The last 5 years have brought significant innovation and advancement in the genetics of breast cancer. This clinical opinion aims to summarize and update current approaches to the care of women at ...risk for a hereditary predisposition to breast cancer. Implications of the BRCA mutation and several other hereditary syndromes will be discussed. Risk assessment and criteria for referral to cancer genetic professionals as well as high-risk screening and prophylactic options will be reviewed. Finally, the newly available genetic cancer panels and implications of mutations in some of these lesser known genes will be discussed. As the field of cancer genetics continues to evolve, the education of medical students, residents, and faculty will be paramount to identify appropriate candidates for genetic counseling and testing in conjunction with cancer genetic professionals.
Connecticut and Rhode Island recently became the first U.S. states to mandate insurance coverage of fertility-preservation services for patients about to undergo a medical treatment — surgery, ...radiation, or chemotherapy — that may have deleterious effects on the gonads.
Purpose
Patients undergoing chemotherapy for cancer often experience heightened anxiety. While receipt of chemotherapy occurs over multiple cycles, limited research has examined anxiety ...longitudinally. The purposes of this study, in a large sample of patients with breast, gynecological, gastrointestinal, or lung cancer, were to evaluate, over the course of two cycles of chemotherapy, for inter-individual differences in the trajectories of anxiety and identify associations between demographic, clinical, symptom, and psychological adjustment characteristics and initial levels and trajectories of anxiety.
Methods
Patients with breast, gynecologic, lung, or gastrointestinal cancer (
n
= 1323) were assessed with the Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S) six times over two cycles of chemotherapy. At enrollment, patients completed self-report instruments assessing demographic, symptom, stress, and coping characteristics. We used hierarchical linear modeling to identify risk factors associated with initial levels and trajectories of state anxiety.
Results
Inter-individual differences in initial levels of anxiety were associated with functional status, sleep disturbance, morning fatigue, cognitive function, global and cancer-specific stress, resilience, and several coping characteristics (i.e., sense of coherence, acceptance, using emotional support, self-distraction, denial, venting, and self-blame). Demographic and clinical characteristics associated with interindividual differences in anxiety trajectories were age, employment status, and MAX-2 score.
Conclusion
This study provides novel data on the course and predictors of anxiety during two cycles of chemotherapy among a large sample of patients with varied cancer types. Further research focused on risk factors for heightened levels of anxiety during chemotherapy may help point toward more effective interventions for this commonly experienced symptom.
Breast cancer screening recommendations are based on risk factors. For average-risk women, screening mammography and/or digital breast tomosynthesis is recommended beginning at age 40. Ultrasound ...(US) may be useful as an adjunct to mammography for incremental cancer detection in women with dense breasts, but the balance between increased cancer detection and the increased risk of a false-positive examination should be considered in the decision. For intermediate-risk women, US or MRI may be indicated as an adjunct to mammography depending upon specific risk factors. For women at high risk due to prior mantle radiation between the ages of 10 to 30, mammography is recommended starting 8 years after radiation therapy but not before age 25. For women with a genetic predisposition, annual screening mammography is recommended beginning 10 years earlier than the affected relative at the time of diagnosis but not before age 30. Annual screening MRI is recommended in high-risk women as an adjunct to mammography. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Financial toxicity in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers Proussaloglou, Ellie M.; Rosenthal, Alex E.; Raker, Christina A. ...
Gynecologic oncology,
March 2023, 2023-03-00, Letnik:
170
Journal Article
Recenzirano
Financial toxicity (FT), the cumulative financial burden experienced due to medical care, is a well-established adverse effect of healthcare. Patients with BRCA mutations have significantly increased ...cancer risks compared to non-affected individuals, requiring more frequent screenings and, at times, prophylactic surgery, increasing their risk for FT. Our primary aim in this study was to describe rates of FT among BRCA carriers.
We performed a novel, cross-sectional study of FT in BRCA1/2 carriers. Participants were recruited via phone and/or email to complete consents and surveys on REDCap. The FACIT-COST tool, a validated tool for measuring FT, was used to assess FT; scores were divided into tertiles, with high FT defined as COST score < 24.
265 BRCA positive female participants met enrollment criteria; 76 (28.7%) consented to participate and completed the survey. Participants were primarily non-Hispanic White (97.4%), privately insured (82.9%), and employed full time (67.1%). A significant proportion (22.7%) of participants reported delaying or avoiding care secondary to finances. No statistically significant association was seen between financial toxicity groups and analyzed demographics. Participants with high FT were more likely to engage in all surveyed cost-saving measures, with 41.7% of participants reporting delays/avoidance of care due to cost (p = 0.02).
This study of FT in BRCA carriers shows that financial toxicity exists as an issue in this high-risk patient population. This work serves as the first description of FT in BRCA mutation carriers and highlights the importance of incorporating routine counseling on cost when discussing recommendations for screening and clinical care with this patient population.
•BRCA mutation carriers are at high risk of financial toxicity (FT) due to regular screenings and prophylactic surgery•No studies have evaluated FT in genetic mutation carriers despite known FT risk in patients with breast & ovarian cancers•Financial toxicity exists among BRCA carriers•BRCA carriers with high FT are statistically significantly more likely to engage in all cost-saving measures•41.7% of patients in our study with high FT report delay or avoidance of care due to cost
Breast cancer screening recommendations for transgender and gender nonconforming individuals are based on the sex assigned at birth, risk factors, and use of exogenous hormones. Insufficient evidence ...exists to determine whether transgender people undergoing hormone therapy have an overall lower, average, or higher risk of developing breast cancer compared to birth-sex controls. Furthermore, there are no longitudinal studies evaluating the efficacy of breast cancer screening in the transgender population. In the absence of definitive data, current evidence is based on data extrapolated from cisgender studies and a limited number of cohort studies and case reports published on the transgender community. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Appropriate imaging evaluation of nipple discharge depends the nature of the discharge. Imaging is not indicated for women with physiologic nipple discharge. For evaluation of pathologic nipple ...discharge, multiple breast imaging modalities are rated for evidence-based appropriateness under various scenarios. For women age 40 or older, mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) should be the initial examination. Ultrasound is usually added as a complementary examination, with some exceptions. For women age 30 to 39, either mammogram or ultrasound may be used as the initial examination on the basis of institutional preference. For women age 30 or younger, ultrasound should be the initial examination, with mammography/DBT added when ultrasound shows suspicious findings or if the patient is predisposed to developing breast cancer. For men age 25 or older, mammography/DBT should be performed initially, with ultrasound added as indicated, given the high incidence of breast cancer in men with pathologic nipple discharge. Although MRI and ductography are not usually appropriate as initial examinations, each may be useful when the initial standard imaging evaluation is negative. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Background Individuals who undergo chemotherapy for cancer are at elevated risk of developing depressive symptoms, yet substantial interindividual variation exists in trajectories of these symptoms. ...Objective To examine interindividual variations in trajectories of depressive symptoms during 2 cycles of chemotherapy and to evaluate associations between demographic and clinical characteristics, symptom severity scores, psychological adjustment characteristics (eg, stress and coping), and initial levels and trajectories of depressive symptoms. Methods Patients (n = 1323) diagnosed with breast, gynecologic, lung, or gastrointestinal cancer completed the Center for Epidemiological Studies—Depression Scale 6 times, over 2 cycles of chemotherapy. At enrollment, patients provided demographic information and completed a broad range of symptom, stress, and coping measures. Hierarchical linear modeling was used to identify characteristics associated with initial levels and trajectories of depressive symptoms. Results Interindividual differences in initial levels of depressive symptoms were associated with marital status, functional status, level of comorbidity, chemotherapy toxicity, sleep disturbance, morning fatigue, cognitive function, global and cancer-related stress, and coping characteristics (ie, sense of coherence, venting, behavioral disengagement, and self-blame). Interindividual differences in depression trajectories were associated with education, cancer type, chemotherapy toxicity, sleep disturbance, evening energy, evening fatigue, cognitive function, global and cancer-related stress, and self-blame. Conclusions We present new findings concerning the trajectories and predictors of depressive symptoms during chemotherapy. Implications for Practice Modifiable risk factors (eg, stress and coping) are important targets for intervening to address depressive symptoms in oncology patients.
While anxiety is prevalent among women who undergo chemotherapy for breast or gynecologic cancer, research on its predictors has focused primarily on cross-sectional evaluations or on assessments of ...anxiety prior to and after receipt of chemotherapy. Few studies have evaluated for predictors of inter-individual variability in levels of anxiety during chemotherapy. This study evaluated for inter-individual differences in anxiety across two cycles of chemotherapy and identified demographic, clinical, symptom, and psychological adjustment (e.g., stress, coping) characteristics associated with initial levels and trajectories of anxiety.
Patients with breast (n = 530) or gynecologic (n = 233) cancer completed the Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory six times over two cycles of chemotherapy. At enrollment, self-report measures were used to assess demographic, symptom, stress, and coping characteristics. Hierarchical linear modeling was used to evaluate for risk factors associated with initial levels and trajectories of state anxiety.
At enrollment, demographic, clinical, symptom, and psychological adjustment characteristics associated with inter-individual differences of anxiety were: marital status, functional status, sleep disturbance, cognitive function, global stress, cancer-specific stress, resilience, sense of coherence, and the coping strategies of venting and self-blame. Employment status and morning fatigue were the only characteristics associated with inter-individual differences in the trajectories of anxiety. Denial was the only characteristic associated with both initial levels and the trajectories of anxiety.
A variety of patient characteristics predicted initial levels of anxiety. Fewer characteristics predicted trajectories of anxiety. Identification of specific risk factors, such as avoidant coping, suggests the need for targeted interventions among higher-risk patients.
•Anxiety impacts women receiving chemotherapy for breast and gynecological cancer.•Few studies explore inter-individual differences in anxiety in this population.•We studied demographic, clinical, symptom, and psychological characteristics.•Such factors are associated with anxiety levels and can inform future interventions.
Patients with locally advanced invasive breast cancers are often treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to definitive surgical intervention. The primary aims of this approach are to: 1) reduce ...tumor burden thereby permitting breast conservation rather than mastectomy; 2) promptly treat possible metastatic disease, whether or not it is detectable on preoperative staging; and 3) potentially tailor future chemotherapeutic decisions by monitoring in-vivo tumor response. Accurate radiological assessment permits optimal management and planning in this population. However, assessment of tumor size and response to treatment can vary depending on the modality used, the measurement technique (such as single longest diameter, 3-D measurements, or calculated tumor volume), and varied response of different tumor subtypes to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (such as concentric shrinkage or tumor fragmentation). As discussed in further detail, digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, US and MRI represent the key modalities with potential to help guide patient management. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
PDF
