Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is preceded by asymptomatic WM (AWM), for which the risk of progression to overt disease is not well defined.
We studied 439 patients with AWM, who were diagnosed ...and observed at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 1992 and 2014.
During the 23-year study period, with a median follow-up of 7.8 years, 317 patients progressed to symptomatic WM (72%). Immunoglobulin M 4,500 mg/dL or greater, bone marrow lymphoplasmacytic infiltration 70% or greater, β2-microglobulin 4.0 mg/dL or greater, and albumin 3.5 g/dL or less were all identified as independent predictors of disease progression. To assess progression risk in patients with AWM, we trained and cross-validated a proportional hazards model using bone marrow infiltration, immunoglobulin M, albumin, and beta-2 microglobulin values as continuous measures. The model divided the cohort into three distinct risk groups: a high-risk group with a median time to progression (TTP) of 1.8 years, an intermediate-risk group with a median TTP of 4.8 years, and a low-risk group with a median TTP of 9.3 years. We validated this model in two external cohorts, demonstrating robustness and generalizability. For clinical applicability, we made the model available as a Web page application ( www.awmrisk.com ). By combining two cohorts, we were powered to identify wild type MYD88 as an independent predictor of progression (hazard ratio, 2.7).
This classification system is positioned to inform patient monitoring and care and, for the first time to our knowledge, to identify patients with high-risk AWM who may need closer follow-up or benefit from early intervention.
Because the outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is predominantly influenced by disease type and status, it is essential to be able to stratify patients undergoing HCT by ...disease risk. The Disease Risk Index (DRI) was developed for this purpose. In this study, we analyzed 13 131 patients reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research who underwent HCT between 2008 and 2010. The DRI stratified patients into 4 groups with 2-year overall survival (OS) ranging from 64% to 24% and was the strongest prognostic factor, regardless of age, conditioning intensity, graft source, or donor type. A randomly selected training subgroup of 9849 patients was used to refine the DRI, using a multivariable regression model for OS. This refined DRI had improved prediction ability for the remaining 3282 patients compared with the original DRI or other existing schemes. This validated and refined DRI can be used as a 4- or 3-group index, depending on the size of the cohort under study, for prognostication; to facilitate the interpretation of single-center, multicenter, or registry studies; to adjust center outcome data; and to stratify patients entering clinical trials that enroll patients across disease categories.
•The DRI successfully stratified patients in a very large allogeneic transplantation registry cohort.•The DRI was refined by using this cohort to build a more inclusive and conditioning intensity–independent index.
In the past decades, survival has improved after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) due largely to advances in the prevention of graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) and opportunistic ...infection. However, few inroads have been made into the problem of leukemia relapse which is the primary reason for failure of allo-HCT. The graft-vs.-leukemia (GVL) response, in which engrafted immunocompetent donor immune cells can eliminate leukemia cells, is acknowledged as the foundation upon which the curative potential of allo-HCT is based. Despite our strongly held faith in its existence, we remain unable to define GVL on a mechanistic level. T cells, in part, mediate GVL though the roles of specific T cell subsets, NK cells, B cells, macrophages remain elusive. A higher frequency of marrow-infiltrating T cells expressing PD-1, CTLA-4, and TIM-3 and other immune checkpoints have been observed in relapsed patients compared to those in remission. Studies have described the association of T cells expressing an exhausted phenotype with response to immune manipulation post-HCT. In light of these observations and the well documented activity of immune checkpoint blockade (CPB) in transplant naïve patients with hematologic malignancies, considerable interest has developed in evaluating strategies incorporating CPB to address relapse post-HCT. While checkpoint inhibitors may be provocative agents to test, they also raise concern for potential induction of GVHD and uncontrollable immune breakthrough events. This review will lay the framework upon which CPB is being utilized post-HCT, describe early clinical results, and lay out future directions.
Hematologic cancers that recur after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation are often difficult to treat. A small pilot study suggests that ipilimumab may induce durable responses in a ...subgroup of patients with these cancers.
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only cure for many patients who have advanced hematologic cancers, principally through the induction of a graft-versus-tumor effect.
1
Unfortunately, more than one third of patients who have undergone transplantation have a relapse of disease.
2
The prognosis for these patients is poor; the majority die within 1 year after relapse despite salvage chemotherapy, donor-lymphocyte infusion, or retransplantation.
3
–
5
Immune escape (i.e., tumor evasion of the donor immune system) contributes to relapse after allogeneic HSCT, and immune checkpoint inhibitory pathways probably play an important role.
6
The engagement of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed . . .
A low daily dose of subcutaneous interleukin-2 increases the number and function of regulatory T cells and results in substantial improvement in about half of patients with chronic graft-versus-host ...disease.
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) invokes donor-derived immune responses that can result in therapeutic graft-versus-tumor activity and toxic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Chronic GVHD, a systemic inflammatory disorder with pleomorphic autoimmune manifestations that is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality, develops in more than half of patients who have undergone HSCT.
1
–
3
Treatment with systemic glucocorticoids has limited efficacy and substantial long-term toxicity. There is no established second-line therapy.
Regulatory T (Treg) cells — as defined by expression of CD4, CD25, and transcription factor forkhead box P3 (FOXP3) — account for approximately 5 to 10% of circulating CD4+ T cells, suppress . . .
Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) can be transmitted from a donor to a recipient during allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Exclusion of candidate donors with CH is controversial since its impact ...on recipient outcomes and graft alloimmune function is uncertain.
We performed targeted error-corrected sequencing on samples from 1,727 donors age 40 years or older and assessed the effect of donor CH on recipient clinical outcomes. We measured long-term engraftment of 102 donor clones and cytokine levels in 256 recipients at 3 and 12 months after transplant.
CH was present in 22.5% of donors, with
(14.6%) and
(5.2%) mutations being most common; 85% of donor clones showed long-term engraftment in recipients after transplantation, including clones with a variant allele fraction < 0.01.
CH with a variant allele fraction ≥ 0.01, but not smaller clones, was associated with improved recipient overall (hazard ratio HR, 0.79;
= .042) and progression-free survival (HR, 0.72;
= .003) after adjustment for significant clinical variables. In patients who received calcineurin-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis, donor
CH was associated with reduced relapse (subdistribution HR, 0.59;
= .014), increased chronic graft-versus-host disease (subdistribution HR, 1.36;
= .042), and higher interleukin-12p70 levels in recipients. No recipient of sole
or
-CH developed donor cell leukemia (DCL). In seven of eight cases, DCL evolved from donor CH with rare
or splicing factor mutations or from donors carrying germline
mutations.
Donor CH is closely associated with clinical outcomes in transplant recipients, with differential impact on graft alloimmune function and potential for leukemic transformation related to mutated gene and somatic clonal abundance. Donor
-CH is associated with improved recipient survival because of reduced relapse risk and with an augmented network of inflammatory cytokines in recipients. Risk of DCL in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is driven by somatic myelodysplastic syndrome-associated mutations or germline predisposition in donors.
The outcome of allogeneic HSCT varies considerably by the disease and remission status at the time of transplantation. Any retrospective or prospective HSCT study that enrolls patients across disease ...types must account for this heterogeneity; yet, current methods are neither standardized nor validated. We conducted a retrospective study of 1539 patients who underwent transplantation at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital from 2000 to 2009. Using multivariable models for overall survival, we created a disease risk index. This tool uses readily available information about disease and disease status to categorize patients into 4 risk groups with significantly different overall survival and progression-free survival on the basis of primarily differences in the relapse risk. This scheme applies regardless of conditioning intensity, is independent of comorbidity index, and was validated in an independent cohort of 672 patients from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. This simple and validated scheme could be used to risk-stratify patients in both retrospective and prospective HSCT studies, to calibrate HSCT outcomes across studies and centers, and to promote the design of HSCT clinical trials that enroll patients across diseases and disease states, increasing our ability to study nondisease-specific outcomes in HSCT.
Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is associated with inadequate reconstitution of tolerogenic CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs). Previous phase 1 studies identified a low daily dose ...of interleukin-2 (IL-2) that was well tolerated, did not exacerbate alloimmunity, augmented Treg in vivo, and was associated with improvement of active cGVHD. In the current phase 2 study, 35 adults with steroid-refractory cGVHD received daily IL-2 (1 × 106 IU/m2) for 12 weeks. Median time from transplantation and cGVHD onset was 616 days (range, 270-2145 days) and 317 days (range, 28-1880 days), respectively. Two patients withdrew and 5 required IL-2 dose reductions due to side effects. Twenty of 33 evaluable patients (61%) had clinical responses at multiple cGVHD sites (liver, skin, gastrointestinal tract, lung, joint/muscle/fascia). Three patients (9%) had progressive cGVHD. Compared with pretreatment levels, Treg and natural killer cell counts rose >fivefold (P < .001) and >fourfold (P < .001), respectively, without significant change in conventional CD4 T cells (Tcons) or CD8 T cells. The Treg:Tcon ratio rose >fivefold (P < .001). Clinical responders initiated IL-2 earlier (508 vs 917 days after transplantation, P = .005; 249 vs 461 days after cGVHD onset; P = .03). Treg:Tcon ratios ≥0.07 at baseline and ≥0.2 at week 1 also predicted clinical response (P = .003; P = .0003, respectively). After a 4-week treatment hiatus, clinical responders were eligible to continue IL-2 therapy indefinitely. During 2 years of extended IL-2 therapy, clinical and Treg immune responses persisted, while Tcon count and Treg:Tcon ratio gradually normalized. Low-dose IL-2 provides durable clinical improvement in active cGVHD and extended therapy is well-tolerated.
•Low-dose IL-2 is efficacious in steroid-refractory cGVHD, with objective responses in >50% of patients, and durable disease control.•IL-2 initiation earlier after cGVHD onset, prior to severe impairment of Treg:Tcon ratios, improves likelihood of clinical response.