Math learning difficulty (MLD) is a learning disorder characterized by persistent impairments in the understanding and application of numbers independent of intelligence or schooling. The current ...study aims to review existing neuroimaging studies to characterize the neurobiological basis in MLD for their quantity and arithmetic dysfunctions. We identified a total of 24 studies with 728 participants through the literature. Using the activation likelihood estimate (ALE) method, we found that the most consistent neurobiological dysfunction in MLD was observed in the right intraparietal sulcus (IPS) with distinct patterns of the anterior and posterior aspects. Meanwhile, neurobiological dysfunctions were also observed in a distributed network including the fusiform gyrus, inferior temporal gyrus, insula, prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, and claustrum. Our results suggest a core dysfunction in the right anterior IPS and left fusiform gyrus with atypically upregulated functions in brain regions for attention, working memory, visual processing, and motivation, serving as the neurobiological basis of MLD.
Using the activation likelihood estimate (ALE) method, we revealed the IPS and a distributed brain network for attention, working memory, visual processing, and motivation, serving as the neurobiological basis of math learning difficulties (MLD). The study provided the first comprehensive and quantitative review of the neurobiological basis of MLD.
INTRODUCTION
Lewy body disease (LBD) is a common primary or co‐pathology in neurodegenerative syndromes. An alpha‐synuclein seed amplification assay (αSyn‐SAA) is clinically available, but clinical ...performance, especially lower sensitivity in amygdala‐predominant cases, is not well understood.
METHODS
Antemortem CSF from neuropathology‐confirmed LBD cases was tested with αSyn‐SAA (N = 56). Diagnostic performance and clinicopathological correlations were examined.
RESULTS
Similar to prior reports, sensitivity was 100% for diffuse and transitional LBD (9/9), and overall specificity was 96.3% (26/27). Sensitivity was lower in amygdala‐predominant (6/14, 42.8%) and brainstem‐predominant LBD (1/6, 16.7%), but early spread outside these regions (without meeting criteria for higher stage) was more common in αSyn‐SAA‐positive cases (6/7, 85.7%) than negative (2/13, 15.4%).
DISCUSSION
In this behavioral neurology cohort, αSyn‐SAA had excellent diagnostic performance for cortical LBD. In amygdala‐ and brainstem‐predominant cases, sensitivity was lower, but positivity was associated with anatomical spread, suggesting αSyn‐SAA detects early LBD progression in these cohorts.
Highlights
A cerebrospinal fluid alpha‐synuclein assay detects cortical LBD with high sensitivity/specificity.
Positivity in prodromal stages of LBD was associated with early cortical spread.
The assay provides precision diagnosis of LBD that could support clinical trials.
The assay can also identify LBD co‐pathology, which may impact treatment responses.
BACKGROUNDFascial plane blocks provide effective analgesia after midline laparotomy; however, the most efficacious technique has not been determined. We conducted a systematic review and network ...meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials to synthesise the evidence with respect to pain, opioid consumption, and adverse events.METHODSWe searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, and Scopus databases for studies comparing commonly used non-neuraxial analgesic techniques for midline laparotomy in adult patients. The co-primary outcomes of the study were 24-h cumulative opioid consumption and 24-h resting pain score, reported as i.v. morphine equivalents and 11-point numerical rating scale, respectively. We performed a frequentist meta-analysis using a random-effects model and a cluster-rank analysis of the co-primary outcomes.RESULTSOf 6115 studies screened, 67 eligible studies were included (n=4410). Interventions with the greatest reduction in 24-h cumulative opioid consumption compared with placebo/no intervention were single-injection quadratus lumborum block (sQLB; mean difference MD -16.1 mg, 95% confidence interval CI -29.9 to -2.3, very low certainty), continuous transversus abdominis plane block (cTAP; MD -14.0 mg, 95% CI -21.6 to -6.4, low certainty), single-injection transversus abdominis plane block (sTAP; MD -13.7 mg, 95% CI -17.4 to -10.0, low certainty), and continuous rectus sheath block (cRSB; MD -13.2 mg, 95% CI -20.3 to -6.1, low certainty). Interventions with the greatest reduction in 24-h resting pain score were cRSB (MD -1.2, 95% CI -1.8 to -0.6, low certainty), cTAP (MD -1.0, 95% CI -1.7 to -0.2, low certainty), and continuous wound infusion (cWI; MD -0.7, 95% CI -1.1 to -0.4, low certainty). Clustered-rank analysis including the co-primary outcomes showed cRSB and cTAP blocks to be the most efficacious interventions.CONCLUSIONSBased on current evidence, continuous rectus sheath block and continuous transversus abdominis plane block were the most efficacious non-neuraxial techniques at reducing 24-h cumulative opioid consumption and 24-h resting pain scores after midline laparotomy (low certainty). Future studies should compare techniques for upper vs lower midline laparotomy and other non-midline abdominal incisions.CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATIONPROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42021269044.
Biofortification of staple crops has been proposed as a strategy to address micronutrient malnutrition, particularly with respect to insufficient intake of vitamin A, iron, zinc, and folate. The ...World Health Organization, in collaboration with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the Sackler Institute for Nutrition Science at the New York Academy of Sciences, convened a technical consultation entitled “Staple Crops Biofortified with Vitamins and Minerals: Considerations for a Public Health Strategy” in April 2016. Participants of the consultation reviewed the definition of biofortification of staple crops, patterns of crops production, processing, consumption, seed varieties, and micronutrient stability and bioavailability, as well as farmers’ adoption and acceptability of the modified crops. Also discussed were economic, environmental, safety, and equity aspects of biofortified crops, as well as legal, policy, regulatory, and ethical issues for the implementation of biofortification strategies in agriculture and nutrition. Consultation working groups identified important and emerging technical issues, lessons learned, and research priorities to better support the evidence of improved nutrition and unintended adverse effects of biofortification. This paper provides the background and rationale of the technical consultation, synopsizes the presentations, and provides a summary of the main considerations proposed by the working groups.
PDF