Purpose
We aimed to assess the prognostic and predictive significance of pretreatment Onodera’s prognostic nutritional index (OPNI) in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC) treated ...with first-line chemotherapy.
Materials and methods
Patients with metastatic NSCLC who attended five different medical oncology clinics between December 2008 and January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The optimal cut-off point for OPNI was performed by a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Patients were assigned to either the low OPNI group or high OPNI group.
Results
A total of 333 patients were included in the study. Significant differences between the low and high OPNI groups were found regarding the rates of response to chemotherapy, sex, and hemoglobin level (
p
< 0.05). The patients in high OPNI group had a longer overall survival (OS) (15.3 vs. 10.6 months,
p
< 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (6.7 vs. 5.3 months,
p
< 0.001) compared to the patients in low OPNI group. A multivariate analysis using Cox regression model revealed that a high OPNI score was an independent prognostic factor of OS (HR = 1.535,
p
= 0.002) and PFS (HR = 1.336,
p
= 0.014), but failed to demonstrate a statistical significance of pretreatment OPNI scores in predicting treatment response (
p
= 0.56).
Conclusions
Pretreatment OPNI is an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS in metastatic NSCLC patients treated with first-line chemotherapy. Thus, it may be used as easily calculated and low-cost prognostic tool in the routine clinical practice in this patient group.
Mean platelet volume (MPV), the most commonly used measure of platelet size, and is altered in patients with malignancies. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of MPV on overall ...survival (OS) of patients with locally advanced (Stage IIIA/B) inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This retrospective study included patients who received concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with cisplatin + etoposide regimen due to locally advanced stage IIIA/B NSCLC. The study included a total of 115 cases, consisting of 110 (95.7%) male and 5 (4.2%) female patients. The mean age of the patients was 61.3 ± 10.4 (22-82) years. ROC curve generated by MPV for OS yielded an AUC of 0.746 (95% CI 0.659-0.833), (p < 0.001). MPV was detected as >9 fL with a sensitivity of 74.4% and a specificity of 72.0%. In patients with stage IIIA, median OS was 45.0 months (95% CI 17.3-74.1) and 21 months (95% CI 10.6-31.3) in groups with MPV > 9.0 fL and ≤9.0 fL, respectively (p = 0.013). In patients with stage IIIB, median OS was 44.0 months (95% CI 13.8-60.6) and 16 months (95% CI 9.5-22.4) in groups with MPV > 9.0 fL and ≤9.0 fL, respectively (p = 0.036). ECOG performance score, total platelet count, and MPV were found as the most significant independent factors affecting survival (p < 0.001, p = 0.008, and, p = 0.034, respectively). In this study, we showed that decreased pre-treatment MPV was an independent risk factor for survival in NSCLC patients who were administered CCRT. As part of routine complete blood count panel, MPV may represent one of the easiest measuring tools as an independent prognostic marker for survival in locally advanced NSCLC.
Background. The guidelines recommend considering the BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in female patients with breast carcinomas. In this retrospective study, the BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence in ...high-risk breast carcinoma patients in a Turkish population was investigated. Materials and Methods. In high genetic risk breast carcinoma patients, the BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations were identified by applying next-generation sequencing. Results. The results showed BRCA1/2 mutations in 19% of the total patients. In those with first-degree relatives with breast carcinoma histories, the BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence was also 19%. In the patients younger than 40 years old, the BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence was 19.5%. In the triple-negative breast carcinoma patients younger than 60 years old, the BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence was 24.2%. In the patients younger than 40 years old with triple-negative breast carcinomas, BRCA1/2 mutation positivity was found in 37.5% of the patients. Overall, in the Turkish population, the BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence ranges from 19% to 37% in patients with high-risk breast carcinomas. Conclusion. It is recommended to check for BRCA1/2 mutations in all high-risk breast carcinoma patients in the Turkish population.
The optimal treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) after the second line is still controversial. Regorafenib has been the standard of care in this setting as it improved overall survival ...(OS) compared to placebo. In real-world practice chemotherapy rechallenge is also a preferred option even though supporting evidence is not enough. We aim to compare the efficacy of regorafenib and 5-fluorouracil-based (5-FU) rechallenge treatment in the third line setting of mCRC.
In this retrospective multi-institutional trial, mCRC patients from 21 oncology centers who progressed after 2 lines of chemotherapy were analyzed. Patients who were treated with regorafenib or rechallenge therapy in the third-line setting were eligible. Rechallenge chemotherapy was identified as the re-use of the 5-FU based regimen which was administered in one of the previous treatment lines. OS, disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS) and toxicity were analyzed.
Three hundred ninety-four mCRC patients were included in the study. 128 (32.5%) were in the rechallenge, and 266 (67.5%) were in the regorafenib group. Median PFS was 5.82 months in rechallenge and 4 months in regorafenib arms (hazard ratio:1.45,95% CI, p = 0.167). DCR was higher in the rechallenge group than regorafenib (77% vs 49.5%, respectively, p = < 0.001). Median OS after the third-line treatment was 11.99 (95% CI, 9.49-14.49) and 8.08 months (95% CI, 6.88-9.29) for rechallenge and regorafenib groups, respectively (hazard ratio:1.51, 95% CI, p < 0.001). More adverse effects and discontinuation were seen with regorafenib treatment.
Our study revealed that higher disease control and OS rates were achieved with rechallenge treatment compared to regorafenib, especially in patients who achieved disease control in one of the first two lines of therapy.
Celotno besedilo
Dostopno za:
DOBA, IZUM, KILJ, NUK, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, SIK, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
Based on the CheckMate 649 trial, nivolumab plus chemotherapy is the recommended first-line treatment for HER2-negative unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric, gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), ...or esophageal adenocarcinoma. This nationwide, multicenter, retrospective study evaluated the real-world effectiveness of this regimen in Turkish patients and identified subgroups that may experience superior outcomes. Conducted across 16 oncology centers in Turkey, this study retrospectively reviewed the clinical charts of adult patients diagnosed with HER2-negative unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric, GEJ, or esophageal adenocarcinoma from 2016 to 2023. This study included 111 patients (54 women, 57 men) with a median age of 58 years. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 11.7 months and 18.2 months, respectively, whereas the objective response rate (ORR) was 70.3%. Multivariable analyses revealed that previous curative surgery was a favorable independent prognostic factor for both PFS and OS. Conversely, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 emerged as an adverse independent prognostic factor for OS. The safety profile of nivolumab plus chemotherapy was found to be manageable. Our findings support the use of nivolumab plus chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of Turkish patients with HER2-negative unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric, GEJ, or esophageal adenocarcinoma. Patient selection based on clinical characteristics is crucial for optimizing treatment outcomes.
Objective: We aimed to investigate the factors affecting the complete response (CR) rate and the effect of treatment response on survival in patients with extensive stage-small cell lung cancer ...(ES-SCLC) who received a combination of cisplatin and etoposide as first-line therapy. Method: This retrospective analysis included 140 ES-SCLC patients, who were followed in an oncology clinic. Patients were divided into two groups as CR and non-CR according to radiological evaluation after first line chemotherapy. Clinical and demographic characteristics and pre-treatment hemogram parameters were obtained from electronic medical record system. Results: While CR was seen in 34 (24.3%) of all patients after the first line chemotherapy, 106 (75.7%) patients were in the non-CR group. On univariate analysis, predictors for CR to treatment were the absence of brain metastasis, receiving 6 chemotherapy cycles and good performance status (p<0.001; p=0.020; p=0.001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, the absence of brain metastasis and good performance status were independent predictive factors for CR (p=0.033; p=0.019, respectively). Better treatment response rate to first-line chemotherapy was found to be associated with improved disease-free survival, and overall survival (log-rank p<0.001; log-rank p<0.001, respectively). Conclusion: Good performance status and the absence of brain metastases were identified as independent predictive factors for CR in ES-SCLC patients at the time of diagnosis. Patients who achieved CR had a significantly longer survival rate than patients with lower treatment response.
Purpose
The aim of this study is to investigate the prognostic effect of tumor regression grade (TRG) on long-term survival in locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative ...chemoradiotherapy.
Methods
Medical records of 182 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, who were treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery between 2002 and 2016, were retrospectively reviewed. TRG was classified into five categories based on the pathological response as follows – TRG1: no viable cancer cell, TRG2: single cancer cell or small groups of cancer cells, TRG3: residual tumor outgrown by fibrosis, TRG4: residual tumor outgrowing fibrosis, TRG5: diffuse residual tumor without regression. TRG1, (TRG2+TRG3), and (TRG4+TRG5) were grouped as complete response, intermediate response, and no response, respectively.
Results
Of the 182 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, 112 (61.5%) were male. The mean age was 54.4 (range, 25–87) years. The total number of patients in complete response, intermediate response, and no response group was 24 (13.2%), 105 (57.7%), and 53 (29.1%), respectively. The corresponding five-year relapse-free survival and overall survival rates were 79.8%–92.3%, 74.7%–79.4%, and 55.7%–55.8%, respectively (p < 0.05 for relapse-free survival, p < 0.05 for overall survival). According to ypTNM stage, there was no significant difference in relapse-free survival among TRG groups in ypStage I and II patients (p > 0.05). In ypStage III patients, relapse-free survival was 62 months in no response group vs. not reached in intermediate response group (p < 0.05). According to the ypTNM, there was no significant difference in overall survival among TRG groups in ypStage I, II, and III patients (p > 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, pathological complete response was found to be an independent variable for relapse-free survival and overall survival (hazard ratio (95% confidence interval), 0.34 (0.17–6.77), 0.39 (0.18–0.83), respectively).
Conclusion
This study showed that patients with pathological complete response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy had longer relapse-free survival and overall survival rates than those with residual disease.
OBJECTIVEThis study aims to investigate the factors affecting survival in operated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and the possible prognostic effect of primary tumor localization on ...treatment outcomes. METHODSIn this study, 98 patients with curatively-operated PDAC, who were followed up and treated for the years 2008 through 2018, were enrolled. Metastatic and locally advanced stages and patients under 18 years of age were excluded from this study. Patients were divided into two groups based on the primary tumor localization as *head or *body/tail. RESULTSSixty-seven (68.3%) patients were male and 31 (31.7%) were female, with a median age of 62 years (range, 35-82 years). The numbers of patients with a primary tumor located in *head vs.*body/tail were 74 (75.4%) vs. 24 (24.6%), respectively. Patients with a primary tumor located in *head vs.*body/tail; median disease-free survival was 16.0 months vs. 13 months (p=0.972), respectively, with corresponding median overall survival was 25 months vs. 33 months (p=0.698). The level of carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA) at diagnosis (Hazard ratioHR, 1.09 95%CI, 1.01-1.18), stage III disease (HR, 2.09 95%CI, 1.16-4.35), and receiving adjuvant treatment (HR, 0.20 95%CI, 0.09-4.34) were the independent predictors of survival. CONCLUSIONOur study revealed that high levels of CEA at diagnosis and stage III disease adversely affected the survival in non-metastatic PDAC patients, while receiving adjuvant therapy had a positive effect on survival. The findings suggest that primary tumor localization did not affect survival in operated PC patients. The results on this issue are still inconsistent and under debate in the literature.