Summary Background Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard of care in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer, but the optimal radiotherapy schedule and dose remains controversial. The aim of this ...study was to establish a standard chemoradiotherapy treatment regimen in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer. Methods The CONVERT trial was an open-label, phase 3, randomised superiority trial. We enrolled adult patients (aged ≥18 years) who had cytologically or histologically confirmed limited-stage small-cell lung cancer, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2, and adequate pulmonary function. Patients were recruited from 73 centres in eight countries. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 45 Gy radiotherapy in 30 twice-daily fractions of 1·5 Gy over 19 days, or 66 Gy in 33 once-daily fractions of 2 Gy over 45 days, starting on day 22 after commencing cisplatin–etoposide chemotherapy (given as four to six cycles every 3 weeks in both groups). The allocation method used was minimisation with a random element, stratified by institution, planned number of chemotherapy cycles, and performance status. Treatment group assignments were not masked. The primary endpoint was overall survival, defined as time from randomisation until death from any cause, analysed by modified intention-to-treat. A 12% higher overall survival at 2 years in the once-daily group versus the twice-daily group was considered to be clinically significant to show superiority of the once-daily regimen. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT00433563 ) and is currently in follow-up. Findings Between April 7, 2008, and Nov 29, 2013, 547 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive twice-daily concurrent chemoradiotherapy (274 patients) or once-daily concurrent chemoradiotherapy (273 patients). Four patients (one in the twice-daily group and three in the once-daily group) did not return their case report forms and were lost to follow-up; these patients were not included in our analyses. At a median follow-up of 45 months (IQR 35–58), median overall survival was 30 months (95% CI 24–34) in the twice-daily group versus 25 months (21–31) in the once-daily group (hazard ratio for death in the once daily group 1·18 95% CI 0·95–1·45; p=0·14). 2-year overall survival was 56% (95% CI 50–62) in the twice-daily group and 51% (45–57) in the once-daily group (absolute difference between the treatment groups 5·3% 95% CI −3·2% to 13·7%). The most common grade 3–4 adverse event in patients evaluated for chemotherapy toxicity was neutropenia (197 74% of 266 patients in the twice-daily group vs 170 65% of 263 in the once-daily group). Most toxicities were similar between the groups, except there was significantly more grade 4 neutropenia with twice-daily radiotherapy (129 49% vs 101 38%; p=0·05). In patients assessed for radiotherapy toxicity, was no difference in grade 3–4 oesophagitis between the groups (47 19% of 254 patients in the twice-daily group vs 47 19% of 246 in the once-daily group; p=0·85) and grade 3–4 radiation pneumonitis (4 3% of 254 vs 4 2% of 246; p=0·70). 11 patients died from treatment-related causes (three in the twice-daily group and eight in the once-daily group). Interpretation Survival outcomes did not differ between twice-daily and once-daily concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer, and toxicity was similar and lower than expected with both regimens. Since the trial was designed to show superiority of once-daily radiotherapy and was not powered to show equivalence, the implication is that twice-daily radiotherapy should continue to be considered the standard of care in this setting. Funding Cancer Research UK (Clinical Trials Awards and Advisory Committee), French Ministry of Health, Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (Cancer Research Fund, Lung Cancer, and Radiation Oncology Groups).
Abstract Few issues are as controversial in non-small cell lung cancer as the management of patients with stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer. This manuscript reviews the reasons and the biases ...inherent to this controversy and discusses the different treatment approaches with emphasis on survival as evidenced by meta-analyses and large randomised clinical trials. Prospects on novel treatment modalities and future research opportunities are presented.
Abstract This review addresses the management of MPM. In an introductory section, the etiology, epidemiology, presentation, diagnosis and staging of MPM will be reviewed. The evidence was collected ...by a systematic analysis of the literature (2000–2009) using the databases Medline (National Library of Medicine, USA), Embase (Elsevier, Netherlands), Cochrane Library (Great Britain), National Guideline Clearinghouse (USA), HTA Database (International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment – INAHTA), NIH database (USA), International Pleural Mesothelioma Program – WHOLIS (WHO Database) with the following keywords and filters: pleura, cancer, mesothelioma, guidelines, treatment, surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, palliation, supportive care, pleurodesis, review.
This report investigates the impact of systemic treatments (chemotherapy or immunotherapy) with(out) loco-regional radiotherapy, on HRQoL, toxicity and neurocognitive functioning (NCF) in locally ...advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients enrolled in the PRO-Long study.
Data on patient-reported HRQoL and fourteen toxicities was collected, while NCF was tested, up to one-year post-treatment. HRQoL was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30. Lung cancer, treatment and neuro-psychological related toxicities were scored with the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. NCF was evaluated with six neurocognitive tests. Mixed model analyses were conducted to determine statistical significance (p = .01). Meaningful clinical important differences (MCIDs) were applied for changes in HRQoL and NCF data, while toxicities were compared to baseline values.
In total, 50 patients were enrolled. Overall HRQoL (p = .357) nor its domains (physical, p = .643; role, p = .069; emotional, p = .254; cognitive, p = 494; social, p = .735) changed significantly over time. Meaningful improvements in overall HRQoL were seen in 22, 38 and 39% and deteriorations in 22, 5 and 28% of patients at 2-3, 6 and 12 months respectively post-treatment. Overall toxicity (p = .007), lack of appetite (p = .001), nausea (p = .004) and dysphagia (p = .000) significantly decreased over time. Treatment caused acute toxicity, such as dyspnoea (45%) and memory problems (42%), but also alleviated pre-existing symptoms, including lack of appetite (32%), anxiety (29%) and depression (28%) at 2/3 months. The NCF domains of visual memory (p = .000) and cognitive processing speed (p = .000) showed significant improvements over time. In terms of MCIDs, at 2-3 months (18%) and 6 months (15%), verbal memory was particularly impacted; at 12 months, visual memory (18%) and executive function (18%) deteriorated primarily.
The results suggest that therapy has no significant negative impact on overall HRQoL, its domains, and NCF. About one-third of patients reported a meaningful improved HRQoL at 1 year post-treatment. Treatment caused toxicity, but also alleviated pre-existing symptoms.
The majority of lung cancer patients are diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the bulk of which receive palliative systemic treatment with the goal to provide effective symptom ...palliation and safeguard health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Advanced NSCLC trials with HRQoL endpoints face methodological constraints limiting interpretability.
We provide a comprehensive overview of recent clinical trials evaluating the impact of systemic therapies on HRQoL in advanced NSCLC, focusing on the methodological quality, with the ultimate goal to improve interpretation, comparison and reporting of HRQoL data.
A systematic literature review was performed. Prospective studies published over the last decade evaluating the impact of systemic treatments on HRQoL in advanced NSCLC were included. Methodological quality of HRQoL reporting was assessed with the CONSORT-PRO extension.
Hundred-twelve manuscripts describing 85 trials met all criteria. No formal conclusion can be drawn regarding the impact on HRQoL of different treatments. We report an important variety in methodological quality in terms of definitions of HRQoL, missing data points, lack of standardization of analyzing and presenting HRQoL and no standard follow-up time. The quality of HRQoL data reporting varies substantially between studies but improves over time.
This review shows that in the heterogeneous landscape of trials addressing HRQoL in advanced stage NSCLC. Methodology reporting remains generally poor. Adequate reporting of HRQoL outcome data is equally important to support clinical decision-making as to correctly inform health policy regarding direct approval and reimbursement of the new drugs and combinations that will come online.
Background The discovery of epidermal growth factor receptor oncogenic driver mutations has changed the therapeutic landscape of advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the past decade. Since the ...introduction of next-generation sequencing, uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor mutations are more frequently discovered. Because seldom evaluated in clinical trials, their clinical significance and response on tyrosine kinase inhibitors are less well known. Case presentation A 58-year-old Caucasian woman with no smoking history presented with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Liver biopsy revealed an adenocarcinoma with a programmed death ligand-1 tumor proportion score of 30% and no common oncogenic driver mutations. A combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy was started as first-line treatment. However, treatment was ceased after 18 weeks because of immune-related renal failure and disease progression. In the meantime, the next-generation sequencing results of the liver biopsy had revealed an exon 18 E709_T710delinsD mutation. Therefore, afatinib was administered, which was moderately tolerated with grade 2 paronychia and acneiform skin eruption. After 6 months, a partial response with ongoing decrease of the liver metastasis was retained. Conclusion Because of the lack of clinical trials, tumor heterogeneity, and a tyrosine kinase inhibitor affinity related to the different mutation types, it is difficult to predict the clinical outcome of tyrosine kinase inhibitor in uncommon mutations. Therefore, a therapeutic trial with tyrosine kinase inhibitor has to be considered, but the expected clinical response is lower than for common mutations. Keywords: NSCLC.sub.1, EGFR exon 18.sub.2, E709_T710delinsD mutation.sub.3, Afatinib.sub.4, Case report.sub.5
Abstract Background Targeted therapies have to date not been successful in the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). This study aimed to assess the therapeutic activity of sunitinib (an oral, ...multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor) using positron emission tomography (PET)–computed tomography (CT) imaging as an early indicator of response. Methods This was a single-arm phase II study of sunitinib in patients with SCLC who are either chemo naive (extensive disease) or have a ‘sensitive’ relapse. A loading dose of 150 mg sunitinib was given orally followed by 37.5 mg/d. The primary end-point was disease control rate (DCR) at 8 weeks after the start of treatment and secondary end-points included toxicity of treatment and overall response. PET–CT was carried out at 4 weeks into the treatment. The study was closed early because of low accrual with only 9 of required 48 patients (19%) accrued. Results Nine patients were registered, seven females and two males with a median age of 65 years and a median duration of sunitinib treatment of 7.4 weeks. DCR at 8 weeks was achieved in two patients, both of whom went on to long periods of disease control, one patient achieved a partial response which lasted 10 months and a second patient had stable disease (minor shrinkage) which lasted 20 months. One of these patients proved to have an atypical carcinoid tumour at rebiopsy after 10 months. DCR and PET–CT imaging both predicted these responses. Grade III–IV toxicities were encountered during treatment, most commonly neutropenia (n = 3), thrombocytopenia (n = 3) and hypermagnesaemia (n = 2). One toxic death occurred due to bronchial haemorrhage. Conclusion This study emphasises the need for alternate study design and end-points for new drug assessment in SCLC. EudraCT number : 2006-002485-19.
Abstract Background EORTC study 08021/ILCP 01/03 evaluated the role of consolidation gefitinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), administered in patients with advanced non-small cell lung ...cancer (NSCLC), not progressing following standard 1st-line chemotherapy. Methods Patients with advanced NSCLC, not-progressing after four cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy, were randomised to receive either gefitinib 250 mg/d or matched placebo until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end-point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end-points were progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity. The study was powered to detect a 28% increase in OS from a median of 11–14.1 months (HR = 0.78) and planned to randomise 598 patients to observe 514 deaths. Results After inclusion of 173 patients, the trial was prematurely closed due to low accrual. Baseline characteristics for gefitinib ( n = 86) and placebo ( n = 87) arms were well balanced. After a median follow up of 41 months, the difference in median OS in the gefitinib and placebo arms was not statistically significant (10.9 and 9.4 months, HR 0.83 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.60–1.15; p = 0.2). The difference in median PFS significantly favoured gefitinib (4.1 and 2.9 months, HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.45, 0.83), p = 0.0015). Adverse events reported in more than 10% of patients were rash (47% with gefitinib versus 13% with placebo) and diarrhoea (34% with gefitinib versus13% with placebo). Conclusions Despite its premature closure, this trial confirms previous evidence that consolidation gefitinib is safe and improves PFS. However, no difference in OS was observed in this study ( NCT00091156 ).
Abstract
Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is an aggressive cancer of the serosal lining of the thoracic cavity, predominantly caused by asbestos exposure. Due to nonspecific symptoms, PM is characterized by ...an advanced-stage diagnosis, resulting in a dismal prognosis. However, early diagnosis improves patient outcome. Currently, no diagnostic biomarkers or screening tools are available. Therefore, exhaled breath was explored as this can easily be obtained and contains volatile organic compounds, which are considered biomarkers for multiple (patho)physiological processes. A breath test, which differentiates asbestos-exposed (AEx) individuals from PM patients with 87% accuracy, was developed. However, before being implemented as a screening tool, the clinical utility of the test must be determined. Occupational AEx individuals underwent annual breath tests using multicapillary column/ion mobility spectrometry. A baseline breath test was taken and their individual risk of PM was estimated. PM patients were included as controls. In total, 112 AEx individuals and six PM patients were included in the first of four screening rounds. All six PM patients were correctly classified as having mesothelioma (100% sensitivity) and out of 112 AEx individuals 78 were classified by the breath-based model as PM patients (30% specificity). Given the large false positive outcome, the breath test will be repeated annually for three more consecutive years to adhere to the ‘test, re-test’ principle and improve the false positivity rate. A low-dose computed tomography scan in those with two consecutive positive tests will correlate test positives with radiological findings and the possible growth of a pleural tumor. Finally, the evaluation of the clinical value of a breath-based prediction model may lead to the initiation of a screening program for early detection of PM in Aex individuals, which is currently lacking. This clinical study received approval from the Antwerp University Hospital Ethics Committee (B300201837007).
•Lung cancer patients often receive loco-regional radiotherapy and systemic treatment.•This may negatively impact neurocognitive functioning (NCF) of certain patients.•Patient-reported psychological ...problems are not correlated with objective NCF.•Baseline objective NCF in lung cancer patients may be a predictor for overall survival.•More research is needed on the impact of systemic treatment and/or radiotherapy on cognition.
This observational cohort study investigates neurocognitive functioning (NCF) and its associations with overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and patient-reported psychological toxicities in locally-advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung (NSCLC) cancer patients receiving loco-regional radiotherapy and/or systemic therapy. Objective NCF data was collected with six psychometrically validated neurocognitive tests. Subjective NCF was assessed with the cognitive domain of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 items. Psychological toxicity data was collected with the patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events. Meaningful clinical important differences were determined for changes in NCF. Univariate Cox proportional hazards models and generalized linear models were used to determine statistical significance (p < 0.01).
In total, 50 patients were recruited. At baseline, 13 (26%) patients had an impaired objective NCF. Over time, deterioration was seen in 11% (n = 3), 5% (n = 1) and 6% (n = 1) of patients at 2–3, 6 and 12 months post-treatment. The OS of patients with a normal NCF at baseline was longer than those with an impaired baseline NCF (29.5 vs 17.1 months). No statistical significance has been reached between NCF and OS (p = .353) nor NCF and DFS (p = .251). Objective NCF was not correlated with subjective NCF (p = .193), nor anxiety (p = .504), depression (p = .513), memory problems (p = .813) and concentration problems (p = .813).
Systemic treatment and loco-regional radiotherapy may have a temporarily negative impact on NCF in a small proportion of locally-advanced and metastatic NSCLC. Baseline NCF could be a predictor for OS.
PDF
