Nonadherence is currently an underrecognized and potentially modifiable obstacle to care in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). The purpose of our study was to design and implement a standardized ...approach to identifying adherence barriers for youth with JIA across 7 pediatric rheumatology clinics through the Pediatric Rheumatology Care and Outcomes Improvement Network (PR-COIN) and to assess the frequency of adherence barriers in patients and their caregivers across treatment modalities.
An iterative process using coproduction among parents and providers of patients with JIA was used to design the Barriers Assessment Tool to screen for adherence barriers across 4 treatment modalities (i.e., oral medications, injectable medications, infusions, and physical/occupational therapy). This tool was implemented in 7 rheumatology clinics across the United States and patient responses were collected for analysis.
Data were collected from 578 parents and 99 patients (n = 44 parent-child dyads). Seventy-seven percent (n = 444) of caregivers and 70% (n = 69) of patients reported at least 1 adherence barrier across all treatment components. The most commonly reported adherence barriers included worry about future consequences of therapy, pain, forgetting, side effects, and embarrassment related to the therapy. There was no significant difference between endorsement of barriers between parents and adolescents.
Implementing a standardized tool assessing adherence barriers in the JIA population across multiple clinical settings is feasible. Systematic screening sheds light on the factors that make adherence difficult in JIA and identifies targets for future adherence interventions in clinical practice.
Objective
To determine the relationship between serum levels of S100A8/A9 and S100A12 and the maintenance of clinically inactive disease during anti–tumor necrosis factor (anti‐TNF) therapy and the ...occurrence of disease flare following withdrawal of anti‐TNF therapy in patients with polyarticular forms of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).
Methods
In this prospective, multicenter study, 137 patients with polyarticular‐course JIA whose disease was clinically inactive while receiving anti‐TNF therapy were enrolled. Patients were observed for an initial 6‐month phase during which anti‐TNF treatment was continued. For those patients who maintained clinically inactive disease over the 6 months, anti‐TNF was withdrawn and they were followed up for 8 months to assess for the occurrence of flare. Serum S100 levels were measured at baseline and at the time of anti‐TNF withdrawal. Spearman's rank correlation test, Mann‐Whitney U test, Kruskal‐Wallis test, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and Kaplan‐Meier survival analyses were used to assess the relationship between serum S100 levels and maintenance of clinically inactive disease and occurrence of disease flare after anti‐TNF withdrawal.
Results
Over the 6‐month initial phase with anti‐TNF therapy, the disease state reverted from clinically inactive to clinically active in 24 (18%) of the 130 evaluable patients with polyarticular‐course JIA; following anti‐TNF withdrawal, 39 (37%) of the 106 evaluable patients experienced a flare. Serum levels of S100A8/A9 and S100A12 were elevated in up to 45% of patients. Results of the ROC analysis revealed that serum S100 levels did not predict maintenance of clinically inactive disease during anti‐TNF therapy nor did they predict disease flare after treatment withdrawal. Elevated levels of S100A8/A9 were not predictive of the occurrence of a disease flare within 30 days, 60 days, 90 days, or 8 months following anti‐TNF withdrawal, and elevated S100A12 levels had a modest predictive ability for determining the risk of flare within 30, 60, and 90 days after treatment withdrawal. Serum S100A12 levels at the time of anti‐TNF withdrawal were inversely correlated with the time to disease flare (r = −0.36).
Conclusion
Serum S100 levels did not predict maintenance of clinically inactive disease or occurrence of disease flare in patients with polyarticular‐course JIA, and S100A12 levels were only moderately, and inversely, correlated with the time to disease flare.
To report the interim 5-year safety and effectiveness of abatacept in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in the PRINTO/PRCSG registry.
The Abatacept JIA Registry (NCT01357668) is an ...ongoing observational study of children with JIA receiving abatacept; enrolment started in January 2013. Clinical sites enrolled patients with JIA starting or currently receiving abatacept. Eligible patients were assessed for safety (primary end point) and effectiveness over 10 years. Effectiveness was measured by clinical 10-joint Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (cJADAS10) in patients with JIA over 5 years. As-observed analysis is presented according to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.
As of 31 March 2020, 587 patients were enrolled; 569 are included in this analysis (including 134 new users) with 1214.6 patient-years of safety data available. Over 5 years, the incidence rate (IR) per 100 patient-years of follow-up of serious adverse events was 5.52 (95% confidence interval CI: 4.27, 7.01) and of events of special interest was 3.62 (95% CI: 2.63, 4.86), with 18 serious infections (IR 1.48 95% CI: 0.88, 2.34). As early as month 3, 55.9% of patients achieved cJADAS10 low disease activity and inactive disease (20.3%, 72/354 and 35.6%, 126/354, respectively), sustained over 5 years. Disease activity measures improved over 5 years across JIA categories.
Abatacept was well tolerated in patients with JIA, with no new safety signals identified and with well-controlled disease activity, including some patients achieving inactive disease or remission.
Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01357668.
Objective
To determine the frequency, time to flare, and predictors of disease flare upon withdrawal of anti–tumor necrosis factor (anti‐TNF) therapy in children with polyarticular forms of juvenile ...idiopathic arthritis (JIA) who demonstrated ≥6 months of continuous clinically inactive disease.
Methods
In 16 centers 137 patients with clinically inactive JIA who were receiving anti‐TNF therapy (42% of whom were also receiving methotrexate MTX) were prospectively followed up. If the disease remained clinically inactive for the initial 6 months of the study, anti‐TNF was stopped and patients were assessed for flare at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 months. Life‐table analysis, t‐tests, chi‐square test, and Cox regression analysis were used to identify independent variables that could significantly predict flare by 8 months or time to flare.
Results
Of 137 patients, 106 (77%) maintained clinically inactive disease while receiving anti‐TNF therapy for the initial 6 months and were included in the phase of the study in which anti‐TNF therapy was stopped. Stopping anti‐TNF resulted in disease flare in 39 (37%) of 106 patients by 8 months. The mean/median ± SEM time to flare was 212/250 ± 9.77 days. Patients with shorter disease duration at enrollment, older age at onset and diagnosis, shorter disease duration prior to experiencing clinically inactive disease, and shorter time from onset of clinically inactive disease to enrollment were found to have significantly lower hazard ratios for likelihood of flare by 8 months (P < 0.05).
Conclusion
Over one‐third of patients with polyarticular JIA with sustained clinically inactive disease will experience a flare by 8 months after discontinuation of anti‐TNF therapy. Several predictors of lower likelihood of flare were identified.
Biologics treatment with antitumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) is efficacious in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Despite displaying clinical inactivity during treatment, many ...patients will flare on cessation of therapy. The inability to definitively discriminate patients who will relapse or continue to remain in remission after therapy withdrawal is currently a major unmet medical need. CD4 T cells have been implicated in active disease, yet how they contribute to disease persistence despite treatment is unknown.
We interrogated the circulatory reservoir of CD4
immune subsets at the single-cell resolution with mass cytometry (cytometry by time of flight) of patients with JIA (n=20) who displayed continuous clinical inactivity for at least 6 months with anti-TNFα and were subsequently withdrawn from therapy for 8 months, and scored as relapse or remission. These patients were examined prior to therapy withdrawal for putative subsets that could discriminate relapse from remission. We verified on a separate JIA cohort (n=16) the dysregulation of these circulatory subsets 8 months into therapy withdrawal. The immunological transcriptomic signature of CD4 memory in relapse/remission patients was examined with NanoString.
An inflammatory memory subset of CD3
CD4
CD45RA
TNFα
T cells deficient in immune checkpoints (PD1
CD152
) was present in relapse patients prior to therapy withdrawal. Transcriptomic profiling reveals divergence between relapse and remission patients in disease-centric pathways involving (1) T-cell receptor activation, (2) apoptosis, (3) TNFα, (4) nuclear factor-kappa B and (5) mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling.
A unique discriminatory immunomic and transcriptomic signature is associated with relapse patients and may explain how relapse occurs.
Background/Purpose:
Medication options for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) are increasing. Medications differ on a variety of attributes, including mechanisms of action, dosing intervals, modes ...of administration, safety profiles, and cost. Some parents of children with JIA are left with questions and concerns about medications suggesting a need for improved clinician‐parent communication. Decisions like this, with multiple reasonable options that differ in ways that matter to families, are conducive to “Shared Decision Making” (SDM). SDM is a process whereby clinicians share information about the options and patients/parents share information about their goals and preferences. Together, a treatment plan is developed that is the best fit for the individual patient and their family. We conducted a project to develop tools to facilitate SDM within the Pediatric Rheumatology Care and Outcomes Improvement Network (PR‐COIN). PR‐COIN is a learning network designed to improve outcomes of JIA care using quality improvement (QI) approaches.
Methods:
Development of issue cards to facilitate SDM involved multiple steps including qualitative interviews with clinicians and care providers, direct observation of clinical encounters, and an iterative design process involving a graphic designer and a stakeholder panel of clinicians, allied health professionals and parents. We introduced the prototype issue cards for use in clinics using Plan‐Do‐Study‐Act (PDSA) cycles. We elicited feedback to guide card revisions from PR‐COIN members via weekly electronic surveys and discussions during monthly webinars and following direct observation of encounters using the cards.
Results:
We identified the medication attributes deemed most important to discuss by our stakeholders, including “How Soon” will therapies take effect, “How Often” are they given, “Side Effects”, “Cost”, “How Long” will need to stay on the medication, and “Other Considerations.” We used these attributes to organize the issue cards and symbols to convey key concepts (see Figure). Intended use of the cards involves clinicians showing the cards to patient and parent and asking which card they would like to discuss first. By selecting a card, the family reveals what is important to them. After 18 revisions, PR‐COIN stakeholders at 6 sites found the issue cards to be acceptable for regular use.
Conclusion:
PR‐COIN issue cards are well accepted by clinicians and families within network sites. PDSA cycles continue as we seek to implement the issue cards in routine clinical care to facilitate SDM across the network. Our ultimate goal is to drive improvement in child JIA outcomes by reliably engaging patients/parents in SDM to select a medication that is a good fit.
Objective
The ability to assess quality of care is a necessary component of continuous quality improvement. The assessment typically is accomplished by determination of compliance with a defined set ...of quality measures (QMs). The objective of this effort was to establish a set of QMs for the assessment of the process of care in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).
Methods
A 12‐member working group composed of representatives from the American College of Rheumatology, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Board of Pediatrics, and Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals was assembled to guide the project. Delphi questionnaires were sent to 237 health professionals involved in the care of children with JIA. A total of 471 items in 23 domains were identified. The working group met via 4 live e‐meetings during which results from the Delphi questionnaires were distilled to a reduced draft set. Each working group member selected a proposed QM to investigate and present evidence from the literature as to its attributes and appropriateness for inclusion into the set. Nominal group technique was used to come to consensus on a proposed set of QMs.
Results
The proposed set contains 12 QMs within 4 health care domains. Each QM consists of a statement of 1) the assessment to be completed, 2) when the first assessment should be completed and a suggested frequency of assessment during followup, 3) recommendations of appropriate tools or methods of assessment, and 4) initial performance goals.
Conclusion
Implementation of the proposed QM set will improve the process of care, facilitate continuous quality improvement, and eventuate in improved health outcomes of children with JIA.
PURPOSE OF REVIEWQuality improvement is a mandate for all individuals and institutions in medicine. Quality improvement has spread to the specialty certifying boards, resident education ...accreditation, licensure boards, and hospital medical staff offices. This review summarizes the thrust of quality improvement, provides justification for the conduct of quality improvement work, and reviews the progress in development of quality measures in rheumatology to date.
RECENT FINDINGSThe American College of Rheumatology, quality of care, and quality measure committees have developed quality indicators for rheumatoid arthritis, gout, osteoporosis, and drug safety. Pediatric rheumatology is charged with developing quality measures for juvenile idiopathic arthritis; thus, there is a commitment to improve the processes and patient outcomes. Quality improvement science has progressed over the last decade and employs methodology that utilizes small number and rapid improvement cycles. Examples of this quality improvement methodology are elaborated in this review.
SUMMARYThe review summarizes the history and current mandates for quality improvement in the medical community, progress made in the development of quality measures for adult rheumatologic conditions, and preliminary quality measures for juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and cites examples of quality improvement in progress in the pediatric rheumatology.
PDF
