For more than two decades, the only therapy that was proven to extend overall survival among patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma was cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy.
1
First-line ...cisplatin-based chemotherapy yields a median overall survival of 14 to 15 months, coupled with 5-year survival among 5 to 15% of patients. Historically, salvage chemotherapy with vinflunine or a taxane after the receipt of platinum-based chemotherapy has resulted in a response in only approximately 10% of patients, with a dismal median overall survival of 6 to 8 months.
2
,
3
Vinflunine was approved in multiple countries on the basis of a phase 3 trial that . . .
Platinum-based chemotherapy has long been the backbone of treatment for urothelial carcinoma. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment paradigm and significantly improved ...outcomes for many patients. More recently, targeted agents such as erdafitinib and antibody drug conjugates enfortumab vedotin and sacituzumab govitecan have demonstrated robust efficacy after progression on prior chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Many additional agents are currently under investigation in ongoing clinical trials. In this review, we discuss the current treatment landscape, review recent clinical data resulting in approval of novel therapeutic agents and highlight important ongoing studies focusing on the therapeutic landscape beyond immune checkpoint inhibition.
Patients who had had a relapse after receiving platinum-containing chemotherapy and a PD-1 or PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor were assigned to receive enfortumab vedotin or one of three ...chemotherapy agents chosen by their doctor. Enfortumab vedotin prolonged progression-free and overall survival.
Immune-related adverse events (irAE) have been described with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), but the incidence and relative risk (RR) of irAEs associated with these drugs remains unclear. We ...selected five key irAEs from treatments with approved cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors (ipilimumab, nivolumab, or pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab, respectively) to better characterize their safety profile. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized phase II/III immunotherapy trials, with non-ICI control arms, conducted between 1996 and 2016. We calculated the incidence and RR of selected all-grade and high-grade gastrointestinal, liver, skin, endocrine, and pulmonary irAEs across the trials using random-effect models. Twenty-one trials were included, totaling 11,454 patients, of whom 6,528 received an ICI (nivolumab, 1,534; pembrolizumab, 1,522; atezolizumab, 751; and ipilimumab, 2,721) and 4,926 had not. Compared with non-ICI arms, ICIs were associated with more all-grade colitis (RR 7.66,
< 0.001), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevation (RR 1.80;
= 0.020), rash (RR 2.50;
= 0.001), hypothyroidism (RR 6.81;
< 0.001), and pneumonitis (RR 4.14;
= 0.012). Rates of high-grade colitis (RR 5.85;
< 0.001) and AST elevation (RR 2.79;
= 0.014) were higher in the ICI arms. Ipilimumab was associated with a higher risk of all-grade rash (
= 0.006) and high-grade colitis (
= 0.021) compared with PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs. Incidence of fatal irAE was < 1%. This meta-analysis offers substantial evidence that ICIs are associated with a small but significant increase in risk of selected all-grade irAEs and high-grade gastrointestinal and liver toxicities. Although fatal irAEs remain rare, AEs should be recognized promptly as early interventions may alleviate future complications.
.
Bladder cancer (BC) accounts for about 4% of all malignancies. Non-muscle-invasive BC, 75% of cases, is treated with transurethral resection and adjuvant intravesical instillation, while ...muscle-invasive BC warrants cisplatin-based perioperative chemotherapy. Although immune-checkpoint inhibitors, antibody drug conjugates and targeted agents have provided dramatic advances, metastatic BC remains a generally incurable disease and clinical trials continue to vigorously evaluate novel molecules. Cancer vaccines aim at activating the patient's immune system against tumor cells. Several means of delivering neoantigens have been developed, including peptides, antigen-presenting cells, virus, or nucleic acids. Various improvements are constantly being explored, such as adjuvants use and combination strategies. Nucleic acids-based vaccines are increasingly gaining attention in recent years, with promising results in other malignancies. However, despite the recent advantages, numerous obstacles persist. This review is aimed at describing the different types of cancer vaccines, their evaluations in UC patients and the more recent innovations in this field.Bladder cancer (BC) accounts for about 4% of all malignancies. Non-muscle-invasive BC, 75% of cases, is treated with transurethral resection and adjuvant intravesical instillation, while muscle-invasive BC warrants cisplatin-based perioperative chemotherapy. Although immune-checkpoint inhibitors, antibody drug conjugates and targeted agents have provided dramatic advances, metastatic BC remains a generally incurable disease and clinical trials continue to vigorously evaluate novel molecules. Cancer vaccines aim at activating the patient's immune system against tumor cells. Several means of delivering neoantigens have been developed, including peptides, antigen-presenting cells, virus, or nucleic acids. Various improvements are constantly being explored, such as adjuvants use and combination strategies. Nucleic acids-based vaccines are increasingly gaining attention in recent years, with promising results in other malignancies. However, despite the recent advantages, numerous obstacles persist. This review is aimed at describing the different types of cancer vaccines, their evaluations in UC patients and the more recent innovations in this field.
Introduction: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) consists of distinct clinical and biologic entities, with an urgent need for novel therapies targeting histology-specific molecular drivers of cancer growth. ...The MET pathway is now being targeted by multiple novel agents in clinical development. This review highlights the upcoming role of MET inhibition in the treatment of RCC.
Areas covered: The HGF-MET axis is now recognized as playing a vital role in the growth of papillary histology and in driving VEGF inhibitor resistance. The heterogeneity of MET alterations influences sensitivity to MET inhibition and we need predictive biomarkers for improving patient selection. In this review, we highlight the role of the MET pathway in both clear cell and non-clear cell RCC and provide a comprehensive review of preclinical and early clinical data on multiple drugs targeting the MET pathway.
Expert opinion: MET alterations can act as primary or secondary drivers of tumor growth in RCC and represents a viable therapeutic target. Combination strategies of VEGF and MET inhibitors could lead to sustained and deep responses even in non-MET driven RCC by inhibiting pathways of VEGF resistance. Addition of checkpoint inhibitors to MET inhibition has also demonstrated promising signs of early efficacy.
Introduction of novel agents for the management of advanced prostate cancer provides a range of treatment options with notable benefits for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer ...(mCRPC). At the same time, understanding of optimal patient selection, effective sequential use, and development of resistance patterns remains incomplete.
To review current systemic therapies and recent advances in drug development for mCRPC and strategies to aid in patient selection and optimal sequencing.
A literature review of PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, Current Contents Medicine, Web of Science, Clinical Trial.Gov, WHO-ICTRP (January 2004–November 2017), and the proceedings of major international meetings (2015/2016/2017) was performed in November 2017.
In the last few years, several new options for treatment of mCRPC have shown a survival benefit in phase III trials besides docetaxel:abiraterone, enzalutamide, cabazitaxel, radium-223, and sipuleucel-T. Radium-223 and denosumab have increased options in management of bone metastases. Currently, novel agents such as next-generation androgen receptor (AR) axis-targeting treatments, immunotherapeutics, or therapies targeting other oncogenic and genomic pathways, particularly poly(adenosine diphosphate–ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and PD-1 inhibitors, are under clinical investigation. With increasing treatment options for mCRPC, information on how to personalize management and how to select and sequence existing therapies is beginning to emerge, as are predictive biomarkers (homologous repair mutations, mismatch repair mutations, AR splice variant 7). Finally, early use of active agents in the castration-sensitive state will likely also change the clinical management of the disease when it becomes castrate resistant.
The emergence of new drugs for mCRPC has improved treatment options dramatically. Currently, systemic treatment options for mCRPC include hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and radionuclide therapy as well as bone-modifying agents and palliative or supportive measures. Further, new genetically targeted agents (PARP inhibitors and PD-1 inhibitors) are on the horizon for certain subsets of biomarker-selected patients. The best strategies for patient selection and optimal sequential use to achieve the longest cumulative survival improvement and to prevent early resistance remain unclear.
The current literature and proceedings from relevant congresses related to available systemic agents for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, including novel genetically targeted therapies, including poly(adenosine diphosphate–ribose) polymerase inhibitors and PD-1 inhibitors, were reviewed. Current therapies and ongoing developments are discussed.
In the last few years, new therapeutics for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer have increased survival substantially. While promising novel agents are currently under trial, including genetically targeted therapies (poly(adenosine diphosphate–ribose) polymerase inhibitors and PD-1 inhibitors), further clinical and translational research in predictive biomarkers is needed to optimize treatment selection and sequencing strategies for existing drugs.
Despite the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates to the management of advanced urothelial carcinoma, the disease is generally incurable. The increasing ...incorporation of next-generation sequencing of tumor tissue into the characterization of bladder cancer has led to a better understanding of the somatic genetic aberrations potentially involved in its pathogenesis. Genetic alterations have been observed in kinases, such as FGFRs, ErbBs, PI3K/Akt/mTOR, and Ras-MAPK, and genetic alterations in critical cellular processes, such as chromatin remodeling, cell cycle regulation, and DNA damage repair. However, activating mutations or fusions of
and
remains the only validated therapeutically actionable alteration, with erdafitinib as the only targeted agent currently approved for this group. Bladder cancer is characterized by genomic heterogeneity and a high tumor mutation burden. This review highlights the potential relevance of aberrations and discusses the current status of targeted therapies directed at them.
PDF
