Background
Hand grip strength (HGS) is a widely used functional test for the assessment of strength and functional status in patients with cancer, in particular with cancer cachexia. The aim was to ...prospectively evaluate the prognostic value of HGS in patients with mostly advanced cancer with and without cachexia and to establish reference values for a European‐based population.
Methods
In this prospective study, 333 patients with cancer (85% stage III/IV) and 65 healthy controls of similar age and sex were enrolled. None of the study participants had significant cardiovascular disease or active infection at baseline. Repetitive HGS assessment was performed using a hand dynamometer to measure the maximal HGS (kilograms). Presence of cancer cachexia was defined when patients had ≥5% weight loss within 6 months or when body mass index was <20.0 kg/m2 with ≥2% weight loss (Fearon's criteria). Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed to assess the relationship of maximal HGS to all‐cause mortality and to determine cut‐offs for HGS with the best predictive power. We also assessed associations with additional relevant clinical and functional outcome measures at baseline, including anthropometric measures, physical function (Karnofsky Performance Status and Eastern Cooperative of Oncology Group), physical activity (4‐m gait speed test and 6‐min walk test), patient‐reported outcomes (EQ‐5D‐5L and Visual Analogue Scale appetite/pain) and nutrition status (Mini Nutritional Assessment).
Results
The mean age was 60 ± 14 years; 163 (51%) were female, and 148 (44%) had cachexia at baseline. Patients with cancer showed 18% lower HGS than healthy controls (31.2 ± 11.9 vs. 37.9 ± 11.6 kg, P < 0.001). Patients with cancer cachexia had 16% lower HGS than those without cachexia (28.3 ± 10.1 vs. 33.6 ± 12.3 kg, P < 0.001). Patients with cancer were followed for a mean of 17 months (range 6–50), and 182 (55%) patients died during follow‐up (2‐year mortality rate 53%) (95% confidence interval 48–59%). Reduced maximal HGS was associated with increased mortality (per −5 kg; hazard ratio HR 1.19; 1.10–1.28; P < 0.0001; independently of age, sex, cancer stage, cancer entity and presence of cachexia). HGS was also a predictor of mortality in patients with cachexia (per −5 kg; HR 1.20; 1.08–1.33; P = 0.001) and without cachexia (per −5 kg; HR 1.18; 1.04–1.34; P = 0.010). The cut‐off for maximal HGS with the best predictive power for poor survival was <25.1 kg for females (sensitivity 54%, specificity 63%) and <40.2 kg for males (sensitivity 69%, specificity 68%).
Conclusions
Reduced maximal HGS was associated with higher all‐cause mortality, reduced overall functional status and decreased physical performance in patients with mostly advanced cancer. Similar results were found for patients with and without cancer cachexia.
Body wasting in patients with cancer can affect the heart.
The frequency, extent, and clinical and prognostic importance of cardiac wasting in cancer patients is unknown.
This study prospectively ...enrolled 300 patients with mostly advanced, active cancer but without significant cardiovascular disease or infection. These patients were compared with 60 healthy control subjects and 60 patients with chronic heart failure (ejection fraction <40%) of similar age and sex distribution.
Cancer patients presented with lower left ventricular (LV) mass than healthy control subjects or heart failure patients (assessed by transthoracic echocardiography: 177 ± 47 g vs 203 ± 64 g vs 300 ± 71 g, respectively; P < 0.001). LV mass was lowest in cancer patients with cachexia (153 ± 42 g; P < 0.001). Importantly, the presence of low LV mass was independent of previous cardiotoxic anticancer therapy. In 90 cancer patients with a second echocardiogram after 122 ± 71 days, LV mass had declined by 9.3% ± 1.4% (P < 0.001). In cancer patients with cardiac wasting during follow-up, stroke volume decreased (P < 0.001) and resting heart rate increased over time (P = 0.001). During follow-up of on average 16 months, 149 patients died (1-year all-cause mortality 43%; 95% CI: 37%-49%). LV mass and LV mass adjusted for height squared were independent prognostic markers (both P < 0.05). Adjustment of LV mass for body surface area masked the observed survival impact. LV mass below the prognostically relevant cutpoints in cancer was associated with reduced overall functional status and lower physical performance.
Low LV mass is associated with poor functional status and increased all-cause mortality in cancer. These findings provide clinical evidence of cardiac wasting–associated cardiomyopathy in cancer.
Display omitted
Aims
Viral‐induced cardiac inflammation can induce heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)‐like syndromes. COVID‐19 can lead to myocardial damage and vascular injury. We hypothesised ...that COVID‐19 patients frequently develop a HFpEF‐like syndrome, and designed this study to explore this.
Methods and results
Cardiac function was assessed in 64 consecutive, hospitalized, and clinically stable COVID‐19 patients from April–November 2020 with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50% (age 56 ± 19 years, females: 31%, severe COVID‐19 disease: 69%). To investigate likelihood of HFpEF presence, we used the HFA‐PEFF score. A low (0–1 points), intermediate (2–4 points), and high (5–6 points) HFA‐PEFF score was observed in 42%, 33%, and 25% of patients, respectively. In comparison, 64 subjects of similar age, sex, and comorbidity status without COVID‐19 showed these scores in 30%, 66%, and 4%, respectively (between groups: P = 0.0002). High HFA‐PEFF scores were more frequent in COVID‐19 patients than controls (25% vs. 4%, P = 0.001). In COVID‐19 patients, the HFA‐PEFF score significantly correlated with age, estimated glomerular filtration rate, high‐sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT), haemoglobin, QTc interval, LVEF, mitral E/A ratio, and H2FPEF score (all P < 0.05). In multivariate, ordinal regression analyses, higher age and hsTnT were significant predictors of increased HFA‐PEFF scores. Patients with myocardial injury (hsTnT ≥14 ng/L: 31%) vs. patients without myocardial injury, showed higher HFA‐PEFF scores median 5 (interquartile range 3–6) vs. 1 (0–3), P < 0.001 and more often showed left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (75% vs. 27%, P < 0.001).
Conclusion
Hospitalized COVID‐19 patients frequently show high likelihood of presence of HFpEF that is associated with cardiac structural and functional alterations, and myocardial injury. Detailed cardiac assessments including echocardiographic determination of left ventricular diastolic function and biomarkers should become routine in the care of hospitalized COVID‐19 patients.
PDF