ABSTRACT
Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is beneficial for people with several forms of chronic respiratory disease. Given the existing limitations on availability of PR services, it is important to ...identify participants who are most likely to benefit from it. Identification of criteria for patient referral to PR is challenging, as chronic respiratory diseases and their medical and psychosocial co‐morbidities place a complex and multifaceted burden on patients. Although research studies have attempted to identify key parameters predictive of ‘responsiveness to PR’, to date no firm physiological, psychosocial or other criteria exist by which optimal patient candidacy can be determined. Moreover, individual factors do not reliably predict successful multidimensional PR outcomes. In general, individuals who remain symptomatic with dyspnoea, fatigue and exercise intolerance; who have difficulty performing activities of daily living (ADL); and who are having difficulty coping with or managing their disease despite optimized pharmacological therapy are potential candidates for PR. Patient assessment and outcome measurement are core essential features of PR. To be considered as a PR programme, rehabilitation programmes must demonstrate, at a minimum, assessment and outcome measurement in regard to exercise capacity, dyspnoea and health‐related quality of life. Additional parameters, including physical activity, nutritional status, tobacco use status, patient knowledge and self‐efficacy, performance of ADL, fatigue, disease exacerbations, hospitalizations and other urgent healthcare utilization, and behavioural outcomes, including coping styles, patient satisfaction and programme metrics, are other relevant and important aspects of patient assessment and outcome measurement that should be considered and undertaken in PR, where feasible.
Rochester et al thank Anidi et al for their letter regarding the role of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in the management of individuals with posttuberculosis lung disease. They agree with them that ...posttuberculosis lung disease patients can benefit from and should have access to PR and that the rehabilitation needs of this group are often overlooked. They greatly appreciate that, in their letter, Anidi et al have highlighted both the need for and benefits of PR for this patient group.
Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has demonstrated physiological, symptom-reducing, psychosocial, and health economic benefits for patients with chronic respiratory diseases, yet it is underutilized ...worldwide. Insufficient funding, resources, and reimbursement; lack of healthcare professional, payer, and patient awareness and knowledge; and additional patient-related barriers all contribute to the gap between the knowledge of the science and benefits of PR and the actual delivery of PR services to suitable patients.
The objectives of this document are to enhance implementation, use, and delivery of pulmonary rehabilitation to suitable individuals worldwide.
Members of the American Thoracic Society (ATS) Pulmonary Rehabilitation Assembly and the European Respiratory Society (ERS) Rehabilitation and Chronic Care Group established a Task Force and writing committee to develop a policy statement on PR. The document was modified based on feedback from expert peer reviewers. After cycles of review and revisions, the statement was reviewed and formally approved by the Board of Directors of the ATS and the Science Council and Executive Committee of the ERS.
This document articulates policy recommendations for advancing healthcare professional, payer, and patient awareness and knowledge of PR, increasing patient access to PR, and ensuring quality of PR programs. It also recommends areas of future research to establish evidence to support the development of an updated funding and reimbursement policy regarding PR.
The ATS and ERS commit to undertake actions that will improve access to and delivery of PR services for suitable patients. They call on their members and other health professional societies, payers, patients, and patient advocacy groups to join in this commitment.
This European Respiratory Society (ERS) statement provides a comprehensive overview on physical activity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A multidisciplinary Task Force ...of experts representing the ERS Scientific Group 01.02 "Rehabilitation and Chronic Care" determined the overall scope of this statement through consensus. Focused literature reviews were conducted in key topic areas and the final content of this Statement was agreed upon by all members. The current knowledge regarding physical activity in COPD is presented, including the definition of physical activity, the consequences of physical inactivity on lung function decline and COPD incidence, physical activity assessment, prevalence of physical inactivity in COPD, clinical correlates of physical activity, effects of physical inactivity on hospitalisations and mortality, and treatment strategies to improve physical activity in patients with COPD. This Task Force identified multiple major areas of research that need to be addressed further in the coming years. These include, but are not limited to, the disease-modifying potential of increased physical activity, and to further understand how improvements in exercise capacity, dyspnoea and self-efficacy following interventions may translate into increased physical activity. The Task Force recommends that this ERS statement should be reviewed periodically (e.g. every 5-8 years).
Pulmonary Rehabilitation in 2021 Rochester, Carolyn L; Spruit, Martijn A; Holland, Anne E
JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association,
09/2021, Letnik:
326, Številka:
10
Journal Article
Recenzirano
This JAMA Insights Clinical Update provides an overview of pulmonary rehabilitation, including patient candidacy, the process and components, and expected outcomes.
Exercise capacity and physical activity are different concepts: the former refers to what an individual is capable of performing, while the latter refers to what the individual does in daily life. ...Low levels of physical activity (PA), which are very common in individuals with COPD, are associated with poor health outcomes, including increased symptoms, a more rapid decline in lung function, increased health care utilization and increased mortality risk. Because of these pervasive negative outcomes, attempts have been made to increase physical activity in individuals with COPD, hoping that success in this area will mitigate the negative effects of inactivity. Based on its ability to increase exercise capacity and reduce dyspnea in COPD and other chronic respiratory diseases, pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) would be expected also increase physical activity in these patients. However, accessibility to pulmonary rehabilitation programs is problematic in some areas, and studies testing its effectiveness in this outcome area have had inconsistent results. Using telehealth interventions using technology to provide medical care conveniently over a distance would have the benefit of reaching a larger proportion of individuals with COPD. A systematic review of clinical trials testing telehealth to promote physical activity had mixed results and low-certainty evidence, resulting in the inability to recommend any single type of intervention. Thus, using telehealth interventions to promote physical activity for individuals with chronic respiratory diseases, while promising, remains an area where future investigations are needed to identify its optimal modalities and clarify its benefits.
PDF
