The most intense auroral emissions from Earth's polar regions, called discrete for their sharply defined spatial configurations, are generated by a process involving coherent acceleration of ...electrons by slowly evolving, powerful electric fields directed along the magnetic field lines that connect Earth's space environment to its polar regions. In contrast, Earth's less intense auroras are generally caused by wave scattering of magnetically trapped populations of hot electrons (in the case of diffuse aurora) or by the turbulent or stochastic downward acceleration of electrons along magnetic field lines by waves during transitory periods (in the case of broadband or Alfvénic aurora). Jupiter's relatively steady main aurora has a power density that is so much larger than Earth's that it has been taken for granted that it must be generated primarily by the discrete auroral process. However, preliminary in situ measurements of Jupiter's auroral regions yielded no evidence of such a process. Here we report observations of distinct, high-energy, downward, discrete electron acceleration in Jupiter's auroral polar regions. We also infer upward magnetic-field-aligned electric potentials of up to 400 kiloelectronvolts, an order of magnitude larger than the largest potentials observed at Earth. Despite the magnitude of these upward electric potentials and the expectations from observations at Earth, the downward energy flux from discrete acceleration is less at Jupiter than that caused by broadband or stochastic processes, with broadband and stochastic characteristics that are substantially different from those at Earth.
Juno's Jupiter Energetic particle Detector Instrument often detects energetic electron beams over Jupiter's polar regions. In this paper, we document a subset of intense magnetic field‐aligned beams ...of energetic electrons moving away from Jupiter at high magnetic latitudes both north and south of the planet. The number fluxes of these beams are often dominated by electrons with energies above about 1 MeV. These very narrow beams can create broad angular responses in the Jupiter Energetic particle Detector Instrument with unique signatures in the detector count rates, probably because of >10 MeV electrons. We use these signatures to identify the most intense beams. These beams occur primarily above the swirl region of the polar cap aurora. This polar region is described as being of low brightness and high absorption and the most magnetically “open” at Jupiter.
Plain Language Summary
We find that there are very intense beams of energetic (probably dominated by >1 MeV) electrons moving upward over Jupiter's north and south poles that are likely to be magnetically connected to the swirl region in the aurora. We use data from Juno's Jupiter Energetic particle Detector Instrument to characterize the upward beams and also present Ultraviolet Spectrograph data showing the swirl region in a color ratio. We have created a table of times when these very intense beams are present from the first through the eighth perijove pass of the spacecraft.
Key Points
We survey persistent, intense upward MeV electron beams in Jupiter's polar regions
These intense beams appear to be well correlated with the swirl region of the Jovian aurora
We consider Juno JEDI data from perijove 1 through perijove 8
Abstract
Previous Juno mission event studies revealed powerful electron and ion acceleration, to 100s of kiloelectron volts and higher, at low altitudes over Jupiter's main aurora and polar cap (PC; ...poleward of the main aurora). Here we examine 30–1200 keV JEDI‐instrument particle data from the first 16 Juno orbits to determine how common, persistent, repeatable, and ordered these processes are. For the PC regions, we find (1) upward electron angle beams, sometimes extending to megaelectron volt energies, are persistently present in essentially all portions of the polar cap but are generated by two distinct and spatially separable processes. (2) Particle evidence for megavolt downward electrostatic potentials are observable for 80% of the polar cap crossings and over substantial fractions of the PC area. For the main aurora, with the orbit favoring the duskside, we find that (1) three distinct zones are observed that are generally arranged from lower to higher latitudes but sometimes mixed. They are designated here as the diffuse aurora (DifA), Zone‐I (ZI(D)) showing primarily downward electron acceleration, and Zone‐II (ZII(B)) showing bidirectional acceleration with the upward intensities often greater than downward intensities. (2) ZI(D) and ZII(B) sometimes (but not always) contain, respectively, downward electron inverted Vs and downward proton inverted Vs, (potentials up to 400 kV) but, otherwise, have broadband distributions. (3) Surprisingly, both ZI(D) and ZII(B) can generate equally powerful auroral emissions. It is suggested but demonstrated for intense portions of only one auroral crossing, that ZI(D) and ZII(B) are associated, respectively, with upward and downward electric currents.
Plain Language Summary
The science objectives of the Juno mission, with its spacecraft now orbiting Jupiter in a polar orbit, include understanding the space environments of Jupiter's polar regions and generation of Jupiter's uniquely powerful aurora. In Jupiter's polar cap regions (poleward of the main auroral oval encircling the northern and southern poles), we find here that (1) beams of electrons aligned with the upward magnetic field direction are ever‐present with energies extended to the 100s to 1,000s of kilo electron volts and (2) downward magnetic field‐aligned electrostatic potentials reaching greater than a million volts occur over broad regions for 80% of the polar cap crossings. For the main auroral oval, we find three distinct zones: designated here as diffuse aurora (DifA), Zone‐I (ZI(D)) showing downward electron acceleration to 100s of kiloelectron volts, and Zone‐II (ZII(B)) showing bidirectional acceleration with the upward intensities often greater than downward intensities. ZI(D) sometimes shows upward electrostatic potentials reaching 100s of kilovolts and is associated with upward magnetic field‐aligned electric currents. ZII(B) sometimes shows downward electrostatic potentials reaching 100s of kilovolts and is associated with downward electric currents. Unexpectedly from Earth studies, ZI(D) and ZII(B) are just as likely to generate the most intense auroral emissions.
Key Points
Jupiter's polar caps have upward electron beams essentially everywhere (100s of kiloelectron volts) and often downward megavolt electric potentials
Energetic particles reveal three main auroral acceleration zones: diffuse aurora (DifA), Zone‐I (downward), and Zone‐II (bidirectional)
ZI(D) and ZII(B) sometimes (but not always) contain, respectively, downward electron inverted Vs and downward proton inverted Vs
Juno obtained unique low‐altitude space environment measurements over Jupiter's poles on 27 August 2016. Here Jupiter Energetic‐particle Detector Instrument observations are presented for electrons ...(25–800 keV) and protons (10–1500 keV). We analyze magnetic field‐aligned electron angular beams over expected auroral regions that were sometimes symmetric (bidirectional) but more often strongly asymmetric. Included are variable but surprisingly persistent upward, monodirectional electron angular beams emerging from what we term the “polar cap,” poleward of the nominal auroral ovals. The energy spectra of all beams were monotonic and hard (not structured in energy), showing power law‐like distributions often extending beyond ~800 keV. Given highly variable downward energy fluxes (below 1 RJ altitudes within the loss cone) as high as 280 mW/m2, we suggest that mechanisms generating these beams are among the primary processes generating Jupiter's uniquely intense auroral emissions, distinct from what is typically observed at Earth.
Key Points
Upward, energy‐monotonic energetic electron angular beams are unexpectedly persistent over Jupiter's polar caps
Jupiter's aurora appears not to be associated with monoenergetic electron beams but with other processes
Jupiter's aurora is powered by the downward portion of bidirectional, energy‐monotonic electron angular beams and diffuse precipitation
While planetary radiation belts are all embedded within the low energy solar wind, Ganymede is in the unique situation of being surrounded by the energetic particles of Jupiter's magnetosphere. Here ...we study Ganymede's environment based the recent flyby of Juno, as well as through reanalysis of past measurements from the Galileo spacecraft. We find that Ganymede is surrounded by a radiation cavity with intensities that are lower compared to Jupiter. Particles are lost in the cavity due to absorption by Ganymede that is likely enhanced by scattering. In the core of the cavity we find radiation belts. Their intensities are comparable to Jupiter for ions but lower for electrons. The radiation belts form peaks in phase space density, which indicates that they cannot be produced through steady inward influx and accumulation of Jupiter particles. Other processes are needed such as local acceleration, or time dependent transport and loss processes.
Plain Language Summary
Some planetary bodies such as Earth or Jupiter produce strong magnetic fields that trap charged particle radiation in space and form radiation belts. Other planetary bodies such as most moons of the giant planets are only weakly magnetized and mostly absorb the radiation in their environment. Jupiter's moon Ganymede is unique because it is the only known moon that produces its own magnetic field. Different to a planet, it is not embedded in the solar wind but in the magnetosphere of Jupiter. How the interaction between the respective magnetic fields works is poorly understood and the reason for the current study. Here we find that Ganymede is surrounded by a radiation cavity, were radiation intensities are smaller compared to the environment, likely because some of the particles are absorbed by the body of Ganymede itself. Embedded in the cavity we find radiation belts that resemble their planetary equivalents. We find that these belts cannot simply be populated by inflowing particles from Jupiter and discuss what additional physics may be needed.
Key Points
Ganymede's radiation cavity has lower intensities compared to Jupiter
Ganymede has a radiation belt of at least tens and hundreds of keV ions and electrons
Ganymede's radiation belt cannot be produced through influx of Jupiter particles alone
Use of Open Access Platforms for Clinical Trial Data Navar, Ann Marie; Pencina, Michael J; Rymer, Jennifer A ...
JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association,
03/2016, Letnik:
315, Številka:
12
Journal Article
In this paper, we exploit the charge‐dependent nature of auroral phenomena in Jupiter's polar cap region to infer the charge states of energetic oxygen and sulfur. To date, there are very limited and ...sparse measurements of the >50 keV oxygen and sulfur charge states, yet many studies have demonstrated their importance in understanding the details of various physical processes, such as X‐ray aurora, ion‐neutral interactions in Jupiter's neutral cloud, and particle acceleration theories. In this contribution, we develop a technique to determine the most abundant charge states associated with heavy ions in Jupiter's polar magnetosphere. We find that O+ and S++ are the most abundant and therefore iogenic in origin. The results are important because they provide (1) strong evidence that soft X‐ray sources are likely due to charge stripping of magnetospheric ions and (2) a more complete spatial map of the oxygen and sulfur charge states, which is important for understanding how the charge‐ and mass‐dependent physical processes sculpt the energetic particles throughout the Jovian magnetosphere.
Key Points
Quasi‐static electric potentials in Jupiter's polar cap region are used to determine the energetic (>hundreds of keV) ion charge states
The most abundant charge states associated with these precipitating ions are O+ and S++ and therefore iogenic in origin
These observations are important for X‐ray auroral and ion‐neutral interaction physics
The relationship between electron energy flux and the characteristic energy of electron distributions in the main auroral loss cone bridges the gap between predictions made by theory and measurements ...just recently available from Juno. For decades such relationships have been inferred from remote sensing observations of the Jovian aurora, primarily from the Hubble Space Telescope, and also more recently from Hisaki. However, to infer these quantities, remote sensing techniques had to assume properties of the Jovian atmospheric structure - leading to uncertainties in their profile. Juno's arrival and subsequent auroral passes have allowed us to obtain these relationships unambiguously for the first time, when the spacecraft passes through the auroral acceleration region. Using Juno /Jupiter Energetic particle Detector Instrument (JEDI), an energetic particle instrument, we present these relationships for the 30-kiloelectronvolts to 1-megaelectronvolts electron population. Observations presented here show that the electron energy flux in the loss cone is a nonlinear function of the characteristic or mean electron energy and supports both the predictions from Knight (1973, https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(73)90093-7) and magnetohydrodynamic turbulence acceleration theories (e.g., Saur et al., 2003, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015761). Finally, we compare the in situ analyses of Juno with remote Hisaki observations and use them to help constrain Jupiter's atmospheric profile. We find a possible solution that provides the best agreement between these data sets is an atmospheric profile that more efficiently transports the hydrocarbons to higher altitudes. If this is correct, it supports the previously published idea (e.g., Parkinson et al., 2006, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JE002539) that precipitating electrons increase the hydrocarbon eddy diffusion coefficients in the auroral regions.
Two new Juno‐observed particle features of Jupiter's main aurora demonstrate substantial diversity of processes generating Jupiter's mysterious auroral emissions. It was previously speculated that ...sometimes‐observed potential‐driven aurora (up to 400 kV) can turn into broadband stochastic acceleration (dominating at Jupiter) by means of instability. Here direct evidence for such a process is revealed with a “mono‐energetic” electron inverted‐V rising in energy to 200 keV, transforming into a region of broadband acceleration with downward energy fluxes tripling to 3,000 mW/m2, and then transforming back into a mono‐energetic structure ramping down from 200 keV. But a second feature of interest observed nearby is unlikely to have operated in the same way. Here a downward accelerated proton inverted‐V, with inferred potentials to 300–400 kV, occurred simultaneously with downward accelerated broadband electrons with downward energy fluxes as high as any observed (~3,000 mW/m2). This latter feature has no known precedent with Earth auroral observations.
Key Points
Two new particle features are identified within the intense auroral acceleration regions at Jupiter demonstrating great diversity
One feature supports a hypothesis that potential‐driven aurora can become unstable and convert over to broadband, stochastic acceleration
The other feature contradicts that hypothesis and has no qualitative precedent within Earths' auroral acceleration regions
We analyse combined electron spectra across the dynamic range of both Cassini electron sensors in order to characterise the background plasma environment near Titan for 54 Cassini‐Titan encounters as ...of May 2009. We characterise the encounters into four broad types: Plasma sheet, Lobe‐like, Magnetosheath and Bimodal. Despite many encounters occurring close to the magnetopause only two encounters to date were predominantly in the magnetosheath (T32 and T42). Bimodal encounters contain two distinct electron populations, the low energy component of the bi‐modal populations is apparently associated with local water group products. Additionally, a hot lobe‐like environment is also occasionally observed and is suggestively linked to increased local pick‐up. We find that 34 of 54 encounters analysed are associated with one of these groups while the remaining encounters exhibit a combination of these environments. We provide typical electron properties and spectra for each plasma regime and list the encounters appropriate to each.
PDF
