•In IHRs to GBCAs an optimal cut-off for BAT using ROC curves must be obtained.•Basophil reactivity can be expressed both in % of CD63 and SI with equal sensitivity.•BAT can determinate IHRs to GBCAs ...in patients with negative skin tests.•BAT shows similar sensitivity respect to skin tests in patients with IHRs to GBCAs.
Gadolinium based contrast agents (GBCAs) are safe compounds globally used in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, in last years it has been detected an increase of immediate hypersensitivity reactions (IHRs) to them. Diagnosis of IHRs to GBCAs is based on clinical symptoms, skin tests (STs) and drug provocation test (DPT). But DPTs are not without risks, thus it is important to implement an in vitro alternative method such as the basophil activation test (BAT). We described the clinical validation of the BAT using ROC curves from a control population formed by 40 healthy individuals without previous reactions to any contrast agents and 5 patients suffering from IHRs to GBCAs. Four patients presented IHRs to gadoteric acid (GA) as the culprit agent and another one to gadobutrol (G). Basophil reactivity was measured in percentage of CD63 expression and in stimulation index (SI). The optimal cut-off with the highest sensitivity (S) and specificity (E) for the GA was of 4.6% at 1:100 dilution (S = 80% and E = 85%; AUC = 0.880, p = 0.006). For the SI with GA, the cut-off of highest sensitivity and specificity was of 2.79 at 1:100 dilution (S = 80% and E = 100%; AUC = 0.920, p = 0.002). Sensitivity did not show differences between STs regarding the BAT (p < 0.05). Moreover, the BAT was able to detect one case with IHR to GA which had negative STs. Therefore, the BAT is a useful method in diagnosis of IHRs to GBCAs.
Abstract
Background
In the Mediterranean area, patients with LTP syndrome who are sensitized to multiple allergens are often tested for sIgE using multiplex platforms. The results obtained from ...different commercial platforms are not interchangeable, so it is important to compare and validate the platform selected for use. The objective of this study is to compare and validate the performance of the ImmunoCAP ISAC E112i and the macroarray ALEX2 in our daily practice.
Methods
From August 2021 to March 2022, we tested 20 random serum samples from polysensitized patients using the ALEX2 test (MADx) and ImmunoCAP tIgE and ISAC E112i (Thermo Fisher Scientific). We compared the total IgE (tIgE) and sIgE levels for shared allergens.
Results
The heatmap generally showed more intense results for ISAC. The overall correlation was good, but some exceptions were noted. The main discrepancies were found for Ole e 7, which was positive for 11 patients in ISAC but negative for all patients in ALEX2, and for nut LTPs, for which ISAC showed a threefold higher detection rate for Ara h 9 and a fivefold higher detection rate for Cor a 8 and Jug r 3 compared to ALEX2. The regression model showed no interchangeability of tIgE results.
Conclusions
Despite our small sample size and the complexity of comparing a quantitative and a semi‐quantitative platform, our results suggest that patient diagnosis and management can be influenced by the platform used. Therefore, our findings must be taken into consideration when choosing a platform to use for some profiles of LTP‐polysensitized patients, even though more data is needed.
Objetivo: Evaluar la reproducibilidad de los síntomas en pruebas de exposición con fármacos.
Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo, efectuado en pacientes con prueba cutánea o exposición positiva, atendidos ...en 2019. De cada paciente se registró la sospecha clínica según el algoritmo de Karch-Lasagna. El resultado principal fue la reproducibilidad de síntomas en las pruebas de exposición, mediante el análisis de datos emparejado con prueba de McNemar.
Resultados: Se incluyeron 89 pacientes, y de estos 16 reportaron varias pruebas positivas. Se obtuvieron 30 pruebas cutáneas y 75 de exposición positivas. En el 89% de las pruebas de exposición positivas, las reacciones iniciales se clasificaron en probables o posibles, según la escala de Karch-Lasagna. Los síntomas reportados en la reacción inicial no difirieron de los de las pruebas de exposición.
Conclusión: La escala de Karch-Lasagna es un método útil para predecir la respuesta en las pruebas de exposición con fármacos. En la mayor parte de las pruebas positivas, los resultados fueron sugeridos por la historia clínica, sin diferencias entre la manifestación de síntomas en la prueba de exposición versus los referidos en la reacción inicial.
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a disease characterized by symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and at least 15 eosinophils/hpf in the esophagus. Other systemic and local causes of esophageal ...eosinophilia should be excluded.
The study objectives were to examine the annual epidemiology of EoE for 14 consecutive years, investigate whether there is a relationship between the count of aeroallergens and the incidence of EoE for 12 years, evaluate whether there are family ties between the patients with EoE, and determine whether there are cases of EoE that are triggered or exacerbated by pollens.
We conducted a prospective, descriptive, and analytic study in patients with EoE for 14 years (2007-2020). The study variables were age, sex, relatives with EoE, time of evolution of the symptoms until diagnosis of the disease, and symptoms. We examined incidence and prevalence, annual counts of aeroallergens for 12 years, and number of diagnoses per year (in 2007-2020). We studied patients with active EoE (in April-July) and EoE in remission (in August-March) for 2 consecutive years. Exacerbations were investigated by measuring symptoms using a visual analog scale of 1 to 10.
Of the 366 patients with EoE (studied from 2007 to 2020), 83.5% were atopic, with respiratory allergy and 28% had a food allergy. Their mean age was 35 years. The time of evolution of the symptoms was more than 6 years. Only 11% of the patients had a degree of kinship. Of the 366 patients, 87% had dysphagia, 27% had had impactions, and 12.5% had other symptoms of esophageal dysfunction. We found a positive correlation between the incidence of EoE and Platanaceae pollens. We did not detect any case of EoE triggered or exacerbated by pollens.
The epidemiology of EoE in southwestern Europe continues to grow. We have corroborated the relevant impact of the environment on genetics. Future studies will clarify the possible relevance of Platanaceae pollens in the increased epidemiology of EoE. The role of grass and Oleaceae pollens in triggering EoE is limited by having a short pollination in time.
SLIT for the treatment of plant food allergies has been demonstrated to be safe but less effective than OIT, but the latter is associated with more adverse reactions. The aim of the study was to ...evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new protocol starting with SLIT-peach followed by OIT with commercial peach juice in patients with LTP syndrome.
This was a prospective, noncontrolled, open study on patients with LTP syndrome who are not sensitized to storage proteins. SLIT peach ALK was followed by OIT with Granini
peach juice after 40 days of the SLIT maintenance phase. At home, the Granini
juice dose was progressively increased during the 42 days until reaching 200 ml. After achieving the maximum dose, an open oral food challenge was carried out with the food that had caused the most severe reaction. If negative, the patient was instructed to progressively introduce the foods that were avoided before starting immunotherapy at home. Patients were reviewed 1 month later. The quality-of-life questionnaire FAQLQ-AF was completed at the beginning of the study and one month after the final challenge.
Forty-five patients were included, most of them with LTP anaphylaxis. Peach SLIT was well tolerated in 80.5%, and OIT with Granini
was well tolerated in 85%, with no severe adverse reactions. The final provocation was successful in 39/45 (86.6%). One month after the final provocation, 42/45 (93.3%) patients had no dietary restrictions. FAQLA-AF was significantly reduced.
This combination of peach SLIT and OIT with commercial peach juice provides a new, fast, effective, and safe immunotherapy option for selected patients with LTP syndrome who are not allergic to storage proteins, improving their quality of life. This study suggests that cross-desensitization relative to the nsLTPs of several plant foods can be achieved by using Prup3.
