Prognosis of solid cancers is generally more favorable if the disease is treated early and efficiently. A key to long cancer survival is in radical surgical therapy directed at the primary tumor ...followed by early detection of possible progression, with swift application of subsequent therapeutic intervention reducing the risk of disease generalization. The conventional follow-up care is based on regular observation of tumor markers in combination with computed tomography/endoscopic ultrasound/magnetic resonance/positron emission tomography imaging to monitor potential tumor progression. A recent development in methodologies allowing screening for a presence of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) brings a new viable tool in early detection and management of major cancers. It is believed that cfDNA is released from tumors primarily due to necrotization, whereas the origin of nontumorous cfDNA is mostly apoptotic. The process of cfDNA detection starts with proper collection and treatment of blood and isolation and storage of blood plasma. The next important steps include cfDNA extraction from plasma and its detection and/or quantification. To distinguish tumor cfDNA from nontumorous cfDNA, specific somatic DNA mutations, previously localized in the primary tumor tissue, are identified in the extracted cfDNA. Apart from conventional mutation detection approaches, several dedicated techniques have been presented to detect low levels of cfDNA in an excess of nontumorous (nonmutated) DNA, including real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), “BEAMing” (beads, emulsion, amplification, and magnetics), and denaturing capillary electrophoresis. Techniques to facilitate the mutant detection, such as mutant-enriched PCR and COLD–PCR (coamplification at lower denaturation temperature PCR), are also applicable. Finally, a number of newly developed miniaturized approaches, such as single-molecule sequencing, are promising for the future.
Background
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most common cancers and cancer causes of death worldwide. CRC screening and early detection is essential to reduce CRC incidence and mortality. CRC ...screening has been initiated in the Czech Republic in 2000 for persons over 50 and currently offers a faecal occult blood test (FOBT) or screening colonoscopy (CS). The aim of our study was to present complete coverage by examinations in relation to the trends in CRC burden and impact of COVID-19.
Methods
We defined the complete coverage by examinations as the proportion of persons aged over 50 undergoing examination with CRC early detection potential (FOBT or CS for any indication) during past 3 years. Standardized incidence and mortality rates were used to assess epidemiological trends. The impact of COVID-19 was assessed for 2020 and 2021 by comparing the volume of examinations with 2019. We used national health registries (National Registry of Reimbursed Health Services, Czech National Cancer Registry) as the source of data.
Results
Complete coverage was increasing over time and reached around 50% in recent years (target population is more than 4 million persons, most of the performed examinations were screening FOBT). However, coverage has decreased to 47.9% in 2020. In 2020 and 2021, the number of tests performed decreased by 16.9% and 5.5%, respectively, compared to 2019. CRC incidence and mortality rates have decreased by more than 20% and almost 30%, respectively, in the last decade.
Conclusions
Complete coverage has reached a satisfactory level and has likely a positive impact on the epidemiological trends. However, further action is needed to increase coverage, recently affected by COVID-19 pandemic, when non-acute health care may have been neglected.
Key messages
* The long-term high level of coverage by examinations likely has a positive impact on CRC burden.
* The observed decrease in coverage caused by COVID-19 needs to be appropriately compensated.
A substantial body of literature has provided evidence that type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and colorectal neoplasia share several common factors. Both diseases are among the leading causes of death ...worldwide and have an increasing incidence. In addition to usual risk factors such as sedentary lifestyle, obesity, and family history, common pathophysiological mechanisms involved in the development of these diseases have been identified. These include changes in glucose metabolism associated with adipose tissue dysfunction including insulin resistance resulting to hyperinsulinemia and chronic hyperglycemia. In addition to altered glucose metabolism, abdominal obesity has been associated with accented carcinogenesis with chronic subclinical inflammation. An increasing number of studies have recently described the role of the gut microbiota in metabolic diseases including T2DM and the development of colorectal cancer (CRC). Due to the interconnectedness of different pathophysiological processes, it is not entirely clear which factor is crucial in the development of carcinogenesis in patients with T2DM. The aim of this work is to review the current knowledge on the pathophysiological mechanisms of colorectal neoplasia development in individuals with T2DM. Here, we review the potential pathophysiological processes involved in the onset and progression of colorectal neoplasia in patients with T2DM. Uncovering common pathophysiological characteristics is essential for understanding the nature of these diseases and may lead to effective treatment and prevention.
Abstract
Issue
Colorectal cancer (CRC) has been among the most important cancer causes of death globally. CRC screening and early detection can decrease CRC incidence and mortality through timely ...removal of colorectal neoplasia or early CRC treatment. CRC screening has been initiated in the Czech Republic in 2000 for individuals over 50, with GPs having a key role in recruiting individuals to screening, offering faecal occult blood test (FOBT). Screening colonoscopy (CS) was added for individuals over 55 since 2009.
Description of the problem
To increase uptake of CRC screening, personal invitation of non-attenders under 70 was implemented in 2014, along with temporary mass-media campaign. Health insurance companies have been sending invitations to those individuals without record of recent FOBT, CS or CRC treatment.
The aim of our study was to evaluate impact of this policy on complete coverage by examination over 2013-2018. We defined the complete coverage by examination as the proportion of individuals aged 50-69 undergoing examination with CRC early detection potential (FOBT or CS for any indication) during past 3 years. We used newly established National Registry of Reimbursed Health Services as the source of data.
Results
Complete coverage of the target population (2.7 million individuals aged 50-69) was 44.8 % in 2013. By 2016, the coverage increased to 54.6%. Therefore, almost 300,000 individuals were newly covered by the relevant examinations. By 2018, the coverage decreased to 51.2%. When we consider only screening FOBT examinations, the coverage was 36.9 % in 2013, 45.2% in 2016, and 42.0% in 2018.
Lessons
In the health system with accessible CS facilities, the policy of non-attenders' invitation for CRC screening resulted not only in increase in coverage by screening examinations; complete coverage also increased. Unfortunately, the positive effect has been fading out, and further actions to sustain high coverage are therefore warranted.
Key messages
Invitation of non-attenders to colorectal cancer screening increased complete coverage of the target population by examination. Initial increase was followed by a slow decrease in coverage by examination, underlying the need for other actions to increase participation.
To develop standards for high quality in gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) has established the ESGE Quality Improvement Committee. A ...prerequisite for quality assurance and improvement for all GI endoscopy procedures is state-of-the-art integrated digital reporting systems for standardized documentation of the procedures. The current paper describes the ESGE’s viewpoints on the requirements for high-quality endoscopy reporting systems in GI endoscopy.
Recommendations
1
Endoscopy reporting systems must be electronic.
2
Endoscopy reporting systems should be integrated into hospitals’ patient record systems.
3
Endoscopy reporting systems should include patient identifiers to facilitate data linkage to other data sources.
4
Endoscopy reporting systems shall restrict the use of free-text entry to a minimum, and be based mainly on structured data entry.
5
Separate entry of data for quality or research purposes is discouraged. Automatic data transfer for quality and research purposes must be facilitated.
6
Double entry of data by the endoscopist or associate personnel is discouraged. Available data from outside sources (administrative or medical) must be made available automatically.
7
Endoscopy reporting systems shall facilitate the inclusion of information on histopathology of detected lesions, patient satisfaction, adverse events, and surveillance recommendations.
8
Endoscopy reporting systems must facilitate easy data retrieval at any time in a universally compatible format.
9
Endoscopy reporting systems must include data fields for key performance indicators as defined by quality improvement committees.
10
Endoscopy reporting systems must facilitate changes in indicators and data entry fields as required by professional organizations.
Objectives: The main objective is to compare the accuracy of EUS and CEH EUS for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer (PC). The secondary objective is to evaluate the accuracy of EUS FNA and to ...determine to what extent EUS and CEH EUS findings are affected by endosonographer subjectivity.
Methods: A prospective single-centre study was conducted in patients with pancreatic lesions detected on CT. The patients were examined by EUS, CEH EUS and EUS FNA. The obtained results were compared with the final diagnosis that was based on cytology and further clinical findings and on histopathological findings from subjects who underwent surgery. A second reading of the EUS and CEH EUS images was performed by the endosonographer, who was blinded to clinical data of patients.
Results: We examined 116 patients, 73 had a final diagnosis of PC, 14 had NETs and 20 had other tumours. The sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, and accuracy of EUS for diagnosis of PC were 83.1, 62.5, 83.1, 70.7 and 78.6%, for CEH EUS 94.5, 61.7, 84.1, 84 and 84.1% and for EUS FNA 87.6, 91.2, 95.5, 77.5 and 88.8, respectively. The inter-observer agreement for EUS marker of PC was good (κ = 0.75), and that for CEH EUS was average (κ = 0.59 for arterial phase and κ = 0.68 for washout in venous phase).
Conclusion: CEH EUS is a non-invasive method that allows more accurate identification of PC than EUS. The subjectivity of CEH EUS evaluation is worse than that of EUS but acceptable.
PDF
