Heart failure (HF) is a growing issue in developed countries; it is often the result of underlying processes such as ischemia, hypertension, infiltrative diseases or even genetic abnormalities. The ...great majority of the affected patients present a reduced ejection fraction (≤40%), thereby falling under the name of "heart failure with reduced ejection fraction" (HFrEF). This condition represents a major threat for patients: it significantly affects life quality and carries an enormous burden on the whole healthcare system due to its high management costs. In the last decade, new medical treatments and devices have been developed in order to reduce HF hospitalizations and improve prognosis while reducing the overall mortality rate. Pharmacological therapy has significantly changed our perspective of this disease thanks to its ability of restoring ventricular function and reducing symptom severity, even in some dramatic contexts with an extensively diseased myocardium. Notably, medical therapy can sometimes be ineffective, and a tailored integration with device technologies is of pivotal importance. Not by chance, in recent years, cardiac implantable devices witnessed a significant improvement, thereby providing an irreplaceable resource for the management of HF. Some devices have the ability of assessing (CardioMEMS) or treating (ultrafiltration) fluid retention, while others recognize and treat life-threatening arrhythmias, even for a limited time frame (wearable cardioverter defibrillator). The present review article gives a comprehensive overview of the most recent and important findings that need to be considered in patients affected by HFrEF. Both novel medical treatments and devices are presented and discussed.
Cardiac amyloidosis may result in an aggressive form of heart failure (HF). Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) has been shown to be a concrete therapeutic option in patients with symptomatic HF, ...but there is no evidence of its application in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. We present the case of TTR amyloidosis, where CCM therapy proved to be effective. The patient had a history of multiple HF hospitalizations due to an established diagnosis of wild type TTR-Amyloidosis with significant cardiac involvement. Since he was highly symptomatic, except during continuous dobutamine and diuretic infusion, it was opted to pursue CCM therapy device implantation. At follow up, a significant improvement in clinical status was reported with an increase of EF, functional status (6 min walk test improved from zero meters at baseline, to 270 m at 1 month and to 460 m at 12 months), and a reduction in pulmonary pressures. One year after device implantation, no other HF hospital admission was needed. CCM therapy may be effective in this difficult clinical setting. The AMY-CCM Registry, which has just begun, will evaluate the efficacy of CCM in patients with HF and diagnosed TTR amyloidosis to bring new evidence on its potential impact as a therapeutic option.
Increasing attention is being given to the rational use of invasive procedures. In this study, we aimed to evaluate, among patients referred for coronary angiography, the appropriateness of cardiac ...catheterization according to the Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for diagnostic catheterization and to examine the relationship between the appropriateness and the presence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and revascularization.
From November 2017 to December 2018, 1188 consecutive patients referred to undergo a diagnostic catheterization were included. They were categorized as having appropriate, uncertain or inappropriate indication, using a database (Melograno System). We restricted our analysis to 9 appropriate indications including acute coronary syndromes, suspected CAD, valvular heart disease, arrhythmias and cardiomyopathy. We restricted the analysis to the subgroup of patients with suspected or known CAD and, among them, we evaluate the rate of CAD and the need for revascularization.
The indications were appropriate in 1017 patients (85.6%), of uncertain appropriateness in 134 (11.3%), and inappropriate in 37 (3.1%). Restricting the analysis to the CAD subgroup, the indications were appropriate in 848 patients (83.3%), of uncertain appropriateness in 133 (13.1%) and inappropriate in 37 (3.6%). The proportion of patients with critical CAD were 75.9%, 44.3% and 29.7% in the appropriate, uncertain and inappropriate categories respectively (p < 0.001). The revascularization rate was 63.1%, 32.2% and 21.6% in the appropriate, uncertain and inappropriate categories respectively (p < 0.001).
Application of AUC is feasible in a community setting. Melograno system is useful to improve patient care.
Treatment delay is a powerful predictor of survival in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We investigated effectiveness ...of pre-hospital diagnosis of STEMI with direct referral to PCI, alongside more conventional referral strategies.
From January 2003 to December 2004, 658 STEMI patients were referred for primary PCI at our intervention laboratory. Three predefined referral routes were compared: (1) for patients within 90 min drive of the PCI centre, pre-hospital diagnosis and direct transportation (n=166), (2) diagnosis at the interventional hospital emergency department (n=316), (3) diagnosis at local hospitals before transportation (n = 176). Pre-hospital diagnosis was associated with more than 45 min reduction in treatment delay (P = 0.001). No significant difference in in-hospital mortality was apparent in the overall study population. In the cardiogenic shock subgroup (n = 80), pre-hospital diagnosis was associated with a two-thirds reduction in in-hospital mortality (P = 0.019); mortality was only 6.2% in shock patients who underwent PCI in < 2 h.
This study shows that pre-hospital diagnosis can provide a reduction in primary PCI treatment delay, and suggests the hypothesis that this referral strategy might provide survival benefits to patients with cardiogenic shock.
Background High mortality rates were reported in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PPCI) “off-hours.” The objective of this ...study was to evaluate this issue in a more recent population of patients with STEMI treated with PPCI in a high-volume tertiary center specifically dedicated to STEMI treatment. Methods and Results We analyzed in-hospital/1-year mortality among 985 consecutive patients with STEMI treated with PPCI between January 2003 and December 2005 in a high-volume (>1400 PCI/year) hub center in a STEMI provincial network organization during “normal-hours” (weekdays 08:00 am to 07:29 pm ) and “off-hours” (weekdays 07:30 pm to 07:59 am and weekends). Most (61.2%) patients were treated during “off-hours”. Clinical and angiographic characteristics of the ”normal-hours” and “off-hours” groups were comparable (in both groups, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa were administered to ∼80% patients). The off-hours group tended toward higher median (25th-75th percentiles) total ischemic time (199 135-312 minutes vs 179 126-285 minutes; P = .052). Median electrocardiogram-to-balloon time was less than 90 minutes in both groups. Despite 20 minutes longer median total ischemic time, patients who underwent PPCI during “off-hours” showed similar post-PPCI Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 3 flow grade and mean left ventricular ejection fraction. No difference could be observed between the 2 groups in terms of in-hospital and 1-year mortality rates. Conclusion This study provides evidence that the clinical effectiveness of “normal” and “off-hours” PPCI can be equivalent, at least when performed at a center specifically dedicated to STEMI treatment with frequent use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa agents.
We investigated the impact of ambulance-based prehospital triage on treatment delay and all-cause mortality (in hospital and long term) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) ...complicated by cardiogenic shock referred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in a prospectively collected registry. During the study period (January 2003 to December 2005), a total of 121 patients was referred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention at our intervention laboratory through 2 main triage groups: (1) after prehospital, ambulance-telemedicine–based triage (42 patients) and (2) by more conventional routes (79 patients) represented by the institutional S. Orsola-Malpighi hospital emergency department triage (44 patients) and spoke hospital triage (35 patients). Total ischemic time was shorter in the prehospital triage (142 minutes, range 106 to 187, vs 212 minutes, range 150 to 366, p = 0.003). Patients with prehospital triage showed a lower rate (29% vs 54%, p = 0.01) of severely depressed (≤35%) left ventricular systolic function and a 68% decrease in in-hospital mortality (9, 21%, vs 36, 46%, odds ratio 0.32, 95% confidence interval 0.14 to 0.77, p = 0.01). In the entire study population, patients revascularized within an optimal time (2 hours from symptom onset or 90 minutes from STEMI diagnosis) showed remarkably low in-hospital mortality (20% and 29%, respectively). At the 1-year follow-up, patients with prehospital triage had a higher survival rate (74% vs 52%, p = 0.019). In conclusion, this study indicates that prehospital triage with direct transportation to the intervention laboratory is associated with shorter treatment delay and better clinical outcome in patients with STEMI complicated by cardiogenic shock.
Patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are at high risk for recurrent coronary events (RCE). Non-culprit plaque progression and stent failure are the main causes of ...RCEs. We sought to identify the incidence and predictors of RCEs.
Eight hundred thirty patients with STEMI were enrolled and followed up for 5 years. All patients underwent blood test analysis at hospital admission, at 1-month and at 12-month follow-up times. Patients were divided into RCE group and control group. RCE group was further categorized into non-culprit plaque progression and stent failure subgroups.
Among 830 patients with STEMI, 63 patients had a RCE (7.6%). At hospital admission, HDL was numerically lower in RCE group, while LDL at both 1-month and 12-month follow-up times were significantly higher in RCE group. Both HDL at hospital admission and LDL at 12-month follow-up were independently associated with RCEs (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81-0.99 and OR 1.041, 95% CI 1.01-1.07, respectively). RCEs were due to non-culprit plaque progression in 47.6% of cases, while in 36.5% due to stent failure. The mean time frame between pPCI and RCE was significantly greater for non-culprit plaque progression subgroup as compared to stent failure subgroup (27 ± 18 months and 16 ± 14 months, P = 0.032).
RCEs still affect patients after pPCI. Low levels of HDL at admission and high levels of LDL at 12 months after pPCI significantly predicted RCEs. A RCE results in non-culprit plaque progression presents much later than an event due to stent failure.
PDF
