Osteosarcoma remains a leading cause of cancer death in adolescents. Treatment paradigms and survival rates have not improved in two decades. Driving the lack of therapeutic inroads, the molecular ...etiology of osteosarcoma remains elusive. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have demonstrated far-reaching effects on the cellular biology of development and cancer. Their role in osteosarcomagenesis remains largely unexplored. Here we identify for the first time an miRNA signature reflecting the pathogenesis of osteosarcoma from surgically procured samples from human patients. The signature includes high expression of miR-181a,miR-181b, and miR-181c as well as reduced expression of miR-16, miR-29b, and miR-142-5p. We also demonstrate that miR-181b and miR-29b exhibit restricted expression to distinct cell populations in the tumor tissue. Further, higher expression of miR-27a and miR-181c* in pre-treatment biopsy samples characterized patients who developed clinical metastatic disease. In addition, higher expression of miR-451 and miR-15b in pre-treatment samples correlated with subsequent positive response to chemotherapy. In vitro and in vivo functional validation in osteosarcoma cell lines confirmed the tumor suppressive role of miR-16 and the pro-metastatic role of miR-27a. Furthermore, predicted target genes for miR-16 and miR-27a were confirmed as down-regulated by real-time PCR. Affymetrix array profiling of cDNAs from the osteosarcoma specimens and controls were interrogated according to predicted targets of miR-16, miR142-5p, miR-29b, miR-181a/b, and miR-27a. This analysis revealed positive and negative correlations highlighting pathways of known importance to osteosarcoma, as well as novel genes. Thus, our findings establish a miRNA signature associated with pathogenesis of osteosarcoma as well as critical pre-treatment biomarkers of metastasis and responsiveness to therapy.
Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS), a deadly soft tissue malignancy with a predilection for adolescents and young adults, associates consistently with t(X;17) translocations that generate the fusion ...gene ASPSCR1-TFE3. We proved the oncogenic capacity of this fusion gene by driving sarcomagenesis in mice from conditional ASPSCR1-TFE3 expression. The completely penetrant tumors were indistinguishable from human ASPS by histology and gene expression. They formed preferentially in the anatomic environment highest in lactate, the cranial vault, expressed high levels of lactate importers, harbored abundant mitochondria, metabolized lactate as a metabolic substrate, and responded to the administration of exogenous lactate with tumor cell proliferation and angiogenesis. These data demonstrate lactate’s role as a driver of alveolar soft part sarcomagenesis.
Display omitted
•The alveolar soft part sarcoma fusion ASPSCR1-TFE3 drives tumorigenesis in mice•Mouse tumors from ASPSCR1-TFE3 mimic human sarcomas by histology and transcriptome•Alveolar soft part sarcomas demonstrate high Hif1α and angiogenesis without hypoxia•Their anatomy and response to exogenous lactate suggest tumors metabolize lactate
By conditionally expressing the ASPSCR1-TFE3 fusion gene found in human alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) in mice, Goodwin et al. generate a model that recapitulates human ASPS histopathology and expression profile and demonstrates lactate’s role as a driver of ASPS.
Endoprosthetic reconstruction after oncologic resection of bone tumors requires stable fixation between the prosthesis and residual host bone. Compressive osseointegration has been developed as an ...alternative to traditional stemmed implants to address the challenges and complications of achieving this fixation. Sufficient time has now passed from the advent of compressive implants to allow for an assessment of the intermediate-term and long-term results of this form of fixation.
At a minimum follow-up of 10 years after implantation of a compressive osseointegration device for oncologic reconstruction: (1) What is the risk of periprosthetic fracture, aseptic loosening, or implant breakage resulting in revision surgery for endoprosthesis removal? (2) What is the long-term cortical response at the host-endoprosthesis interface as visualized on plain radiographs?
A single-center, retrospective study was performed between 2002 and 2010, in which 110 patients with primary bone sarcoma of the proximal or distal femur were considered for oncologic resection and reconstruction. Patients were considered for a compressive osseointegration endoprosthesis if they were 50 years of age or younger, had not previously received femoral radiation, had no metabolic disease impairing bone healing, were not diagnosed with metastatic disease, and had life expectancy greater than six months. Of the 110 patients, 25 were treated with a compressive osseointegration implant of the proximal or distal femur, and 85 patients were treated with conventional stemmed implants or amputation because of older age, advanced disease, metabolic comorbidities, inability to tolerate a nonweightbearing postoperative period, or in the case of rotationplasty, patient preference. All patients who received this device during the period of study were considered eligible for inclusion in this review. The median (range) age was 18 years (7 to 50), and 13 of 25 patients were men. Five patients died of disease before the minimum follow-up duration of 10 years; two underwent amputation due to local recurrence and three died with the implant in situ, leaving 20 patients for complete analysis. Median follow-up was 144 months, and all 20 surviving patients had a minimum follow-up of 10 years (121 to 230 months). The primary endpoint was reoperation and implant removal for periprosthetic fracture, aseptic loosening, or mechanical breakage of any component of the compressive device in the endoprosthesis. In final analysis, death was considered a competing event to revision surgery, and cumulative incidence was reported after competing-event analysis. A secondary aim was radiographic evaluation of the host-implant interface to assess the long-term cortical response to compressive osseointegration.
Spindle fracture or loosening was noted in three patients, and the remaining 17 patients maintained the compression device until the final follow-up. The risk of reoperation for aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fracture, or mechanical breakage of the implant using a competing risks estimator was 12% at 10 years (95% CI 0% to 26%). These complications occurred within 29 months of the index surgery; no patients had implant loosening or mechanical breakdown after this initial period. On radiographic assessment, 14 patients demonstrated cortical hypertrophy of the bone-implant interface, six patients had maintenance of the native cortical contour, and no patients had cortical atrophy or narrowing at the implant interface.Conclusion Long-term follow-up in patients with compressive osseointegrative endoprosthetic devices demonstrated no late revisions because of periprosthetic fracture, aseptic loosening, or implant breakage in this cohort with a minimum 10-year follow-up. There was no evidence of late-onset cortical atrophy or stress shielding at the host-implant interface. This study supports the long-term stability of the interface between host bone and the endoprosthesis in compressive osseointegration devices.
Level IV, therapeutic study.
Tumour grade, tumour size, resection potential, and extent of disease affect outcome in paediatric non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft-tissue sarcoma (NRSTS), but no risk stratification systems exist and the ...standard of care is poorly defined. We developed a risk stratification system from known prognostic factors and assessed it in the context of risk-adapted therapy for young patients with NRSTS.
In this prospective study, eligible patients enrolled in 159 hospitals in three countries were younger than 30 years, had a Lansky (patients ≤16 years) or Karnofsky (patients >16 years) performance status score of at least 50, and a new diagnosis of a WHO (2002 criteria) intermediate (rarely metastasising) or malignant soft-tissue tumour (apart from tumour types eligible for other Children's Oncology Group studies and tumours for which the therapy in this trial was deemed inappropriate), malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour, non-metastatic and grossly resected dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma of the liver, or unclassified malignant soft-tissue sarcoma. Each patient was assigned to one of three risk groups and one of four treatment groups. Risk groups were: low (non-metastatic R0 or R1 low-grade, or ≤5 cm R1 high-grade tumour); intermediate (non-metastatic R0 or R1 >5 cm high-grade, or unresected tumour of any size or grade); or high (metastatic tumour). The treatment groups were surgery alone, radiotherapy (55·8 Gy), chemoradiotherapy (chemotherapy and 55·8 Gy radiotherapy), and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (chemotherapy and 45 Gy radiotherapy, then surgery and radiotherapy boost based on margins with continued chemotherapy). Chemotherapy included six cycles of ifosfamide 3 g/m2 per dose intravenously on days 1–3 and five cycles of doxorubicin 37·5 mg/m2 per dose intravenously on days 1–2 every 3 weeks with sequence adjusted on the basis of timing of surgery or radiotherapy. The primary outcomes were event-free survival, overall survival, and the pattern of treatment failure. Analysis was done per protocol. This study has been completed and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00346164.
Between Feb 5, 2007, and Feb 10, 2012, 550 eligible patients were enrolled, of whom 21 were treated in the incorrect group and excluded from this analysis. 529 evaluable patients were included in the analysis: low-risk (n=222), intermediate-risk (n=227), high-risk (n=80); surgery alone (n=205), radiotherapy (n=17), chemoradiotherapy (n=111), and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (n=196). At a median follow-up of 6·5 years (IQR 4·9–7·9), 5-year event-free survival and overall survival were: 88·9% (95% CI 84·0–93·8) and 96·2% (93·2–99·2) in the low-risk group; 65·0% (58·2–71·8) and 79·2% (73·4–85·0) in the intermediate-risk group; and 21·2% (11·4–31·1) and 35·5% (23·6–47·4) in the high-risk group, respectively. Risk group predicted event-free survival and overall survival (p<0·0001). No deaths from toxic events during treatment were reported. Nine patients had unexpected grade 4 adverse events (chemoradiotherapy group, n=2; neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group, n=7), including three wound complications that required surgery (all in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group).
Pre-treatment clinical features can be used to effectively define treatment failure risk and to stratify young patients with NRSTS for risk-adapted therapy. Most low-risk patients can be cured without adjuvant therapy, thereby avoiding known long-term treatment complications. Survival remains suboptimal for intermediate-risk and high-risk patients and novel therapies are needed.
National Institutes of Health, St Baldrick's Foundation, Seattle Children's Foundation, American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities.
PDF
