Opinion statement
KRASp.G12C mutation occurs in 12% of newly diagnosed advanced NSCLC and has recently emerged as a positive predictive biomarker for the selection of advanced NSCLC patients who may ...respond to novel KRASp.G12C inhibitors. The recent discovery of a new binding pocket under the effector region of KRAS G12C oncoprotein has made direct pharmacological inhibition of the KRASp.G12 mutation possible, leading to the clinical development of a new series of direct selective inhibitors, with a potential major impact on patients’ survival and quality of life. Promising efficacy and tolerability data emerging from the early phase CodeBreak trial have already supported the regulatory approval of sotorasib as first in class targeted treatment for the second-line treatment of KRASp.G12C-positive NSCLC population, following immunotherapy-based first-line therapies, while the randomized phase III CodeBreak 200 clinical study has recently confirmed a significant superiority of sotorasib over docetaxel in terms of progression-free survival and quality of life. However, KRAS mutant NSCLC is a high heterogeneous disease characterized by a high rate of co-mutations, most frequently involving P53, STK11, and KEAP1 genes, which significantly modulate the composition of the tumor microenvironment and consequently affect clinical responses to both immunotherapy and targeted inhibitors now available in clinical practice. Both pre-clinical and clinical translational series have recently revealed a wide spectrum of resistance mechanisms occurring under selective KRASG12C inhibitors, including both on-target and off-target molecular alterations as well as morphological switching, negatively affecting the antitumor activity of these drugs when used as single agent therapies. The understanding of such biological background along with the emergence of pre-clinical data provided a strong rational to investigate different combination strategies, including the inhibition of SHP2, SOS1, and KRAS G12C downstream effectors, as well as the addition of immunotherapy and/or chemotherapy to targeted therapy. The preliminary results of these trials have recently suggested a promising activity of SHP2 inhibitors in the front-line setting, while toxicity issues limited the concurrent administration of immune-checkpoint inhibitors and sotorasib. The identification of predictive genomic/immunological biomarkers will be crucial to understand how to optimally sequencing/combining different drugs and ultimately personalize treatment strategies under clinical investigation, to definitively increase the survival outcomes of KRASp.G12C mutant advanced NSCLC patients.
Immune‐checkpoint inhibitors represent the new standard of care in patients with advanced NSCLC who progressed after first‐line treatment. This work aim to assess any difference in both efficacy and ...safety profiles among Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab and Atezolizumab in pre‐treated NSCLC patients. Randomized clinical trials comparing immune‐checkpoint inhibitor versus docetaxel in pre‐treated patients with advanced NSCLC were included and direct comparison meta‐analysis of selected trials have been performed. Subsequently the summary estimates of Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab and Atezolizumab emerging from the direct meta‐analysis were selected to provide the pooled estimates of hazard ratio (HR) and relative risk (RR) for the indirect comparisons among these agents. A total of 5 studies met the selection criteria and were included in the meta‐analysis. Indirect comparisons for efficacy outcomes showed the RR for ORR nivolumab versus atezolizumab 1.66 (95% CI 1.07−2.58), pembrolizumab versus atezolizumab 1.94 (95% CI 1.30−2.90). No significant differences in both PFS and OS have been observed. Indirect comparisons for safety showed the RR for G3‐5 AEs nivolumab versus pembrolizumab 0.41 (95% CI 0.29−0.60), nivolumab versus atezolizumab 0.50 (95% CI 0.35−0.72). No significant differences in both pneumonitis and discontinuation rate have been observed. The results of this work revealed that nivolumab and pembrolizumab are associated with a significant increase of ORR as compared to atezolizumab and nivolumab is associated with a significant lower incidence of G3‐5 AEs as compared to the other drugs. These evidences could support the oncologists to select the best drug for each patient.
What's new?
In advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), failure of first‐line therapy is followed by the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which have superior survival benefits compared to standard chemotherapy. Three ICIs are available for pre‐treated NSCLC patients: atezolizumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab. The present meta‐analysis examined differences in efficacy and safety profiles between these agents. Indirect comparisons of data on clinical outcomes from five studies included in the meta‐analysis reveal significant differences in efficacy and toxicity between atezolizumab and nivolumab and between atezolizumab and pembrolizumab. The findings warrant further investigation given their potential impact on drug selection for NSCLC patients.
Introduction: Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and their signaling pathways, control normal cellular processes; however, their deregulation play important roles in malignant transformation. In ...advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the recognition of oncogenic activation of specific RTKs, has led to the development of molecularly targeted agents that only benefit roughly 20% of patients. Entrectinib is a pan-TRK, ROS1 and ALK inhibitor that has shown potent anti-neoplastic activity and tolerability in various neoplastic conditions, particularly NSCLC.
Areas covered: This review outlines the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, mechanism of action, safety, tolerability, pre-clinical studies and clinical trials of entrectinib, a promising novel agent for the treatment of advanced solid tumors with molecular alterations of Trk-A, B and C, ROS1 or ALK.
Expert opinion: Among the several experimental drugs under clinical development, entrectinib is emerging as an innovative and promising targeted agent. The encouraging antitumor activity reported in the Phase 1 studies, together with the acceptable toxicity profile, suggest that entrectinib, thanks to its peculiar mechanism of action, could play an important role in the treatment-strategies of multiple TRK-A, B, C, ROS1, and ALK- dependent solid tumors, including NSCLC and colorectal cancer. That being said, further evidence for its clinical use is still needed.
Highlights • KRAS and BRAF mutations as predictors of recurrence-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS) in colorectal cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment of CRC liver metastases ...(CLM). • Meta-analysis to estimate the prognostic value of both KRAS and BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment of CRC liver metastases (CLM). • KRAS and BRAF mutations are prognostic biomarkers, associated with worse survival outcomes in patients undergoing hepatic resection of CLM.
In the past 10 years, a deeper understanding of the immune landscape of cancers, including immune evasion processes, has allowed the development of a new class of agents. The reactivation of host ...antitumor immune response offers the potential for long-term survival benefit in a portion of patients with thoracic malignancies.
The advent of programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death ligand-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), both as single agents and in combination with chemotherapy, and more recently, the combination of ICI, anti–programmed cell death protein 1, and anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 antibody, have led to breakthrough therapeutic advances for patients with advanced NSCLC, and to a lesser extent, patients with SCLC. Encouraging activity has recently emerged in pretreated patients with thymic carcinoma (TC). Conversely, in malignant pleural mesothelioma, pivotal positive signs of activity have not been fully confirmed in randomized trials. The additive effects of chemoradiation and immunotherapy suggested intriguing potential for therapeutic synergy with combination strategies. This has led to the introduction of ICI consolidation therapy in stage III NSCLC, creating a platform for future therapeutic developments in earlier-stage disease. Despite the definitive clinical benefit observed with ICI, primary and acquired resistance represent well-known biological phenomena, which may affect the therapeutic efficacy of these agents.
The development of innovative strategies to overcome ICI resistance, standardization of new patterns of ICI progression, identification of predictive biomarkers of response, optimal treatment duration, and characterization of ICI efficacy in special populations, represent crucial issues to be adequately addressed, with the aim of improving the therapeutic benefit of ICI in patients with thoracic malignancies.
In this article, an international panel of experts in the field of thoracic malignancies discussed these topics, evaluating currently available scientific evidence, with the final aim of providing clinical recommendations, which may guide oncologists in their current practice and elucidate future treatment strategies and research priorities.
The angiopoietin-like 4 (ANGPTL4) protein belongs to a superfamily of secreted proteins structurally related to factors modulating angiogenesis known as angiopoietins. At first, ANGPTL4 has been ...identified as an adipokine exclusively involved in lipid metabolism, because of its prevalent expression in liver and adipose tissue. This protein regulates lipid metabolism by inhibiting lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity and stimulating lipolysis of white adipose tissue (WAT), resulting in increased levels of plasma triglycerides (TG) and fatty acids. Subsequently, ANGPTL4 has been shown to be involved in several nonmetabolic and metabolic conditions, both physiological and pathological, including angiogenesis and vascular permeability, cell differentiation, tumorigenesis, glucose homoeostasis, lipid metabolism, energy homeostasis, wound healing, inflammation, and redox regulation. The transcriptional regulation of ANGPTL4 can be modulated by several transcription factors, including PPARα, PPARβ/δ, PPARγ, and HIF-1α, and nutritional and hormonal conditions. Several studies showed that high levels of ANGPTL4 are associated with poor prognosis in patients with various solid tumors, suggesting an important role in cancer onset and progression, metastasis, and anoikis resistance. Here, we have discussed the potential role of ANGPTL4 in mediating the cross talk between metabolic syndromes, such as diabetes and obesity, and cancer through regulation of its expression by PPARs.
Colorectal cancer(CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death. Surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy have been till now the main therapeutic strategies for disease control and ...improvement of the overall survival. Twenty-five per cent(25%) of CRC patients have clinically detectable liver metastases at the initial diagnosis and approximately 50% develop liver metastases during their disease course. Twentythirty per cent(20%-30%) are CRC patients with metastases confined to the liver. Some years ago various studies showed a curative potential for liver metastases resection. For this reason some authors proposed the conversion of unresectable liver metastases to resectable to achieve cure. Since those results were published, a lot of regimens have been studied for resectability potential. Better results could be obtained by the combination of chemotherapy with targeted drugs, such as anti-VEGF and antiEGFR monoclonal antibodies. However an accurate selection for patients to treat with these regimens and to operate for liver metastases is mandatory to reduce the risk of complications. A multidisciplinary team approach represents the best way for a proper patient management. The team needs to include surgeons, oncologists, diagnostic and interventional radiologists with expertise in hepatobiliary disease, molecular pathologists, and clinical nurse specialists. This review summarizes the most important findings on surgery and systemic treatment of CRC-related liver metastases.
Purpose of Review
Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements represent a seldom event in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Given the oncogene alteration, ALK targeting represents the main ...therapeutic strategy. Here, we review evidence regarding ALK inhibitors (ALKi): clinical activity, safety profiles, financial costs, and biomarkers of efficacy.
Recent Findings
During the past 10 years, multiple ALKi have been developed, and four different compounds are currently available as upfront options for ALK+ NSCLC patients: crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, and brigatinib. Second-generation (2G) ALKi demonstrated superior clinical activity in terms of median progression-free survival (mPFS), objective response rate (ORR), intracranial disease control, and duration of response (DOR) when compared with crizotinib.
Summary
2G ALKi represent the current gold-standard first-line treatment for ALK-rearranged metastatic NSCLC. Among all available options, in our opinion, alectinib has likely the best profile of clinical activity and safety, thus emerging as the best upfront therapy. More insights will come from ongoing trials and analysis of biomarkers.
PDF
