Abstract
Background
Appropriate and timely anticoagulant therapy with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or non-vitamin K oral antagonists (NOACs) is essential for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial ...fibrillation (NVAF). Comparative data regarding effectiveness and safety for edoxaban vs phenprocoumon, the predominant VKA in Germany, are scarce.
Objectives
The study evaluates effectiveness and safety of edoxaban vs phenprocoumon in NVAF patients in a German real-world setting.
Methods
German statutory health insurance claims data of the Institute for Applied Health Research Berlin (InGef) Research Database from 2014 until 2019 were analyzed. In NVAF patients, new users of edoxaban and phenprocoumon were compared to assess effectiveness (stroke/systemic embolism (SE)) and safety (bleeding) during therapy. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated through multiple outcome-specific cox proportional hazard models adjusting for baseline characteristics. Outcomes of geriatric patients were analyzed in subgroup analyses.
Results
Between 2015 and 2018, 7,975 and 13,319 NVAF patients newly initiated treatment with edoxaban or phenprocoumon. After adjusting for baseline confounders, the risk of stroke/SE (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.70–1.02) was numerically but not significantly lower, while the risk of major bleeding (HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.58–0.81) was significantly lower for edoxaban. In the geriatric subgroups, homogenous results compared to the main analysis were obtained.
Conclusion
The results of this real-world analysis indicated better effectiveness and safety outcomes in patients with NVAF initiating edoxaban treatment compared to phenprocoumon. The findings confirm that the beneficial effects observed in the pivotal ENGAGE AF-TMI 48 trial can also be achieved in real-world use of edoxaban.
•PCV recommendations differ for mature (2 + 1) and premature (3 + 1) infants.•In cohort 2018, only 47 % of premature but 77 % of mature infants obtained full PCV.•49 % of premature and 15 % of mature ...infants did not receive a booster dose.•5 % (premature) and 9 % (mature) remained unvaccinated and PCV was often delayed.•Higher acceptance of the reduced PCV schedule for mature infants is not proven.
In August 2015, the German Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) changed the pneumococcal conjugate vaccination (PCV) schedule for mature infants from a 3+1 to a 2+1scheme. For premature infants, the 3+1schedule remained unchanged. Aim was to assess vaccination rates, completeness, and timeliness for PCV stratified by premature and mature infants before and after the recommendation change based on real-world data.
Retrospective claims data analyses were conducted using a comprehensive research database. The study population consisted of all mature and premature infants born in 2013, 2016, or 2018 with an individual follow-up of 24 months using ICD-10-GM codes P07.2 and P07.3 for premature infants. Hexavalent (HEXA) combination vaccination with a consistent 3+1recommendation for premature and mature infants was analyzed as a reference.
After follow-up of 24 months, rates of premature and mature infants receiving ≥1PCV and HEXA vaccination steadily increased since the change of STIKO’s recommendation. However, in 2018 (2016/2013), only 47 % (41 %/65 %) of premature but 74 % (72 %/68 %) of mature infants obtained the recommended 3+1 respectively 2+1 PCV doses. At the same age, a consistent increase in complete HEXA vaccination with 3+1 doses was observed over time in premature (2013/2016/2018: 66 %/68 %/70 %) and mature (2013/2016/2018: 69 %/72 %/73 %) infants. Timeliness of PCV and HEXA booster administration remained stable with ∼50 % of all premature and mature infants receiving the booster according to recommended timelines.
There is no proven evidence that the reduced PCV schedule for mature infants induced a higher acceptance of vaccination. The rate of unvaccinated infants remained at a considerable level and vaccinations were often delayed. Although the STIKO still recommends a 3+1 PCV schedule for premature infants in Germany, less than half of children showed a completed vaccination series. To protect these vulnerable groups, efforts are needed to increase adherence to the STIKO recommendation especially for premature infants.
•STIKO changed PCV recommendation (mature infants) from 3+1 to 2+1 scheme in 2015.•Almost 10% of children remained unvaccinated in 2013 and 2016.•The rate of the booster dose increased slightly ...(birth cohort 2013 vs 2016).•Nearly 25% of the infants born in 2016 did not receive a booster dose.•The PCV booster dose was administered on time in less than half of infants in 2016.
In August 2015, the German Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) changed the pneumococcal conjugate vaccination (PCV) schedule for mature infants from a 3+1 scheme to a 2+1 scheme. It was expected that a reduction of doses would be associated with a higher acceptance of the vaccination. Aim of this study was to assess vaccination rates and adherence for PCV after the change of recommendation based on real-world data.
A retrospective claims data analysis using the InGef Research Database was conducted. The study population consisted of all mature infants born in 2013 (last birth cohort completely under 3+1 recommendation) or 2016 (first birth cohort completely under 2+1 recommendation) with an individual follow-up of 24 months. Hexavalent combination vaccination (HEXA) with a consistent 3+1 recommendation was analyzed as reference.
After follow-up of 24 months, 90.9% (91.2%) of the 2016 (2013) cohort received at least one dose of PCV. At the same age, 67.7% of the 2013 cohort received a booster dose according to the 3+1 schedule and 75.6% of the 2016 cohort received a booster dose presumably either according to the 2+1 (71.7%) or 3+1 (3.9%) schedule. Of those receiving the booster dose, only 46.3% (2016) and 45.1% (2013) received the booster dose on time as recommended. The HEXA vaccination rate increased from 88.9% (2013) to 91.6% (2016) with a full series completion in 69.1% (2013) vs 72.9% (2016). The proportion of infants receiving the booster vaccination on time rose to 50.0% in 2016 (47.8% in 2013).
Although the rate for the PCV booster dose slightly increased, nearly a quarter of the infants born in 2016 did not receive a booster dose at all. Furthermore, vaccinations were still frequently delayed, and the rate of unvaccinated infants remained constant.
•In 2015, STIKO changed PCV recommendation for mature infants to a 2+1scheme.•For premature infants, the 3+1 scheme remained unchanged.•Comparing birth cohorts 2013 and 2016, less premature infants ...received full PCV.•Regarding birth cohort 2016, 60% of premature infants did not receive a PCV booster.•Almost 6% of premature infants remained unvaccinated.
In 2015, the German Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) changed the pneumococcal conjugate vaccination (PCV) schedule for mature infants from a 3+1scheme (2, 3, 4, and 11–14 months of age) to a 2+1scheme (2, 4, and 11–14 months of age). For premature infants, the 3+1scheme remained. The aim of this study was to assess vaccination rates, completeness, and timeliness for PCV in premature infants before and after the modified recommendation.
A retrospective claims data analysis using the “Institut für angewandte Gesundheitsforschung Berlin” Research Database was conducted. Premature infants born in 2013 and 2016 with an individual follow-up of 24 months were included. Hexavalent combination (HEXA) vaccination with a consistent 3+1recommendation for mature and premature infants was analyzed as reference vaccination.
After 24 months, the PCV rate for at least one dose remained stable in premature newborns of 2016 compared to 2013, while the HEXA vaccination rate increased slightly. However, a significant decrease of a completed PCV schedule (4 doses) in premature infants was noted, whereas the completeness of HEXA vaccination did not change. The timeliness of PCV in premature newborns increased for the first and the booster PCV, while the timeliness of HEXA immunization did not change from 2013 to 2016.
Although STIKO still recommends a 3+1PCV schedule for premature infants in Germany, premature infants were vaccinated according to the changed recommendations for mature born infants. A substantial share of premature infants remained unvaccinated, and their vaccinations were often delayed.
Despite migraine being one of the most common neurological diseases, affected patients are often not effectively treated. This analysis describes the burden of migraine in Germany and assesses ...real-world treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) of preventive-treated migraine patients from the perspective of Statutory Health Insurance.
A retrospective analysis was conducted using InGef Research Database claims data from 2018-2019. Migraine patients were stratified into cohorts by acute and preventive treatment status. Patients on preventive treatment were further stratified according to the type of prophylaxis received. Disease burden in preventively treated migraine patients was reported via treatment patterns, pathways, and comorbidities. HCRU was assessed through outpatient provider visits, hospitalizations, and sick leave.
160,164 adult migraine patients were identified, of which 55,378 (34.6%) were prescribed preventive treatment with conventional (n = 25,984, 46.9%), calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody (CGRP mAb) (n = 613, 1.1%), or off-label therapies (n = 28,781, 52.0%). 936 (1.7%) patients received Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A (BoNTA). CGRP mAb-treated patients had a high rate of triptan prescriptions (2018: 95.5%; 2019: 88.9%), migraine-related hospitalizations (2018: 33.0%; 2019: 21.0%), and sick leave (2018: 26.8%; 2019: 22.5%). A high proportion of CGRP mAb- and BoNTA-treated patients was diagnosed with abdominal and pelvic pain (34.3% and 36.2%) and low back pain (34.1% and 35.3%). These patients also showed a high prevalence of depressive episodes (49.1% and 50.1%) and chronic pain disorders (37.5% and 32.9%).
This study focused on descriptive analyses which do not allow for assessment of causality when comparing treatment groups.
Disease burden was high in patients receiving CGRP mAbs suggesting that patients treated preventively with CGRP mAbs shortly after product launch in Germany were severely affected, chronic migraine patients. The same may be true for patients receiving BoNTA who also showed an increased disease burden.
•Combined BRAF/MEK inhibition shows high response rates in relapsed refractory multiple myeloma with activating BRAF mutations.•RAS mutations and structural variants involving the BRAF locus may ...drive resistance to therapy.
Display omitted
Activating BRAF mutations are found in a small subset of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, but prevalence increases in late-stage, refractory disease, and the mutations are associated with adverse outcome. This prospective single-arm, open-label, multicenter phase 2 trial assessed the efficacy and safety of combined BRAF/MEK inhibition, using encorafenib and binimetinib, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) carrying a BRAFV600E mutation. Patients received 450 mg encorafenib once daily and binimetinib 45 mg twice daily. The primary end point was the overall response rate achieved within the first year after start of treatment according to International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Twelve RRMM patients with a median of 5 prior lines of therapy were enrolled. The overall response rate was 83.3%, with 10 patients achieving at least a partial response. The median progression-free survival was 5.6 months, and overall survival was 55% at 24 months. Emerging resistance to therapy was driven by RAS mutations and structural variants involving the BRAF locus. This is the first prospective clinical trial to demonstrate that combined BRAF/MEK inhibition is highly effective in patients with BRAFV600E-mutated RRMM, and it represents a successful targeted precision medicine approach in this disease. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02834364.
Abstract
Activating BRAF mutations are found in a small subset of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, but prevalence increases in late-stage, refractory disease, and the mutations are ...associated with adverse outcome. This prospective single-arm, open-label, multicenter phase 2 trial assessed the efficacy and safety of combined BRAF/MEK inhibition, using encorafenib and binimetinib, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) carrying a BRAFV600E mutation. Patients received 450 mg encorafenib once daily and binimetinib 45 mg twice daily. The primary end point was the overall response rate achieved within the first year after start of treatment according to International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Twelve RRMM patients with a median of 5 prior lines of therapy were enrolled. The overall response rate was 83.3%, with 10 patients achieving at least a partial response. The median progression-free survival was 5.6 months, and overall survival was 55% at 24 months. Emerging resistance to therapy was driven by RAS mutations and structural variants involving the BRAF locus. This is the first prospective clinical trial to demonstrate that combined BRAF/MEK inhibition is highly effective in patients with BRAFV600E-mutated RRMM, and it represents a successful targeted precision medicine approach in this disease. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02834364.
Introduction: The treatment of patients (pts) with rrMM remains challenging and response is often limited in depth and duration. In contrast to many other malignant diseases, targeted therapy in MM ...is hampered by the limited number of actionable targets. Activating mutations of BRAF have been found in 2-4% of newly diagnosed MM and in up to 8% of rrMM. Several case reports have reported clinical efficacy of downstream pathway inhibition in MM. This phase II trial is evaluating the safety and efficacy of combined BRAF/MEK inhibition in rrMM pts with BRAF V600E mutation.
Aims: The primary objective of this study was to demonstrate the therapeutic efficacy of encorafenib in combination with binimetinib. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR), defined as best response within 1 year of treatment. Main secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and duration of response. Safety analyses included all adverse events (AEs) with those of grade 1/2 only being assessed further if considered to be related to study medications by the investigator.
Methods: A total of 15 pts with rrMM who have failed at least 2 prior lines of therapy, including a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and an immunomodulatory drug (IMID), were planned to be enrolled in this open-label phase II multicenter trial. Key inclusion criteria were presence of a BRAF V600E/K mutation confirmed by both mutation-specific immunohistochemistry (IHC) and next-generation sequencing in more than 50% of MM cells. Exclusion criteria included plasma cell leukemia, CNS involvement, cardiac dysfunction, or a history of retinal vein occlusion. Pts received encorafenib 450mg p.o. daily and binimetinib 45mg p.o. twice daily. Responses were assessed using IMWG 2016 criteria. The primary endpoint was analyzed by testing the one-sided null hypothesis of ORR <= 20% using a one-sided binomial test at a significance level of 5%. Exploratory biomarker assessments include cytogenetics, genomic analysis (WGS, RNAseq) and phospho-IHC.
Results: As of July 2020, 12 pts have been enrolled and were evaluable for safety and 11 pts were evaluable for response as 1 pt had just completed cycle 1 with confirmation of response pending at the time of data lock. Subtypes of MM were IgG in 6 pts, IgA in 2 pts, and Bence Jones in 4 pts. Pts had received a median of 5 prior lines of therapy (range 2-14). All pts had failed previous treatment with both a PI and an IMID and in addition carfilzomib, pomalidomid, and/or anti-CD38 antibodies in 8/4/6 pts, respectively.
The study already reached its primary endpoint. The ORR was 82% (lower limit of the 95% CI 56.4%, one-sided exact binomial test, p<0.0001) with 9/11 pts achieving partial response (PR) or better, 6/11 pts had at least a very good partial response (VGPR, 55%) and 3 pts reached (near) complete response (nCR/CR, 27%). Responses occurred rapidly with 8/11 pts achieving at least a PR or better already after cycle 1. PFS remains immature and will be reported at the conference. Duration of response exceeding 1 year has been observed in individual pts.
Adverse events of all grades, assessed to be at least possibly related to a study drug, occurred in 9/12 pts and included blurred vision, macula edema, cramps, arthralgia, diarrhea, skin rash, and decreased left ventricular function. Grade 3 or 4 AEs irrespective of causality occurring in more than 1 pt were reported in 8 pts with anemia, hypertension and thrombocytopenia (3/ 3/ 2 pts, respectively). SAEs were reported in 2 pts, respiratory tract infection in both pts and tooth decay in 1 pt that was not related to the study medication. No deaths occurred while on treatment or within 30 days of the end of treatment.
Preliminary results of biomarker assessments reveal new RAS mutations and amplification of the BRAF locus at the time of relapse while on study treatment as potential markers of resistance. Analysis of pharmacodynamic markers by phospho-IHC reveals suppression of BRAF/MEK signaling at cycle 1 / day 28 and restoration of expression at the time of relapse.
Conclusion: Targeting activating BRAF mutations in rrMM by combining the BRAF inhibitor, encorafenib, and the MEK inhibitor, binimetinib, induces rapid and deep responses in the majority of pts. No new safety signal has been observed when compared to prior reports on these compounds. The study reached its primary endpoint with fewer pts than expected. The primary efficacy and safety analysis will be presented at the conference.
Raab:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Heidelberg Pharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Scheid:BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Besemer:GSK: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Metzler:Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy. Khandanpour:Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Trautmann-Grill:Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy; BMS: Honoraria. Goldschmidt:Mundipharma GmbH: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck Sharp and Dohme (MSD): Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product:, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product:, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product:, Research Funding; University Hospital Heidelberg, Internal Medicine V and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany: Current Employment; GlaxoSmithKline (GSK): Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product:, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Molecular Partners: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Johns Hopkins University: Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Research Funding; Dietmar-Hopp-Foundation: Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product:. Weisel:Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Adaptive: Consultancy, Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria.
Encorafenib and Binimetinib in BRAF V600E mutant multiple myeloma
Background
Although clinically effective treatment is available for schizophrenia, recovery often is still hampered by persistent poor psychosocial functioning, which in turn is limited by ...impairments in neurocognition, social cognition, and social behavioral skills. Although cognitive remediation has shown general efficacy in improving cognition and social functioning, effects still need to be improved and replicated in appropriately powered, methodologically rigorous randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Existing evidence indicates that effects can most likely be optimized by combining treatment approaches to simultaneously address both social cognitive and social behavioral processes.
Objectives
To assess whether Integrated Social Cognitive and Behavioral Skill Therapy (ISST) is more efficacious in improving functional outcome in schizophrenia than the active control treatment Neurocognitive Remediation Therapy (NCRT).
Methods
The present study is a multicenter, prospective, rater-blinded, two-arm RCT being conducted at six academic study sites in Germany. A sample of 180 at least partly remitted patients with schizophrenia are randomly assigned to either ISST or NCRT. ISST is a compensatory, strategy-based program that targets social cognitive processes and social behavioral skills. NCRT comprises mainly drill and practice-oriented neurocognitive training. Both treatments consist of 18 sessions over 6 months, and participants are subsequently followed up for another 6 months. The primary outcome is all-cause discontinuation over the 12-month study period; psychosocial functioning, quality of life, neurocognitive and social cognitive performance, and clinical symptoms are assessed as secondary outcomes at baseline before randomization (V1), at the end of the six-month treatment period (V6), and at the six-month follow-up (V12).
Discussion
This RCT is part of the German Enhancing Schizophrenia Prevention and Recovery through Innovative Treatments (ESPRIT) research network, which aims at using innovative treatments to enhance prevention and recovery in patients with schizophrenia. Because this study is one of the largest and methodologically most rigorous RCTs on the efficacy of cognitive remediation approaches in schizophrenia, it will not only help to identify the optimal treatment options for improving psychosocial functioning and thus recovery in patients but also allow conclusions to be drawn about factors influencing and mediating the effects of cognitive remediation in these patients.
Trial Registration
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT 02678858, German Study Register DRKS 00010033
PDF
