Despite low nonrelapse mortality (NRM) at day 100 after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), NRM at 1 year remains substantial. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed 199 patients ...who were treated on a phase II clinical trial assessing safety and efficacy of myeloablative fractionated busulfan and fludarabine conditioning regimen for hematologic malignancies. The goal of the study was to identify factors associated with NRM occurring between days 101 and 365 post-HCT and generate a hypothesis for future studies to reduce the risk of NRM at 1 year. We found that a vast majority (83%) of patients who experienced NRM between days 101 and 365 had prior grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), which was the leading cause of death either by itself (33.3%) or complicated by infections (37.5%). In multivariate analysis, grade II-IV acute GVHD (hazard ratio (HR) 2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-6.6, p = 0.01) was the only significant predictor of NRM between days 101 and 365. Measures to reduce the risk of acute GVHD could lower the risk of NRM at 1 year and improve overall survival.
In the CALGB (Alliance) 100104 study, lenalidomide versus placebo after autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) was investigated for patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. That study showed ...improved time to progression and overall survival and an increase in second primary malignancies for lenalidomide at a median follow-up of 34 months. Here we report an updated intention-to-treat analysis of CALGB (Alliance) 100104 at a median follow-up of 91 months.
Patients were eligible for this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial if they had symptomatic disease requiring treatment; had received, at most, two induction regimens; and had achieved stable disease or better in the first 100 days after ASCT. We randomly assigned patients to either lenalidomide or placebo groups using permuted block randomisation, with a fixed block size of six. Randomisation was stratified by three factors: normal or elevated β2 microglobulin concentration at registration (≤2·5 mg/L vs >2·5 mg/L), previous use or non-use of thalidomide during induction therapy, and previous use or non-use of lenalidomide during induction therapy. The starting dose was two capsules (10 mg) per day, escalated to three capsules (15 mg) per day after 3 months. The primary endpoint was time to progression (time of progressive disease or death from any cause), with intention-to-treat analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT00114101. New patients are no longer being recruited, but some patients remain on treatment and in follow-up.
Between April 14, 2005, and July 2, 2009, 460 patients were randomly assigned to receive either lenalidomide (n=231) or placebo (n=229). After three interim analyses, the study was unblinded at a median follow-up of 18 months, at which point 86 (67%) of 128 patients without progressive disease in the placebo group chose to cross over to the lenalidomide group. The median follow-up for the updated survival analysis, as of Oct 19, 2016, was 91 months (IQR 83·6-103·1). The median time to progression was 57·3 months (95% CI 44·2-73·3) for the lenalidomide group and 28·9 months (23·0-36·3) for the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·57, 95% CI 0·46-0·71; p<0·0001). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (116 50% patients in the lenalidomide group and 41 18% patients in the placebo group) and thrombocytopenia (34 15% patients in the lenalidomide group and 12 5% patients in the placebo group). 18 (8%) haematological and 14 (6%) solid tumour second primary malignancies were diagnosed after randomisation and before disease progression in the lenalidomide group, compared with three (1%) haematological and nine (4%) solid tumour second primary malignancies in the placebo group. Three haematological and five solid tumour second primary malignancies in the placebo group were in the crossover subgroup.
Despite an increase in haematological adverse events and second primary malignancies, lenalidomide maintenance therapy after ASCT significantly improved time to progression and could be considered a standard of care.
The National Cancer Institute.
Summary
Multiple myeloma (MM) primarily affects older patients. There are scarce data on the outcomes of young adults undergoing autologous transplantation (auto‐HCT). In this single‐centre analysis, ...we included 117 younger patients, with a median age of 37 years (range 22–40) at transplant. Seventeen (15%) patients had high‐risk cytogenetics. Before transplant, 10% of patients achieved ≥CR and 44% achieved ≥VGPR. At best post‐transplant response, 56% and 77% of patients achieved ≥CR and ≥VGPR respectively. With a median follow‐up for survivors of 72.6 months (range 0.9–238.0), median PFS and OS were 43.1 months (95% CI 31.2–65.0) and 146.6 months (95% CI 100.0–208.1) respectively. Patients who underwent auto‐HCT after 2010 had better median PFS (84.9 months vs. 28.2 months, p < 0.001) and OS (NR vs. 91.8 months, p < 0.001) compared with those transplanted earlier. In multi‐variate analysis, achieving ≥CR as best post‐transplant response was associated with improved PFS (HR 95% CI 0.55 0.32–0.95, p = 0.032), while achieving ≥VGPR was predictive of superior OS (0.32 0.16–0.62, p < 0.001). Three patients (3%) developed a second primary malignancy. Younger MM patients had durable survival after auto‐HCT, which further improved after the availability of novel anti‐myeloma drugs in recent years. Depth of response following transplant remains a key predictor of survival.
In this single‐centre retrospective study, the outcomes of 117 young patients with multiple myeloma, aged 22–40 years, who underwent autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplant between 1989 and 2021 were examined. Median progression‐free survival and overall survival were 43.1 months (95% CI 31.2–65.0) and 146.6 months (95% CI 100.0–208.1) respectively. In multi‐variate analysis, the depth of response after transplant was a key predictor of survival, with those achieving a complete response post‐transplant exhibiting superior progression‐free survival. With the advent of novel anti‐myeloma drugs in recent years, those who underwent transplant after 2010 had better outcomes compared with those transplanted prior to 2010.
CAPTION(S): Data S1. Supplementary methods. Byline: Chutima Kunacheewa, Lei Feng, Elisabet E. Manasanch, Qaiser Bashir, Krina K. Patel, Rohtesh Mehta, Gregory P. Kaufman, Samer Srour, Neeraj Saini, ...Swaminathan P. Iyer, Sheeba K. Thomas, Donna M. Weber, Robert Z. Orlowski, Muzaffar H. Qazilbash, Hans C. Lee
The growing list of available therapies for patients with multiple myeloma has resulted in tremendously high response rates and prolonged survival. However, the cure remains elusive. A continued ...effort at developing strategies to utilize all available treatment modalities in the most effective manner is needed. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is a robust platform, associated with high response rates, and provides a unique foundation on which immune therapies and novel agents can be employed to improve clinical outcomes. Patients with high-risk myeloma and those relapsing after novel agent-based therapies or early after an autologous HCT should be considered for allo-HCT, ideally in a clinical trial setting. Results from several ongoing studies are expected to provide important information that will help determine the place of allo-HCT in the myeloma treatment algorithm.
Increasing research suggests that inflammation mediates symptom development. In this longitudinal study, we examined inflammatory factors related to the development of high symptom burden during ...autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AuSCT) for multiple myeloma.
Patients (n = 63) repeatedly reported symptom severity on the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory multiple myeloma module (MDASI-MM) and contributed blood samples periodically for up to 100 days after AuSCT for inflammatory marker assays. The temporal associations between serum inflammatory marker concentrations and symptom severity outcomes were examined by nonlinear mixed-effect modeling.
Fatigue, pain, disturbed sleep, lack of appetite, and drowsiness were consistently the most severe MDASI-MM symptoms during the study. Peak symptom severity occurred on day 8 after AuSCT, during white blood cell count nadir. Patterns of serum interleukin (IL)-6 (peak on day 9) and soluble IL-6 receptor (sIL-6R; nadir on day 8) expression paralleled symptom development over time (both P < 0.0001). By univariate analysis, serum IL-6, sIL-6R, IL-10, C-reactive protein, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α, sIL-1R2, sIL-1RA, and soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 were significantly related to the most severe symptoms during the first 30 days after AuSCT (all P < 0.05). By multivariate analysis, IL-6 (estimate = 0.170; P = 0.004) and MIP-1α (estimate = -0.172; P = 0.006) were temporally associated with the severity of the component symptom score.
Systemic inflammatory response was associated with high symptom burden during the acute phase of AuSCT. Additional research is needed to understand how the inflammatory response is mechanistically associated with symptom expression and whether suppression of this response can reduce symptoms without compromising tumor control.
Measuring response among patients with multiple myeloma is essential for the care of patients. Deeper responses are associated with better progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). ...To test the hypothesis that Mass-Fix, a mass spectrometry-based means to detect monoclonal proteins, is superior to existing methodologies to predict for survival outcomes, samples from the STAMINA trial (NCT01109004), a trial comparing three transplant approaches, were employed. Samples from 575 patients from as many as three time points (post-induction post-I; pre-maintenance pre-M; 1 year post enrollment 1YR) were tested when available. Four response parameters were assessed: Mass-Fix, serum immunofixation, complete response, and measurable residual disease (MRD) by next generation flow cytometry. Of the four response measures, only MRD and Mass-Fix predicted for PFS and OS at multiple testing points on multivariate analyses. Although MRD drove Mass-Fix from the model for PFS at post-I and pre-M, 1YR Mass-Fix was independent of 1YR MRD. For OS, the only prognostic pre-I measure was Mass-Fix, and the only 1YR measures that were prognostic on multivariate analysis were 1YR MRD and 1YR Mass-Fix. SIFE and CR were not. Mass-Fix is a powerful means to track response.
Bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD) induction is standard prior to autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) in newly diagnosed, high-risk multiple myeloma (ND-HRMM). ...Carfilzomib (K) is another proteasome inhibitor approved for MM. In this single-center, retrospective analysis, we compared outcomes in ND-HRMM with pre-transplant KRD or VRD induction. High-risk was defined by t(4:14), t(14:16), 1q21 gain/amplification, or del(17p). Primary endpoints were progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Of 121 ND-HRMM patients, 63 received KRD, and 58 received VRD. Post-induction, complete (CR), very good partial (VGPR), partial response (PR), and overall response (ORR) rates were 23.8%/49.2%/25.4%/98.4% with KRD, and 19%/46.6%/27.6%/93.1% with VRD. At day 100 post-auto-HCT, these were 38.1%/42.9%/19%/100% with KRD, versus 35.1%/49.1%/12.3%/94.8% with VRD. Pre-auto-HCT, 11 (18.3%) KRD and 7 (12.5%) VRD patients had minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative CR (p = 0.45). Post-auto-HCT, 14 (41.2%) and 13 (43.3%) patients had MRD-negative CR (p = 1.000). Median PFS was 38.2 (95%CI 28.7-NA) and 45.9 months (95%CI 43.2-NA) for KRD and VRD, respectively (p = 0.25). Respective 3-year PFS and OS were 53.5% (95%CI 41.1-69.6) and 95.2% (95%CI 90-100) for KRD and 64% (95%CI 51.6-79.5) and 84.2% (95%CI 73.5-96.3, p = 0.30) for VRD. Overall, KRD induction pre-auto-HCT does not improve outcomes. Prospective, randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings.
PDF
