Background The use of small-bore wire-guided chest drains for pleural effusions and pneumothorax has become popular; however, limited data are available on its efficacy and morbidity. The aim of this ...retrospective study is to measure, via the analysis of the so far largest reported cohort, the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of this approach in different clinical conditions. Methods In the period from January 2002 to December 2008, 1092 patients have undergone the positioning of a small-bore wire-guided chest drain (12F) for the evidence of pneumothorax or pleural effusion and have been monitored over time for morbidity, pain at the time of insertion (measured via the visual analogue scale), and drain failure for misplacement or blockage. Patients with trauma were excluded from this study. Results Male/female ratio and mean age were respectively 418:674 and 55.85 ± 18.6. Three-hundred ninety-nine (36.5%) drains were inserted for pneumothorax, 324 (29.7%) for malignant effusion, 97 (8.9%) for empyema, and 272 (24.9%) for nonmalignant effusion. The pain experience was on average “very mild” (mean visual analogue scale = 4.6 mm). The overall drain failure rate was 12.9%. The percentage of successful cases was 93.8% in malignant effusion, 93% in pneumothorax, and 92.3% in nonmalignant effusion; in the cases of pathologically diagnosed empyema, drains were more likely to get blocked (74.2%). We recorded 1 serious complication within the malignant effusion group. Conclusions Wire-guided 12F Seldinger-type drains are a well-tolerated and effective method of treating pneumothorax and uncomplicated pleural effusions (malignant and nonmalignant) with acceptable morbidity. The use of 12F small-bore chest drain is not indicated for the treatment of empyema.
Objective We have analyzed short- and long-term variations of pulmonary function in locally advanced non–small cell lung cancer after induction chemoradiotherapy. Methods Twenty-seven patients with ...stage IIIA (N2) non–small cell lung cancer underwent resection with radical intent after induction chemoradiotherapy in the period 2003 to 2006. Pulmonary function has been evaluated by spirometry, diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, and blood gas analysis before induction chemoradiotherapy (T0), 4 weeks after induction chemoradiotherapy and before surgery (T1), and 1 (T2), 3 (T3), 6 (T4), and 12 months (T5) after surgery. Results A 22.80% decrease of diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide ( P < .001) was observed at T1. At T2 significant decreases in the following were present: vital capacity, −20.50% ( P < .001); forced vital capacity, −22.50% ( P < .001); forced expiratory volume in 1 second, −23.00% ( P < .001); peak expiratory flow, −29.0 ( P < .001); forced expiratory flow 25% to 75%, −13.7% ( P = .005); and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, 43.6% ( P < .001). However, in the interval between T2 and T5, a progressive improvement of lung function in most parameters was observed, but only diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide presented a significant increase ( P < .001). Within the same time gap (T2 to T5), subjects 65 years of age or younger showed an increasing trend for vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, total lung capacity, and residual volume significantly different from that of elderly patients, in whom a decrease in these parameters is reported. Conclusions An impairment of respiratory function is evident in the immediate postoperative setting in patients with non–small cell lung cancer receiving induction chemoradiotherapy. In the long-term period, a general recovery in diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide was found, whereas an improvement of forced expiratory volume in 1 second, vital capacity, total lung capacity, and residual volume was detected in the younger population only.
PDF