During the last decades the older patients who are candidates for surgery have grown esponentially due to the increase in life expectancy and the surgery technique improvement. Despite this, the ...mortality remains high and our ability to predict the surgery outcomes continues to be low in the elderly. The main reason is related to different difficulties; we are unable to differentiate properly the chronological from the biological age, and the current surgery and cardiology risk scores are poorly geriatric-oriented. We must underline how the measure of comorbidity during the preoperative evaluation is often limited to a simple count of comorbid conditions, without a more detailed assessment of their severity. On the other hand different comorbidity scores have been validated in geriatric populations showing a good correlation with prognosis, such as the Index of Coexisting Disease-ICED or the Geriatric Index of Comorbidity-GIC. Our predictive deficiency about the outcomes is linked to poor attention for identifying the frail patients that are already at high risk of disability. Recently, the evaluation of frailty is a key target for geriatric medicine, and geriatricians have developed various methods for measuring this parameter and suggesting the physical performance indexes as a reliable surrogate of frailty. Surrogate frailty measures, such as the “gait speed” or the “Short Physical Performance Battery-SPPB” seem to be the valid tools for evaluating older surgery patients due to their simplicity and short administration time. We think that the future challenge will be their widespread use in this specific clinical setting.
•New emerging drugs have shown to improve prognosis in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction .•For many of these patients, benefit seems to be consistent across age ...subgroups.•Trials enrolled younger patients than those encountered in practice and registries confirming safety in older patients are needed.•Older patients focused outcomes (eg, functional and cognitive status, quality of life) are rarely assessed in clinical trials.•For future trials older patients representativeness and focused outcomes should be valued.
Heart failure (HF) is a major public health concern, with a high prevalence in the older population. The majority of randomized clinical trials evaluating new emerging pharmacologic agents for HF (eg, angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitors, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, intravenous iron for deficiency treatment, transthyretin stabilizers, soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators, cardiac myosin activators, and new potassium binders) have found positive results on various clinical outcomes, particularly in patients with reduced ejection fraction. These treatments might have an important role in the management of older patients as well. Nevertheless, trials demonstrating benefit of these drugs have involved patients significantly younger (on average, approximately 10 years) and fewer comorbidities than those commonly encountered in clinical practice. We describe the recent evidence regarding the newest HF drugs and their applicability to older individuals in terms of efficacy and safety, and we discuss their effects on outcomes particularly valuable to older patients, such as preservation of cognitive function, functional status, independence, and quality of life. Although available subgroup analyses seem to confirm efficacy and safety across the age spectrum for some of these drugs, their effects on older patients centered outcomes often have been neglected. Future HF trials should be designed to include older patients more representative of the real clinical practice, to overcome generalizability biases.
Prolonged hospital stay must be considered as risk factor for poor outcomes after cardiac surgery; different variables have been advocated as predictors of in-hospital stay. Nevertheless, most ...patients requiring prolonged hospital stay are frail older subjects; thus, we hypothesized a significant influence of pre-operative physical performance, as a frailty measure, on in-hospital stay after elective cardiac surgery.
In a prospective, single-center, cohort study we enrolled patients aged 75+ years referred to our Division of Cardiac Surgery at Careggi University Hospital, for their first elective cardiac surgery. All participants were preoperatively evaluated by a team composed by a cardiac surgeon, a cardiologist, an anaesthesist, and a geriatrician to assess global cardiac surgery risk; lower extremity performance was measured with the Short Physical Performance Battery-SPPB.
A total of 518 patients were included in the study. Mean age was 79.5 ± 3.3 years; 256 (49.4%) were women. Isolated coronary by pass graft was performed in 37 patients (7.1%), isolated valve surgery in 115 (22.0%), and combined cardiac surgery procedures in 366 (70,9%). In a multivariable model, SPPB score was strongly associated with hospital length of stay both as continuous, categorized and dichotomous variable (p < 0.001; p = 0.002; p = 0.002 respectively) in all study population, and in subgroup of patients candidate to cardiac surgery considered by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons calculator score (p = 0.023; p = 0.056; p = 0.013 respectively).
Our findings support the use of pre-operative SPPB evaluation before elective cardiac surgery based on the independent ability to predict length of hospital stay.
Display omitted
•Our findings support the pre-operative measurement of lower extremity performance in older adults before cardiac surgery.•SPPB improves the risk evaluation for an important post-operative outcome as a prolonged hospital stay.•Our finding suggest that a pre-habilitation program might reduce prolonged hospital stay, improving a physical reserve.
•All creatinine-based equations used for estimated glomerular filtration rate predicted in-hospital worsening renal function (the higher sensitivity/specificity ratio pertained to BIS-1 formula ...respect to MDRD, CKD-Epi and Cockroft-Gault ones).•Measure of physical performance such as gait speed (not reported in current cardiac risk scores) increased significantly their accuracy.•These findings suggest that a more accurate assessment of renal function and of physical performance should be incorporated into cardiac surgery risk scores, in order to improve prediction of in-hospital worsening renal function and, hence, risk stratification in older adults undergoing elective cardiac surgery.
Though renal impairment is highly prevalent in older patients and influence post-operative outcomes in cardiac surgery; its prognostic relevance is debated and not fully assessed by surgical risk scores.
We investigated the predictive role of estimated glomerular filtration rate formulas for in-hospital worsening renal function (WRF) after cardiac surgery.
We prospectively enrolled in single-center cohort study, patients aged ≥ 75 years candidate to elective cardiac surgery. Four creatinine-based equations were used to calculate estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) formulas: Cockroft-Gault, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology, and Berlin Initiative Study 1 formulas. Each patient underwent geriatric and clinical evaluation before surgery with calculation of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons scores. In-hospital WRF was defined as a composite of an increase in SCr ≥0.5 mg/dl or the occurrence of grade III KDIGO acute kidney injury. The association between each eGFR equation, alone and in models including clinical variables, and WRF was analyzed using logistic regressions and ROC analysis.
WRF occurred in 69 patients (19.8%), and the predictors of WRF were previous acute myocardial infarction, hypertension, 4-mt gait speed performance, and preoperative eGFR, irrespective of the equation used. With all equations, inclusion of these additional variables in the logistic regression models improved the prediction of WRF (AUCs 0.798–0.810).
An accurate assessment of renal function and of physical performance should be incorporated into cardiac surgery risk scores to improve prediction of in-hospital WRF and, hence, risk stratification in older adults undergoing elective cardiac surgery.
Because of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, we were forced to cancel scheduled visits for nearly 150 patients followed in our heart failure (HF) outpatient clinic. Therefore, we ...structured a telephone follow-up, developing a standardized 23-item questionnaire from which we obtained the Covid-19-HF score. The questionnaire was built to reproduce our usual clinical evaluation investigating a patient's social and functional condition, mood, adherence to pharmacological and nonpharmacological recommendations, clinical and hemodynamic status, pharmacological treatment, and need to contact emergency services. The score was used as a clinical tool to define patients' clinical stability and timing of the following telephone contact on the basis of the assignment to progressively increasing risk score groups: green (0-3), yellow (4-8), and red (≥9). Here we present our experience applying the score in the first 30 patients who completed the 4-week follow-up, describing baseline clinical characteristics and events that occurred in the period of observation.
To evaluate 6-month risk stratification capacity of the newly developed TeleHFCovid19-Score for remote management of older patients with heart failure (HF) during the coronavirus disease 2019 ...pandemic.
Monocentric observational prospective study.
Older HF outpatients remotely managed during the first pandemic wave.
The TeleHFCovid19-Score (0-29) was obtained by an ad hoc developed multiparametric standardized questionnaire administered during telephone visits to older HF patients (and/or caregivers) followed at our HF clinic. Questions were weighed on the basis of clinical judgment and review of current HF literature. According to the score, patients were divided in progressively increasing risk groups: green (0-3), yellow (4-8), and red (≥9).
A total of 146 patients composed our study population: at baseline, 112, 21, and 13 were classified as green, yellow, and red, respectively. Mean age was 81±9 years, and women were 40%. Compared to patients of red and yellow groups, those in the green group had a lower use of high-dose loop diuretics (P < .001) or thiazide-like diuretics (P = .027) and had reported less frequently dyspnea at rest or for basic activities, new or worsening extremity edema, or weight increase (all P < .001). At 6 months, compared with red (62.2%) and yellow patients (33.3%), green patients (8.9%) presented a significantly lower rate of the composite outcome of cardiovascular death and/or HF hospitalization (P < .001). Moreover, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed a high sensibility and specificity of our score at 6 months (area under the curve = 0.789, 95% CI 0.682-0.896, P < .001) with a score <4.5 (very close to green group cutoff) that identified lower-risk subjects.
The TeleHFCovid19-Score was able to correctly identify patients with midterm favorable outcome. Therefore, our questionnaire might be used to identify low-risk chronic HF patients who could be temporarily managed remotely, allowing to devote more efforts to the care of higher-risk patients who need closer and on-site clinical evaluations.
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves clinical and functional recovery in older patients after acute cardiac syndromes, whose outcome is influenced by cardiac disease severity, but also by comorbidity ...and frailty. The aim of the study was to analyze the predictors of physical frailty improvement during the CR program. Data were collected in all patients aged > 75 years consecutively admitted from 1 January to December 2017 to our CR, consisting of 5-day-per-week of 30-min session of biking or calisthenics on alternate days for 4 weeks. Physical frailty was measured with short physical performance battery (SPPB) at the entry and the end of CR. Outcome was represented by an increase of at least 1 point in the SPPB score from baseline to the end of the CR program. In our study population of 100 patients, mean age 81 years, we demonstrated that a strong predictor of improvement in SPPB score was the poorer performance in the test at baseline; for Δ-1 point of score, we registered an OR 2.50 (95% CI = 1.64–3.85;
p
= 0.001) of probability to improve the physical performance at the end of CR. Interestingly those patients with worse performance at SPPB balance and chair standing task showed greater probability of ameliorating their physical frailty profile at the end of CR. Our data strongly suggest that CR program after acute cardiac syndrome produces a significant physical frailty improvement in those patients with worse frailty phenotype with an impairment in chair standing or balance at entry.
The positive effect of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is demonstrated in younger and older patients. However, it is quite debated whether the beneficial effect is similarly maintained in both genders ...during follow-up.
to determine if the improvement obtained after CR remained significant at 1-year follow-up in older population, testing the influence of gender on this outcome.
All patients aged 75+ years consecutively referred to Cardiac Rehabilitation outpatient Unit at Careggi University Hospital were screened for eligibility. All patients attended a CR program, based on 5-day-per-week aerobic training sessions for 4 weeks and they were evaluated at the end of CR at 6 and 12 months of follow-up.
361 patients with a mean age 80.6 ± 4.4 years with a complete 1-year follow-up were enrolled in the study, 87.5 % of them had an acute coronary event, and 27.6 % were females. The increase in exercise capacity at the end of CR and at 1-year follow-up was statistically significant (VO2 peak: +8.7 % in males p < 0.001, +8.5 % in females p < 0.001; distance walked at 6-min test: +7.3 % in males p < 0.001, +10.2 % in females p < 0.001, respectively); the trajectory of exercise improvement at 6 and 12 months of FU was similar in men and women without significant decrease (VO2 peak-ml/kg/min: CR discharge vs 1 year FU = 15.2 vs 15,0 p: NS; distance walked-meters: CR discharge vs 1 year FU = 445.5 vs 440.6, p: NS) from end of CR to 1-year.
the improvement in exercise tolerance obtained with CR program is still maintained at 1-year FU without significant influence of gender in our very old population.
The Italian Association for Cardiovascular Rehabilitation and Prevention (ITACARE-P) and the Italian Federation of Associations of Hospital Doctors on Internal Medicine (FADOI) released a joint ...position paper to guide referrals of cardiovascular patients discharged from Internal Medicine (IM) wards to Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) facilities. The document provides rationale and operative recommendations for appropriateness (i.e. qualifying diagnoses) and priority criteria to overcome the mismatch between potential demand and effective supply of CR programmes. In case of no-referral due to logistic barriers, the document recommends the adoption of best alternatives to CR for disability reduction, better prognosis, and improvement of quality of life. The joint position paper is also aimed to promote the consideration of IM as a potential stakeholder of CR.