Introduction
Rapid improvement of psoriasis is valued by patients and should be considered to be an important factor in treatment selection. We investigated Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) ...and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) response rates within the first 12 weeks of treatment to compare the rapid response of 11 biologic therapies for moderate-to-severe psoriasis using Bayesian and Frequentist network meta-analyses (NMA).
Methods
A systematic literature review was conducted to identify phase 3, double-blind, randomized, controlled trials for adult patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with interleukin (IL)-17 (brodalumab, ixekizumab, secukinumab), IL-12/-23 (ustekinumab), IL-23 (guselkumab, risankizumab, tildrakizumab), or tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, infliximab). Outcome measures extracted from 32 publications were ≥ 75, ≥ 90, or 100% improvement in PASI score (PASI 75, PASI 90, or PASI 100, respectively) at weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 and DLQI (0,1), where score (0,1) indicates no effect on patient's life, at week 12. Bayesian NMA (BNMA) used fixed-treatment effect and random-baseline effect, normal independent models. Frequentist NMA (fNMA) was conducted as sensitivity analyses to test the robustness of the findings.
Results
Based on BNMA and fNMA, brodalumab and ixekizumab showed the most rapid treatment effects on PASI 75 at weeks 2, 4, and 8 and on PASI 90 and PASI 100 at weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12; ixekizumab overlapped with risankizumab on PASI 75 at week 12. Brodalumab, ixekizumab, and secukinumab yielded higher DLQI (0,1) gains at week 12 compared to all of the other biologics studied. Additional measures of quality of life were not assessed in this report.
Conclusions
Ixekizumab and brodalumab provide the most rapid response and earliest clinical benefit at week 2 among all of the biologics studied, including other biologic treatments such as secukinumab, ustekinumab, guselkumab, adalimumab, and etanercept. BNMA and fNMA results showed similar relative effect estimates and treatment rankings.
Funding
Eli Lilly and Company.
BACKGROUNDAvailable network meta-analyses (NMAs) comparing the efficacy of biologics in nail psoriasis (NP) have not included recently approved biologics such as bimekizumab nor have they provided ...comparisons up to 1 year. OBJECTIVEWe conducted two NMAs that update and extend results from a previous NMA comparing biologics for achieving complete resolution of NP. METHODSBayesian NMAs were performed using a generalized linear model with a logit link to model the binary outcome of nail clearance at weeks 24-28 and 48-52. RESULTSFor the NMA at weeks 24-28, which included seven biologics and placebo, the absolute probability of achieving complete resolution of NP was highest for ixekizumab (46.4%; 95% credibility interval CrI 35.2-58.0), followed by brodalumab (37.1%; 95% CrI 17.1-62.2) and bimekizumab (30.3%; 95% CrI 12.7-53.9). For the NMA at weeks 48-52, which included six biologics, the absolute probability was highest for ixekizumab (77.2%; 95% CrI 51.1-93.4), followed by adalimumab (75.6%; 95% CrI 61.5-87.3) and brodalumab (71.9%; 95% CrI 38.4-93.2). CONCLUSIONAmong biologics included in these two NMAs, ixekizumab has the highest absolute probability of achieving complete resolution of NP. Results may help to inform treatment decisions for patients with NP.
Celotno besedilo
Dostopno za:
DOBA, IZUM, KILJ, NUK, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
Introduction
Biologics used to treat moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis may cause injection site reactions (ISRs) characterized by erythema, edema, itch, and sometimes pain. The Federal Adverse ...Event Reporting System (FAERS) is a repository of spontaneous post-marketing reports of adverse events (AEs) that are reported to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Our objective was to perform a pharmacovigilance analysis of FAERS reports of ISRs associated with the use of subcutaneously administered biologic products approved to treat moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.
Methods
The products included in our assessment were adalimumab, etanercept, ixekizumab, secukinumab, and ustekinumab. Reports from the date of US approval for each biologic as treatment for plaque psoriasis through 2 years were included using the search term “injection site.”
Results
The results show that the FAERS database contained reports of ISRs for all of the included biologics during the 2 years following FDA approval. The most common reports on ISRs were on pain, irritation, and erythema for adalimumab; reaction, pain, and erythema for etanercept; erythema, pain, and reaction for ixekizumab; bruising, pain, hemorrhage for secukinumab; and pain, induration, and swelling for ustekinumab. FAERS does not include data on total patient exposure; therefore, ISR rates could not be calculated.
Conclusions
Specific ISRs varied among the biologic therapies assessed. The findings presented could be helpful when patients consider switching therapies due to ISRs.
Funding
Eli Lilly and Company.
Introduction
Ixekizumab, a high-affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin-17A, is approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Since scalp psoriasis can ...be burdensome and challenging to treat with non-systemic therapies, this post hoc analysis focused on scalp psoriasis in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and baseline scalp involvement. The analysis considered a holistic concept of clearance through 5 years of ixekizumab treatment.
Methods
Ixekizumab-treated patients with baseline scalp involvement were pooled from three multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials (integrated UNCOVER-1/2 and UNCOVER-3). Analyses were performed on a subpopulation of patients who achieved complete resolution of scalp psoriasis at Week 60 (i.e., Week 60 Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index PSSI-0 responders) and on the overall patient population (i.e., Week 60 PSSI-0 responders and non-responders), which was used as a reference. Clinical outcomes (PSSI), patient-reported outcomes (Itch Numeric Rating Scale NRS score, Skin Pain Visual Analogue Scale VAS), quality of life (Dermatology Life Quality Index DLQI), and concurrent outcomes were assessed from baseline through 5 years. Descriptive statistics of observed data were reported.
Results
After 60 weeks of ixekizumab treatment, 88.4% (UNCOVER-1/2) and 75.9% (UNCOVER-3) of patients with baseline scalp involvement achieved complete clearance (PSSI-0) of scalp psoriasis. Substantial improvements in the clinical outcomes (PSSI), patient-reported outcomes (Itch NRS, Skin Pain VAS), and quality of life (DLQI) were achieved by Week 60 and sustained through Week 264 in the Week 60 PSSI-0 responders and in the overall patient population. Additionally, a significant proportion of Week 60 PSSI-0 responders achieved concurrent complete scalp and skin clearance and quality of life improvement through 5 years.
Conclusions
Continued treatment with ixekizumab provided long-term sustained scalp clearance over 5 years to patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and baseline scalp involvement, and holistic improvements occurred across clinical outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, and quality of life.
Clinical Trial Numbers
NCT01474512 (UNCOVER-1), NCT01597245 (UNCOVER-2), and NCT01646177 (UNCOVER-3).
Introduction
When assessing the effect of a therapy for psoriasis (PsO), it is important to consider speed of response and cumulative response. However, responses among biologics may differ by body ...regions. This post hoc analysis compares speed of response and cumulative response for ixekizumab (IXE), an interleukin-17A antagonist, and guselkumab (GUS), an interleukin-23p19 inhibitor, in different body regions of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque PsO participating in the IXORA-R study, up to week 24.
Methods
The IXORA-R design has been previously described. Patients received the respective on-label dosing of IXE or GUS. The median time to first Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 50, 75, 90, and 100 response (50%, 75%, 90%, and 100% improvement from baseline, respectively) and the cumulative days with clear skin for PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100 responses were assessed in four body regions: head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities.
Results
A total of 1027 patients were enrolled and received IXE (
N
= 520) or GUS (
N
= 507). Median time to first PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100 response was shortest in the head region, followed by the remaining body regions in both IXE and GUS cohorts. In each body region, IXE was significantly faster than GUS (
p
< 0.001) in achieving PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100. Through 24 weeks, the number of days with clear skin for PASI 90 and 100 was greater in the head region, followed by trunk, upper extremities, and lastly lower extremities in both IXE and GUS cohorts. In each body region, through 24 weeks, patients on IXE experienced a significantly higher number of days with clear skin for PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100 than patients on GUS (
p
< 0.01).
Conclusions
As compared to GUS, IXE provided a faster skin clearance and more days with clear skin in all body regions of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque PsO through 24 weeks.
Trial Registration Number
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/
: NCT03573323 (IXORA-R).
Plain Language Summary
Psoriasis, a long-term, inflammatory skin disease, impacts patient’s lives, and response to treatment varies depending on the body region affected. Here, we assessed the speed of response and cumulative response through 24 weeks in different body regions (head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities) of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis treated with currently approved therapies: ixekizumab (IXE), an interleukin-17A antagonist, or guselkumab (GUS), an interleukin-23p19 inhibitor. We calculated the speed of response as the number of weeks to achieve first skin clearance, based on the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) tool, and the cumulative response as the number of days with clear skin throughout the 24-week period. We found that the head region achieved skin clearance fastest and had a higher number of days with clear skin compared to the trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities, in both groups of patients treated with IXE or GUS. Compared to GUS, IXE provided faster skin clearance and a higher number of days with clear skin in all body regions. For example, the head region of patients treated with IXE, as compared to GUS, achieved complete skin clearance twofold faster and experienced 18.7% more days of complete skin clearance. In conclusion, treatment with IXE through 24 weeks provided a faster response and a higher cumulative response than treatment with GUS in all four body regions of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.
Background
People with genital psoriasis may avoid close social interactions (hugs, handshakes, kisses, touching others, or being touched), which can have a significant impact on quality of life. ...Ixekizumab, an interleukin 17A antagonist, demonstrated rapid and persistent improvement in moderate‐to‐severe genital psoriasis through 52 weeks in a phase 3 trial (IXORA‐Q).
Objectives
To evaluate general touch avoidance (TA) in patients with moderate‐to‐severe genital psoriasis treated with ixekizumab through 52 weeks in the IXORA‐Q trial.
Methods
In IXORA‐Q (NCT02718898), adult patients received 80 mg ixekizumab every 2 weeks (IXE Q2W, N = 75) or placebo (PBO, N = 74) for 12 weeks. At Week 12, all patients received open‐label 80 mg ixekizumab every 4 weeks (IXE Q4W) through Week 52, with an opportunity to escalate dosing to Q2W at Weeks 24, 28, or 40. Patients used a numeric rating scale (NRS) to self‐report the degree of TA experienced over the past 2 weeks (score of 0 not at all to 10 very much). Outcomes included TA NRS score change from baseline and the proportion of patients achieving a TA NRS score of 0 through Week 52. Correlations between TA NRS scores and psoriasis outcomes were also examined.
Results
Mean (standard deviation) baseline TA NRS score was 2.7 (3.3) for IXE Q2W and 3.0 (3.5) for PBO. Among patients with a baseline TA NRS score >0, mean (standard deviation) change from baseline at Week 52 (where a lower score indicates greater improvement) and the proportion of patients who achieved a TA NRS score of 0 at Week 52 were −4.4 (3.2) 78.0% for patients treated continuously with ixekizumab (Q2W then Q4W, N = 41) and −4.1 (3.6) 62.5% for PBO/IXE Q4W (N = 40). TA NRS score improved in parallel with the majority of psoriasis outcomes examined, with the strongest positive association between the TA NRS score and Dermatology Life Quality Index total score.
Conclusions
Among patients with moderate‐to‐severe genital psoriasis, ixekizumab treatment achieves continued sustained improvement in general TA to 52 weeks.
Ixekizumab is a high-affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin-17 A.
Examine the efficacy of ixekizumab in clearing psoriasis within different body regions.
Data from 3 ...placebo- (PBO) or PBO- and etanercept (ETN)-controlled trials were integrated. Patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis were randomized to 12 weeks of PBO (UNCOVER-1, -2, -3, N = 792; UNCOVER-2, -3, N = 361), 50 mg ETN twice weekly (N = 740), or 80 mg ixekizumab every 2 (IXE Q2W; N = 1169; N = 736) or 4 weeks (IXE Q4W; N = 1165; N = 733) after a 160-mg starting dose.
Mean percent improvements in regional Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) were noted at Week 1 and increased through Week 12 in the IXE Q2W (approved dosing regimen) group for each body region. Week 12 improvements were 91.4% (head/neck); 92.8% (trunk); 89.9% (arms); and 88.7% (legs) (all regions p < .001 vs. PBO). Mean regional PASI improvements at Week 12 were ≥84.2% for ixekizumab versus ≤70.9% for ETN in all regions (p < .001). Scaling and thickness reduced faster than erythema.
Within 12 weeks of ixekizumab treatment, all signs of psoriasis across all body regions reached clinically meaningful improvements, with the head/neck and trunk responding quicker than psoriasis of the arms and legs, especially with reduced scaling and thickness.
Celotno besedilo
Dostopno za:
DOBA, IZUM, KILJ, NUK, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
Introduction
The National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) recommends evaluating patient response to treatment at week 12, with a target response of ≤ 1% body surface area (BSA) affected by plaque ...psoriasis and an acceptable response of BSA ≤ 3% or ≥ 75% improvement. This post hoc analysis compared the achievement of NPF target and acceptable responses for ixekizumab (IXE) versus other biologics.
Methods
Outcomes were evaluated at week 12 for patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis from four head-to-head randomized clinical trials (RCTs; UNCOVER-2, UNCOVER-3, IXORA-R, and IXORA-S) and one real-world prospective observational study (Psoriasis Study of Health Outcomes; PSoHO). RCT patients were treated with IXE or etanercept (ETN; UNCOVER-2/3), guselkumab (GUS; IXORA-R), or ustekinumab (UST; IXORA-S). PSoHO patients were treated with anti-interleukin (IL)-17A biologics (IXE, secukinumab, SEC) and other approved biologics for the treatment of plaque psoriasis. Patients with missing outcomes were imputed as non-responder imputation. For RCT data, statistical comparisons between treatment groups were performed using Fisher’s exact test with no multiplicity adjustments. For real-world data, adjusted comparative analyses were performed using frequentist model averaging (FMA) and reported as odds ratio (OR).
Results
Across the four head-to-head clinical trials analyzed, significantly higher proportions of patients achieved target and acceptable responses at week 12 with IXE versus ETN, GUS, or UST. Likewise, the proportion of PSoHO patients achieving target and acceptable response at week 12 was higher with IXE compared with other individual biologics. Adjusted comparative analyses showed that IXE had significantly greater odds of target and acceptable response at week 12 versus SEC, GUS, risankizumab (RIS), adalimumab (ADA), UST, and tildrakizumab (TILD) and numerically greater odds of target and acceptable response at week 12 versus brodalumab (BROD).
Conclusion
Across both clinical studies and real-world settings, more patients treated with IXE achieved NPF target and acceptable responses at week 12 compared with those treated with other biologics.
Trial Registration
UNCOVER-2 (NCT01597245); UNCOVER-3 (NCT01646177); IXORA-R (NCT03573323); IXORA-S (NCT02561806); PSoHO (EUPAS24207).
This post-hoc analysis studied the effect of baseline glucocorticoid dose on the 18-month bone mineral density (BMD) response to teriparatide 20 microg/day or alendronate 10 mg/day in 387 patients ...with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO) from a randomized, double-blind trial.
Lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN), and total hip (TH) BMD were measured at baseline and 18 months. Mean baseline glucocorticoid dose was categorized as low (< or = 5 mg/day), medium (> 5 and < 15 mg/day), or high (> or = 15 mg/day).
Baseline LS, FN, and TH BMD were similar between groups, and between glucocorticoid dose categories within each group. LS BMD increases at the low, medium, and high glucocorticoid doses were 8.1%, 6.6%, and 4.6%, respectively, with teriparatide, and 3.6%, 2.8%, and 2.3% with alendronate. Analyzed as a continuous variable, higher glucocorticoid doses had a negative, but non-significant, effect on the percentage increase in LS BMD in both groups. Glucocorticoid dose did not significantly affect FN or TH BMD increases in either group. Across the 3 glucocorticoid dose categories, the overall LS BMD increases were different for both treatments combined (p = 0.033), but the relative differences between the treatment groups were not different (interaction, p = 0.52).
Teriparatide and alendronate increased LS and hip BMD across a range of baseline glucocorticoid doses. LS BMD increases with teriparatide were greater in the low-dose category than in the high-dose category. Overall LS BMD increases were significantly greater with teriparatide compared with alendronate, which may reflect the respective anabolic and antiresorptive mechanisms of action. Clinical Trial Registry Number: NCT00051558.
PDF
