AbstractPurposeThe incidence of brain metastases is increasing as a result of more routine diagnostic imaging and improved extracranial systemic treatment strategies. As noted in recent consensus ...guidelines, postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to the resection cavity has lower rates of local control than whole brain radiation therapy but improved cognitive outcomes. Further analyses are needed to improve local control and minimize toxicity.Methods and materialsPatients receiving SRS to a resection cavity between 2006 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Presurgical variables, including tumor location, diameter, dural/meningeal contact, and histology, were collected, as were SRS treatment parameters. Patients had routine follow-up with magnetic resonance imaging, and those noted to have local failure were further assessed for the recurrence location, distance from the target volume, and dosimetric characteristics.ResultsOverall, 82 patients and 85 resection cavities underwent postoperative SRS during the study period. Of these, 58 patients with 60 resection cavities with available follow-up magnetic resonance imaging scans were included in this analysis. With a median follow-up of 19.8 months, local recurrence occurred in 12 of the resection cavities for a 15% 1-year and 18% 2-year local recurrence rate. Pretreatment tumor volume contacted the dura/meninges in 100% of cavities with recurrence versus 67% of controlled cavities ( P = .025). A total of 5 infield, 5 marginal, and 4 out-of-field recurrences were found, with a median distance to the centroid from the target volume of 3 mm. The addition of a 10-mm dural margin increased the target volume overlap with the recurrence contours for 10 of the 14 recurrences. ConclusionsDural contact was associated with an increased rate of recurrence for patients who received SRS to a surgical cavity, and the median distance of marginal recurrences from the target volume was 3 mm. These results provide evidence in support of recent consensus guidelines suggesting that additional dural margin on SRS volumes may benefit local control.
A clinical workflow was developed for urgent palliative radiotherapy treatments that integrates patient simulation, planning, quality assurance, and treatment in one 30‐minute session. This has been ...successfully tested and implemented clinically on a linac with MV CBCT capabilities. To make this approach available to all clinics equipped with common imaging systems, dose calculation accuracy based on treatment sites was assessed for other imaging units. We evaluated the feasibility of palliative treatment planning using on‐board imaging with respect to image quality and technical challenges. The purpose was to test multiple systems using their commercial setup, disregarding any additional in‐house development. kV CT, kV CBCT, MV CBCT, and MV CT images of water and anthropomorphic phantoms were acquired on five different imaging units (Philips MX8000 CT Scanner, and Varian TrueBeam, Elekta VersaHD, Siemens Artiste, and Accuray Tomotherapy linacs). Image quality (noise, contrast, uniformity, spatial resolution) was evaluated and compared across all machines. Using individual image value to density calibrations, dose calculation accuracies for simple treatment plans were assessed for the same phantom images. Finally, image artifacts on clinical patient images were evaluated and compared among the machines. Image contrast to visualize bony anatomy was sufficient on all machines. Despite a high noise level and low contrast, MV CT images provided the most accurate treatment plans relative to kV CT‐based planning. Spatial resolution was poorest for MV CBCT, but did not limit the visualization of small anatomical structures. A comparison of treatment plans showed that monitor units calculated based on a prescription point were within 5% difference relative to kV CT‐based plans for all machines and all studied treatment sites (brain, neck, and pelvis). Local dose differences >5% were found near the phantom edges. The gamma index for 3%/3 mm criteria was ≥95% in most cases. Best dose calculation results were obtained when the treatment isocenter was near the image isocenter for all machines. A large field of view and immediate image export to the treatment planning system were essential for a smooth workflow and were not provided on all devices. Based on this phantom study, image quality of the studied kV CBCT, MV CBCT, and MV CT on‐board imaging devices was sufficient for treatment planning in all tested cases. Treatment plans provided dose calculation accuracies within an acceptable range for simple, urgently planned palliative treatments. However, dose calculation accuracy was compromised towards the edges of an image. Feasibility for clinical implementation should be assessed separately and may be complicated by machine specific features. Image artifacts in patient images and the effect on dose calculation accuracy should be assessed in a separate, machine‐specific study.
PACS number(s): 87.55.D‐, 87.57.C‐, 87.57.Q‐
Objectives/Hypothesis
To determine if volumetric growth prior to gamma knife (GK) radiosurgery predicts long‐term tumor control.
Study Design
Retrospective cohort study.
Methods
Sporadic vestibular ...schwannomas (VS) treated with GK between 2002 and 2014 at a single tertiary care center were identified. Patients were included if they had over 6 months of pretreatment observation and over 1.5 years of posttreatment follow‐up. Volumetric tumor analysis was performed on T1 postcontrast imaging. Pretreatment and posttreatment volume change was calculated. Tumors with over 20% volume increase were classified as growing.
Results
There were 62 patients included in this study; 48 had pretreatment growth and 14 had no pretreatment growth. Median tumor volume was 0.58 ± 1.8 cm3 and median follow‐up was 3.3 ± 2.0 years. For tumors with and without pretreatment growth, salvage treatment rates were 2% and 7% (P = .35), and posttreatment radiologic stability rates were 73% and 86%, respectively (P = .33). Median pretreatment growth was 27 ± 33% per year for tumors with posttreatment radiographic growth and 18 ± 26% per year for tumors without posttreatment radiographic growth (P = .99).
Conclusions
Pretreatment growth was not associated with increased salvage treatment or posttreatment radiographic progression rates in VS following GK.
Level of Evidence
4 Laryngoscope, 129:743–747, 2019
Background Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is rare, with a treatment backbone that typically includes high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy, with radiation often reserved for ...persistent or progressive disease. In this study, we report the outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with PCNSL to potentially defer whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) or as salvage after WBRT. Methodology We performed a single-institution, retrospective review of 20 patients with PCNSL who received single-fraction or fractionated SRS to 32 lesions between September 1992 and July 2019. Results The median age at SRS was 67 years (interquartile range (IQR) = 56-74 years). The median Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) at SRS was 80 (IQR = 50-80). In total, 18 (90%) patients received methotrexate-based chemotherapy prior to SRS, with a median of eight cycles (IQR = 5-10). A total of 10 patients received SRS for recurrent disease after chemotherapy and/or WBRT, nine patients received SRS for the persistent disease after chemotherapy alone, and one patient received up-front SRS. Overall, five patients received SRS following WBRT. The median SRS dose was 16 Gy (IQR = 14-22.5 Gy) in one fraction (IQR = 1-5 fractions). Eight patients (40%) were treated with consolidative pomalidomide or lenalidomide following SRS. The local control rate was 100% (32/32 lesions at a median follow-up of 15 months). In total, 13 of 16 (81%) patients with available follow-up experienced distant brain recurrence. The median time to distant failure following SRS was 10 months (IQR = 1-16 months). Three patients received salvage SRS, and three patients received salvage WBRT. The median overall survival from diagnosis was 39 months (95% confidence interval = 24-54 months). KPS at the time of SRS was significantly correlated with time to progression (p = 0.002). The use of lenalidomide or pomalidomide after SRS was associated with improved overall survival after SRS (three vs. 14 months, p = 0.035). Consolidative etoposide and cytarabine after initial methotrexate-based chemotherapy was also associated with improved survival following SRS (eight vs. 47 months, p = 0.028). Conclusions SRS offers effective local tumor control for patients with PCNSL; however, the majority of patients experience distant progression. SRS may have a role in the salvage setting for patients with recurrence after WBRT, or allow deferral of WBRT in select patients, although systemic therapy appears to strongly influence outcomes in this cohort.
Cavernous malformations are a rare complication of radiation therapy reported most commonly as a late complication after cranial irradiation for pediatric malignancies. However, cavernous ...malformations after stereotactic radiosurgery in adult patients are not well characterized. We present a case of a 67-year-old female with metastatic breast cancer who received Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases and developed a cavernous malformation at the site of a treated metastasis 30 months after treatment. She underwent resection and did well until 55 months later, when she developed symptomatic recurrence of cavernous malformation without evidence of tumor recurrence, requiring repeat resection. This represents the first reported case of radiation-induced cavernous malformation treated with stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases, who later developed a recurrence of the cavernous malformation. As patients with brain metastases are living longer and are increasingly treated with stereotactic radiosurgery, awareness of cavernous malformation as a potential complication and the risk of recurrence is critical to ensure appropriate diagnosis and management.
The relative roles of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) vs. whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in the treatment of patients with brain metastases from breast cancer remain undefined. In this study, we ...reviewed our experience with these patients.
We retrospectively reviewed all patients treated between 1991 and 2005 with Gamma Knife SRS for brain metastases from breast cancer. The actuarial survival and freedom from progression endpoints were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Between 1991 and 2005, 176 patients underwent SRS for brain metastases from breast cancer. The median survival time was 16.0 months for 95 newly diagnosed patients and 11.7 months for 81 patients with recurrent brain metastases. In the newly diagnosed patients, omission of upfront WBRT did not significantly affect the MST (p = .20), brain freedom from progression (p = .75), or freedom from new brain metastases (p = .83). Longer survival was associated with age <50 years, Karnofsky performance score >or=70, primary tumor control, estrogen receptor positivity, and Her2/neu overexpression. No association was found between the number of treated brain metastases and the survival time.
We have described prognostic factors for breast cancer patients treated with SRS for newly diagnosed or recurrent brain metastases. Most patient subsets had a median survival time of >or=11 months. Unexpectedly, upfront WBRT did not appear to improve brain freedom from progression, and a larger number of brain metastases was not associated with a shorter survival time. Breast cancer might be distinct from other primary sites in terms of prognostic factors and the roles of WBRT and SRS for brain metastases.
Purpose
: To assess clinical and imaging outcomes in patients treated with Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brainstem metastases.
Materials and methods
: We reviewed all patients with ...brain metastases treated with SRS at the University of California, San Francisco from 1991–2005 to identify patients who had SRS to a brainstem metastasis. Survival time and freedom from progression (FFP) were calculated from date of SRS using the Kaplan–Meier method. Prognostic factors were evaluated using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model.
Results
: From 1991 through 2005, 42 consecutive patients with brainstem metastases had SRS to 44 lesions (seven midbrain, 31 pontine, and six medullary) in 42 sessions. Primary diagnoses included 14 cases of lung cancer (one small-cell), 10 melanoma, 12 breast cancer, five renal cell, and one unknown. The median age was 55 years (range, 25–79). The median survival time was 9 months after SRS. Longer survival time was associated with single metastasis, non-melanoma histology, and extracranial disease control. The median target volume was 0.26 ml (0.015–2.8 ml) and the median prescribed dose was 16.0 Gy (10.0–19.8 Gy). Brainstem lesion FFP was 90% at 6 months and 77% at 1 year. Four patients had brainstem complications following treatment. Poor brainstem outcome was associated with melanoma and renal cell histology as well as brainstem lesion volume ≥1 ml.
Conclusions
: In this series, SRS using a median dose of 16 Gy provided excellent local control with relatively low morbidity in patients with brainstem metastases less than 1 ml or non-melanoma, non-renal cell histology.
Purpose
: Data collected from 10 institutions were reviewed to compare survival probabilities of patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases managed initially with radiosurgery (RS) alone vs. RS + ...whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT).
Methods and Materials
: A database was created from raw data submitted from 10 institutions on patients treated with RS for brain metastases. The major exclusion criteria were resection of a brain metastasis and interval from the end of WBRT until RS >1 month (to try to ensure that the up-front intent was to combine RS + WBRT and that RS was not given for recurrent brain metastases). Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method from the date of first treatment for brain metastases until death or last follow-up. Survival times were compared for patients managed initially with RS alone vs. RS + WBRT using the Cox proportional hazards model to adjust for known prognostic factors or Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class.
Results
: Out of 983 patients, 31 were excluded because treatment began after 6/1/98; 159 were excluded because brain metastases were resected; 179 were excluded because there was an interval >1 month from WBRT until RS; and 45 were excluded for other reasons. Of the 569 evaluable patients, 268 had RS alone initially (24% of whom ultimately had salvage WBRT), and 301 had RS + up-front WBRT. The median survival times for patients treated with RS alone initially vs. RS + WBRT were 14.0 vs. 15.2 months for RPA Class 1 patients, 8.2 vs. 7.0 months for Class 2, and 5.3 vs. 5.5 months for Class 3, respectively. With adjustment by RPA class, there was no survival difference comparing RS alone initially to RS + up-front WBRT (
p = 0.33, hazard ratio = 1.09).
Conclusions
: Omission of up-front WBRT does not seem to compromise length of survival in patients treated with RS for newly diagnosed brain metastases.
Purpose: To quantitatively evaluate dose conformity achieved using Gamma Knife radiosurgery, compare results with those reported in the literature, and evaluate risk factors for complications.
...Methods and Materials: All lesions treated at our institution with Gamma Knife radiosurgery from May 1993 (when volume criteria were routinely recorded) through December 1998 were reviewed. Lesions were excluded from analysis for reasons listed below. Conformity index (the ratio of prescription volume to target volume) was calculated for all evaluable lesions and for lesions comparable to those reported in the literature on conformity of linac radiosurgery. Univariate Cox regression models were used to test for associations between treatment parameters and toxicity.
Results: Of 1612 targets treated in 874 patients, 274 were excluded, most commonly for unavailability of individual prescription volume data because two or more lesions were included within the same dose matrix (176 lesions), intentional partial coverage for staged treatment of large arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) (33 lesions), and missing target volume data (26 lesions). The median conformity indices were 1.67 for all 1338 evaluable lesions and 1.40–1.43 for lesions comparable to two linac radiosurgery series that reported conformity indices of 1.8 and 2.7, respectively. Among all 651 patients evaluable for complications, there were one Grade 5, eight Grade 4, and 27 Grade 3 complications. Increased risk of toxicity was associated with larger target volume, maximum lesion diameter, prescription volume, or volume of nontarget tissue within the prescription volume.
Conclusions: Gamma Knife radiosurgery achieves much more conformal dose distributions than those reported for conventional linac radiosurgery and somewhat more conformal dose distributions than sophisticated linac radiosurgery techniques. Larger target, nontarget, or prescription volumes are associated with increased risk of toxicity.
PDF
