Summary Background The Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trial showed that mortality at 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years is much the same with transcatheter aortic valve replacement ...(TAVR) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. We report here the 5-year outcomes. Methods We did this randomised controlled trial at 25 hospitals, in Canada (two), Germany (one), and the USA (23). We used a computer-generated randomisation sequence to randomly assign high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis to either SAVR or TAVR with a balloon-expandable bovine pericardial tissue valve by either a transfemoral or transapical approach. Patients and their treating physicians were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome of the trial was all-cause mortality in the intention-to-treat population at 1 year, we present here predefined outcomes at 5 years. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT00530894. Findings We screened 3105 patients, of whom 699 were enrolled (348 assigned to TAVR, 351 assigned to SAVR). Overall mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality score was 11·7%. At 5 years, risk of death was 67·8% in the TAVR group compared with 62·4% in the SAVR group (hazard ratio 1·04, 95% CI 0·86–1·24; p=0·76). We recorded no structural valve deterioration requiring surgical valve replacement in either group. Moderate or severe aortic regurgitation occurred in 40 (14%) of 280 patients in the TAVR group and two (1%) of 228 in the SAVR group (p<0·0001), and was associated with increased 5-year risk of mortality in the TAVR group (72·4% for moderate or severe aortic regurgitation vs 56·6% for those with mild aortic regurgitation or less; p=0·003). Interpretation Our findings show that TAVR as an alternative to surgery for patients with high surgical risk results in similar clinical outcomes. Funding Edwards Lifesciences.
In a randomized trial, 1000 patients with severe aortic stenosis who were at low risk for death with surgery were assigned to undergo transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a balloon-expandable ...valve or surgical aortic-valve replacement. At 1 year, the rate of death, stroke, or rehospitalization was significantly lower in the TAVR group.
In a randomized trial involving more than 2000 patients, transcatheter aortic-valve replacement was noninferior to surgical replacement in the primary end point of death from any cause or disabling ...stroke at 2 years.
Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) is a new therapy for patients with severe aortic stenosis who are not candidates for surgery
1
,
2
or who are at high risk for complications due to surgery.
3
,
4
The acceptance of the use of TAVR in high-risk patients was based on evidence from clinical trials
5
,
6
that used early-generation TAVR devices; these procedures were associated with considerable procedure-related complications.
7
–
9
Recently, increased operator experience and enhanced transcatheter valve systems have led to a worldwide trend to use TAVR in patients who are at low or intermediate risk.
10
–
12
This trend has been evaluated in small . . .
In low surgical risk patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, the PARTNER 3 (Safety and Effectiveness of the SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve in Low Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis) ...trial demonstrated superiority of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) versus surgery for the primary endpoint of death, stroke, or re-hospitalization at 1 year.
This study determined both clinical and echocardiographic outcomes between 1 and 2 years in the PARTNER 3 trial.
This study randomly assigned 1,000 patients (1:1) to transfemoral TAVR with the SAPIEN 3 valve versus surgery (mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score: 1.9%; mean age: 73 years) with clinical and echocardiography follow-up at 30 days and at 1 and 2 years. This study assessed 2-year rates of the primary endpoint and several secondary endpoints (clinical, echocardiography, and quality-of-life measures) in this as-treated analysis.
Primary endpoint follow-up at 2 years was available in 96.5% of patients. The 2-year primary endpoint was significantly reduced after TAVR versus surgery (11.5% vs. 17.4%; hazard ratio: 0.63; 95% confidence interval: 0.45 to 0.88; p = 0.007). Differences in death and stroke favoring TAVR at 1 year were not statistically significant at 2 years (death: TAVR 2.4% vs. surgery 3.2%; p = 0.47; stroke: TAVR 2.4% vs. surgery 3.6%; p = 0.28). Valve thrombosis at 2 years was increased after TAVR (2.6%; 13 events) compared with surgery (0.7%; 3 events; p = 0.02). Disease-specific health status continued to be better after TAVR versus surgery through 2 years. Echocardiographic findings, including hemodynamic valve deterioration and bioprosthetic valve failure, were similar for TAVR and surgery at 2 years.
At 2 years, the primary endpoint remained significantly lower with TAVR versus surgery, but initial differences in death and stroke favoring TAVR were diminished and patients who underwent TAVR had increased valve thrombosis. (Safety and Effectiveness of the SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve in Low Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis PARTNER 3; NCT02675114)
Display omitted
This study provides 2-year data from the PARTNER trial, in which patients with aortic stenosis received transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) or surgical replacement. Overall mortality was ...similar, but paravalvular leak increased mortality in the TAVR group.
Aortic stenosis is associated with high mortality after the appearance of cardiac symptoms.
1
Nevertheless, many patients do not undergo surgical aortic-valve replacement owing to real or perceived increased risks associated with surgery.
2
–
5
Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as an alternative therapy in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis.
6
–
10
Observational registries from various countries have reported 1-month and 1-year outcomes after TAVR,
11
–
14
but there are limited long-term follow-up data.
15
The Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trial was a randomized trial comparing TAVR with standard-of-care therapies in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. One-year mortality outcomes from PARTNER showed . . .
This article provides 2-year data on patients with inoperable aortic stenosis randomly assigned to receive standard therapy or transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR). Death rates at 2 years ...were higher with standard therapy, but the rate of stroke was higher with TAVR.
Symptomatic aortic stenosis, if left untreated, is characterized by a high risk of death.
1
–
6
In the randomized Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trial, transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR), as compared with standard therapy, in patients who were not considered to be suitable candidates for surgery, decreased the rate of death at 1 year, reduced cardiac symptoms, and improved the hemodynamic performance of the valve.
2
Longer-term outcomes are essential to guide clinical practice decisions in this elderly patient population, in which many of the patients have multiple coexisting conditions. Moreover, there is a paucity of long-term data on the performance . . .
BACKGROUND:In the initial PARTNER trial (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) of transcatheter aortic valve replacement for high-risk (HR) and inoperable patients, mortality at 1 year was 24% in ...HR and 31% in inoperable patients. A recent report of the 30-day outcomes with the low-profile SAPIEN 3 transcatheter aortic valve replacement system demonstrated very low rates of adverse events, but little is known about the longer-term outcomes with this device.
METHODS:Between October 2013 and September 2014, 583 HR (65%) or inoperable (35%) patients were treated via the transfemoral (84%) or transapical/transaortic (16%) access route at 29 US sites. Major clinical events at 1 year were adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee, and echocardiographic results were analyzed by a core laboratory.
RESULTS:Baseline characteristics included age of 83 years, 42% female, and median Society of Thoracic Surgeons score of 8.4%. At the 1-year follow-up, survival (all-cause) was 85.6% for all patients, 87.3% in the HR subgroup, and 82.3% in the inoperable subgroup. Survival free of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the transfemoral patients from the HR cohort was 87.7% and 93.3%, respectively. There was no severe paravalvular leak. Moderate paravalvular leak (2.7%) was associated with an increase in mortality at 1 year, whereas mild paravalvular leak had no significant association with mortality. Symptomatic improvement as assessed by the percentage of patients in New York Heart Association class III and IV (90.1% to 7.7% at 1 year; P<0.0001) and by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary score (improved from 46.9 to 72.4; P<0.0001) was marked. Multivariable predictors of 1-year mortality included alternative access, Society of Thoracic Surgeons score, and disabling stroke.
CONCLUSIONS:In this large, adjudicated registry of SAPIEN 3 HR and inoperable patients, the very low rates of important complications resulted in a strikingly low mortality rate at 1 year. Between 30 and 365 days, the incidence of moderate paravalvular aortic regurgitation did not increase, and no association between mild paravalvular leak and 1-year mortality was observed, although a small increase in disabling stroke occurred. These results, which likely reflect device iteration and procedural evolution, support the use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement as the preferred therapy in HR and inoperable patients with aortic stenosis.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATIONURLhttp://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifierNCT01314313.
This study examines use of an expandable bovine pericardial prosthetic valve inserted with a catheter system for valvular aortic stenosis. Outcomes were noninferior to those of surgical aortic-valve ...replacement, but the risk of stroke, aortic regurgitation, and vascular complications was substantial.
After the appearance of symptoms, aortic stenosis is associated with a high rate of death if left untreated.
1
–
10
Although surgical aortic-valve replacement improves symptoms and survival,
11
–
15
observational studies have identified various subgroups of patients (i.e., those with an advanced age and those with poor left ventricular function or other coexisting disorders) who are at increased risk for operative complications or death.
16
–
21
In such patients, a less invasive treatment may be a desirable alternative.
Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement treats aortic stenosis by displacing and functionally replacing the native valve with a bioprosthetic valve delivered on a catheter through the . . .
The level of evidence for HIV transmission risk through condomless sex in serodifferent gay couples with the HIV-positive partner taking virally suppressive antiretroviral therapy (ART) is limited ...compared with the evidence available for transmission risk in heterosexual couples. The aim of the second phase of the PARTNER study (PARTNER2) was to provide precise estimates of transmission risk in gay serodifferent partnerships.
The PARTNER study was a prospective observational study done at 75 sites in 14 European countries. The first phase of the study (PARTNER1; Sept 15, 2010, to May 31, 2014) recruited and followed up both heterosexual and gay serodifferent couples (HIV-positive partner taking suppressive ART) who reported condomless sex, whereas the PARTNER2 extension (to April 30, 2018) recruited and followed up gay couples only. At study visits, data collection included sexual behaviour questionnaires, HIV testing (HIV-negative partner), and HIV-1 viral load testing (HIV-positive partner). If a seroconversion occurred in the HIV-negative partner, anonymised phylogenetic analysis was done to compare HIV-1 pol and env sequences in both partners to identify linked transmissions. Couple-years of follow-up were eligible for inclusion if condomless sex was reported, use of pre-exposure prophylaxis or post-exposure prophylaxis was not reported by the HIV-negative partner, and the HIV-positive partner was virally suppressed (plasma HIV-1 RNA <200 copies per mL) at the most recent visit (within the past year). Incidence rate of HIV transmission was calculated as the number of phylogenetically linked HIV infections that occurred during eligible couple-years of follow-up divided by eligible couple-years of follow-up. Two-sided 95% CIs for the incidence rate of transmission were calculated using exact Poisson methods.
Between Sept 15, 2010, and July 31, 2017, 972 gay couples were enrolled, of which 782 provided 1593 eligible couple-years of follow-up with a median follow-up of 2·0 years (IQR 1·1–3·5). At baseline, median age for HIV-positive partners was 40 years (IQR 33–46) and couples reported condomless sex for a median of 1·0 years (IQR 0·4–2·9). During eligible couple-years of follow-up, couples reported condomless anal sex a total of 76 088 times. 288 (37%) of 777 HIV-negative men reported condomless sex with other partners. 15 new HIV infections occurred during eligible couple-years of follow-up, but none were phylogenetically linked within-couple transmissions, resulting in an HIV transmission rate of zero (upper 95% CI 0·23 per 100 couple-years of follow-up).
Our results provide a similar level of evidence on viral suppression and HIV transmission risk for gay men to that previously generated for heterosexual couples and suggest that the risk of HIV transmission in gay couples through condomless sex when HIV viral load is suppressed is effectively zero. Our findings support the message of the U=U (undetectable equals untransmittable) campaign, and the benefits of early testing and treatment for HIV.
National Institute for Health Research.
PDF
