Multiple BRAF inhibitor resistance mechanisms have been described, however, their relative frequency, clinical correlates, and effect on subsequent therapy have not been assessed in patients with ...metastatic melanoma.
Fifty-nine BRAF(V600)-mutant melanoma metastases from patients treated with dabrafenib or vemurafenib were analyzed. The genetic profile of resistance mechanisms and tumor signaling pathway activity was correlated with clinicopathologic features and therapeutic outcomes.
Resistance mechanisms were identified in 58% progressing tumors and BRAF alterations were common. Gene expression analysis revealed that mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activity remained inhibited in 21% of resistant tumors, and the outcomes of patients with these tumors were poor. Resistance mechanisms also occurred in pretreatment biopsies and heterogeneity of resistance mechanisms occurred within patients and within tumors. There were no responses to subsequent targeted therapy, even when a progressing tumor had a resistance mechanism predicted to be responsive.
Selecting sequential drugs based on the molecular characteristics of a single progressing biopsy is unlikely to provide improved responses, and first-line therapies targeting multiple pathways will be required.
One-third of BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma patients treated with combined BRAF and MEK inhibition progress within 6 months. Treatment options for these patients remain limited. Here we analyse 20 ...BRAF(V600)-mutant melanoma metastases derived from 10 patients treated with the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib for resistance mechanisms and genetic correlates of response. Resistance mechanisms are identified in 9/11 progressing tumours and MAPK reactivation occurred in 9/10 tumours, commonly via BRAF amplification and mutations activating NRAS and MEK2. Our data confirming that MEK2(C125S), but not the synonymous MEK1(C121S) protein, confers resistance to combination therapy highlight the functional differences between these kinases and the preponderance of MEK2 mutations in combination therapy-resistant melanomas. Exome sequencing did not identify additional progression-specific resistance candidates. Nevertheless, most melanomas carried additional oncogenic mutations at baseline (for example, RAC1 and AKT3) that activate the MAPK and PI3K pathways and are thus predicted to diminish response to MAPK inhibitors.
Deregulated glucose metabolism fulfills the energetic and biosynthetic requirements for tumor growth driven by oncogenes. Because inhibition of oncogenic BRAF causes profound reductions in glucose ...uptake and a strong clinical benefit in BRAF-mutant melanoma, we examined the role of energy metabolism in responses to BRAF inhibition. We observed pronounced and consistent decreases in glycolytic activity in BRAF-mutant melanoma cells. Moreover, we identified a network of BRAF-regulated transcription factors that control glycolysis in melanoma cells. Remarkably, this network of transcription factors, including hypoxia-inducible factor-1α, MYC, and MONDOA (MLXIP), drives glycolysis downstream of BRAF(V600), is critical for responses to BRAF inhibition, and is modulated by BRAF inhibition in clinical melanoma specimens. Furthermore, we show that concurrent inhibition of BRAF and glycolysis induces cell death in BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi)-resistant melanoma cells. Thus, we provide a proof-of-principle for treatment of melanoma with combinations of BRAFis and glycolysis inhibitors.
BRAF is suppress glycolysis and provide strong clinical benefi t in BRAF V600 melanoma. We show that BRAF inhibition suppresses glycolysis via a network of transcription factors that are critical for complete BRAFi responses. Furthermore, we provide evidence for the clinical potential of therapies that combine BRAFis with glycolysis inhibitors.
Abstract Background Acquired resistance to BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) is a near-universal phenomenon caused by numerous genetic and non-genetic alterations. In this study, we evaluated the spectrum, ...onset, pattern of progression, and subsequent clinical outcomes associated with specific mechanisms of resistance. Methods We compiled clinical and genetic data from 100 patients with 132 tissue samples obtained at progression on BRAFi therapy from 3 large, previously published studies of BRAFi resistance. These samples were subjected to whole-exome sequencing and/or polymerase chain reaction-based genetic testing. Results Among 132 samples, putative resistance mechanisms were identified in 58%, including NRAS or KRAS mutations (20%), BRAF splice variants (16%), BRAF V600E/K amplifications (13%), MEK1/2 mutations (7%), and non-mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway alterations (11%). Marked heterogeneity was observed within tumors and patients; 18 of 19 patients (95%) with more than one progression biopsy had distinct/unknown drivers of resistance between samples. NRAS mutations were associated with vemurafenib use (p = 0.045) and intracranial metastases (p = 0.036), and MEK1/2 mutations correlated with hepatic progression (p = 0.011). Progression-free survival and overall survival were similar across resistance mechanisms. The median survival after disease progression was 6.9 months, and responses to subsequent BRAF and MEK inhibition were uncommon (2 of 15; 13%). Post-progression outcomes did not correlate with specific acquired BRAFi-resistance mechanisms. Conclusions This is the first study to systematically characterise the clinical implications of particular acquired BRAFi-resistance mechanisms in patients with BRAF -mutant melanoma largest study to compile the landscape of resistance. Despite marked heterogeneity of resistance mechanisms within patients, NRAS mutations correlated with vemurafenib use and intracranial disease involvement.
Acquired resistance to BRAF inhibitors often involves MAPK re-activation, yet the MEK inhibitor trametinib showed minimal clinical activity in melanoma patients that had progressed on BRAF-inhibitor ...therapy. Selective ERK inhibitors have been proposed as alternative salvage therapies. We show that ERK inhibition is more potent than MEK inhibition at suppressing MAPK activity and inhibiting the proliferation of multiple BRAF inhibitor resistant melanoma cell models. Nevertheless, melanoma cells often failed to undergo apoptosis in response to ERK inhibition, because the relief of ERK-dependent negative feedback activated RAS and PI3K signalling. Consequently, the combination of ERK and PI3K/mTOR inhibition was effective at promoting cell death in all resistant melanoma cell models, and was substantially more potent than the MEK/PI3K/mTOR inhibitor combination. Our data indicate that a broader targeting strategy concurrently inhibiting ERK, rather than MEK, and PI3K/mTOR may circumvent BRAF inhibitor resistance, and should be considered during the clinical development of ERK inhibitors.
•We examine the activity of the MEK and ERK inhibition in models of melanoma BRAF inhibitor resistance.•ERK inhibitors more efficiently suppress MAPK signalling in these models.•Despite cell cycle arrest ERK inhibitors can only induce apoptosis in a subset of resistance models.•Survival is due to ERK-dependent negative feedback activated RAS and PI3K signalling.•Combined ERK and PI3K/mTOR inhibition was effective at promoting cell death in all models.
Epigenetic changes are widespread in melanoma and contribute to the pathogenic biology of this disease. In the present study, we show that I-BET151, which belongs to a new class of drugs that target ...the BET family of epigenetic “reader” proteins, inhibits melanoma growth in vivo and induced variable degrees of apoptosis in a panel of melanoma cells. Apoptosis was caspase dependent and associated with G1 cell cycle arrest. All melanoma cells tested had increased levels of the BH3 proapoptotic protein BIM, which appeared to be regulated by the BRD2 BET protein and to some extent by BRD3. In contrast, knockdown experiments indicated that inhibition of BRD4 was associated with decreased levels of BIM. Apoptosis was dependent on BIM in some but not all cell lines, indicating that other factors were determinants of apoptosis, such as downregulation of antiapoptotic proteins revealed in gene expression arrays. G1 cell cycle arrest appeared to be mediated by p21 and resulted from inhibition of the BRD4 protein. The activity of BET protein inhibitors appears independent of the BRAF and NRAS mutational status of melanoma, and further studies to assess their therapeutic role in melanoma are warranted.
To examine the relationship between immune activity, PD-L1 expression, and tumor cell signaling, in metastatic melanomas prior to and during treatment with targeted MAPK inhibitors.
Thirty-eight ...tumors from 17 patients treated with BRAF inhibitor (
= 12) or combination BRAF/MEK inhibitors (
= 5) with known PD-L1 expression were analyzed. RNA expression arrays were performed on all pretreatment (PRE,
= 17), early during treatment (EDT,
= 8), and progression (PROG,
= 13) biopsies. HLA-A/HLA-DPB1 expression was assessed by IHC.
Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of PRE, EDT, and PROG melanomas revealed that transcriptome signatures indicative of immune cell activation were strongly positively correlated with PD-L1 staining. In contrast, MAPK signaling and canonical Wnt/-β-catenin activity was negatively associated with PD-L1 melanoma expression. The expression of PD-L1 and immune activation signatures did not simply reflect the degree or type of immune cell infiltration, and was not sufficient for tumor response to MAPK inhibition.
PD-L1 expression correlates with immune cells and immune activity signatures in melanoma, but is not sufficient for tumor response to MAPK inhibition, as many PRE and PROG melanomas displayed both PD-L1 positivity and immune activation signatures. This confirms that immune escape is common in MAPK inhibitor-treated tumors. This has important implications for the selection of second-line immunotherapy because analysis of mechanisms of immune escape will likely be required to identify patients likely to respond to such therapies.
.
The epigenetic modifier EZH2 is part of the polycomb repressive complex that suppresses gene expression via histone methylation. Activating mutations in EZH2 are found in a subset of melanoma that ...contributes to disease progression by inactivating tumor suppressor genes. In this study we have targeted EZH2 with a specific inhibitor (GSK126) or depleted EZH2 protein by stable shRNA knockdown. We show that inhibition of EZH2 has potent effects on the growth of both wild-type and EZH2 mutant human melanoma in vitro particularly in cell lines harboring the EZH2Y646 activating mutation. This was associated with cell cycle arrest, reduced proliferative capacity in both 2D and 3D culture systems, and induction of apoptosis. The latter was caspase independent and mediated by the release of apoptosis inducing factor (AIFM1) from mitochondria. Gene expression arrays showed that several well characterized tumor suppressor genes were reactivated by EZH2 inhibition. This included activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3) that was validated as an EZH2 target gene by ChIP-qPCR. These results emphasize a critical role for EZH2 in the proliferation and viability of melanoma and highlight the potential for targeted therapy against EZH2 in treatment of patients with melanoma.
Prediction of outcome for melanoma patients with surgically resected macroscopic nodal metastases is very imprecise. We performed a comprehensive clinico-pathologic assessment of fresh-frozen ...macroscopic nodal metastases and the preceding primary melanoma, somatic mutation profiling, and gene expression profiling to identify determinants of outcome in 79 melanoma patients. In addition to disease stage <II at initial presentation, the following clinical and pathologic factors were independent predictors of improved outcome (odds ratios for survival >4 years, 90% confidence interval): the presence of a nodular component in the primary melanoma (6.8, 0.6–76.0), and small cell size (11.1, 0.8–100.0) or low pigmentation (3.0, 0.8–100.0) in the nodal metastases. Absence of BRAF mutation (20.0, 1.0–1000.0) or NRAS mutation (16.7, 0.6–1000.0) were both favorable prognostic factors. A 46-gene expression signature with strong overrepresentation of immune response genes was predictive of better survival (10.9, 0.4–325.6); in the full cohort, median survival was >100 months in those with the signature, but 10 months in those without. This relationship was validated in two previously published independent stage III melanoma data sets. We conclude that the presence of BRAF mutation, NRAS mutation, and the absence of an immune-related expressed gene profile predict poor outcome in melanoma patients with macroscopic stage III disease.
Aberrant activation of the BRAF kinase occurs in ∼60% of melanomas, and although BRAF inhibitors have shown significant early clinical success, acquired resistance occurs in most patients. Resistance ...to chronic BRAF inhibition often involves reactivation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling, and the combined targeting of BRAF and its downstream target MAPK/ERK kinase (MEK) may delay or overcome resistance. To investigate the efficacy of combination BRAF and MEK inhibition, we generated melanoma cell clones resistant to the BRAF inhibitor GSK2118436. These BRAF inhibitor–resistant sublines acquired resistance through several distinct mechanisms, including the acquisition of activating N-RAS mutations and increased accumulation of COT1. These alterations uniformly promoted MAPK reactivation and most conferred resistance to MEK inhibition and to the concurrent inhibition of BRAF and MEK. These data indicate that melanoma tumors are likely to develop heterogeneous mechanisms of resistance, many of which will confer resistance to multiple MAPK inhibitory therapies.
PDF
