Isolated nocturnal hypertension (INH) is associated with greater mortality and cardiovascular events. Subclinical target organ damage (TOD) is a prognostic marker for cardiovascular events. Our ...objective is to systematically summarize evidence on the association between INH and subclinical TOD. Observational population studies were considered. INH was defined as nighttime blood pressure (BP) ⩾120 and/or 70 mm Hg with daytime BP <135/85 mm Hg. We systematically searched Pubmed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library. Abstracts were reviewed by two assessors. Potentially eligible articles were compared with inclusion criteria. The search yielded 954 titles, 13 abstracts were selected for review and four articles fulfilled inclusion criteria. INH was associated with higher ambulatory arterial stiffness index (0.4 unit vs. 0.35 unit, P<0.05), pulse wave velocity (16.2 m s(-1) vs. 14.7 m s(-1), P<0.05), central (140.4% vs. 134.0%, P<0.05) and peripheral (82.6% vs. 76.5%, P<0.01) augmentation index in a Chinese study. In the same population there was no association with left ventricular hypertrophy documented by electrocardiogram. INH was not associated with increased arterial stiffness or left venticular mass index in a Swedish study. An American study demonstrated higher left ventricular mass (152.46 g vs. 136.16 g, P=0.01) and greater odds of left ventricular hypertrophy (odds ratio 3.03, 95% confidence interval 1.02-9.05) in unadjusted analysis. There was no association with proteinuria. Evidence is inconclusive regarding the association between INH and subclinical TOD. Future research should focus on trying to elucidate the mechanisms that generate INH and contribute to the higher mortality associated with this BP pattern.
A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial aimed to determine whether levothyroxine provided clinical benefits in older persons with subclinical hypothyroidism. No apparent ...benefits were observed.
Subclinical hypothyroidism is defined as an elevated serum thyrotropin level and a serum free thyroxine level within the reference range.
1
Between 8% and 18% of adults 65 years of age or older have these biochemical features, and the prevalence is higher among women than among men.
2
Subclinical hypothyroidism is a possible contributor to many problems in older persons. Thyroid hormones have multiple effects, since they act as an essential regulatory factor in numerous physiological systems, including the vascular tree and the heart,
3
the brain (including cognition),
4
skeletal muscle, and bone.
5
Tiredness is the most important symptom of overt hypothyroidism,
6
but . . .
Cognitive impairment (CI) and fatigue are common in people with multiple sclerosis (MS), with well‐known profound effects on quality of life. Sleep disorders, including obstructive sleep apnoea ...(OSA), are also common in MS patients. The presence of CI has previously been shown to strongly correlate with OSA diagnosed using polysomnography in MS. Treatment of OSA has not previously been investigated as a potential modality to improve cognition in MS patients. Therefore, we sought to investigate the potential effects of OSA treatment on both cognitive function and fatigue in MS patients. Twenty‐three participants with MS reporting significant fatigue were enrolled. CI was assessed by the Brief International Cognitive Assessment in MS and the 3‐second Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test. All participants underwent overnight polysomnography to assess for possible OSA. Cognitive and fatigue measures were repeated in those subsequently treated for OSA and in a comparative untreated sample. Seven participants (30%) had a diagnosis of OSA based on an apnoea–hypopnea index greater than 5 per hour, with no correlation between the presence of CI and OSA. Verbal learning at follow‐up assessment was seen to improve significantly in those treated for OSA, compared with those who were not treated for a sleep disorder. This small study demonstrates the potential for OSA treatment to improve verbal learning in people with MS, larger studies are indicated to further investigate the potential for cognitive and fatigue improvement in people with MS through treatment of comorbid OSA.
Summary
The high prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea has led to increasing interest in ambulatory diagnosis. The SleepMinder™ (SM) is a novel non‐contact device that employs radiofrequency wave ...technology to assess the breathing pattern, and thereby estimate obstructive sleep apnea severity. We assessed the performance of SleepMinder™ in the home diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea.
One‐hundred and twenty‐two subjects were prospectively recruited in two protocols, one from an unselected sleep clinic cohort (n = 67, mean age 51 years) and a second from a hypertension clinic cohort (n = 55, mean age 58 years). All underwent 7 consecutive nights of home monitoring (SMHOME) with the SleepMinder™ as well as inpatient‐attended polysomnography in the sleep clinic cohort or cardiorespiratory polygraphy in the hypertension clinic cohort with simultaneous SleepMinder™ recordings (SMLAB).
In the sleep clinic cohort, median SMHOME apnea–hypopnea index correlated significantly with polysomnography apnea–hypopnea index (r = .68; p < .001), and in the hypertension clinic cohort with polygraphy apnea–hypopnea index (r = .7; p < .001). The median SMHOME performance against polysomnography in the sleep clinic cohort showed a sensitivity and specificity of 72% and 94% for apnea–hypopnea index ≥ 15. Device performance was inferior in females. In the hypertension clinic cohort, SMHOME showed a 50% sensitivity and 72% specificity for apnea–hypopnea index ≥ 15. SleepMinder™ classified 92% of cases correctly or within one severity class of the polygraphy classification. Night‐to‐night variability in home testing was relatively high, especially at lower apnea–hypopnea index levels.
We conclude that the SleepMinder™ device provides a useful ambulatory screening tool, especially in a population suspected of obstructive sleep apnea, and is most accurate in moderate–severe obstructive sleep apnea.
Background and purpose Thyroid diseases are common and often affect quality of life (QoL). No cross-culturally validated patient-reported outcome measuring thyroid-related QoL is available. The ...purpose of the present study was to test the cross-cultural validity of the newly developed thyroid-related patient-reported outcome ThyPRO, using tests for differential item functioning (DIF) according to language version. Methods The ThyPRO consists of 85 items summarized in 13 multi-item scales and one single item. Scales cover physical and mental symptoms, well-being and function as well as social and daily function and cosmetic concerns. Translation applied standard forward-backward methodology with subsequent cognitive interviews and reviews. Responses (N = 1,810) to the ThyPRO were collected in seven countries: UK (n = 166), The Netherlands (n = 147), Serbia (n = 150), Italy (n = 110), India (n = 148), Denmark (n = 902) and Sweden (n = 187). Translated versions were compared pairwise to the English version by examining uniform and nonuniform DIF, i.e., whether patients from different countries respond differently to a particular item, although they have identical level of the concept measured by the item. Analyses were controlled for thyroid diagnosis. DIF was investigated by ordinal logistic regression, testing for both statistical significance and magnitude (ΔR² > 0.02). Scale level was estimated by the sum score, after purification. Results For twelve of the 84 tested items, DIF was identified in more than one language. Eight of these were small, but four were indicative of possible low translatability. Twenty-one instances of DIF in single languages were identified, indicating potential problems with the particular translation. However, only seven were of a magnitude which could affect scale scores, most of which could be explained by sample differences not controlled for. Conclusion The ThyPRO has good cross-cultural validity with only minor cross-cultural invariance and is recommended for use in international multicenter studies.
BACKGROUND:Physician’s prescribing preference is increasingly used as an instrumental variable in studies of therapeutic effects. However, differences in prescribing patterns among physicians may ...reflect differences in preferences or in case-mix. Furthermore, there is debate regarding the possible assumptions for point estimation using physician’s preference as an instrument.
METHODS:A survey was sent to general practitioners (GPs) in The Netherlands, the United Kingdom, New Zealand, Ireland, Switzerland, and Germany, asking whether they would prescribe levothyroxine to eight fictitious patients with subclinical hypothyroidism. We investigated (1) whether variation in physician’s preference was observable and to what extent it was explained by characteristics of GPs and their patient populations and (2) whether the data were compatible with deterministic and stochastic monotonicity assumptions.
RESULTS:Levothyroxine prescriptions varied substantially among the 526 responding GPs. Between-GP variance in levothyroxine prescriptions (logit scale) was 9.9 (95% confidence interval8.0, 12) in the initial mixed effects logistic model, 8.3 (6.7, 10) after adding a fixed effect for country and 8.2 (6.6, 10) after adding GP characteristics. The occurring prescription patterns falsified the deterministic monotonicity assumption. All cases in all countries were more likely to receive levothyroxine if a different case of the same GP received levothyroxine, which is compatible with the stochastic monotonicity assumption. The data were incompatible with this assumption for a different definition of the instrument.
CONCLUSIONS:Our study supports the existence of physician’s preference as a determinant in treatment decisions. Deterministic monotonicity will generally not be plausible for physician’s preference as an instrument. Depending on the definition of the instrument, stochastic monotonicity may be plausible.
Often developed for acute care and less frequently for primary care, care bundles are clusters of evidence-based practices for improving care delivery and patient outcomes. Care bundles usually arise ...when ineffective or costly outcomes are identified, are meant to make care more reliable, and require superb teamwork and communication.
Patients using the highest proportion of health care services are those living with complex health conditions and challenging sociocultural lives, statistics corroborated within our primary care clinic. In our nurse practitioner (NP)-led, interprofessional, team-based primary care program serving mainly low-income patients, we noted that many patients with multiple chronic conditions had an excess of clinic encounters, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations.
To improve health status for these patients and reduce costly care inefficiencies, we developed a unique bundle of care practices for embedding within our NP-led complex care program. Our goals were to improve patient efficacy for self-management of chronic conditions and promote appropriate use of health care resources and services.
Using AEIØOU as a mnemonic, the derived care bundle better focused our team efforts and provided us with a planning, communication, and documentation schema for quality improvement. It was particularly useful for team-based care because tasks could be documented or communicated by letter or number and easily reviewed by team members or others involved in patients' care.
Use of the AEIØOU bundle within our program resulted in better coordination of team-based comprehensive care for our high-needs patients, seen anecdotally in fewer unnecessary contacts and missed appointments and in patient appreciation comments. Emergency department visits and hospitalization data for the six months before compared with 6 months after enrollment in the program showed significant reductions.
To improve the primary care of complex patient populations, we recommend further use and testing of the AEIØOU bundle within other care models.
There is limited evidence about the impact of treatment for subclinical hypothyroidism, especially among older people.
To investigate the variation in GP treatment strategies for older patients with ...subclinical hypothyroidism depending on country and patient characteristics.
Case-based survey of GPs in the Netherlands, Germany, England, Ireland, Switzerland, and New Zealand.
The treatment strategy of GPs (treatment yes/no, starting-dose thyroxine) was assessed for eight cases presenting a woman with subclinical hypothyroidism. The cases differed in the patient characteristics of age (70 versus 85 years), vitality status (vital versus vulnerable), and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) concentration (6 versus 15 mU/L).
A total of 526 GPs participated (the Netherlands n = 129, Germany n = 61, England n = 22, Ireland n = 21, Switzerland n = 262, New Zealand n = 31; overall response 19%). Across countries, differences in treatment strategy were observed. GPs from the Netherlands (mean treatment percentage 34%), England (40%), and New Zealand (39%) were less inclined to start treatment than GPs in Germany (73%), Ireland (62%), and Switzerland (52%) (P = 0.05). Overall, GPs were less inclined to start treatment in 85-year-old than in 70-year-old females (pooled odds ratio OR 0.74 95% confidence interval CI = 0.63 to 0.87). Females with a TSH of 15 mU/L were more likely to get treated than those with a TSH of 6 mU/L (pooled OR 9.49 95% CI = 5.81 to 15.5).
GP treatment strategies of older people with subclinical hypothyroidism vary largely by country and patient characteristics. This variation underlines the need for a new generation of international guidelines based on the outcomes of randomised clinical trials set within primary care.
PDF
