Synovial sarcoma (SS) is a rare sarcoma driven by a translocation between SS18 and SSX 1, 2, or 4. With approximately 800 to 1,000 cases a year in the United States, it most commonly affects young ...adults between the ages of 15 and 30 years. The resultant tumors are either monophasic (pure sarcomas), biphasic (a combination or epithelioid and sarcomatous components), or poorly differentiated. The hybrid transcription factor SS18:SSX alters SWItch/Sucrose Non-Fermentable (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling and global methylation patterns that may allow for future therapeutic opportunities. In this review, we focus on the pharmacologic management of SS, both in the curative setting, where the standard approach is wide surgical excision combined with radiotherapy and/or (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy as appropriate, and in the palliative setting. In advanced disease, chemotherapy with anthracyclines and/or ifosfamide, trabectedin, or pazopanib has been demonstrated to be more active compared with other soft tissue sarcomas. In addition, a better understanding of the molecular and immunologic characteristics of SS has allowed for the identification of new potential targets and the development of novel biology-driven therapies that are all at different stages of testing. There include targeted agents, immunotherapy, and metabolic therapies. Because the impact of these strategies for improving SS outcome is still limited, current and future research is strongly needed to better understand the tumor biology, to identify predictive biomarkers, and to improve the outcomes for patients with SS.
Summary Chordomas are very rare bone malignant tumours that have had a shortage of effective treatments for a long time. New treatments are now available for both the local and the metastatic phase ...of the disease, but the degree of uncertainty in selecting the most appropriate treatment remains high and their adoption remains inconsistent across the world, resulting in suboptimum outcomes for many patients. In December, 2013, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) convened a consensus meeting to update its clinical practice guidelines on sarcomas. ESMO also hosted a parallel consensus meeting on chordoma that included more than 40 chordoma experts from several disciplines and from both sides of the Atlantic, with the contribution and sponsorship of the Chordoma Foundation, a global patient advocacy group. The consensus reached at that meeting is shown in this position paper.
For metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients not eligible for surgery, systemic treatments, including standard chemotherapy and newer biological compounds, still play the most relevant role in ...the management of the disease. An anthracycline and alkylating agent combination has formed the cornerstone of chemotherapy in STS for more than 30 years, with its value over that of administration of anthracycline as a single agent still being debated. Efforts have been made to improve the activity and minimise the toxicity of the combination, as well as to explore the upfront efficacy of agents known to be active in sarcoma and to develop new biological compounds. Nevertheless, beyond the first line, evidence for medical treatment in STS is less robust and all the more driven by histology. Thus, the introduction of kinases and small molecule inhibitors in the treatment armamentarium for STS is a major achievement in this setting. Preliminary data on immunotherapy are also available and discussed in this review.
Celotno besedilo
Dostopno za:
DOBA, IZUM, KILJ, NUK, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, SIK, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
To determine whether the administration of histology-tailored neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HT) was superior to the administration of standard anthracycline plus ifosfamide neoadjuvant chemotherapy (A+I) ...in high-risk soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of an extremity or the trunk wall.
This was a randomized, open-label, phase III trial. Patients had localized high-risk STS (grade 3; size, ≥ 5 cm) of an extremity or trunk wall, belonging to one of the following five histologic subtypes: high-grade myxoid liposarcoma (HG-MLPS); leiomyosarcoma (LMS), synovial sarcoma (SS), malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS). Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive three cycles of A+I or HT. The HT regimens were as follows: trabectedin in HG-MLPS; gemcitabine plus dacarbazine in LMS; high-dose prolonged-infusion ifosfamide in SS; etoposide plus ifosfamide in MPNST; and gemcitabine plus docetaxel in UPS. Primary and secondary end points were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using Cox models adjusted for treatment and stratification factors. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT01710176).
Between May 2011 and May 2016, 287 patients (UPS: n = 97 33.8%; HG-MLPS: n = 65 22.6%; SS: n = 70 24.4%; MPNST: n = 27 9.4%; and LMS: n = 28 9.8%) were randomly assigned to either A+I or HT. At the final analysis, with a median follow-up of 52 months, the projected DFS and OS probabilities were 0.55 and 0.47 (log-rank
= .323) and 0.76 and 0.66 (log-rank
= .018) at 60 months in the A+I arm and HT arm, respectively. No treatment-related deaths were observed.
In a population of patients with localized high-risk STS, HT was not associated with a better DFS or OS, suggesting that A+I should remain the regimen to choose whenever neoadjuvant chemotherapy is used in patients with high-risk STS.
Background
Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas comprise a heterogeneous group of rare tumors of mesenchymal origin that include several well-defined histologic subtypes. In 2015, the Transatlantic ...Australasian RPS Working Group (TARPSWG) published consensus recommendations for the best management of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). Since then, through international collaboration, new evidence and knowledge have been generated, creating the need for an updated consensus document.
Methods
The primary aim of this study was to critically evaluate the current evidence and develop an up-to-date consensus document on the approach to these difficult tumors. The resulting document applies to primary RPS that is non-visceral in origin, with exclusion criteria as previously described. The relevant literature was evaluated and an international group of experts consulted to formulate consensus statements regarding the best management of primary RPS. A level of evidence and grade of recommendation were attributed to each new/updated recommendation.
Results
Management of primary RPS was considered from diagnosis to follow-up. This rare and complex malignancy is best managed by an experienced multidisciplinary team in a specialized referral center. The best chance of cure is at the time of primary presentation, and an individualized management plan should be made based on the 29 consensus statements included in this article, which were agreed upon by all of the authors. Whenever possible, patients should be enrolled in prospective trials and studies.
Conclusions
Ongoing international collaboration is critical to expand upon current knowledge and further improve outcomes of patients with RPS. In addition, prospective data collection and participation in multi-institution trials are strongly encouraged.
Summary Background The current American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control (AJCC/UICC) staging system does not have sufficient details to encompass the variety of ...soft-tissue sarcomas, and available prognostic methods need refinement. We aimed to develop and externally validate two prediction nomograms for overall survival and distant metastases in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma in their extremities. Methods Consecutive patients who had had an operation at the Istituto Nazionale Tumori (Milan, Italy), from Jan 1, 1994, to Dec 31, 2013, formed the development cohort. Three cohorts of patient data from the Institut Gustave Roussy (Villejuif, France; from Jan 1, 1996, to May 15, 2012), Mount Sinai Hospital (Toronto, ON, Canada; from Jan 1, 1994, to Dec 31, 2013), and the Royal Marsden Hospital (London, UK; from Jan 1, 2006, to Dec 31, 2013) formed the external validation cohorts. We developed the nomogram for overall survival using a Cox multivariable model, and a Fine and Gray multivariable model for the distant metastases nomogram. We applied a backward procedure for variables selection for both nomograms. We assessed nomogram model performance by examining overall accuracy (Brier score), calibration (calibration plots and Hosmer–Lemeshow calibration test), and discrimination (Harrell C index). We plotted decision curves to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the two nomograms. Findings 1452 patients were included in the development cohort, with 420 patients included in the French validation cohort, 1436 patients in the Canadian validation cohort, and 444 patients in the UK validation cohort. In the development cohort, 10-year overall survival was 72·9% (95% CI 70·2–75·7) and 10-year crude cumulative incidence of distant metastases was 25·0% (95% CI 22·7–27·5). For the overall survival nomogram, the variables selected applying a backward procedure in the multivariable Cox model (patient's age, tumour size, Fédération Française des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer FNCLCC grade, and histological subtype) had a significant effect on overall survival. The same variables, except for patient age, were selected for the distant metastases nomogram. In the development cohort, the Harrell C index for overall survival was 0·767 (95% CI 0·743–0·789) and for distant metastases was 0·759 (0·736–0·781). In the validation cohorts, the Harrell C index for overall survival and distant metastases were 0·698 (0·638–0·754) and 0·652 (0·605–0·699; French), 0·775 (0·754–0·796) and 0·744 (0·720–0·768; Canadian), and 0·762 (0·720–0·806) and 0·749 (0·707–0·791; UK). The two nomograms both performed well in terms of discrimination (ability to distinguish between patients who have had an event from those who have not) and calibration (accuracy of nomogram prediction) when applied to the validation cohorts. Interpretation Our nomograms are reliable prognostic methods that can be used to predict overall survival and distant metastases in patients after surgical resection of soft-tissue sarcoma of the extremities. These nomograms can be offered to clinicians to improve their abilities to assess patient prognosis, strengthen the prognosis-based decision making, enhance patient stratification, and inform patients in the clinic. Funding None.
PURPOSE OF REVIEWChordoma is an exceedingly rare subtype of bone sarcoma. This review aims to provide a comprehensive insight into chordoma epidemiology, and an update on the recent advances in ...disease, biology and medical therapies.
RECENT FINDINGSThe incidence of chordoma is approximately 0.08/100 000 and the 5-year overall age-adjusted relative survival is 72% in the United States and 61% in Europe. Over the last years, significant steps forwards have been done in the comprehension of chordoma complexity, with insights gained into the biology and morphology of this disease. New entities have been described and potentially druggable molecular targets identified. This is becoming all the more relevant today, as new potentially active agents are under development.
SUMMARYChordoma is a complex disease because of its rarity, biological heterogeneity and peculiar clinical behaviour. Despite the progress done, the outcome in this disease remains unsatisfactory and the identification of active systemic treatments remains an urgent, unmet medical need.
To prospectively assess the behaviour of primary sporadic (not FAP associated) desmoid fibromatosis (DF) managed by active surveillance (AS).
This is an Italian prospective, multicenter, ...observational study (NCT02547831) including patients {greater than or equal to}16 years with primary sporadic DF at any site. Patients were assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) version 1.1 . Primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS) at 3 years. Treatment-free survival (TFS) was also analyzed. PFS and TFS were calculated by Kaplan-Meier plots and compared by log-rank test Cox proportional-hazard multivariable regression analyses were performed.
From 2013 to 2018 108 consecutive patients were included (82% female); median age was 39-yr; median size was 51 mm. CTNNB1 mutations were: T41A (50%); S45F (12%); other (19%); WT (19%). At 32.3-month median-FU, 42/108 (39%) showed RECIST progression. Spontaneous regression (SR) was initially observed in 27/108 (25%), while it followed dimensional progression in other 33/108 (31%). PFS at 36 months was 54.5% (95% CI, 44.9%-66.1%). Thirty-five/108 (32%) patients received active treatments, 18/108 (17%) after RECIST progression and 17/108 (15%) after symptomatic progression. TFS at 36 months was 65.9% (95% CI, 57.3%-75.9%). Larger tumor size and extremity location were associated to shorter TFS and a trend for S45F mutation was also observed (p=0.06), while none of the above variables was significantly associated to PFS.
In primary DF, AS can be proposed, since disease stabilization and SR frequently occur. However extra care should be taken for patients with tumors of larger size, extremity location and S45F mutation.
Background
The optimal treatment for advanced leiomyosarcoma is still debated. Given histotype‐specific prospective controlled data lacking, this study retrospectively evaluated doxorubicin plus ...dacarbazine, doxorubicin plus ifosfamide, and doxorubicin alone as first‐line treatments for advanced/metastatic leiomyosarcoma treated at European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (EORTC‐STBSG) sites.
Methods
The inclusion criteria were a confirmed histological diagnosis, treatment between January 2010 and December 2015, measurable disease (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1), an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2, and an age ≥ 18 years. The endpoints were progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and overall response rate (ORR). PFS was analyzed with methods for interval‐censored data. Patients were matched according to their propensity scores, which were estimated with a logistic regression model accounting for histology, grade, age, sex, performance status, tumor site, and tumor extent.
Results
Three hundred three patients from 18 EORTC‐STBSG sites were identified. One hundred seventeen (39%) received doxorubicin plus dacarbazine, 71 (23%) received doxorubicin plus ifosfamide, and 115 (38%) received doxorubicin. In the 2:1:2 propensity score–matched population (205 patients), the estimated median PFS was 9.2 months (95% confidence interval CI, 5.2‐9.7 months), 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.2‐10.1 months), and 4.8 months (95% CI, 2.3‐6.0 months) with ORRs of 30.9%, 19.5%, and 25.6% for doxorubicin plus dacarbazine, doxorubicin plus ifosfamide, and doxorubicin alone, respectively. PFS was significantly longer with doxorubicin plus dacarbazine versus doxorubicin (hazard ratio HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52‐0.99). Doxorubicin plus dacarbazine was associated with longer OS (median, 36.8 months; 95% CI, 27.9‐47.2 months) in comparison with both doxorubicin plus ifosfamide (median, 21.9 months; 95% CI, 16.7‐33.4 months; HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.40‐1.06) and doxorubicin (median, 30.3 months; 95% CI, 21.0‐36.3 months; HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.43‐0.99). Adjusted analyses retained an effect for PFS but not for OS. None of the factors selected for multivariate analysis had a significant interaction with the received treatment for both PFS and OS.
Conclusions
This is the largest retrospective study of first‐line treatment for advanced leiomyosarcoma. In the propensity score–matched population, doxorubicin and dacarbazine showed favorable activity in terms of both ORR and PFS and warrants further evaluation in prospective trials.
In this propensity score‐adjusted, multi‐institutional series, doxorubicin and dacarbazine show better outcomes for the first‐line treatment of advanced leiomyosarcoma and warrant further studies. This series represents a benchmark for the future development of trials for leiomyosarcoma.
Perivascular epitheliod cell tumors (PEComas) are rare mesenchymal neoplasms for which the role of systemic treatments is not established as there are no published prospective clinical trials or ...sufficiently large retrospective case series. The aim of this study is to clarify the activity of conventional chemotherapy and biological agents in advanced/metastatic PEComas.
This was an observational, retrospective, international study that included patients with advanced/metastatic PEComa treated with systemic therapy at 5 European sarcoma reference centers and within the Italian Rare Cancer Network. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox hazards regression models.
A total of 53 patients were included. Cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens were active only in a small proportion of PEComas. Gemcitabine-based regimens objective response rate (ORR): 20%, median progression-free survival (PFS): 3.4 months seemed to have the same activity of anthracycline-based regimens (ORR: 13%, median PFS: 3.2 months). Antiangiogenic agents resulted in disease stabilization in some patients, with a number having density changes/tissue response on imaging, with an ORR of 8.3% and a median PFS of 5.4 months. mTOR inhibitors were the most active agents, with an ORR of 41% and a median PFS of 9 months.
Our study provides data for the selection of systemic therapy in patients with advanced/metastatic PEComa: mTOR inhibitors are the most active agents. Antiangiogenics and chemotherapy with gemcitabine-based regimens or anthracycline-based regimens are options in further line, but with a lower response rate and PFS.
PDF
