In this 12‐month, multicenter, randomized, open‐label, noninferiority study, de novo renal transplant recipients (RTxRs) were randomized (1:1) to receive everolimus plus low‐dose tacrolimus ...(EVR+LTac) or mycophenolate mofetil plus standard‐dose Tac (MMF+STac) with induction therapy (basiliximab or rabbit anti‐thymocyte globulin). Noninferiority of composite efficacy failure rate (treated biopsy‐proven acute rejection tBPAR/graft loss/death/loss to follow‐up) in EVR+LTac versus MMF+STac was missed by 1.4%, considering the noninferiority margin of 10% (24.6% vs. 20.4%; 4.2% −3.0, 11.4). Incidence of tBPAR (19.1% vs. 11.2%; p < 0.05) was significantly higher, while graft loss (1.3% vs. 3.9%; p < 0.05) and composite of graft loss/death/lost to follow‐up (6.1% vs. 10.5%, p = 0.05) were significantly lower in EVR+LTac versus MMF+STac groups, respectively. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was similar between EVR+LTac and MMF+STac groups (63.1 22.0 vs. 63.1 19.5 mL/min/1.73 m2) and safety was comparable. In conclusion, EVR+LTac missed noninferiority versus MMF+STac based on the 10% noninferiority margin. Further studies evaluating optimal immunosuppression for improved efficacy will guide appropriate dosing and target levels of EVR and LTac in RTxRs.
This 12‐month, multicenter, randomized, open‐label study in de novo renal transplant recipients reports statistically better graft survival, similar renal function, and comparable safety, despite missing the noninferiority margin of composite efficacy failure rate, with an everolimus plus low‐dose tacrolimus regimen versus mycophenolate mofetil plus standard dose tacrolimus.
A key objective in the use of immunosuppression after kidney transplantation is to attain the optimal balance between efficacy and safety. In a phase 3b, multicenter, randomized, open‐label, ...noninferiority study, the incidences of clinical events, renal dysfunction, and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed at 12 months in 309 de novo renal transplant recipients receiving everolimus (EVR), low‐dose tacrolimus (LTac), and prednisone. Cox proportional hazard regression modeling was used to estimate the probability of clinical events at specified combinations of time‐normalized EVR and Tac trough concentrations. At 12 months, the highest incidence of treated biopsy‐proven acute rejection (tBPAR) and graft loss occurred most often in patients with EVR trough concentration <3 ng/mL (64.7% and 10.5%, respectively). At 1 month and 12 months, increasing EVR levels were associated with fewer tBPAR events (both p < 0.0001). Low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and decreased eGFR occurred more often in patients with lower EVR and higher Tac levels. AEs were most often observed in patients with EVR levels <3 ng/mL. This study supports maintaining an EVR trough concentration of 3–8 ng/mL, when combined with LTac, to achieve balanced efficacy and safety in renal transplant recipients. Trial registration: NCT01025817.
This post hoc exploratory analysis of the US92 study assesses efficacy and safety events with specific everolimus and tacrolimus trough concentrations, and supports maintaining an everolimus trough concentration of 3–8 ng/mL when combined with low‐dose tacrolimus to achieve favorable efficacy and safety outcomes in renal transplant patients.
TruGraf v1 is a laboratory-developed DNA microarray-based gene expression blood test to enable proactive noninvasive serial assessment of kidney transplant recipients with stable renal function. It ...has been previously validated in patients identified as Transplant eXcellence (TX: stable serum creatinine, normal biopsy results, indicative of immune quiescence), and not-TX (renal dysfunction and/or rejection on biopsy results). TruGraf v1 is intended for use in subjects with stable renal function to measure the immune status as an alternative to invasive, expensive, and risky surveillance biopsies.
In this study, simultaneous blood tests and clinical assessments were performed in 192 patients from 7 transplant centers to evaluate TruGraf v1. The molecular testing laboratory was blinded to renal function and biopsy results.
Overall, TruGraf v1 accuracy (concordance between TruGraf v1 result and clinical and/or histologic assessment) was 74% (142/192), and a result of TX was accurate in 116 of 125 (93%). The negative predictive value for TruGraf v1 was 90%, with a sensitivity 74% and specificity of 73%. Results did not significantly differ in patients with a biopsy-confirmed diagnosis vs those without a biopsy.
TruGraf v1 can potentially support a clinical decision enabling unnecessary surveillance biopsies with high confidence, making it an invaluable addition to the transplant physician's tool kit for managing patients. TruGraf v1 testing can potentially avoid painful and risky invasive biopsies, reduce health care costs, and enable frequent assessment of patients with stable renal function to confirm the presence of immune quiescence in the peripheral blood.
•There is an urgent need for non-invasive testing of kidney transplant recipients with stable renal function to confirm adequacy of immunosuppression as a key element to preventing future rejection and especially Antibody Mediated Rejection.•Current monitoring techniques to detect kidney injury includes measuring serum creatinine levels and immunosuppressive drug levels, both of which are insensitive and non-specific and routine surveillance (protocol) biopsies are both expensive and invasive, have significant intra-observer variation in interpretation of biopsy results and are unsuitable for frequent monitoring.•TruGraf® v1 is a is a laboratory developed DNA microarray-based gene expression blood test to enable proactive non-invasive serial assessment of kidney transplant recipients with stable renal function.•In this study, simultaneous blood tests and clinical assessments were performed in 192 patients from 7 transplant centers to evaluate TruGraf v1 and the results show that TruGraf v1 can potentially support a clinical decision enabling unnecessary surveillance biopsies with high confidence, making it an invaluable addition to the transplant physician's toolkit for managing patients.
TruGraf v1 is a well-validated DNA microarray-based test that analyzes blood gene expression profiles as an indicator of immune status in kidney transplant recipients with stable renal function.
In ...this study, investigators assessed clinical utility of the TruGraf test in patient management. In a retrospective study, simultaneous blood tests and clinical assessments were performed in 192 patients at 7 transplant centers, and in a prospective observational study they were performed in 45 subjects at 5 transplant centers.
When queried regarding whether or not the TruGraf test result impacted their decision regarding patient management, in 168 of 192 (87.5%) cases the investigator responded affirmatively. The prospective study indicated that TruGraf results supported physicians' decisions on patient management 87% (39/45) of the time, and in 93% of cases physicians indicated that they would use serial TruGraf testing in future patient management. A total of 21 of 39 (54%) reported results confirmed their decision that no intervention was needed, and 17 of 39 (44%) reported that results specifically informed them that a decision not to perform a surveillance biopsy was correct.
TruGraf is the first and only noninvasive test to be evaluated for clinical utility in determining rejection status of patients with stable renal function and shows promise of providing support for clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary surveillance biopsies with a high degree of confidence. TruGraf is an invaluable addition to the transplant physician's tool kit for managing patient health by avoiding painful and invasive biopsies, reducing health care costs, and enabling frequent assessment of patients with stable renal function to confirm immune quiescence.
•TruGraf is a well-validated DNA microarray-based test that analyzes blood gene expression profiles as an indicator of immune status in kidney transplant recipients with stable renal function.•In both a retrospective and prospective clinical study the clinical utility of the TruGraf test was demonstrated.•TruGraf is the first and only noninvasive test to be evaluated for clinical utility in determining rejection status of patients with stable renal function and has the potential to support clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary surveillance biopsies with high confidence.
This randomized, pilot study compared the Janus kinase inhibitor CP‐690,550 (15 mg BID CP15 and 30 mg BID CP30, n = 20 each) with tacrolimus (n = 21) in de novo kidney allograft recipients. Patients ...received an IL‐2 receptor antagonist, concomitant mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids. CP‐690,550 doses were reduced after 6 months. Due to a high incidence of BK virus nephropathy (BKN) in CP30, MMF was discontinued in this group. The 6‐month biopsy‐proven acute rejection rates were 1 of 20, 4 of 20 and 1 of 21 for CP15, CP30 and tacrolimus groups, respectively. BKN developed in 4 of 20 patients in CP30 group. The 6‐month rates of cytomegalovirus disease were 2 of 20, 4 of 20 and none of 21 for CP15, CP30 and tacrolimus groups, respectively. Estimated glomerular filtration rate was >70 mL/min at 6 and 12 months (all groups). NK cells were reduced by ≤77% in CP‐690,550‐treated patients. In the CP‐690,550 arms, there were modest lipid elevations and a trend toward more frequent anemia and neutropenia during the first 6 months. These data suggest that coadministration of CP‐690,550 30 mg BID with MMF is associated with overimmunosuppression. At 15 mg BID, the efficacy/safety profile was comparable to the tacrolimus control group, excepting a higher rate of viral infection. Further dose‐ranging evaluation of CP‐690,550 is warranted.
In this pilot study, inhibition of the JAK3 pathway with CP‐690,550 resulted in relatively low rates of rejection after kidney transplantation with evidence of over‐immunosuppression when CP‐690,550 30 mg BID was combined with MMF.
In view of the superior T-cell depletion and prolonged half-life of thymoglobulin, we initiated a protocol to administer thymoglobulin intermittently based on peripheral blood CD3+ lymphocyte counts.
...In this prospective study, 41 consecutive high-risk cadaver transplant recipients (panel reactive antibody level >30%, repeat transplant recipients, simultaneous pancreas and kidney or pancreas after kidney recipients, prolonged cold-ischemia time, prolonged donor hypotension, non-heart-beating donors) who received thymoglobulin induction therapy were included. The first dose (1.5 mg/kg) of thymoglobulin was administered intraoperatively. CD3+ lymphocyte count in the peripheral blood was determined daily and repeat doses were administered when the CD3+ count was >20 cells/mm3. Calcineurin inhibitors (CI) in low doses were introduced when the allograft function recovered and the serum creatinine level dropped by at least 25% from the pretransplant level. Thymoglobulin treatment was discontinued once therapeutic CI drug levels were achieved. Concomitant immunosuppression consisted of mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone.
The mean individual thymoglobulin dose was 104 mg (1.4 mg/kg), and the total cumulative dose per patient was 318 mg (4.2 mg/kg). Patients received an average of three doses and a mean of six CD3 counts were obtained per patient. Introduction of CI was delayed for an average of 6 days posttransplantation. At a mean follow-up of 340 days, two (4.9%) patients died; three (7.3%) renal allografts and two (18.2%) pancreas allografts were lost. Five (12.2%) patients developed a total of six acute rejection episodes. The mean serum creatinine in the 38 patients with a functioning kidney was 1.47 mg/dl, and the mean blood glucose in the 9 pancreas allograft recipients was 89 mg/dl. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection occurred in one (2.4%) patient. No posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders were seen in this patient cohort. The hospital pharmacy charge for a 100-mg dose of thymoglobulin at this center was $2,165, and the laboratory charge for a single CD3 determination was $70. In this study, the average charges per patient for the total dose of thymoglobulin and six CD3 determinations were $7305. In comparison, the charge for daily administration of 104 mg of thymoglobulin (which was the mean dose) for 6 days (mean time to CI therapy initiation) would be $13,510 and for 10 days (mean time to therapeutic CI levels) would be $22,516. This represents a savings of 46% and 68%, respectively.
Intermittent thymoglobulin therapy, based on peripheral blood CD3+ lymphocyte counts, is safe and associated with low acute rejection rate in high-risk kidney and kidney-pancreas transplant recipients. A mean of three doses resulted in adequate suppression of CD3+ lymphocytes permitting delayed introduction of CI in low doses until recovery of renal function occurred. When compared to traditional daily administration, intermittent therapy results in significant cost savings and reduces the total cumulative dose of this potent immunosuppressive agent.
Short-term and long-term results of renal transplantation have improved over the past 15 years. However, there has been no change in the prevalence of recurrent and de novo diseases. A retrospective ...study was initiated through the Renal Allograft Disease Registry, to evaluate the prevalence and impact of recurrent and de novo diseases after transplantation.
From October 1987 to December 1996, a total of 4913 renal transplants were performed on adults at the Medical College of Wisconsin, University of Cincinnati, University of California at San Francisco, University of Louisville, University of Washington, Seattle, and Washington University School of Medicine. The patients were followed for a minimum of 1 year. A total of 167 (3.4%) cases of recurrent and de novo disease were diagnosed by renal biopsy. These patients were compared with other patients who did not have recurrent and de novo disease (n=4746). There were more men (67.7% vs. 59.8%, P<0.035) and a higher number of re-transplants (17% vs. 11.5%, P<0.005) in the recurrent and de novo disease group. There was no difference in the rate of recurrent and de novo disease according to the transplant type (living related donor vs. cadaver, P=NS). Other demographic findings were not significantly different. Common forms of glomerulonephritis seen were focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), 57; immunoglobulin A nephritis, 22; membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (GN), 18; and membranous nephropathy, 16. Other diagnoses include: diabetic nephropathy, 19; immune complex GN, 12; crescentic GN (vasculitis), 6; hemolytic uremic syndrome-thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (HUS/TTP), 8; systemic lupus erythematosus, 3; Anti-glomerular basement membrane disease, 2; oxalosis, 2; and miscellaneous, 2. The diagnosis of recurrent and de novo disease was made after a mean period of 678 days after the transplant. During the follow-up period, there were significantly more graft failures in the recurrent disease group, 55% vs. 25%, P<0.001. The actuarial 1-, 2-, 3-, 4, and 5-year kidney survival rates for patients with recurrent and de novo disease was 86.5%, 78.5%, 65%, 47.7%, and 39.8%. The corresponding survival rates for patients without recurrent and de novo disease were 85.2%, 81.2%, 76.5%, 72%, and 67.6%, respectively (Log-rank test, P<0.0001). The median kidney survival rate for patients with and without recurrent and de novo disease was 1360 vs. 3382 days (P<0.0001). Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazard model for graft failure was performed to identify various risk factors. Cadaveric transplants, prolonged cold ischemia time, elevated panel reactive antibody, and recurrent disease were identified as risk factors for allograft failure. The relative risk (95% confidence interval) for graft failure because of recurrent and de novo disease was 1.9 (1.57-2.40), P<0.0001. The relative risk for graft failure because of posttransplant FSGS was 2.25 (1.6-3.1), P<0.0001, for membranoprolifera. tive glomerulonephritis was 2.37 (1.3-4.2), P<0.003, and for HUS/TTP was 5.36 (2.2-12.9), P<0.0002. There was higher graft failure (64.9%) and shorter half-life (1244 days) in patients with recurrent FSGS.
In conclusion, recurrent and de novo disease are associated with poorer long-term survival, and the relative risk of allograft loss is double. Significant impact on graft survival was seen with recurrent and de novo FSGS, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, and HUS/TTP.
Recurrent or de novo glomerular disease is an important cause of graft dysfunction and eventual loss. Cyclosporine A (CyA) has improved short- term renal allograft outcome but has not altered ...long-term graft survival. The purpose of the current study is to determine the prevalence of such disease and its impact on graft function in the CyA era. From 1984 to 1994, 1,557 renal allografts were performed at the Medical College of Wisconsin and the University of Cincinnati. Patients were followed up for an average of 7.2 years (minimum, 1 year). Recurrent disease was diagnosed by renal biopsy in 98 (6.3%) patients after an average of 36 months. Demographic characteristics of patients with and without recurrent disease were similar. Glomerulonephritis was the most common finding, occurring in 73 patients, and included focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), 25; IgA nephropathy (IgAN), 11; membranous (MN), 11; proliferative, 11; membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN), 10; glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM), 3; and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), two. Diabetic nephropathy was present in 22, hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) in two, and oxalosis in one. Graft loss occurred in 60 of 98 (61%) recipients. Half-life of the allograft was diminished in patients with recurrent disease, 2,038 +/- 225 versus 3,135 +/- 385 days, P = 0.002. The actuarial allograft survival at 1, 3, 5, and 8 years posttransplantation with recurrence was 88%, 74%, 57%, and 34%, respectively; and the corresponding graft survival for patients without recurrent disease was 80%, 70%, 64%, and 53%, respectively (P = 0.003). The risk of recurrent disease increased with length of graft survival from 2.8% at 2 years to 9.8% and 18.5% at 5 and 8 years, respectively. We conclude that recurrent disease is a significant problem after renal transplantation and is associated with decreased graft survival. (Am J Kidney Dis 1998 Jun;31(6):928-31)
PDF
