BENCHMRK-1 and -2 are ongoing double-blind phase III studies of raltegravir in patients experiencing failure of antiretroviral therapy with triple-class drug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus ...infection. At week 96 (combined data), raltegravir (400 mg twice daily) plus optimized background therapy was generally well tolerated, with superior and durable antiretroviral and immunological efficacy, compared with optimized background therapy alone.
BACKGROUND:MK-0518 is a novel HIV-1 integrase strand transfer inhibitor with potent in vitro activity against HIV-1 (95% inhibitory concentration IC95 = 33 nM in 50% human serum) and good ...bioavailability in uninfected subjects. This study explored the antiretroviral activity and safety of MK-0518 versus placebo for 10 days as monotherapy in antiretroviral therapy-naive HIV-1-infected patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels of at least 5000 copies/mL and CD4 T-cell counts of at least 100 cells/mm.
METHODS:This was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled 2-part study, with the first part using MK-0518 in 1 of 4 doses (100, 200, 400, and 600 mg) versus placebo (randomized 1:1:1:1:1) given twice daily for 10 days of monotherapy. Patients were monitored for safety, pharmacokinetic parameters, and antiretroviral effect.
RESULTS:Thirty-five patients were enrolled (6-8 patients per treatment group) and completed 10 days of therapy; the mean baseline log10 HIV RNA level ranged from 4.5 to 5.0 copies/mL in each group. On day 10, the mean decrease from baseline in the log10 HIV RNA level was −0.2 copies/mL for the placebo group and −1.9, −2.0, −1.7 and −2.2 log10 copies/mL for the MK-0518 100-, 200-, 400-, and 600-mg treatment groups, respectively. All dose groups had superior antiretroviral activity compared with placebo (P < 0.001 for comparison of each dose with placebo). At least 50% of patients in each MK-0518 dose group achieved an HIV RNA level <400 copies/mL by day 10. Mean trough MK-0518 concentrations at each dose exceeded the IC95 of 33 nM. Study therapy was generally well tolerated. The most common adverse experiences were headache and dizziness; these were similar between active and control groups. There were no discontinuations because of adverse experiences and no serious adverse experiences.
CONCLUSIONS:MK-0518 showed potent antiretroviral activity as short-term monotherapy and was generally well tolerated at all doses. Based on these results, part 2 of the study, a dose-ranging 48-week trial of MK-0518 versus efavirenz in a combination regimen, has been initiated.
Background. DAS181, a novel host-directed antiviral in development for influenza treatment, was assessed in this phase II clinical trial. Methods. This study was a double-blind, placebo-controlled ...phase II clinical trial assessing influenza viral load and patient safety in otherwise healthy influenza-infected participants. Participants were randomized to a single-dose, multiple-dose, or placebo group and were followed for safety and virologie outcomes. Results. A total of 177 laboratory-confirmed influenza-infected participants were enrolled in the trial, which encompassed 3 influenza seasons from 2009-2011 in both the Northern and Southern Hemispheres. Thirty-seven percent of participants had confirmed infection with influenza B, 33% with seasonal H3N2, 29% with pandemic 2009 H1N1, and 1 participant was positive for both influenza and pandemic 2009 H1N1. Significant effects were observed in regard to decreased change from baseline viral load and viral shedding in the multiple-dose group compared with placebo as measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (P<.05). No instances of H274Y were observed among viral isolates from this trial. Overall, the drug was generally well tolerated. Conclusions. DAS181 significantly reduced viral load in participants infected with influenza, thus warranting future clinical development of this novel host-directed therapy. Clinical Trials.gov Identifier. NCT01037205
Summary Background Two randomised, placebo-controlled trials—BENCHMRK-1 and BENCHMRK-2—investigated the efficacy and safety of raltegravir, an HIV-1 integrase strand-transfer inhibitor. We report ...final results of BENCHMRK-1 and BENCHMRK-2 combined at 3 years (the end of the double-blind phase) and 5 years (the end of the study). Methods Integrase-inhibitor-naive patients with HIV resistant to three classes of drug and who were failing antiretroviral therapy were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to raltegravir 400 mg twice daily or placebo, both with optimised background treatment. Patients and investigators were masked to treatment allocation until week 156, after which all patients were offered open-label raltegravir until week 240. The primary endpoint was previously assessed at 16 weeks. We assessed long-term efficacy with endpoints of the proportion of patients with an HIV viral load of less than 50 copies per mL and less than 400 copies per mL, and mean change in CD4 cell count, at weeks 156 and 240. Findings 1012 patients were screened for inclusion. 462 were treated with raltegravir and 237 with placebo. At week 156, 51% in the raltegravir group versus 22% in the placebo group (non-completer classed as failure) had viral loads of less than 50 copies per mL, and 54% versus 23% had viral loads of less than 400 copies per mL. Mean CD4 cell count increase (analysed by an observed failure approach) was 164 cells per μL versus 63 cells per μL. After week 156, 251 patients (54%) from the raltegravir group and 47 (20%) from the placebo group entered the open-label raltergravir phase; 221 (47%) versus 44 (19%) completed the entire study. At week 240, viral load was less than 50 copies per mL in 193 (42%) of all patients initially assigned to raltegravir and less than 400 copies per mL in 210 (45%); mean CD4 cell count increased by 183 cells per μL. Virological failure occurred in 166 raltegravir recipients (36%) during the double-blind phase and in 17 of all patients (6%) during the open-label phase. The most common drug-related adverse events at 5 years in both groups were nausea, headache, and diarrhoea, and occurred in similar proportions in each group. Laboratory test results were similar in both treatment groups and showed little change after year 2. Interpretation Raltegravir has a favourable long-term efficacy and safety profile in integrase-inhibitor-naive patients with triple-class resistant HIV in whom antiretroviral therapy is failing. Raltegravir is an alternative for treatment-experienced patients, particularly those with few treatment options. Funding Merck Sharp & Dohme.
For patients infected with multidrug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), therapeutic options are limited. Raltegravir is a new molecule that inhibits HIV integrase. In two phase 3 ...studies, raltegravir was found to be superior to placebo, in the context of optimized background antiviral therapy, in suppressing HIV viral load at 48 weeks (62.1% vs. 32.9%).
In two phase 3 studies, raltegravir was found to be superior to placebo, in the context of optimized background antiviral therapy, in suppressing HIV viral load at 48 weeks (62.1% vs. 32.9%).
Highly active antiretroviral therapy is the standard of care for patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
1
Combination regimens have resulted in improved survival, decreased morbidity, and cost-effective care for patients with a CD4 count of less than 350 per cubic millimeter.
2
–
8
However, viral suppression cannot always be achieved or sustained with standard treatments because of the development of viral resistance, toxic effects of drugs, or lack of adherence.
9
–
18
The majority of HIV-infected patients in whom highly active antiretroviral therapy fails have resistant viral quasispecies.
12
–
15
,
19
,
20
Cross-resistance to agents within a drug class may exhaust . . .
In subgroups of two phase 3 studies, patients with high-risk features for failure of antiretroviral therapy, such as a low CD4 count, high base-line level of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 ...RNA, or unfavorable genotypic or phenotypic sensitivity score, raltegravir was superior to placebo in terms of a virologic response at 48 weeks. However, among these patients, in whom antiretroviral therapy had been used previously, 23% of raltegravir recipients had virologic failure by 48 weeks.
In patients with high-risk features for failure of antiretroviral therapy, raltegravir was superior to placebo in terms of a virologic response at 48 weeks. However, among these patients, in whom antiretroviral therapy had been used previously, 23% of raltegravir recipients had virologic failure by 48 weeks.
Despite the substantial decrease in mortality and morbidity rates associated with highly active antiretroviral therapy over the past decade, there is still a substantial need for effective antiretroviral drugs for patients infected with resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1).
1
,
2
The majority of licensed antiretroviral drugs belong to three classes targeting either the HIV-1 protease or reverse transcriptase, and considerable cross-resistance exists among drugs within each class.
3
,
4
In patients with resistant virus, use of antiretroviral agents from new classes offers considerable potential benefit because of the absence of cross-resistance.
5
–
7
HIV-1 integrase represents a new therapeutic target.
8
, . . .
The emergence of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic influenza A virus, as well as constant antigenic drift of seasonal influenza, underscores the remarkable versatility of this virus in adapting to the human ...population. While vaccines are the principal public health defence against influenza, rapid vaccine development can be a daunting task. Antiviral drugs offer the promise of inhibiting influenza regardless of its genetic variations. However, the rapid rise of resistance to several antivirals has highlighted the need for developing novel therapeutics with reduced drug resistance potential. In this review, we will summarize the effects of the currently licensed anti-influenza drugs as well as the candidates in development against the seasonal and the 2009 H1N1 pandemic influenza A virus with an emphasis on drug resistance.
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is associated with insulin resistance. HIV type 1 Nef downregulates cell surface protein expression, alters signal transduction, and interacts with the ...cytoskeleton and proteins involved in actin polymerization. These functions are required for glucose uptake by insulin-stimulated adipocytes. We sought to determine whether Nef alters adipocyte glucose homeostasis. Using radiolabeled glucose, we found that adipocytes exposed to recombinant Nef took in 42% less glucose after insulin stimulation than did control cells. This reduction resulted from a Nef-dependent inhibition of glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4) trafficking, as assessed by means of immunofluorescence microscopy. Immunoblot analysis revealed a decrease in phosphorylation of signal transducing proteins after Nef treatment, and fluorescence microscopy showed a dramatic alteration in cortical actin organization. We conclude that Nef interferes with insulin-stimulated processes in adipocytes. We have identified HIV Nef, which is detectable and antigenic in serum samples from HIV-infected people, as a novel contributor to the development of insulin resistance.
The insulin-sensitizing drugs thiazolidinediones (TZDs), such as rosiglitazone, improve insulin sensitivity and also promote adipocyte differentiation in vitro. The authors hypothesized that TZDs ...might be beneficial to patients with HIV disease to improve insulin sensitivity and the distribution of body fat by increasing peripheral fat. The ability of rosiglitazone (8 mg/d) to improve insulin sensitivity (from hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp) and to improve body fat distribution (determined from computed tomography measurements of visceral adipose tissue VAT and subcutaneous adipose tissue SAT) was determined in 8 HIV-positive patients. Before treatment, the insulin sensitivity of the patients was reduced to approximately 34% of that in control subjects. The rate of glucose disposal during a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp (Rd) was 3.8 +/-.4 (SEM) mg glucose/kg lean body mass/min compared with 11.08 +/- 1.1 (p<.001) in healthy age- and body mass index (BMI)-matched control subjects. After rosiglitazone treatment of 6 to 12 weeks, Rd increased to 5.99 +/-.9 (p=.02), an improvement of 59 +/- 22%. SAT increased by 23 +/- 10% (p=.05), and, surprisingly, VAT was decreased by 21 +/- 8% (p=.04) with a trend for increased SAT/VAT that failed to reach statistical significance. There were no significant changes in blood counts, viral loads, or CD4 counts with rosiglitazone treatment. The study demonstrates that rosiglitazone therapy improves insulin resistance and body fat distribution in some patients with HIV disease.
PDF
