvant therapy. Specifically, 48.4% received anti-PD-1 therapy, 29.7% received interferon, 14.1% received tezozolomide, and 7.8% received B-Raf proto-oncogene/mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors. Patients who received adjuvant therapy had a median DFS of 24 (10.9-37.2) months, whereas those who did not receive adjuvant therapy had a median DFS of 15 (9.8-20.2) months. Multivariate analysis for DFS revealed that the receipt of adjuvant therapy and lymph node metastasis stage were independent significant parameters ( P = 0.021, P = 0.018, respectively). No statistically significant difference was observed for DFS between programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitor treatment and other adjuvant treatments. Regarding overall survival (OS), patients who received adjuvant treatment had a median OS of 71 (30.4-111.7) months, whereas those who did not receive adjuvant treatment had a median OS of 38 (16.7-59.3; P = 0.023) months. In addition, there were no significant differences in OS observed between various adjuvant treatment agents ( P = 0.122). In our study, we have shown that adjuvant therapy had a positive effect on both DFS and OS in patients with stages III-IV acral melanoma who underwent curative intent surgery. Notably, we found no significant differences between anti-PD-1 therapy and other adjuvant therapies.
Fluoropyrimidine+cisplatin/oxaliplatin+trastuzumab therapy is recommended for the first-line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma. However, there is no comprehensive study on ...which platinum-based treatment should be preferred. This study aimed to compare the treatment response and survival characteristics of patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer who received fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and leucovorin (mFOLFOX)+trastuzumab or cisplatin and fluorouracil (CF)+trastuzumab as first-line therapy. It was a multicenter, retrospective study of the Turkish Oncology Group, which included 243 patients from 21 oncology centers. There were 113 patients in the mFOLFOX+trastuzumab arm and 130 patients in the CF+trastuzumab arm. The median age was 62 years in the mFOLFOX+trastuzumab arm and 61 years in the CF+trastuzumab arm (P = 0.495). 81.4% of patients in the mFOLFOX+trastuzumab arm and 83.1% in the CF+trastuzumab arm had gastric tumor localization (P = 0.735). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly higher in the mFOLFOX+trastuzumab arm (9.4 months vs. 7.3 months, P = 0.024). The median overall survival (OS) was similar in both groups (18.4 months vs. 15.1 months, P = 0.640). Maintenance trastuzumab was continued after chemotherapy in 101 patients. In this subgroup, the median OS was 23.3 months and the median PFS was 13.3 months. In conclusion, FOLFOX+trastuzumab is similar to CF+trastuzumab in terms of the median OS, but it is more effective in terms of the median PFS in the first-line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic gastric and GEJ cancer. The choice of treatment should be made by considering the prominent toxicity findings of the chemotherapy regimens.
Aim Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is a monogenic autoinflammatory disease characterised by recurrent episodes of fever and polyserositis. Sacroiliac joint involvement is rare in FMF patients. ...The purpose of this study was to evaluate the demographic, clinical, laboratory and imaging findings of patients with FMF who developed sacroiliitis. Methods The files of paediatric patients aged 0–18 years who were followed up with a diagnosis of FMF were retrospectively reviewed. FMF patients with evidence of sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included in the study. Results Among 1062 FMF patients, 22 (12 males; median age 8.5) (2.1%) of them were found to have sacroiliitis. FMF was diagnosed before sacroiliitis in nine (40.9%) patients and after in 13 (59.1%) patients. The most common symptom in patients with sacroiliitis was low back pain ( n = 21, 95.5%). In MEFV gene analysis, M694V was found in 16 (72.7%) patients and was the most common mutation. MRI showed evidence of sacroiliitis in all patients. All patients were using colchicine. Patients with FMF‐associated sacroiliitis, remission was achieved with non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs in 12 (54.5%), conventional disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs in six (27.3%) and tumour necrosis factor inhibitor treatment in four (31.8%). Four (31.8%) patients experienced sacroiliitis when colchicine incompatible and four (31.8%) patients experienced sacroiliitis while using biologic agents for colchicine‐resistant FMF. Conclusions FMF‐associated sacroiliitis should be considered especially in patients with M694V mutation if they have symptoms such as low back pain. Colchicine‐resistant FMF patients should be evaluated for sacroiliitis symptoms at each visit.
PDF
